1. Machine learning validation of the AVAS classification compared to ultrasound mapping in a multicentre study
- Author
-
Katerina Lawrie, Petr Waldauf, Peter Balaz, Radoslav Bortel, Ricardo Lacerda, Emma Aitken, Krzysztof Letachowicz, Mario D’Oria, Vittorio Di Maso, Pavel Stasko, Antonio Gomes, Joana Fontainhas, Matej Pekar, Alena Srdelic, VAVASC Study Group, and Stephen O’Neill
- Subjects
Arteriovenous access ,Classification system ,Dialysis ,Mapping ,Random forest ,Renal replacement therapy ,Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Abstract The Arteriovenous Access Stage (AVAS) classification simplifies information about suitability of vessels for vascular access (VA). It’s been previously validated in a clinical study. Here, AVAS performance was tested against multiple ultrasound mapping measurements using machine learning. A prospective multicentre international study (NCT04796558) with patient recruitment from March 2021-July 2024. Demographics, risk factors, vessels parameters, types of predicted and created VA (pVA, cVA) were collected. We modelled pVA and cVA using the Random Forest algorithm. Model performance was estimated and compared using Bayesian generalized linear models. ROC AUC with 95% credible intervals was the performance metric. 1151 patients were included. ROC AUC for pVA prediction by AVAS was 0.79 (0.77;0.82) and by mapping was 0.85 (0.83;0.88). ROC AUC for cVA prediction by AVAS was 0.71 (0.69;0.74) and by mapping was 0.8 (0.78;0.83). Using AVAS with other parameters increased the ROC AUC to 0.87 for pVA (0.84;0.89) and 0.82 (0.79;0.84) for cVA. Using mapping with other parameters increased the ROC AUC to 0.88 for pVA (0.86;0.91) and 0.85 (0.83;0.88) for cVA. Multiple mapping measurements showed higher performance at VA prediction than AVAS. However, AVAS is simpler and quicker, so may be preferable for routine clinical practice.
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF