Search

The unmet need for pediatric surgery incurs enormous health and economic consequences globally, predominantly shouldered by Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where children comprise almost half of the population. Lack of economic impact data on improving pediatric surgical infrastructure in SSA precludes informed allocation of limited resources towards the most cost-effective interventions to bolster global surgery for children. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of installing and maintaining a pediatric operating room in a hospital in Nigeria with a pre-existing pediatric surgical service by constructing a decision tree model of pediatric surgical delivery at this facility over a year, comparing scenarios before and after the installation of two dedicated pediatric operating rooms (ORs), which were funded philanthropically. Health outcomes measured in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted were informed by the hospital’s operative registry and prior literature. A societal perspective included costs incurred by the hospital system, charity, and patients’ families. Costs were annualized and reported in 2021 United States dollars ($). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the annualized OR installation were presented from charity and societal perspectives. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. We found that the installation and maintenance of two pediatric operating rooms averted 1145 DALYs and cost $155,509 annually. Annualized OR installation cost was $87,728 (56% of the overall cost). The ICER of the OR installation was $152 per DALY averted (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 147-156) from the societal perspective, and $77 per DALY averted (95% UI 75-81) from the charity perspective. These ICERs were well under the cost-effectiveness threshold of the country’s half-GDP per capita in 2020 ($1043) and remained cost-effective in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Installation of additional pediatric operating rooms in SSA with pre-existing pediatric surgical capacity is therefore very cost-effective, supporting investment in children’s global surgical infrastructure as an economically sound intervention.

Background Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for persons with current or past sexually transmitted infections (STI). Our aim is to systematically assess the association of hepatitis B virus (HBV) sero-markers for current or past infection with syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhoea, or unspecified STIs. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from 1982 to 2018 were searched using medical subject headings (MeSH) terms for HBV, STIs and epidemiology. We included studies conducted in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries or Latin America that permit the calculation of prevalence ratios (PRs) for HBV and STIs and extracted PRs and counts by HBV and STI status. Results: Of 3144 identified studies, 43 met inclusion requirements, yielding 72 PRs. We stratified outcomes by HBV sero-markers [surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), combined], STI pathogen (syphilis, gonorrhoea/chlamydia, unspecified), and STI history (current, past) resulting in 18 potential outcome groups, for which results were available for 14. For the four outcome groups related to HBsAg, PR point estimates ranged from 1.65 to 6.76. For the five outcome groups related to anti-HBc, PRs ranged from 1.30 to 1.82; and for the five outcome groups related to combined HBV markers, PRs ranged from 1.15 to 1.89). The median HBsAg prevalence among people with a current or past STI was 4.17; not all studies reported HBsAg. Study settings and populations varied. Conclusion: This review found evidence of association between HBV infection and current or past STIs.

BackgroundFemur fracture patients require significant in-hospital care. The burden incurred by caregivers of such patients amplifies the direct costs of these injuries and remains unquantified. Aim Here we aim to establish the in-hospital economic burden faced by informal caregivers of femur fracture patients. Methods 70 unique caregivers for 46 femoral shaft fracture patients were interviewed. Incurred economic burden was determined by the Human Capital Approach, using standardized income data to quantify productivity loss (in $USD). Linear regression assessed the relationship between caregiver burden and patient time-in-hospital.ResultsThe average economic burden incurred was $149, 9% of a caregiver’s annual income and positively correlated with patient time in hospital (p

Intensive psychotherapy assisted with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA-AT) was shown in Phase 3 clinical trials to substantially reduce post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms compared to psychotherapy with placebo. This study estimates potential costs, health benefits, and net savings of expanding access to MDMA-AT to eligible US patients with chronic and severe PTSD.Using a decision-analytic model, we compared the costs, deaths averted, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained of three, 10-year MDMA-AT coverage targets (25%, 50%, and 75%) compared to providing standard of care to the same number of eligible patients with chronic and severe PTSD. We used a payer perspective and discounted costs (in US$) and QALYs to 2020. We conducted one-way, scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and calculated the net monetary value of MDMA-AT using a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained.Expanding access to MDMA-AT to 25-75% of eligible patients is projected to avert 43,618-106,932 deaths and gain 3.3-8.2 million QALYs. All three treatment targets are dominant or cost-saving compared to standard of care. Our sensitivity analyses found that accounting for parameter uncertainty and changes in various assumptions did not alter the main finding-MDMA-AT is dominant compared to standard of care.Expanding access to MDMA-AT to patients with chronic and severe PTSD will provide substantial health and financial benefits. The precise magnitude is uncertain and will depend on the number of eligible patients and other inputs.

Background Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in health care facilities poses a challenge against pandemic control. Health care workers (HCWs) have frequent and high-risk interactions with COVID-19 patients. We undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine optimal testing strategies for screening HCWs to inform strategic decision-making in health care settings. Methods We modeled the number of new infections, quality-adjusted life years lost, and net costs related to six testing strategies including no test. We applied our model to four strata of HCWs, defined by the presence and timing of symptoms. We conducted sensitivity analyses to account for uncertainty in inputs. Results When screening recently symptomatic HCWs, conducting only a PCR test is preferable; it saves costs and improves health outcomes in the first week post-symptom onset, and costs $83,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained in the second week post-symptom onset. When screening HCWs in the late clinical disease stage, none of the testing approaches is cost-effective and thus no testing is preferable, yielding $11 and 0.003 new infections per 10 HCWs. For screening asymptomatic HCWs, antigen testing is preferable to PCR testing due to its lower cost. Conclusions Both PCR and antigen testing are beneficial strategies to identify infected HCWs and reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in health care settings. IgG tests’ value depends on test timing and immunity characteristics, however it is not cost-effective in a low prevalence setting. As the context of the pandemic evolves, our study provides insight to health-care decision makers to keep the health care workforce safe and transmissions low.

Background Surgical disease increasingly contributes to global mortality and morbidity. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery found that global cost-effectiveness data are lacking for a wide range of essential surgical procedures. This study helps to address this gap by defining the cost-effectiveness of exploratory laparotomies in a regional referral hospital in Uganda. Materials and methods A time-and-motion analysis was utilized to calculate operating theater personnel costs per case. Ward personnel, administrative, medication, and supply costs were recorded and calculated using a microcosting approach. The cost in 2018 US Dollars (USD, $) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted was calculated based on age-specific life expectancies for otherwise fatal cases. Results Data for 103 surgical patients requiring exploratory laparotomy at the Soroti Regional Referral Hospital were collected over 8 mo. The most common cause for laparotomy was small bowel obstruction (32% of total cases). The average cost per patient was $75.50. The postoperative mortality was 11.7%, and 7.8% of patients had complications. The average number of DALYs averted per patient was 18.51. The cost in USD per DALY averted was $4.08. Conclusions This investigation provides evidence that exploratory laparotomy is cost-effective compared with other public health interventions. Relative cost-effectiveness includes a comparison with bed nets for malaria prevention ($6.48-22.04/DALY averted), tuberculosis, tetanus, measles, and polio vaccines ($12.96-25.93/DALY averted), and HIV treatment with multidrug antiretroviral therapy ($453.74-648.20/DALY averted). Given that the total burden of surgically treatable conditions in DALYs is more than that of malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV combined, our findings strengthen the argument for greater investment in primary surgical capacity in low- and middle-income countries.

The past decade has seen a growing emphasis on the production of high-quality costing data to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of global health interventions. The need for such data is especially important for decision making and priority setting across HIV services from prevention and testing to treatment and care. To help address this critical need, the Global Health Cost Consortium was created in 2016, in part to conduct a systematic search and screening of the costing literature for HIV and TB interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The purpose of this portion of the remit was to compile, standardise, and make publicly available published cost data (peer-reviewed and gray) for public use. We limit our analysis to a review of the quantity and characteristics of published cost data from HIV interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. First, we document the production of cost data over 25 years, including density over time, geography, publication venue, authorship and type of intervention. Second, we explore key methods and reporting for characteristics including urbanicity, platform type, ownership and scale. Although the volume of HIV costing data has increased substantially on the continent, cost reporting is lacking across several dimensions. We find a dearth of cost estimates from HIV interventions in west Africa, as well as inconsistent reporting of key dimensions of cost including platform type, ownership and urbanicity. Further, we find clear evidence of a need for renewed focus on the consistent reporting of scale by authors of costing and cost-effectiveness analyses.Keywords: costing, HIV/AIDS, LMIC, cost-effectiveness, systematic review

Consistently defined, accurate, and easily accessible cost data are a valuable resource to inform efficiency analyses, budget preparation, and sustainability planning in global health. The Global Health Cost Consortium (GHCC) designed the Unit Cost Study Repository (UCSR) to be a resource for standardised HIV and TB intervention cost data displayed by key characteristics such as intervention type, country, and target population. To develop the UCSR, the GHCC defined a typology of interventions for each disease; aligned interventions according to the standardised principles, methods, and cost and activity categories from the GHCC Reference Case for Estimating the Costs of Global Health Services and Interventions; completed a systematic literature review; conducted extensive data extraction; performed quality assurance; grappled with complex methodological issues such as the proper approach to the inflation and conversion of costs; developed and implemented a study quality rating system; and designed a web-based user interface that flexibly displays large amounts of data in a user-friendly way. Key lessons learned from the extraction process include the importance of assessing the multiple uses of extracted data; the critical role of standardising definitions (particularly units of measurement); using appropriate classifications of interventions and components of costs; the efficiency derived from programming data checks; and the necessity of extraction quality monitoring by senior analysts. For the web interface, lessons were: understanding the target audiences, including consulting them regarding critical characteristics; designing the display of data in “levels”; and incorporating alert and unique trait descriptions to further clarify differences in the data.Keywords: tuberculosis, database, reference case, systematic review

Objective: To estimate facility-level average cost for ART services and explore unit cost variations using pooled facility-level cost estimates from four HIV empirical cost studies conducted in five African countries .Methods: Through a literature search we identified studies reporting facility-level costs for ART programmes. We requested the underlying data and standardised the disparate data sources to make them comparable. Subsequently, we estimated the annual cost per patient served and assessed the cost variation among facilities and other service delivery characteristics using descriptive statistics and meta-analysis. All costs were converted to 2017 US dollars ($).Results: We obtained and standardised data from four studies across five African countries and 139 facilities. The weighted average cost per patient on ART was $251 (95% CI: 193–308). On average, 46% of the mean unit cost correspond to antiretroviral (ARVs) costs, 31% to personnel costs, 20% other recurrent costs, and 2% to capital costs. We observed a lot of variation in unit cost and scale levels between countries. We also observed a negative relationship between ART unit cost and the number of patients served in a year.Conclusion: Our approach allowed us to explore unit cost variation across contexts by pooling ART costs from multiple sources. Our research provides an example of how to estimate costs based on heterogeneous sources reconciling methodological differences across studies and contributes by giving an example on how to estimate costs based on heterogeneous sources of data. Also, our study provides additional information on costs for funders, policy-makers, and decision-makers in the process of designing or scaling-up HIV interventions.Keywords: HIV, treatment, efficiency, cost variatio

Background The US National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) emphasizes the use of technology to facilitate coordination of comprehensive care for people with HIV. We examined cost-effectiveness from the health system perspective of 6 health information technology (HIT) interventions implemented during 2008 to 2012 in a Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) Program demonstration project. Methods/findings HIT interventions were implemented at 6 sites: Bronx, New York; Durham, North Carolina; Long Beach, California; New Orleans, Louisiana; New York, New York (2 sites); and Paterson, New Jersey. These interventions included: (1) use of HIV surveillance data to identify out-of-care individuals; (2) extension of access to electronic health records (EHRs) to support service providers; (3) use of electronic laboratory ordering and prescribing; and (4) development of a patient portal. We employed standard microcosting techniques to estimate costs (in 2018 US dollars) associated with intervention implementation. Data from a sample of electronic patient records from each demonstration site were analyzed to compare prescription of antiretroviral therapy (ART), CD4 cell counts, and suppression of viral load, before and after implementation of interventions. Markov models were used to estimate additional healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years saved as a result of each intervention. Overall, demonstration site interventions cost $3,913,313 (range = $287,682 to $998,201) among 3,110 individuals (range = 258 to 1,181) over 3 years. Changes in the proportion of patients prescribed ART ranged from a decrease from 87.0% to 72.7% at Site 4 to an increase from 74.6% to 94.2% at Site 6; changes in the proportion of patients with 0 to 200 CD4 cells/mm3 ranged from a decrease from 20.2% to 11.0% in Site 6 to an increase from 16.7% to 30.2% in Site 2; and changes in the proportion of patients with undetectable viral load ranged from a decrease from 84.6% to 46.0% in Site 1 to an increase from 67.0% to 69.9% in Site 5. Four of the 6 interventions—including use of HIV surveillance data to identify out-of-care individuals, use of electronic laboratory ordering and prescribing, and development of a patient portal—were not only cost-effective but also cost saving ($6.87 to $14.91 saved per dollar invested). In contrast, the 2 interventions that extended access to EHRs to support service providers were not effective and, therefore, not cost-effective. Most interventions remained either cost-saving or not cost-effective under all sensitivity analysis scenarios. The intervention that used HIV surveillance data to identify out-of-care individuals was no longer cost-saving when the effect of HIV on an individual’s health status was reduced and when the natural progression of HIV was increased. The results of this study are limited in that we did not have contemporaneous controls for each intervention; thus, we are only able to assess sites against themselves at baseline and not against standard of care during the same time period. Conclusions These results provide additional support for the use of HIT as a tool to enhance rapid and effective treatment of HIV to achieve sustained viral suppression. HIT has the potential to increase utilization of services, improve health outcomes, and reduce subsequent transmission of HIV., Starley Shade and co-workers assess cost-effectiveness of information technology interventions in HIV care programs in the United States., Author summary Why was this study done? The Health Resources and Services Administration’s Special Projects of National Significance Program (HRSA/SPNS) funded a 4-year initiative (2007 to 2011) in 6 demonstration sites to enhance and evaluate existing health information electronic network systems for people living with HIV (PLHIV) in underserved communities. Each of the 6 demonstration sites implemented one or more health information technology (HIT) interventions to facilitate comprehensive care and enhance engagement in HIV medical services. These interventions included: (1) use of HIV surveillance data to identify out-of-care individuals; (2) extension of access to electronic health records to support service providers; (3) use of electronic laboratory ordering and prescribing; and (4) development of a patient portal. This study estimates the total costs, cost-effectiveness, and potential cost-savings of these 6 interventions. What did researchers do and find? We used information on the cost of each intervention and the health status of PLHIV in each setting before and after implementation of each intervention to estimate: (1) changes in the cost of care and other services for PLHIV in each setting; and (2) changes in expected health status (measured as quality-adjusted life-years or QALYs) among PLHIV in each setting. We then used this information to estimate additional healthcare costs and QALYs gained for each intervention. Four of the interventions were associated with lower healthcare costs and better health outcomes (QALYs gained) for PLHIV in each setting. These interventions saved between $6.87 and $14.91 per dollar invested. Two interventions that provided access to medical record information to support service providers were not associated with improved health outcomes for PLHIV in these settings. These interventions were not effective or cost-effective. What do these findings mean? These results show that HIT interventions that facilitate changes in patient or provider behavior have the potential to improve the health status of PLHIV and reduce healthcare costs. HIT interventions that only provided additional information to support service providers were less successful. This study did not include a contemporaneous comparison group. Therefore, we do not know the degree to which improvements in the health status of PLHIV in these settings were due to changes in the quality of care for PLHIV over the life of the interventions.

We systematically reviewed the literature to assess the effectiveness of school-based programs to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STI) among adolescents in the USA. We searched six databases including PubMed for studies published through May 2017. Eligible studies included youth ages 10-19 years and assessed any school-based programs in the USA that reported changes in HIV/STI incidence or testing. We used Cochrane tool to assess the risk of bias and GRADE to determine the evidence quality for each outcome. Three RCTs and six non-RCTs, describing seven interventions, met study inclusion criteria. No study reported changes in HIV incidence or prevalence. One comprehensive intervention, assessed in a non-RCT and delivered to pre-teens, reduced STI incidence into adulthood (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.56). A non-RCT examining chlamydia and gonorrhea incidence before and after a condom availability program found a significant effect at the city level among young men 3 years later (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.80). The remaining four interventions found no effect. The effect on STI prevalence was also not significant (pooled RR 0.83 from two non-RCTs, RR 0.70 from one RCT). Only one non-RCT showed an increase in HIV testing (RR 3.19, 95% CI 1.24-8.24). The quality of evidence for all outcomes was very low. Studies, including the RCTs, were of low methodological quality and had mixed findings, thus offering no persuasive evidence for the effectiveness of school-based programs. The most effective intervention spanned 6 years, was a social development-based intervention with multiple components, rather than a sex education program, and started in first grade.

BackgroundChronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a disabling condition that generates considerable morbidity, mortality, and both medical and indirect social costs. Treatment options are limited. A novel therapy using 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has shown efficacy in six phase 2 trials. Its cost-effectiveness is unknown.Methods and findingsTo assess the cost-effectiveness of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy (MAP) from the health care payer's perspective, we constructed a decision-analytic Markov model to portray the costs and health benefits of treating patients with chronic, severe, or extreme, treatment-resistant PTSD with MAP. In six double-blind phase 2 trials, MAP consisted of a mean of 2.5 90-minute trauma-focused psychotherapy sessions before two 8-hour sessions with MDMA (mean dose of 125 mg), followed by a mean of 3.5 integration sessions for each active session. The control group received an inactive placebo or 25-40 mg. of MDMA, and otherwise followed the same regimen. Our model calculates net medical costs, mortality, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Efficacy was based on the pooled results of six randomized controlled phase 2 trials with 105 subjects; and a four-year follow-up of 19 subjects. Other inputs were based on published literature and on assumptions when data were unavailable. We modeled results over a 30-year analytic horizon and conducted extensive sensitivity analyses. Our model calculates expected medical costs, mortality, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Future costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% per year. For 1,000 individuals, MAP generates discounted net savings of $103.2 million over 30 years while accruing 5,553 discounted QALYs, compared to continued standard of care. MAP breaks even on cost at 3.1 years while delivering 918 QALYs. Making the conservative assumption that benefits cease after one year, MAP would accrue net costs of $7.6 million while generating 288 QALYS, or $26,427 per QALY gained.ConclusionMAP provided to patients with severe or extreme, chronic PTSD appears to be cost-saving while delivering substantial clinical benefit. Third-party payers are likely to save money within three years by covering this form of therapy.

Background: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in health care facilities poses a challenge against pandemic control. Health care workers (HCWs) have frequent and high-risk interactions with COVID-19 patients. We undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine optimal testing strategies for screening HCWs to inform strategic decision-making in health care settings. Methods: We modeled the number of new infections, quality-adjusted life years lost, and net costs related to five testing strategies: (1) no tests, (2) only PCR test, (3) only IgG test, (4) conditional PCR test if IgG test is positive, and (5) concurrent PCR and IgG tests. We applied our model to four strata of HCWs, defined by the presence and timing of clinical presentation. We conducted sensitivity analyses to account for uncertainty in inputs. Findings: When screening asymptomatic and recently symptomatic HCWs, conducting only a PCR test offers the best health outcomes and fewest costs; it is associated with 28-144 fewer new infections over two weeks per 100 HCWs screened compared to no test, and saves between $810-$4,600 per test. When screening HCWs in the late clinical disease stage, PCR testing is associated with 49·5 additional infections per 100 HCWs screened compared to no screening. Depending on the degree of immunity conferred, IgG testing may avoid up to 3·7 additional infections. Interpretation: PCR testing is a beneficial strategy to identify infected HCWs and reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in health care settings. Utility of IgG testing depends on the time when the test is administered and immunity characteristics. More evidence is needed on the latter to better inform policy decisions. Funding: None received. Declaration of Interests: Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Femoral shaft fractures are one of the most common injuries seen by surgeons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Surgical repair in LMICs is often dismissed as not being cost-effective or unsafe, though little evidence exists to support this notion. Therefore, the goal of this study is to determine the cost of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in Tanzania. We used micro-costing methods to estimate the fixed and variable costs of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Variable costs assessed included medical personnel costs, ward personnel costs, implants, medications, and single-use supplies. Fixed costs included costs for surgical instruments and administrative and ancillary staff. 46 adult femoral shaft fracture patients admitted to Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute between June and September 2014 were enrolled and treated with intramedullary fixation. The total cost per patient was $530.87 (SD $129.99). The mean variable cost per patient was $419.87 (SD $129.99), the largest portion coming from ward personnel $144.47 (SD $123.30), followed by implant $134.10 (SD $15.00) medical personnel $106.86 (SD $28.18), and medications/supplies $30.05 (SD $12.28). The mean fixed cost per patient was $111.00, consisting of support staff, $103.50, and surgical instruments, $7.50. Our study provides empirical information on the variable and fixed costs of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in LMICs. Importantly, the lack of surgical capacity was the primary driver of the largest cost for this procedure, preoperative ward personnel time. Our results provide the cost data for a formal cost-effectiveness analysis on this intervention.

Kahn, Mwai, Kazi, and Marseille explain how economics brings together estimates of disease burden and the costs needed to reduce that burden so that policymakers can choose which intervention strategies will maximize health gains with available resources. The authors introduce and illustrate key health economics methods, including econometrics, cost-benefit analysis, micro-costing, behavioural economics, work force projections, financing, and discrete choice experimentation. They describe methods for calculating Disability-Adjusted Life Years, a standard summary metric that combines health losses due to mortality and morbidity, thus permitting comparison and summation across diseases and populations. The authors explain cost-effectiveness analysis, which compares health intervention costs with reductions in burden of disease, yielding the widely used Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio, and discuss the ethical underpinnings of cost-effectiveness.

Objectives Pneumonia is the largest infectious cause of death in children under 5 years globally, and limited resource settings bear an overwhelming proportion of this disease burden. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP), an accepted supportive therapy, is often thought of as cost-prohibitive in these settings. We hypothesise that bCPAP is a cost-effective intervention in a limited resource setting and this study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of bCPAP, using Malawi as an example. Design Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting District and central hospitals in Malawi. Participants Children aged 1 month–5 years with severe pneumonia, as defined by WHO criteria. Interventions Using a decision tree analysis, we compared standard of care (including low-flow oxygen and antibiotics) to standard of care plus bCPAP. Primary and secondary outcome measures For each treatment arm, we determined the costs, clinical outcomes and averted disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). We assigned input values from a review of the literature, including applicable clinical trials, and calculated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results In the base case analysis, the cost of bCPAP per patient was $15 per day and $41 per hospitalisation, with an incremental net cost of $64 per pneumonia episode. bCPAP averts 5.0 DALYs per child treated, with an ICER of $12.88 per DALY averted compared with standard of care. In one-way sensitivity analyses, the most influential uncertainties were case fatality rates (ICER range $9–32 per DALY averted). In a multi-way sensitivity analysis, the median ICER was $12.97 per DALY averted (90% CI, $12.77 to $12.99). Conclusion bCPAP is a cost-effective intervention for severe paediatric pneumonia in Malawi. These results may be used to inform policy decisions, including support for widespread use of bCPAP in similar settings.

Many countries use the cost-effectiveness thresholds recommended by the World Health Organization's Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective project (WHO-CHOICE) when evaluating health interventions. This project sets the threshold for cost-effectiveness as the cost of the intervention per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted less than three times the country's annual gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Highly cost-effective interventions are defined as meeting a threshold per DALY averted of once the annual GDP per capita. We argue that reliance on these thresholds reduces the value of cost-effectiveness analyses and makes such analyses too blunt to be useful for most decision-making in the field of public health. Use of these thresholds has little theoretical justification, skirts the difficult but necessary ranking of the relative values of locally-applicable interventions and omits any consideration of what is truly affordable. The WHO-CHOICE thresholds set such a low bar for cost-effectiveness that very few interventions with evidence of efficacy can be ruled out. The thresholds have little value in assessing the trade-offs that decision-makers must confront. We present alternative approaches for applying cost-effectiveness criteria to choices in the allocation of health-care resources.De nombreux pays utilisent les seuils de rentabilité recommandés par le projet WHO-CHOICE (Choosing Interventions that are Cost–Effective; en français: « choisir des interventions efficaces au meilleur coût ») de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé lors de l'évaluation des interventions sanitaires. Ce projet définit le seuil de rentabilité comme étant égal au coût de l'intervention par espérance de vie corrigée de l'incapacité (EVCI) évitée moins trois fois le produit intérieur brut (PIB) annuel du pays par habitant. Les interventions très rentables sont définies comme celles satisfaisant un seuil par EVCI évitée égal à une fois le PIB annuel par habitant. Nous soutenons que le recours à ces seuils réduit la valeur des analyses de rentabilité et qu'il rend ces analyses trop grossières pour qu'elles soient utiles pour la prise de décision dans le domaine de la santé publique. L'utilisation de ces seuils est peu justifiée théoriquement, contourne le classement difficile mais nécessaire des valeurs relatives des interventions applicables localement et néglige l'examen de ce qui vraiment abordable. Les seuils de WHO-CHOICE fixent une limite de rentabilité si basse que très peu d'interventions présentant des preuves d'efficacité peuvent être exclues. Les seuils ont peu de valeur pour évaluer les compromis auxquels les décideurs doivent faire face. Nous présentons des approches alternatives pour l'application des critères de rentabilité aux choix liés à l'allocation des ressources de soins de santé.Numerosos países utilizan los umbrales de rentabilidad recomendados por el proyecto Elección de intervenciones rentables de la Organización Mundial de la Salud – (WHO-CHOICE) al evaluar las intervenciones de salud. Este proyecto establece el umbral de rentabilidad como el coste de la intervención por año de vida ajustado por discapacidad (AVAD) evitado, que es tres veces inferior al producto interno bruto anual del país (PIB) per cápita. Las intervenciones de rentabilidad elevada se definen como el cumplimiento de un umbral por AVAD evitado equivalente a una vez el PIB per cápita anual. Se arguye que la dependencia de estos umbrales reduce el valor de los análisis de rentabilidad y hace que dichos análisis sean demasiado contundentes para que resulten útiles en la mayoría de las decisiones en el campo de la salud pública. El uso de estos umbrales tiene una justificación teórica insuficiente, elude la clasificación difícil pero necesaria de los valores relativos de las intervenciones aplicables a nivel local y omite cualquier consideración de lo que es realmente asequible. Los umbrales de WHO-CHOICE establecen un límite de rentabilidad tan bajo que son muy pocas las intervenciones de eficacia probada que pueden descartarse. Los umbrales tienen poco valor a la hora de evaluar las ventajas y desventajas a las que los responsables de la toma de decisiones deben enfrentarse. Presentamos enfoques alternativos para la aplicación de los criterios de rentabilidad en las decisiones acerca de la asignación de los recursos de salud.تستخدم العديد من البلدان عتبات المردودية التي أوصى بها مشروع "اختيار التدخلات عالية المردود التابع لمنظمة الصحة العالمية" (WHO-CHOICE) عند تقدير التدخلات في مجال الصحة. ويحدد هذا المشروع عتبة المردودية على أنها تكلفة التدخل لكل سنة تم تفاديها من سنوات العمر المصححة باحتساب مدد العجز الأقل من ثلاث أضعاف الناتج الإجمالي المحلي السنوي للبلد لكل فرد. ويتم تعريف التدخلات عالية المردود على أنها تلبية العتبة لكل سنة تم تفاديها من سنوات العمر المصححة باحتساب مدد العجز لمرة واحدة من الناتج الإجمالي المحلي السنوي لكل فرد. ونرى أن الاعتماد على هذه العتبات يقلل من قيمة تحليلات المردودية ويجعل مثل هذه التحليلات عديمة الفائدة في معظم حالات اتخاذ القرار في مجال الصحة العمومية. ويستند استخدام هذه العتبات إلى مبرر نظري ضعيف ويتجنب الترتيب الصعب والضروري للقيم النسبية للتدخلات السارية على الصعيد المحلي ويغفل النظر عن النهج معقولة التكلفة بالفعل. وتحدد عتبات WHO-CHOICE عتبة دنيا للمردودية يمكن على أساسها استبعاد بضعة تدخلات ذات بيِّنات على الكفاءة. وتكون للعتبات قيمة قليلة في تقييم عمليات الموازنة التي يتعين على متخذي القرار مواجهتها. ونقدم نهجاً بديلة لتطبيق معايير المردودية على الاختيارات في تخصيص موارد الرعاية الصحية.许多国家在评估卫生干预措施时使用世界卫生组织WHO-CHOICE（选择具有成本效益的干预措施项目）推荐的成本效益阈值。该项目将成本效益阈值设定为避免单位残疾调整生命年（DALY）的干预措施的成本低于国家年度人均国内生产总值（GDP）三倍。将极具成本效益的干预措施定义为达到以单倍年度人均国内生产总值避免的单位DALY的成本的阈值。我们主张，对这些阈值的依赖减少了成本效益分析的价值，使这种分析太过生硬，以致于对大多数公共卫生领域的决策来说用处不大。使用这些阈值几乎没有理论依据，绕开了做起来很难但又不得不去做的对当地适用干预措施相对价值排名，忽略了对任何有关什么才真正实惠的考虑。WHO-CHOICE阈值为成本效益设定的门槛这样低，以至于为数不多具有效力证据的干预措施也会被排除在外。阈值在评估决策者必须面对的权衡上价值微乎其微。我们提出了医疗资源分配方面的选择上成本效益标准应用的替代方法。.Во многих странах используются пороговые значения эффективности затрат, рекомендованные рабочей программой ВОЗ «Выбор мероприятий, эффективных с точки зрения затрат» (WHO-CHOICE), при оценке проводимых мероприятий в области здравоохранения. Этот проект устанавливает пороговое значение эффективности затрат как стоимость мероприятия на количество предотвращенных лет жизни, утраченных в результате инвалидности (ДАЛИ), не превышающая три годовых валовых внутренних продукта (ВВП) страны на душу населения. При этом высокоэффективными мероприятиями считаются те, которые соответствуют пороговому значению на предотвращенное ДАЛИ в размере, не превышающем одного годового ВВП на душу населения. Мы утверждаем, что использование этих пороговых значений снижает стоимость анализа эффективности затрат и делает подобный анализ поверхностным для большинства случаев принятия решений в области общественного здравоохранения. Для использования этих пороговых значений не имеется достаточных теоретических обоснований, они упускают из виду трудоемкое, но необходимое ранжирование относительной стоимости применяемых локально мероприятий, а также не рассматривают доступность подобных мероприятий. Программой WHO-CHOICE устанавливается такая низкая планка для эффективности затрат, что лишь немногие мероприятия с признаками эффективности могут быть исключены. Эти пороговые значения не имеют большой ценности в процессе принятия компромиссных решений, с которыми приходится иметь дело отвественным лицам. Мы предлагаем альтернативные подходы для применения критериев эффективности затрат при выборе предпочтительных вариантов в процессе распределения ресурсов здравоохранения.

Background: Globally, there is a large unmet need for family planning in the postpartum period: 90% of women in this group want family planning for birth spacing or to avoid unintended pregnancies and stop child bearing once desired family size has been reached. In total 76% of Rwandan women want family planning postpartum, yet a 26% unmet need remains. Currently, the four most commonly used postpartum family planning methods in Rwanda are injections, subdermal implants, pills, and condoms. The economic and health benefit impact of the current method selection has not yet been evaluated. Methods: To evaluate the impact of current usage rates and method types, this cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) compared the most frequently used family planning methods in Rwanda broken into two categories, longer-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (injections and subdermal implants) and shorter-acting reversible contraceptives (non-LARC) (pills and condoms). A time horizon of 24 months was used to reflect the World Health Organization suggested two-year spacing from birth until the next pregnancy, and was conducted from a health systems perspective. This CEA compared two service package options to provide a comparator for the two method types, thus enabling insights to differences between the two. Results: For women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Rwanda, including LARC postpartum family planning methods in the options, saves $18.73 per pregnancy averted, compared to family planning options that offer non-LARC methods exclusively. Conclusion: There is an opportunity to avert unplanned pregnancies associated with increased utilization of LARC methods. The full benefits of LARC are not yet realized in Rwanda. Under the conditions presented in this study, a service package that includes LARC has the potential to be cost-saving compared with one non-LARC methods. Effective health messaging of LARC use for the postpartum population could both enhance health and reduce costs.

