Search

Objective To report the outcomes of redo fenestrated and/or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR in FEVAR) to rescue previous failed FEVAR. Methods Retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing F/BEVAR in FEVAR at eight aortic centres including pre-, intra-, and post-operative data according to a pre-established protocol. Follow up consisted of at least yearly computed tomography angiography. Values are presented as median and interquartile range, and survival as estimate ± standard error in percentage. Results 18 male patients (76 years old; range 69 – 78 years) receiving FEVAR involving two (two or three) target vessels between 2006 and 2016 underwent F/BEVAR in FEVAR between 2012 and 2019 (aneurysm diameter of 63 mm; range 56 – 69 mm). Median interval between the procedures was 53 (29 – 103) months. The indication for F/BEVAR in FEVAR was type Ia endoleak in 16 cases (eight isolated and eight combined with graft migration), one graft migration without endoleak and one migration with significant proximal aortic expansion. F/BEVAR in FEVAR involved all patent renovisceral arteries and had an operating time of 260 (204 – 344) minutes. Technical success was achieved in 15 (83%) cases. There was a failure to bridge one renal artery, one renal capsular bleed with the subsequent need for renal artery embolisation within 24 hours and one persistent type Ib endoleak despite iliac extension. There was no peri- or in hospital death. Two patients developed spinal cord ischaemia, one transient paraparesis and one permanent paraplegia. The latter occurred in a non-staged procedure where spinal drainage was used. During a follow up of 27 (7 – 39) months, three (17%) patients underwent late re-interventions. Overall survival at 24 months was 70 ± 11% with no aneurysm related death and a secondary clinical success at 24 months of 84 ± 11%. Conclusion F/BEVAR in FEVAR is a technically challenging but feasible solution to rescue failed FEVAR. The outcomes are promising in many aortic centres but need to be confirmed by further studies with longer follow up.

Background Current guidelines indicate iliac-branched endografts (IBDs) as the ideal means to preserve pelvic perfusion during endovascular aortic repair. Because patient vascular anatomy represents the main limitation to extensive use of these devices, off-label application may be considered to expand the number of patients being treated. The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term outcomes obtained using the Cook ZBIS endograft in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms as per or outside manufacturer's instruction for use (IFU). Methods Data from all patients who underwent IBD implant in a single center were reviewed. Study population was divided into two subgroups: Group I treated as per manufacturer's IFU and group II treated outside IFU. Results During the study period (2008–2018), 119 patients were treated with 130 IBDs. Eighty-six patients were treated as per IFU (group I) and 44 outside IFU (group II). Overall technical success was 99.2%. Mean follow-up was of 63.5 ± 38.3 months for group I and 58.3 ± 35.9 months for group II (P = 0.45). Freedom from reintervention at ten years was 79.8% in group I and 69.6% in group II (P = 0.29). Freedom from IBD-related reintervention rate was 98.7% and 95.3% in groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.240). Iliac-branched module thrombosis occurred significantly more in patients treated outside IFU with 4 cases in group I (4.7%) and 10 cases in group II (22.7%), (P = 0.005). Cox regression analysis identified hypogastric artery aneurysm as the only independent predictor for both IBD thrombosis and hypogastric artery occlusion during follow-up. Conclusions When used by an experienced team, Cook IBDs are safe and effective in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms both inside and outside IFU. Anyway a lower target hypogastric patency rate should be expected when treating patients with hypogastric aneurysms.

Background Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered an important tool in carotid revascularization. Carotid artery stenting is usually performed by using self-expandable stent with different designs. The stent design influences many physical characteristics. Also, it may affect the complication rate with special relevance to perioperative stroke, hemodynamic instability, and late restenosis. Methods This study comprised all consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery stenting for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis from March 2014 to May 2021. Both symptomatic patient and asymptomatic patients were included. Patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis of ≥50% or asymptomatic carotid stenosis of ≥60% were selected for carotid artery stenting . Patients with fibromuscular dysplasia and acute or unstable plaque were not included. Variables of clinical relevance were tested in multivariable analysis using binary logistic regression model. Results A total of 728 patients were enrolled. The majority of this cohort was asymptomatic (578/728, 79.4%), while 150/728 (20.6%) were symptomatic. The mean degree of carotid stenosis was 77.82 ± 4.73%, with a mean plaque length of 1.76 ± 0.55 cm. A total of 277 (38%) patients were treated with Xact® Carotid Stent System. Successful carotid artery stenting was achieved in 698 (96%) of patients. Of these patients, stroke rate in symptomatic patients was nine (5.8%), while in asymptomatic patients was 20 (3.4%). In a multivariable analysis, the open-cell carotid stent was not associated with a differential risk for combined acute and sub-acute neurologic complications as compared with closed-cell stents. Patients treated with open cell stents had a significantly lower rate of procedural hypotension ( P 0.0188) at bivariate analysis. Conclusion Carotid artery stenting is considered a safe alternative to CEA that can be used in selected average surgical risk patient. Different stent designs can affect the rate of major adverse events in carotid artery stenting patients, but further studies are necessary with avoiding different bias to study the effect of different stent designs.

Item does not contain fulltext OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) using the INCRAFT AAA Stent Graft System was safe and effective in regulatory approval studies. We herein report on the 1-year results of a real-world clinical study. METHODS: The INSIGHT study is a multi-center, prospective, open label, post-approval study conducted to continually evaluate the safety and performance of the INCRAFT System. Between 2015 and 2016, 150 consecutive patients with AAA at 23 centers in Europe were treated with the device in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was freedom from major adverse events (MAEs), namely death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and renal failure, within 30 days of the index procedure. End point data were assessed by a core laboratory. The secondary end points included technical success at the conclusion of the procedure and clinical success. RESULTS: All 150 patients studied (mean age, 73.6 ± 8.0 years; 89.3% men) met the primary end point without MAEs at 30-day follow-up. Technical success was achieved in 99.3% of patients without stent fractures at 30 days. Among the 146 patients eligible for 1-year follow-up, the MAE rate was 8.2% (ie, 12 patients suffered 13 MAEs: cerebrovascular accident in 8, myocardial infarction in 1, and 4 died, resulting in a 2.7% all-cause mortality rate). There were no reports of new onset renal failure requiring dialysis. Only 2.7% of patients had type I endoleak, and no type III endoleaks were identified through 1 year. The rate of clinical success at 1 year was 91.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year results of this multicenter real-world study underscore the safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment of AAA with the INCRAFT System in routine clinical practice.

Summary Background Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence. Methods ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362. Findings Between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 31, 2020, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 to CAS and 1814 to CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and a mean 5 years of follow-up. Overall, 1% had disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated to CAS and 18 to CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 allocated to CAS and 29 to CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2·5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5·3% with CAS versus 4·5% with CEA for any stroke (rate ratio [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·86–1·57; p=0·33). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS versus CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR 1·11, 95% CI 0·91–1·32; p=0·21). Interpretation Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects of these two carotid artery procedures on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable. Funding UK Medical Research Council and Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Introduction Contrast medium (CM) use in computed tomography (CT) is limited by nephrotoxicity and possible allergic reactions. The purpose of this study is to introduce a tool for the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) by avoiding the use of CM. Methods With and without CM CTs of patients with AAA were evaluated. A mathematical algorithm was implemented to allow visualization of the inner aortic lumen in the series without CM. The first step of the algorithm consisted in manually highlighting a squared region of interest (ROI) close to the target aortic area. The rest of the algorithm is completely automated and performs the following flow of operations: The “Kantorovich” algorithm is applied to the ROI for image enhancement. Then, a wavelet decomposition method is applied to identify the different frequency components of the image. Exploiting the wavelet decomposition, the system selects the low-frequency components of the image, corresponding to the major structures. Thresholding method, based on the analysis of the gray-level histogram, is then performed to extract the contours of the vessel. At this point, the extraction of the pervious area is completed. Final images were compared with the contrast enhanced scans, valued as gold standard. To validate the algorithm, an analysis of the results has been performed considering the following types of error: En = #m/#ROI ΔA = |1-(#CM/#CEX)| (#m = number of misclassified pixels; #ROI = number of pixels in the ROI; #CM = number of pixels belonging to the CM; #CEX = extracted areas). En provided a measure on the pixels wrongly classified, and ΔA the difference of extracted areas. Results The algorithm was applied to 233 CT images. Extracted images were compared with the ones with CM. Mean values of the numerical errors ranged from 0.12 to 0.17 for En and 0.11 to 0.35 for ΔA. For all the 233 CT images in the analyzed sequences, the mean error was 0.14 (En) and 0.28 (ΔA). Conclusions The developed mathematical algorithm allows to detect the position of the vessel lumen and to extract its contours with a good accuracy. Our experience shows encouraging results and suggests a possible future clinical application to reduce CT CM use.

Background: To address the predictors of hemodynamic instability (HI) related to carotid artery stenting (CAS) and evaluate the association between HI and periprocedural adverse outcomes. Methods: This study comprised all consecutive patients who underwent CAS for atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis from March 2014 to May 2018. A standardized dose of atropine (0.4 mg) was given prior to stent deployment. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and neurological status were monitored and recorded. Potential predictors of HI were tested in multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression model. Results: A total of 728 patients were enrolled. Two hundred twenty seven patients (31.2%) developed periprocedural HI. The presence of hypertension (OR, 2.037; 95% CI, 1.292-3.211; P = 0.0022), symptomatic carotid lesions (OR, 1.704; 95% CI, 1.057-2.747; P = 0.0287), right sided lesions (OR, 3.090; 95% CI, 1.934-4.935; P ≤ 0.0001), hyperechoic/calcified plaques (OR, 2.195; 95% CI, 1.458-3.304; p P = 0.0002), and longer lesions (OR, 1.043; 95% CI, 1.012-1.076; P = 0.0072) were significant predictable factors for the occurrence of HI. On the other hand, smoking was significantly associated with a 48.1% decrease in risk of development of HI (OR, 0.519; 95% CI, 0.358-0.754; P = 0.0006). There were no statistically significant differences in periprocedural morbidity or mortality between patients with and without HI. Conclusion: HI occurs in a considerable percentage of patients undergoing CAS. Hypertension, right sided, symptomatic carotid lesions, calcified plaques, and longer lesions were shown to be independent risk factors for the development of periprocedural HI. Conversely, smoking demonstrated a protective effect. HI did not appear to predispose to periprocedural adverse events.

Objective Patients in the Valiant Evo U.S. and international clinical trials had positive short-term outcomes; however, late structural failures, including type IIIb endoleaks have been recently discovered. Type IIIb endoleaks are serious adverse events because the repressurization of the aneurysm sac increases the risk of rupture. The purpose of the present study was to detail the imaging patterns associated with the structural failures with the aim of increasing awareness of failing graft presentation, early recognition, and prompt treatment. Methods The Valiant Evo clinical trial was a prospective, single-arm investigation of a thoracic stent graft system. With the recent late structural failures, sites were requested to submit all available imaging studies to date to allow the core laboratory to assess for structural failures such as type IIIb endoleaks, stent ring fractures, and stent ring enlargement. Of the 100 patients originally enrolled in the trial from 2016 to 2018, the core laboratory assessed the imaging studies performed at ≥1 year for 83 patients. Results No structural failures of the graft were reported through 1 year of follow-up. At 1 to 4 years, graft structural failures were detected in 11 patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Of the 11 patients, 5 had a type IIIb endoleak. Four of the five had imaging findings showing stent fractures consistent with the location of the graft seam and one had a type IIIb endoleak attributed to calcium erosion with no stent fracture or ring enlargement. Of the four patients with stent fracture in line with the graft seam, three underwent a relining procedure that successfully excluded the type IIIb endoleak. One of these three patients died 4 days later of suspected thoracic aortic rupture because the distal thoracic endovascular aortic repair extension had been landed in a previously dissected and fragile section of the aorta. The remaining six patients had had stent ring enlargement. One of the six patients had had persistent aneurysm expansion from the time of implantation onward and had died of unknown causes. The remaining five patients have continued to be monitored. Conclusions In the present preliminary analysis, the imaging patterns associated with type IIIb endoleaks, stent fractures, and stent ring enlargement appear to be related to the loss of seam integrity or detachment of the stent rings from the surface of the graft material. The imaging patterns we have detailed should be closely monitored using computed tomography angiography surveillance to allow structural failures to be promptly identified and treated.

PURPOSE: to report three cases of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) involving the cervical- dorsal level and leading to quadriplegia and quadriparesis, following thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) endovascular repair. CASE REPORTS: A 79-year-old woman with an extent III TAAA was scheduled for a multi-step fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair. Immediately after the first step, consisting of standard proximal thoracic stent-graft implantation, she developed quadriplegia that did not resolve despite all therapeutic actions, and died as a consequence on postoperative day 32. A 72-year old male with an extent IV TAAA underwent endovascular repair, using a customized fenestrated aortic stent-graft. Five hours after the procedure, he developed an asymmetric quadriparesis, that progressively resolved after spinal fluid drainage and arterial pressure increase, even if signs of SCI were documented at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A 79-year old man, referred for a type II TAAA with rapid enlargement, underwent a one-stage endovascular repair, using a customized branched aortic stent-graft. As soon as the procedure was completed, the patient presented inferior limbs paralysis and upper limbs paresis. Although no signs of SCI were documented at MRI, the patient did not recover and died as a consequence three months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, cervical-dorsal SCI may develop during TAAA endovascular aortic repair. This possibly catastrophic event should be considered in the decisional process of TAAA repair and taken into account to allow prompt recognition and treatment.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long term results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and ectatic common iliac arteries (CIAs).In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database in two high volume centres, patients with AAAs undergoing elective standard EVAR were divided into two groups: those with both CIA diameters18 mm, and those with at least one ectatic iliac artery (CIA ≥ 18 mm). Patients with an intentional external iliac artery landing zone were excluded. Primary outcomes were survival and freedom from re-intervention. Secondary end points were EVAR failure and iliac related endoleak and iliac re-intervention.From 2000 to 2015, 648 patients were included in the study, 277 (43%) had at least one CIA ≥ 18 mm. Pre-operative risk factors were similar between the two groups, with the exception of chronic renal insufficiency (p = .010) and cerebrovascular events (p = .040), which were higher in the ectatic CIA group. At 30 days from primary procedure, there was a higher rate of type Ib endoleak in patients with ectatic iliacs (p = .020). A statistically significant increase in the incidence of late type Ib endoleak in patients with ectatic iliac arteries was confirmed at a mean follow up of 74.8 months (p = .01). The need for iliac related re-intervention was higher in patients with CIAs ≥18 mm (odds ratio 1.94; 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.2).Ectatic iliac arteries are considered suitable landing zones for EVAR, although there is an increased risk of secondary interventions in time mainly due to late CIA dilation and secondary type Ib endoleak. Patients receiving EVAR with flared iliac limbs may benefit a more intensive surveillance to avoid late failures.

The benefit of statin therapy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease remains uncertain. Randomized trials have questioned the efficacy of the drug in improving outcomes for on-dialysis populations, and many patients with end-stage renal disease are not currently taking statins. This study aimed to investigate the impact of statin use on survival of patients with vascular access performed at a vascular center for chronic dialysis. Consecutive end-stage renal disease patients admitted for vascular access surgery in 2006 to 2013 were reviewed. Information on therapy was retrieved and patients on statins were compared to those who were not on statins. Primary endpoint was 5-year survival. Independent predictors of mortality were assessed with Cox regression analysis adjusting for covariates (ie, age, sex, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, cardiac disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, diabetes, and statins). Three hundred fifty-nine patients (230 males; mean age 68.9 ± 13.7 years) receiving 554 vascular accesses were analyzed: 127 (35.4%) were on statins. Use of statins was more frequent in patients with hypertension (89.8% v 81%; P = .034), hyperlipidemia (52.4% v 6.2%; P < .0001), coronary disease (54.1% v 42.6%; P = .043), diabetes (39.4% v 21.6%; P = .001), and obesity (11.6% v 2.0%; P < .0001). Mean follow-up was 35 months. Kaplan-Meier survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 84.4% and 75.9% for patients taking statins and 77.0% and 65.1% for those not taking statins (P = .18). Cox regression analysis selected statins therapy as the only independent negative predictor (odds ratio = 0.55; 95% confidence interval = 0.32-0.95; P = .032) of mortality, while age was an independent positive predictor (odds ratio = 1.05; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.08; P < .0001). Vascular access patency was comparable in statin takers and those not taking statins (P = .60). Use of statins might halve the risk of all-cause mortality at 5 years in adult patients with vascular access for chronic dialysis. Statins therapy should be considered in end-stage renal disease populations requiring dialysis access placement.

Background A successful case of urgent type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair with an inner branched endograft conducted entirely through femoral accesses without the bailout possibility to achieve an upper extremity approach for bridging stents delivery is described. Case report A 70-year-old male patient underwent hybrid treatment for a thoracic aortic aneurysm on complicated type B dissection in 2 steps. First, arch debranching with carotid-carotid-subclavian bypass and then ascending aortic replacement with reimplantation of the anonymous trunk plus TEVAR were performed. The scheduled 1-month control computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed a rapid increase of the false lumen thoracoabdominal aneurysm, with axial diameter measuring more than 10 cm. The repair procedure was based on the use, as off-the-shelf graft, of a prosthesis customized for another patient with inner branches for visceral vessels that well suited the characteristics of the case. A steerable guiding sheath was essential to stabilize the system in the selective and sequential cannulation of 2 of the 4 inner branches (for celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery) and to complete the bridging stents deployment. Procedure was carried out without complications. Conclusions In an urgent setting, total endovascular correction of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm exclusively through femoral accesses appears to be feasible when the appropriate tools are available.

Objective To gather consensus among European educators about technical procedures that should be included in a future simulation based curriculum in vascular surgery. Methods A three round modified Delphi survey was initiated among 189 key opinion leaders (KOL) from 34 countries across Europe who were identified according to their positions in the European Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery , and Union Europeenne des Medecins Specialistes Section and Board of Vascular Surgery. The first round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified vascular surgeon should be able to perform. The answers were analysed qualitatively. The second round investigated how often the identified procedures are performed, the number of vascular surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, whether the procedures pose a risk to the patients, and whether simulation based education (SBE) is feasible. In the third round, elimination and re-ranking of procedures were performed. Only procedures that gained more than 70% support were included. An international steering group consisting of open and endovascular surgeons and medical educators governed the process. Results Response rates in the three rounds were 75% (142/189), 89% (126/142), and 85% (107/126), respectively. In the final prioritised list of 30 technical procedures for SBE, the top five procedures focus on basic open vascular skills, basic endovascular skills, vascular imaging interpretation, femoral endarterectomy, and open peripheral bypass. Twenty-six procedures were eliminated, including peripheral pressure measurement, wound management, open management of complications, major amputations, and highly advanced endovascular skills. Conclusion The prioritised list of technical procedures from this ESVS supported project could be used to guide planning and development of future SBE programs to meet the needs of vascular surgeons across Europe.

