1. TKA is More Durable Than UKA for Morbidly Obese Patients: A Two-Year Minimum Follow-Up Study.
- Author
-
Ellis RT, Nettrour JF, and Keeney JA
- Subjects
- Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Obesity, Morbid surgery, Osteoarthritis, Knee surgery
- Abstract
Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) indications have expanded during the past two decades to include some morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m
2 ). Few published studies have compared UKA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in this unique patient subgroup with conflicting observations., Methods: We retrospectively compared 89 mobile bearing UKA (71 patients) and 201 TKA (175 patients) performed at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.4 years). Demographic characteristics were similar for both patient cohorts. A detailed medical record review was performed to assess the frequency of component revision, revision indications, minor secondary procedures (components retained), and infections., Results: UKA was more frequently associated with clinical failure (29.2% vs 2.5%, P < .001) and component revision (15.7% vs 2.5%, P < .001), TKA was more frequently associated with extensor mechanism complications or knee manipulation (5.5% vs 0.0%, P = .02), and there was no difference in the infection rate (3.0% vs 2.2%, P = 1.0)., Conclusion: Early complications were lower following UKA but were outweighed by higher component revision rates for arthritis progression and implant failure. The study findings suggest that TKA provides a more predictable mid-term outcome for morbidly obese patients considering knee arthroplasty surgery., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF