Search

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between an estimated integral total body radiation dose delivered and phosphorylated histone H2AX protein (γ-H2AX) foci formation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of cancer patients. Material and methods: γ-H2AX formation was quantified as the mean number of foci per lymphocyte (NmeanH2AX) and the percentage of lymphocytes with ≥n foci. The integrated total body radiation dose was estimated from the dose volume histogram of patient's body corrected for the proportion of the body scanned by computed tomography for 3D treatment planning. Results: There was a strong linear correlation between the mean number of γ-H2AX foci per lymphocyte in the peripheral blood sample and integrated total body radiation dose (r = 0.83, p < 0.0001). The slope of the relationship was dependent on the site of body irradiated. In comparison to chest irradiation with a slope of 8.7 ± 0.8 foci Gy-1, the slopes for brain, upper leg and pelvic sites were significantly shallower by -4.7, -4.3, and -3.8 Gy-1, respectively (p < 0.0001), while the slope for upper abdomen irradiation was significantly larger by 9.1 ± 2.6 Gy-1 (p = 0.0007). There was a slight time effect since the start of radiotherapy on the slopes of the in vivo dose responses leading to shallower slopes (-1.5 ± 0.7 Gy-1, p = 0.03) later (≥10 day) during radiotherapy. After in vitro irradiation, lymphocytes showed 10.41 ± 0.12 foci per Gy with no evidence of inter-individual heterogeneity. Conclusions: γ-H2AX measurements in peripheral lymphocytes after local radiotherapy allow the estimation of the applied integral body dose. The site and time dependence have to be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Provides information on a study that described the clinical course of patients with angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy type lymphoma with a sequential treatment with prednisone and COPBLAM/IMVP-16. Methodology of the study; Results and discussion on the study.

UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18-60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19)., Competing Interests: L. Thurner has received travel grants from Abbvie, Janssen and EUSA-Pharm, and has indicated consultancy for Takeda, Astra-Zeneca, Merck, EUSA-pharm. DK-M has received personal fees from Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, and nonfinancial support from Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Novartis. AV has received honoraria from Roche, Amgen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and has indicated a membership of the advisory board of Roche, Amgen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb. UBK has received honoraria and advisory fees from Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Hexal, Pfizer, Astra- Zeneca, Pentixapharm, Amgen, Novartis, MSD and has received clinical study support for Celgene, Takeda, BMS, Roche, Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, MSD, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer. MN has received travel grants from Roche, Celgene and MSD and personal fees from Roche, Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Incyte and Abbvie. FG participates in advisory board of Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Merck, Takeda, MSD, Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen and Janssen. RT has received grants from Atara and Roche and travel support from Roche, Atara, Celgene, Janssen and Abbvie; he has indicated a membership of the advisory board of Atara and Abbvie and has indicated consultancy for s Atara. PdNB has indicated consultancy for Roche, Incyte and Novartis. FM has received travel grants from Roche, Takeda, Janssen and Gilead and has indicated consultancy and advisory role for Roche, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Takeda and Novartis. SS has received grants from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys and has indicated consultancy for for Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys; he has received drug/equipment supplied by entity from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys. VP has received grants from Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid), Chugai, Abbvie, Amgen, Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb. GH has received grants from Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Spectrum and MSD. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

UNFOLDER (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19) is a phase-3 trial in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis, including primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). In a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso(lo)ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic/bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized criteria from 1999, which did not include F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET) scans. Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). A subgroup of 131 patients with PMBCLs was included (median age, 34 y; 54% female, 79% elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), 20% LDH >2× upper limit of normal [ULN], and 24% extralymphatic involvement). Eighty-two (R-CHOP-21: 43 and R-CHOP-14: 39) patients were assigned to radiotherapy and 49 (R-CHOP-21: 27, R-CHOP-14: 22) to observation. The 3-year EFS was superior in radiotherapy arm (94% [95% confidence interval (CI), 89-99] versus 78% [95% CI, 66-89]; P = 0.0069), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PRs) (2% versus 10%). PR triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy (n = 5; PR: 4; complete response/unconfirmed complete response: 1). No significant differences were observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (95% [95% CI, 90-100] versus 90% [95% CI, 81-98]; P = 0.25) nor in overall survival (OS) (98% [95% CI, 94-100] versus 96% [95% CI, 90-100]; P = 0.64). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21, EFS, PFS, and OS were not different. A prognostic marker for adverse outcome was elevated LDH >2× ULN (EFS: P = 0.016; PFS: P = 0.0049; OS: P = 0.0014). With the limitation of a pre-PET-era trial, the results suggest a benefit of radiotherapy only for patients responding to R-CHOP with PR. PMBCL treated with R-CHOP have a favorable prognosis with a 3-year OS of 97%., Competing Interests: GH has received grants from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Spectrum and MSD. L Thurner has received travel grants from Abbvie, Janssen and EUSA-Pharm, and has indicated consultancy for Takeda, Astra-Zeneca, Merck, EUSA-pharm. VP has received grants from Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid), Chugai, Abbvie, Amgen, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. AV has received honoraria from Roche, Amgen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and has indicated a membership of the advisory board of Roche, Amgen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb. MN has received travel grants from Roche, Celgene, and MSD and personal fees from Roche, Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Incyte, and Abbvie. FG participates in advisory board of Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Merck, Takeda, MSD, Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, and Janssen. PdNB has indicated consultancy for Roche, Incyte, and Novartis. SS has received grants from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys and has indicated consultancy for for Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys; he has received drug/equipment supplied by entity from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Purpose: This study determined the effects of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) on radiation-induced foci formation of gamma-H2AX and Rad51 in lymphocytes., Experimental Design: Twenty-eight cancer patients were irradiated for intrathoracic, pelvic, or head and neck tumors and received simultaneous cisplatin containing chemotherapy. The effect of cisplatin on radiation-induced gamma-H2AX and Rad51 foci as a response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks was measured in lymphocytes after in vivo and in vitro radiochemotherapy. The role of DNA-dependent protein kinase and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase in gamma-H2AX signaling, the consequences of altered gamma-H2AX foci formation on double-strand break end joining, was studied., Results: Cisplatin decreased the number of induced gamma-H2AX foci in lymphocytes after in vivo or in vitro irradiation by 34% +/- 6% at days 0 to 3 after cisplatin (P < 0.0001) and remained significant until day 6. The variation in this cisplatin effect from patient to patient was larger than the retest error within the same patient (P = 0.01). The cisplatin effect was not accompanied by an inhibition of end joining of double-strand break as analyzed using gel electrophoresis of DNA under neutral conditions. Cisplatin also decreased radiation induced Rad51 foci formation in lymphocytes after stimulation of proliferation with phytohemagglutinin by 47% +/- 6% (P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Cisplatin has long-term effects on the early double-strand break response of gamma-H2AX and Rad51 foci formation after ionizing radiation. Inhibition of sensing and processing of double-strand break by gamma-H2AX and Rad51 foci formation are important mechanisms by which cisplatin can alter the radiation response.