Objective Elderly patients are often turned down from receiving treatment for descending thoracic aortic diseases (DTADs) because of the uncertain benefits, especially in acute settings. This study investigated the impact of old age and timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on outcomes of DTAD in patients older than 75 years of age. Methods Patients from a prospective TEVAR database were dichotomized by age (75 and 80 years of age). Older and young patients were compared in three timing scenarios: (1) elective procedures, (2) any emergency (within 15 days from onset), and (3) acute ruptures (any emergency subgroup). Primary outcome was perioperative mortality assessed at 30 and 90 days. Results Between 2003 and 2015, 141 consecutive TEVARs (71.6% men) were performed. Fifty-seven patients (40.4%) were older than 75 years of age; 28 were octogenarians. Eighty-three TEVARs were performed electively and 58 emergently. Among overall emergencies, 42 TEVARs were for acute ruptures. In the elective scenario, the 30-day mortality rate was 5.0% vs 0 (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.1; P = .23), and 90-day mortality was 7.5% vs 0, for patients older than 75 years of age vs those who were younger than 75, respectively ( P = .11). No octogenarian died. In the emergency scenario, 30-day mortality was 41.2% vs 9.8%, for patients older than 75 years of age vs those who were younger than 75, respectively (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.6-26.6; P = .01) with unchanged rates at 90 days. The mortality rate was 50% for octogenarians. In the acute rupture scenario, 30-day mortality was 40% vs 11.1% (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.10-25.99; P = .05) for patients older than 75 years of age vs those younger than 75 years of age and 46% vs 10% (OR, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.47-37.46; P = .016) for octogenarians vs younger patients. Rates remained unchanged at 90 days. Patients older than age 75 survived for a mean of 53.98 ± 7.7 months after TEVAR. Conclusions In the elderly patient population with DTAD, mortality risks from TEVAR are strongly related to timing and age. When compared to younger patients, those older than 75 years of age have three to five times the risk of mortality after urgent or emergent TEVAR. However, older patients should still be considered for emergent life-saving treatment, given that the majority survives.

Background Recent technological developments allowed significant improvements in interventional approach to carotid artery stenosis. Tapered stents were specifically designed for extracranial carotid artery stenting (CAS) to deal with vessels mismatch with the objective of decreasing the risk of thrombosis. Nevertheless, whether the stent geometry may affect the outcomes of CAS is uncertain. This study aims to investigate the impact of stent configuration on perioperative and long-term results of this procedure. Methods All CAS procedures performed between 2005 and 2012 at a single high-volume center were reviewed. Primary end points of the study were 30-day mortality and any ipsilateral neurological event. Secondary end points were any late (>30 days) neurological event and restenosis >50%. Results About 1,368 procedures were performed in the period 2005–2012. 9.1% of the patients were symptomatic for recent focal neurological event. 883 patients were treated with a cylindrical stent while the others underwent a tapered design device implantation. Technical success was achieved in 96% of the procedures. No perioperative mortality was recorded; perioperative stroke occurred in 1.2% vs. 1.6% (P = not significant) in tapered and straight stent group respectively. Stent design did not predict perioperative ipsilateral neurological events neither at bivariate nor at multivariate analysis. At a mean follow-up of 30 months, late neurological events occurred in 26 cases (1.9%); conic stents resulted protective at Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.027). Conclusions The use of conic stents appears to be associated with similar perioperative results when compared with straight stents. Late outcomes suggest a lower risk of restenosis and late neurological events in patients with conical shape stents.

Objective/Background Absence of an adequate iliac seal rarely represents an absolute contraindication to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Iliac branch devices (IBD) are increasingly used in patients with extensive aorto-iliac aneurysmal disease, but few data are available on the long-term results of these procedures. Methods Between 2006 and 2016, 157 consecutive IBD procedures performed at a single centre were entered into a prospective database. Indications included unilateral or bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms combined or not with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Long-term results were reported according to the Kaplan–Meier method. Results During the study period 149 patients were treated with an iliac branched endograft. Isolated IBD was implanted in 17.8% of the cases; technical success rate was 97.5%. Peri-operative procedure failure occurred in seven patients, four during surgery and three within 30 days of the procedure. Presence of ipsilateral hypogastric aneurysm ( p = .031; Exp [B] = 6.72) and intervention performed during the initial study period ( p = .006; Exp [B] = 10.40) were predictive of early failure on multivariate analysis. After a mean follow-up of 44.2 months actuarial freedom from IBD related re-intervention was 97.4%, 95.6%, 94.0%, and 91.8% at 1, 3, 5, and 9 years, respectively. Hypogastric artery patency was 94.7%, 92.6%, and 90.4% at 1, 3, and 10 years, respectively. Presence of a hypogastric aneurysm was an independent predictor of target artery occlusion during follow-up on multivariate analysis ( p = .007; Exp [B] = 5.93). Conclusion Iliac branched endografting can now be performed with a high technical success rate; long-term freedom from re-intervention is comparable with patients treated with standard aortic endografting. IBD should be considered a first-option treatment in patients with adequate vascular anatomy unsuitable for standard endovascular aortic repair.

ObjectiveCurrent data supporting the effect of anticoagulation drug use on aneurysm sealing and the durability of endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) are conflicting. This study assessed the safety of chronic anticoagulation therapy after EVAR.MethodsRecords of 1409 consecutive patients having elective EVAR during 1997–2011 who were prospectively followed were reviewed. Survival, reintervention, conversion, and endoleak rates were analyzed in patients with and without chronic anticoagulants. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of anticoagulation therapy on outcomes.ResultsOne-hundred and three (7.3%) patients were on chronic anticoagulation drugs (80 on vitamin K antagonists) at the time of EVAR. An additional 46 patients started on anticoagulants after repair were identified. Patients on chronic anticoagulation therapy at repair (mean age 73.6 years; 91 males) had more frequent cardiac disease (74.8% vs. 44.2%; p

BackgroundOperator training is a key factor for the safety of carotid stenting (CAS). Whether institutional practice is associated with improved individual operator outcomes is debated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of the institutional experience on outcomes of new trainees with CAS, a retrospective analysis of a prospectively held database was performed.MethodsThe overall study period, 2004–2012, was divided into two sequential time frames: 2004–April 2006 (leaders-team phase) and May 2006–2012 (expanded team phase). In the first frame, a single leader-operators team that first approached CAS and passed the original institutional learning curve, performed all the procedures; in the following expanded-team phase, five new trainees joined. Institutional CAS training for new trainees was based on a team-working approach including selection of patients, devices and techniques and collegial meetings with critical review and discussion of all procedural steps and imaging.ResultsA total of 431 CAS procedures were performed in the leaders-team phase and 1026 in the sequential expanded-team phase. Periprocedural complication rates in the two time frames were similar: stroke/death (3.0% vs. 2.1%; P = 0.35), stroke (2.8% vs. 2.1%; P = 0.45) major stroke (0.9% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.49), death (0.2% vs. 0%; P = 0.29) during the leaders-team and expanded-team phase, respectively. However, rates of CAS failure requiring surgical conversions (3.7% vs. 0.8%; P

Sex differences in presentation and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with increased mortality rates in women are suggested. This study aimed to assess mortality risk after repair of ruptured AAA (rAAA) in women in the endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) era.Patients treated between 2006 and 2015 for rAAA were included in a prospective database. Characteristics at presentation and outcomes were compared between women and men. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional analyses were performed to identify the effect of sex adjusted for other predictors on mortality.One hundred thirteen patients were identified; of these, 17.7% (20/113) of the patients were women. Forty-four procedures (38.9%) were by EVAR, with comparable rates in women (45%) and men (37.6%, P = 0.62). On admission, women and men shared similar comorbidities and presentation (shock 45% vs. 43.0%, P = 0.81; free rupture 65.0% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.80) and comparable mean aneurysm diameter (76.5 vs. 78.8 mm, P = 0.68), but women were older (mean age 86.4 + 5.5 vs. 75.2 ± 10.6 years, P 0.0001) and octogenarian women were twice as likely as men (90% vs. 40%, P 0.0001). Perioperative mortality was comparable between women and men (40.0% vs. 38.7%) either after EVAR (22.2% vs. 40.0% in women and men respectively; odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-2.37) or after open surgery (54.5% vs. 37.9%; OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.54-7.21), even though there was a trend for lower mortality in women with EVAR. In adjusted analyses, female sex was not associated with perioperative mortality as it was for older age (octogenarians: OR 6.6, 95% CI 2.08-20.82, P = 0.001) and free rupture (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.29-13.73, P = 0.02). Mean follow-up was 34.32 months. After controlling for age, surgical repair, free rupture, cardiac disease, and shock at presentation, female sex was not a predictor of late mortality.AAA repair is often delayed in women and applied at older age; nevertheless, currently women do not show increased perioperative mortality risks from rAAA treatment after the introduction of EVAR.

Background: Perioperative stroke is a devastating complication after treatment of descending thoracic aorta disease (DTAD). As to whether developments in Thoracic Endovascular repair (TEVAR) influenced the overall stroke burden of patients with DTAD remains to be defined. This study investigated the current incidence and severity of procedure-related stroke in patients undergoing elective or emergency TEVAR. Methods: Patients with DTAD treated by TEVAR were questioned for perioperative stroke. Multivariable logistic regression models with backward variable selection were applied to investigate independent associations with perioperative stroke. Results: Between 2003-2015, 141 consecutive TEVAR (71.6% men;mean age 67.3+16.7years) were performed for DTAD: 58 (41.4%) were emergency procedures. The 30-day mortality was 9.2% (13/141) and 10 patients experienced procedure-related stroke. 30-day mortality was increased in patients with stroke: 23% vs. 5.5% (OR 5.2; 95%CI1.16-23.2;P=0.05). Stroke fatality was even more evident in elective repairs (P=0.049). Procedure-related stroke incidence was higher in emergency (13.3% vs. 2.6%;P=0-02), in procedures with left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage (21.4% vs. 3.5%;P=0.004) and in TEVAR performed before 2007 (15.6% vs 3.1%;P= 0.01). The relationship between increased stroke incidence and LSA coverage (35.7% vs. 6.5%;P=0.01) or procedure before 2007 (26.6% vs.5.1%;P=0.02) was particularly evident in TEVAR performed in emergency, while disappeared in elective repairs. Type of disease and age did not affect stroke risk. In multivariable regression, emergency of repair (OR,10.9; 95%CI,1.56-76.5; P=0.0.2), LSA coverage (OR,10.8; 95%CI 1.8-65.6;P=0.009) and procedure after 2007(OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.03-0.88;P=0.04) were confirmed as independently associated with procedure-related stroke as well as female sex (P=0.034). Conclusions: With developed technology the incidence of procedure-related stroke after TEVAR has declined. This trend was particularly achieved in emergency procedures where the prompt treatment may not allow for accurate planning. Nevertheless, stroke remains a devastating complication at high fatality risk for patients with DTAD even after elective TEVAR.

Background: Old age is a main factor increasing perioperative risks especially in emergency. Guidelines recommend performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the acute period after onset of a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke. There are concerns on the benefit from acute carotid revascularization in old patients due to increased periprocedural stroke/death risks exposure during an emergency procedure that could offset the long-term benefit. This study aimed to analyze 30-day and late risk of stroke/death after acute carotid revascularization in symptomatic patients with >80years. Methods: Data of 282 consecutive patients (28.4% females; mean age 73.9y) undergoing carotid revascularization within 15 days from stroke/TIA ,in 2009-2015, were analyzed. Octogenarians and younger patients were compared for presentation, 30-day and late stroke/death rates using multivariable and survival analyses. Results: There were 79 (28%) patients with >80 years (34.2% females): 33(42%) were treated within the first 7 days and 10 (13%) within 48hours from symptom onset. Stroke was the index event in 34(43%); in 11(14%) recurrent TIA. Baseline comorbidity profile, presenting symptoms and timing of treatment were comparable between old and young patients, but the rate of preoperative cerebral infarction was lower in octogenarians: 36.2% vs. 52.5% (P=0.031).30-day stroke/death rate was 2.5% in octogenarians (2/79) and 3.4% (7/203) in younger patients (OR 0.73; 95%Cl,0.15-3.58; P=0.99).There were one 30-day death and no cerebral hemorrhage among octogenarians. No 30-day stroke/death occurred in procedures within 48h. In adjusted analyses octogenarian was not associated with increased stroke/death risk. At 4-year all cause survival was lower (58%) in octogenarians than in younger patients (91%%,P= Conclusions: Octogenarians undergoing carotid revascularization within the acute (15 days) or hyperacute (48 hours) period after TIA/stroke show 30-day stroke/death and 4-year stroke rates comparable to younger patients. Given the higher age-related risk of stroke exposure and recurrence, the benefit from an acute carotid treatment in octogenarians may be relevant.

Objective/Background A consistent number of elderly patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) are deemed unfit for repair and excluded from any treatment. The objective of this study was to examine the impact on survival of endovascular repair and open surgery with restricted turndown in acute AAA repair. Methods A prospective database for patients treated for rAAA was established. None of the patients admitted alive with rAAA were denied treatment. Multivariate regression models, the predictive risk assessment Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS), and subgroup analyses in older patients were applied to identify indicators of excessive 30 day mortality risk that could affect the decision for turndown. Results From 2006 to 2015, 113 consecutive patients (93 males; mean age 77.2 years) with rAAAs were treated (69 open surgery; 44 EVAR). Overall peri-operative (30 day) mortality was 38.9% (44/113): 40.6% (28/69), and 36.4% (16/44) after open surgery and EVAR, respectively ( p = .70). Multivariate logistic regression identified old age as an indicator of increased peri-operative mortality (odd ratio [OR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–1.3; p = .001), as well as free aneurysm rupture (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.3–19.9; p = .02). GAS was higher in patients who died (97.75 vs. 86.62), but the score failed to identify increased peri-operative mortality risk in adjusted analyses (OR 1.0; p = .06). Almost two thirds of the patients ( n = 71) were older than 75 at the time of aneurysm rupture (48.6% octogenarians) and EVAR was more commonly applied than open surgery (86.4% vs. 47.8%; p 75 year old patients was 46.5% compared with 26.2% in younger patients ( p = .05), with rates increased after open surgery (54.5% vs. 27.8%, p = .03) but not after EVAR (39.5% vs. 16.7%; p = .39). According to Kaplan–Meier estimates, mean survival was 39.7 ± 4.8 months. Patients older than 75 years of age survived for a mean of 23.0 ± 4.47 months after rupture. Conclusion In this study aggressive treatment with a very restricted or no turndown strategy for any rAAA, also applied to older patients, allowed for an additional mean 40 months of survival after aneurysm rupture. In the contemporary endovascular era the decision to deny repair arbitrarily to older patients with rAAAs must be revisited.

Background To preliminary report on epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes in a multicenter series of patients treated for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) infection and detected by an Italian National enquiry. Methods From June 2012, 26 cases of abdominal aortic endograft infection were collected by a National Enquiry and recorded in the Italian National Registry of Infection in EVAR. Cases collected were available for patients submitted to EVAR implantation from January 2004 to June 2013. Results Mean time from EVAR treatment to infection diagnosis was 20.5 ± 20.3 months (range, 1–72). In 6 cases (23.1%), an aortoenteric fistula (AEF) was detected. Positive microbiologic cultures were found in 20 patients (76.9%). More than 1 infectious agent was found in 6 cases (19.2%). EVAR infection treatment was conservative in 4 cases, endovascular in 2. Endograft excision was performed in 10 cases by conventional treatment (aortic stump + extra-anatomic bypass) and in 10 cases by in situ reconstruction (cryopreserved allograft or rifampin-soaked silver Dacron graft). A 30-day mortality was 38.4% (10 of 26 cases), 3 patients died from 2 to 24 months after infection treatment, accounting for a mean time from infection treatment to death of 1.25 ± 0.62 months. Mortality rates were 50% in all treatment groups. In those survived (13 of 26 cases) recurrence-free follow-up after infection treatment was 27.9 ± 22.4 months (range, 2–74). Four patients with AEF died in the first month after treatment (66.6%). Suprarenal endografts required supraceliac aortic cross-clamping for removal. Supraceliac cross-clamping was burdened by higher mortality rates than infrarenal cross-clamping (71.4% vs. 30.7%). Conclusions EVAR infection diagnosis is burdened by extremely high mortality rates. Prospective registries could help monitoring outcomes in EVAR infection patients and, possibly, developing new surveillance protocols in patients at high risk of recurrence.

Objective: In the last years, development of materials allowed notably improvements in interventional approach to stroke. Tapered stents were specifically designed for extracranial carotid stenting (CAS) to deal with vessels mismatch decreasing the risk of thrombosis. Nevertheless, as to whether the stent geometry may affect the hemodynamic consequences of CAS remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate the impact of stent configuration on postprocedural sustained hemodynamic depression (HD) requiring action of care after carotid stenting (CAS). Methods: Data on 391 consecutive CAS performed over a 4-year period (2011-2014) were reviewed. Postprocedural sustained HD was defined as any severe hypotension (2 measurements after the end of the procedure and requiring care support or delaying hospital discharge. Stent configuration (tapered or straight) was tested for association with sustained HD using multivariable models adjusted for other confounders (medical therapy, comorbidities, symptoms, stenosis, carotid plaque and demographics).The relation with stroke and death outcomes within 30 days of treatment was also analyzed. Results: Mean age of patients was 70.7y + 7.14 and 66.2% were males. Sustained HD developed after 144 (36.8%) CAS. Tapered stents were applied in 289 (73.9%) CAS, and more frequently in patients with higher degree of stenosis (mean 79% vs 77%, in tapered and straight stents respectively; P=0.007) or asymptomatic (93.8% vs. 85.3% in tapered and straight stents respectively;P=0.012). Diabetes (HR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.01-2.44;P=0.044) and tapered stent configuration (HR, 1.7, 95% CI, 1.05-2.82;P=0.033) were the only factors that showed independent association with sustained HD. At 30-day, 3 strokes and no death occurred. There was no statistically significant association between 30-day outcomes and sustained HD depression or stent configuration. Conclusions: A strong hemodynamic effect, requiring additional actions of care or prolonged hospital stay, is expected after CAS when using tapered stent configuration. These findings alert on the overall benefit and costs of CAS and the requirements for accurate material selection especially in diabetic patients.

Age is a main risk factor for stroke and perioperative risk. This study aims to analyze the effect of age by symptomatic status in young patients receiving carotid revascularization.Consecutive carotid revascularization procedures performed during the period 2001-2009 were reviewed. Patients were analyzed by age using the 70-year threshold as suggested by trials. Primary end point was perioperative stroke or death rate. Secondary end points included survival and late stroke incidence at 6 years.A total of 2,196 procedures (1,080 by carotid artery stenting [CAS] and 1,116 by carotid endarterectomy [CEA]) were analyzed. Symptomatic patients (n = 684) showed higher perioperative stroke or death risks (24 of 684 [3.5%] versus 29 of 1,512 [1.9%], odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.22; P = 0.034) and lower 6-year survival (74% vs. 82%, P0.0001) or freedom from late stroke (93% vs. 97%, P = 0.001) when compared with asymptomatic patients with similar differences detected within CEA or CAS procedure. Overall 949 procedures were in patients with 70 years or less at the time of intervention (500 CEA and 449 CAS); 282 were in patients symptomatic for minor stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months before revascularization. For young symptomatic patients, primary end point rates were2.5% after both CEA and CAS procedure. Perioperative stroke or death rates were 2.4% in symptomatic versus 1.5% in asymptomatic (4 of 170 vs. 5 of 330; OR 1.57; 95% CI 0.42-5.91; P = 0.50) within the CEA group and 1.8% in symptomatic versus 1.2% in asymptomatic (2 of 112 vs. 4 of 337; OR 1.51; 95% CI 0.27-8.38; P = 0.64) within the CAS group. At 6 years, symptomatic young patients showed survival (89.5% vs. 89%, P = 0.76) and freedom from late stroke (97% vs. 98%, P = 0.56) rates comparable to those found in asymptomatic patients, with similar incidences after CAS or CEA procedure.Outcomes after carotid revascularization are related to patients' age. At younger ages (70 years), after carotid revascularization, symptomatic patients show low perioperative risks of stroke or death, comparable with those in asymptomatic patients. The same, 2.5% or lower, threshold for perioperative stroke or death risk related to asymptomatic carotid procedures must be applied today to symptomatic patients when younger than age of 70 years.

