Search

Item does not contain fulltext, PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate features predictive of treatment response for patient-tailored overactive bladder (OAB) intervention with an implantable tibial neurostimulator using patient and technical prediction factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a follow-up study based on parameter settings and patients' preferences during the pilot and extended study of the implantable tibial nerve stimulator (RENOVA™ iStim system). For this study, we compared all treatment parameters (stimulation amplitude, frequency, and pulse width) and usage data (duration of treatment) during the different follow-up visits. RESULTS: We obtained usage data from a total of 32 patients who were implanted with the system between February and September 2015. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and previous experience with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) treatment were considered as possible prediction factors for treatment success. However, only BMI was considered a statistically significant prediction factor (p = 0.042). A statistically significant increase in mean treatment level was seen in the responder group during the 3 month follow-up visit (mean: 6.7 mA, SD 0.416) as compared with the initial system activation visit (mean: 5.8 mA, SD 0.400) (p = 0.049). No other visits demonstrated statistically significant changes in both groups (responders and nonresponders) during the defined timepoints. CONCLUSION: This data underscores the need to use patient-tailored OAB treatment. BMI was found to be a negative predictive factor for treatment success. However, it was not possible to develop a specific responder model. A model predicting response to treatment could be useful for implementing shared decision making.

Contains fulltext : 225048.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access), PURPOSE: We evaluated the 3-year safety and efficacy of the BlueWind Medical RENOVA™ iStim system for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who previously underwent implantation with the RENOVA system were offered continued participation. The primary long-term study end point was to evaluate the safety profile based on incidence of serious adverse events (system and/or procedure related), which was measured by the impact and frequency of serious adverse events. The secondary end points included clinical improvement compared to baseline and quality of life improvement compared to baseline at 36 months, which was measured by 3-day voiding diary and quality of life questionnaires at certain time points. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients with overactive bladder syndrome who previously underwent implantation with the RENOVA system 20 consented to continuation in this 3-year followup study. Mean patient age was 56.1 years and 80% (16) of the study cohort was female. The overall treatment success rate was 75% at 36 months in the per protocol (16) and the intent to treat (20) analyses. In total, 73% of the patients reported improvement in health related quality of life scores above the minimal important difference of 10 points. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-year followup study using the BlueWind RENOVA iStim system for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome symptoms confirms the long-term good safety profile with no technical failures reported. Lasting treatment efficacy is mirrored by a sustained positive impact on patient quality of life.

Aims: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) therapy for overactive bladder (OAB) has proven long‐term safety and efficacy. Historically, the only commercially available SNM device was nonrechargeable requiring replacement surgery due to battery depletion. The Axonics System is the first rechargeable SNM device and is qualified to last a minimum of 15 years in the body. The study objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this rechargeable SNM system. This study reports 2‐year outcomes. Methods: A total of 51 subjects were implanted with the Axonics System in a single nonstaged procedure. Subjects had OAB, confirmed on a 3‐day voiding diary (≥8 voids/day and/or ≥2 incontinence episodes over 72 hours). Test Responders were defined as subjects that were responders at 1 month postimplant. The efficacy analysis included therapy responder rates, change in the quality of life, and subject satisfaction reported in Test Responders (n = 30) and all implanted subjects (n = 37) that completed the follow‐up visits. Adverse events (AEs) are reported in all implanted subjects. Results: At 2 years, 90% of the Test Responders continued to respond to the therapy based on voiding diary criteria. Satisfaction with therapy was reported by 93% of subjects and 86% found their charging experience acceptable. Of the urinary incontinence Test Responders, 88% continued to be responders at 2 years, and 28% were completely dry. There were no unanticipated (AEs) or serious device‐related AEs. Conclusions: The Axonics System® provides sustained clinically meaningful improvements in OAB subjects at 2 years. There were no serious device‐related AEs. Subjects reported continued satisfaction with their therapy.

Aims: The RELAX-OAB study is designed to confirm the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of the Axonics r-SNM System, a miniaturized, rechargeable SNM system approved in Europe and Canada for the treatment of bladder and bowel dysfunction. The purpose of this article is to describe study subjects’ ability to charge the rechargeable neurostimulator and to document their neurostimulator program settings and recharge interval over time. Methods: Fifty-one OAB patients were implanted in a single-stage procedure. These results represent the 3-month charging experience for 48 subjects who completed the 3-month follow-up. Recharge intervals were estimated using therapy stimulation settings and subject experience was evaluated using questionnaires. Results: Forty-seven of forty-eight (98%) subjects were able to successfully charge their device prior to follow-up within 1-month post-implant. At 3-month post-implant, 98% of subjects were able to charge prior to their follow-up visit. Average stimulation amplitude across all subjects was 1.8 mA (±1.1 mA). A total of 69% of subjects had ≥14-day recharge intervals (time between charging) and 98% of subjects had ≥7-day recharge interval. No charging related adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Study subjects were able to charge the Axonics r-SNM System and stimulation settings provided 2 weeks of therapy between recharging for most subjects. Subject satisfaction indicates that subjects are satisfied with rechargeable SNM therapy.

Aims: The primary aim of the RELAX-OAB study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of the Axonics r-SNM System, a miniaturized, rechargeable SNM system. Methods: A total of 51 OAB patients were implanted in a single-stage implant procedure. These results represent the 3-month outcomes. Subject outcomes were evaluated using 3-day bladder diaries and quality of life questionnaires. Results: A total of 31 of

Objectives: Because the term ''interstitial cystitis'' (IC) has different meanings in different centers and different parts of the world, the European Society for the Study of Interstitial Cystitis (ESSIC) has worked to create a consensus on definitions, diagnosis, and classification in an attempt to overcome the lack of international agreement on various aspects of IC. Methods: ESSIC has discussed definitions, diagnostic criteria, and disease classification in four meetings and extended e-mail correspondence. Results: It was agreed to name the disease bladder pain syndrome (BPS) BPS would be diagnosed on the basis of chronic pelvic pain, pressure, or discomfort perceived to be related to the urinary bladder accompanied by at least one other urinary symptom such as persistent urge to void or urinary frequency. Confusable diseases as the cause of the symptoms must be excluded. Classification of BPS types might be performed according to findings at cystoscopy with hydrodistention and morphologic findings in bladder biopsies. The presence of other organ symptoms as well as cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and sexual symptoms, should be addressed. Conclusions: The name IC has become misleading and is replaced by BPS. This name is in line with recent nomenclature recommendations by the European Association of Urology and is based on the axial structure of the international Association for the Study of Pain classification. To facilitate the change of the name, ESSIC agreed to include IC in the overall term (BPS/IC) during this transition period. (C) 2007 European Society for the Study of Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology Udgivelsesdato: 2008/1