Objectives Increasing data suggest that statins can significantly decrease cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events due to a plaque stabilization effect. However, the benefit of statins in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) for carotid stenosis is not well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate whether statins use was associated with decreased perioperative and late risks of stroke, mortality, and restenosis in patients undergoing CAS. Methods All patients undergoing CAS for primary carotid stenosis from 2004 to 2009 were reviewed. The independent association of statins and perioperative morbidity was assessed using multivariable analysis. Survival curves and Cox regression models were used to assess late morbidity and restenosis. Propensity score adjustment was employed. Results A total of 1083 consecutive CAS were performed (29% females, mean age 71.5 years; 24.7% symptomatic); 465 (43%) were on statins medication before treatment that was not discontinued at discharge. Statins use was associated with a reduction of perioperative stroke and death (odds ratio [OR] 0.327, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.80, P = .016) according to multivariable analysis. Statins effect was more significant in reducing stroke and death in symptomatic patients (OR 0.13; P = .032) and in males (OR 0.27, P = .01). At 5 years, survival (87.2% vs 78.3%; P = .009) and ischemic stroke-free interval (88.9% vs 99.7%; P = .02) rates were higher in the statins group of patients. Adjusting for propensity score and covariates in Cox regression analyses, statins use was independently associated with reduced long-term mortality risk (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; P = .039) and borderline associated with decreased late ischemic stroke risk (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.018-1.08, P = .059). There was no effect on restenosis rates. Conclusions These data suggest that statins use is associated with decreased perioperative and late ischemic strokes risk and reduced mortality rates in patients undergoing CAS. Statins therapy should be considered part of the best medical treatment in current CAS practice.

During implantation of an Ovation endograft for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) correction, a patient experienced anaphylactic reaction after polymer leakage outside the device circuit. Procedure was completed after hemodynamic stabilization. Since postoperative day 2, patient complained of loss of legs strength. Medullar injury was excluded by electromyography test, and the clinical signs attributed to muscular necrosis and peripheral nerve involvement after arterial embolization. Furthermore, immediately after surgery, a wide erythematous area appeared in the lumbar region. During the next few days, the lesion developed from extensive blisters and necrosis to deep loss of substance. The wound needed to be medicated 2 or 3 times per week. One year after surgery, the patient still needs crutches for deambulation, and the back injury is currently under treatment. In conclusion, surgeons performing aortic endovascular repair with the Ovation endograft, as well as anesthesiologists participating in the procedure, should be aware of the possibility of embolization and ready to promptly treat possible complications.

ObjectiveThe clinical significance of Haemodynamic Depression (HD) during carotid stenting (CAS) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency and predictors of HD during CAS in a single centre experience.MethodsA prospective protocol for CAS was applied in a 15-month interval. Patients with restenosis, on betablockers, or with arrhythmias were excluded. A standardized dose of atropine (0.4mg) was given prior to stent deployment. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and neurological status were monitored and recorded. HD was defined as systolic pressure

Background: Benefit from carotid revascularization might be lower in female patients due to increased periprocedural stroke/death risks exposure. Aim of this study was to define the 30-day risks of stroke/death after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS) in symptomatic female patients treated within 15 days from last neurological event. Methods: Data of 227 consecutive patients treated during 2009-2014 by CEA or CAS within 15 days from neurological symptoms were analyzed by sex and stratified according to the delay of symptom onset. Results: There were sixty-six (29.1%) females (mean age 74.6y): 32 were treated within the first 7 days and 13 within 48hours from symptom onset. Stroke was the index event in 33 (50%), while in 17 (25.8%) recurrent TIA were recorded in the last 2 weeks before intervention. Twenty-six procedures were performed by CAS with similar rates in males and females. Baseline comorbidity profile, presenting symptoms (stroke, TIA, recurrent TIA) and timing of treatment were comparable between sexes, but there was a tendency for higher proportion of preoperative cerebral lesions in females compared to males (60.7% vs 42.8%; P=.022). The 30-day stroke and death rate was 3.0% in females (2/66) and 2.5% (4/161) in males (Odds ratio 1.27; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.27-7.12; P=.99).There were no 30-day deaths or cerebral hemorrhage in the female group. No 30-day stroke or death occurred in patients undergoing the procedure within the first 48 hours. In adjusted analyses female sex was not associated with increased stroke/death risk. At 4 years survival rates were 98% in female and 87.6% in male patients (P=.11); freedom from stroke rates were 90.1% vs. 95.5% (P=.19) in females and males, respectively. Conclusions: Female patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis may benefit from carotid intervention when performed within the acute (15 days) or hyperacute (48 hours) period after neurologic ischemic event. 30-day stroke and death rates were below or comparable to those of previous randomized trials and treatment was effective in preventing new strokes at mid-term.

Background: Neurological instability may increase operative risks and decrease the benefit of early carotid revascularization in patients with carotid stenosis. This study aims to define the risks after carotid revascularization performed during the acute period stratified for the presenting neurological event. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing carotid revascularization in 2009-2014 during the acute period (within 15 days from the last neurological event) were reviewed. Thirty-day and 4-year stroke/death rates were analyzed in patients presenting with Transient Ischemic attack (TIA), recurrent TIA (more than one in the last 2 weeks before treatment) and stable stroke. Results: There were 227 patients (71% males; mean age 73.6y): 104 (45.8%) were treated after stable stroke. In 46 (20.3%) recurrent TIA were recorded before treatment. According to timing, 123 interventions were performed within the first 7 days and 36 within the first 48hours from index symptom. At 30-day there were 2 deaths, 1 fatal cerebral hemorrhage and 4 recurrent ischemic strokes. 30-day stroke/death rate was 1.6% in patients with TIA, 4.9% in patients with stroke, 4.5% in those with recurrent TIA. Multivariable analysis (backward stepwise) for 30-day stroke/death risk identified recurrent TIA presentation as the strongest independent predictor (Odds ratio,OR, 16.8; 95% Confidence Interval, CI, 1.47-191.7; P=.023), while stroke presentation was retained as a borderline statistical predictor (OR 14.8; 95%CI 0.96-228.6; P= 0.05). At 4-year, survival (86% vs. 94.9% P=.034) and freedom from stroke recurrence (90.4% vs. 97%; P=.055) rates were lower for patients with stroke presentation compared to other patients. Patients with recurrent TIA a showed comparable 4-year outcomes than other TIA patients (survival 94% vs 95% P=. 93; Stroke freedom rates 97% vs 97%; P=.86) Conclusions: For symptomatic patients undergoing carotid intervention during the acute period, presentation with recurrent TIA may expose to increased periprocedural 30-day stroke/death risk. Nevertheless, stroke remains a major marker of poorer late outcomes while recurrent TIA does not impact long-term survival and stroke recurrence.

Changes in surgical techniques may affect outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Numerous studies have attempted to determine whether eversion CEA is safer and more effective than conventional CEA. Randomized controlled trials comparing eversion to conventional technique for CEA have been identified and systematically analyzed by the Cochrane Stroke Review Group database. Outcomes included stroke and death, carotid restenosis/occlusion, and local complications. There is evidence that eversion CEA is an effective surgical option comparable to conventional CEA. In literature no differences were found between eversion CEA and conventional CEA with respect to operative morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based data indicated that eversion CEA had a lower restenosis rate than conventional CEA with primary closure techniques, however, no differences in late stroke-free survival rate and superior long-term durability when compared to patch closure were found. Recent studies, as well as our single center experience, indicate that shunt use in eversion CEA is feasible with comparable complication rate versus use of shunt in conventional CEA, although it may require specific experience with the technique.

Background: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) continues to be a significantly morbid disease for the aging population with high likelihood of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Objective: To analyze incidence and timing of all cause and cardiovascular mortality (CM) in patients who survived after intervention for CLI. Methods: Patients consecutively discharged with diagnosis of CLI during the period 2006-2008 were re-evaluated for cardiovascular morbidity after 2 years. Patients receiving revascularization either open or endovascular and those with primary major amputation were compared with Kaplan-Meier analyses. The effect of treatment on outcome was analyzed with Cox analysis. Results: There were 257 patients (171 men, aged 74.12y), 39 treated by primary major amputation and 218 by revascularization. During a mean follow-up of 37months, 81 patients died for all cause mortality and 35 for CM. Mean survival time was 57.4months. More than half deaths (n=44) occurred by 15 months with 21 patients dying in the first 6 months and 33 within the first 12 months. Thirty-five myocardial infarctions and 15 strokes occurred. Cumulative survival rate at 60 months was 54% for all cause mortality and 79% for CM. There was significantly worse survival in patients with primary amputation when compared to those receiving revascularization: rates for all cause mortality were 45% vs. 75% (p=0.001) and rates for CM were 68% vs. 90% (p Unadjusted odd ratios for all cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with primary amputation vs. revascularization were 3.07 (95%CI 1.5-6.1, p=0.002) and 5.25 (95%CI 2.3-11.6, p Conclusion: Mortality and CM after 2 years in patients surviving from CLI procedures are high. Primary amputation is a strong predictor of poor prognosis in the mid-long term for patients with CLI. Most deaths occur in the first 15 months after treatment. This data may question the benefits of revascularization.

Background: Concerns on procedural risks in patients with recent transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke have been raised against the efficacy of early carotid revascularization performed during the acute period ( Methods: During 2009-2013, 207 consecutive patients were treated with carotid revascularization within 20 days from the last neurologic event. Thirty-day stroke/death rate was analyzed in procedures performed Results: There were 183 CEA and 24 CAS. Overall 175 procedures were performed within the first 15 days and 32 after. Specifically, 22 patients were treated within the first 48h and 89 within the first 7 days. The 30-day stroke and death rate was 2.9% (6/207). There were 3 deaths, 2 cerebral hemorrhages and 3 ischemic strokes. 30-day stroke/death rate was comparable in patients treated within the first 15 days and those treated later : 2.9% (5/175) and 3.1% (1/32); Odds ratio , OR 0.9; 95%Confidence Interval, CI, 0.10-8.1; p=.99. 30-day stroke/death rate was 2.2% (2/89) for patients treated within 7 days and 3.5% (3/86) for those treated between 7 and 15 days. For the 22 patients receiving carotid revascularization within the first 48 hours, periprocedural risk was 0. Conclusions: Currently carotid revascularization can be performed safely within the acute period from neurologic symptoms onset with a stroke/death risk of 3.5% or lower.

Objective Currently, the best approach to the aortic arch remains unsupported by robust evidence. Most of the available data rely on small sample numbers, heterogeneous settings, and limited follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate early and midterm results of arch debranching and endovascular procedures. Methods From 2005 through 2013, 104 consecutive patients underwent elective arch treatment with debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Rates of perioperative (30-day) mortality and neurological complications, and mortality, endoleak, supra-aortic vessel patency, and arch diameter changes at 5 years were analyzed. Results Patients' mean age was 69.8 years, and 90 were males. Twenty arches were repaired for dissection. Nineteen patients required total debranching for diseases extended to zone 0. In 59, debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedures were staged. At 30 days, death, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia occurred in six, four, and three patients, respectively. Extension to ascending aorta (zone 0 landing) was the only multivariate independent predictor for perioperative mortality (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-59.90; P = .015), but not for stroke. Four retrograde dissections, two fatal, occurred during the perioperative period. At 1, 3, and 5 years, Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 89.0%, 82.8%, and 70.9%, and freedom from persistent endoleak rates were 96.1%, 92.5%, and 88.3%, respectively. Over 5-year follow-up, 34 aneurysms shrank ≥ 5 mm, and four grew. Five reinterventions were required. Two supra-aortic vessel occlusions and no late aorta-related mortalities were recorded. Conclusions Despite the perioperative mortality risk, the late outcome of endovascular arch repair presents a low rate of aorta-related deaths and reinterventions and acceptable midterm survival. Furthermore, more than one-third of the aneurysms' diameters decrease over 5 years as a measure of the long-term efficacy of treatment. Retrograde type A dissection remains a major concern in the perioperative period and careful arch approach is required.

Hypothesis: There may be sex differences in presentation and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with increased mortality rates in women. Aim of this study was to assess mortality risk after repair of ruptured AAA (rAAA) in women in the endovascular repair (EVAR) era. Methods: All patients treated in 2006-2014 for rAAA were reviewed. Characteristics at presentation and outcomes were compared between women and men. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed to identify the effect of sex adjusted for other predictors on mortality. Results: One-hundred and four patients were identified: 16.3% (17/104) were women. Forty-one procedures (39.4%) were by EVAR, with comparable rates in women (47.1%) and men (37.9%;P=0.59). On admission women and men shared similar comorbidities and presentation (shock rates 43.8% vs. 45.9%; P=1; free rupture rates 58.8% vs. 67.8%; P=0.58 ) and comparable mean aneurysm diameter (76.2mm vs.77.7mm;P=0.8) but women were older (mean age 86.2+5.8 vs. 75.5 +10.3 years; P Conclusions: Despite AAA repair is often delayed in women and applied at older age, women might not show increased perioperative mortality risks from rAAA treatment after the introduction of EVAR. Larger data are required to confirm this hypothesis.