Background: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) provides dramatic health benefits for HIV-infected individuals in Africa, and widespread implementation of HAART is proceeding rapidly. Little is known about the cost and cost effectiveness of HAART programmes. Objective: To determine the incremental cost effectiveness of a home-based HAART programme in rural Uganda. Methods: A computer-based, deterministic cost-effectiveness model was used to assess a broad range of economic inputs and health outcomes. From the societal perspective, the cost effectiveness of HAART and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was compared with cotrimoxazole alone, and with the period before either intervention. Data for 24 months were derived from a trial of home-based HAART in 1045 patients in the Tororo District in eastern Uganda. Costs and outcomes were projected out to 15 years. All costs are in year 2004 values. The main outcome measures were HAART programme costs, health benefits accruing to HAART recipients, averted HIV infections in adults and children and the resulting effects on medical care costs. The first-line HAART regimen consisted of standard doses of stavudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine or, for patients with active tuberculosis, efavirenz. Second-line therapy consisted of tenofovir, didanosine and lopinavir/ritonavir. For children, first-line HAART consisted of zidovudine, lamivudine and nevirapine syrup; second-line therapy was stavudine, didanosine and lopinavir/ritonavir. Results: The HAART programme, standardized for 1000 patients, cost an incremental $US1.39 million in its first 2 years. Compared with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis alone, the programme reduced mortality by 87%, and averted 6861 incremental disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Benefits were accrued from reduced mortality in HIV-infected adults (67.5% of all benefits), prevention of death in HIV-negative children (20.7%), averted HIV infections in adults (9.1%) and children (1.0%), and improved health status (1.7%). The net programme cost, including the medical cost implications of these health benefits, was $US4.10 million. The net cost per DALY averted was $US597 compared with cotrimoxazole alone. Many HIV interventions have a cost-effectiveness ratio in the range of $US1-150 per DALY averted. Conclusions: This study suggests that a home-based HAART programme in rural Africa may be more cost effective than most previous estimates for facility-based HAART programmes, but remains less cost effective than many HIV prevention and care interventions, including cotrimoxazole prophylaxis.

Background: A rapid scaling up of HIV interventions in India is anticipated, but systematic information on how costs of HIV interventions change over time and programme scale is not available to inform planning. Methods: We studied the changes in unit costs of two major interventions, voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) and sex worker programmes in the south Indian state of Andhra Pradesh between 2002-2003 and 2005-2006 fiscal years. Economic costs (from the provider perspective) and output data from 17 publicly funded VCT centers and 14 sex worker programmes were collected using standardized methods. We calculated unit costs for each programme in each period and explored possible reasons for the changes seen. Results: In 2005-2006, the VCT centers served 66445 clients and the sex worker programmes served 32 550. The unit cost of providing VCT dropped over 3 years by half to Indian Rupees (INR) 147.5 (US$3.33) mainly because the number of clients doubled. There was no decrease in the average time spent counseling each client. The unit cost of providing services to sex workers increased 2.4 times over 3 years to INR 1401 (US$31.6) as a result of increases in male condom distribution, staff salaries and training, and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, all suggesting improved services. Conclusion: The unit cost of these two interventions changed dramatically over a 3-year period, but in opposite directions. The current unit cost for VCT in Andhra Pradesh is much lower than the estimated global average for low-income settings. These local longitudinal cost data are useful to inform the currently planned scaling up of HIV interventions in India.

OBJECTIVE. We undertook a decision analysis to evaluate the economic and health effects and incremental cost-effectiveness of using targeted tuberculin skin testing, compared with universal screening or no screening, before kindergarten.METHODS. We constructed a decision tree to determine the costs and clinical outcomes of using targeted testing compared with universal screening or no screening. Baseline estimates for input parameters were taken from the medical literature and from California health jurisdiction data. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine plausible ranges of associated outcomes and costs. We surveyed California health jurisdictions to determine the prevalence of mandatory universal tuberculin skin testing.RESULTS. In our base-case scenario, the cost to prevent an additional case of tuberculosis by using targeted testing, compared with no screening, was $524897. The cost to prevent an additional case by using universal screening, compared with targeted testing, was $671398. The incremental cost of preventing a case through screening remained above $100000 unless the prevalence of tuberculin skin testing positivity increased to >10%. More than 51% of children entering kindergarten in California live where tuberculin skin testing is mandatory.CONCLUSIONS. The cost to prevent a case of tuberculosis by using either universal screening or targeted testing of kindergarteners is high. If targeted testing replaced universal tuberculin skin testing in California, then $1.27 million savings per year would be generated for more cost-effective strategies to prevent tuberculosis. Improving the positive predictive value of the risk factor tool or applying it to groups with higher prevalence of latent tuberculosis would make its use more cost-effective. Universal tuberculin skin testing should be discontinued, and targeted testing should be considered only when the prevalence of risk factor positivity and the prevalence of tuberculin skin testing positivity among risk factor–positive individuals are high enough to meet acceptable thresholds for cost-effectiveness.

Background: Daily prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) by persons with HIV reduces morbidity and mortality and is recommended by Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS and World Health Organization (WHO), but there are limited published cost-effectiveness data for this intervention. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for persons living with HIV in rural Uganda. Methods: We modeled the cost-effectiveness of daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis based on clinical results and operational data from a prospective cohort study of home-based care delivery to adults and children with HIV in rural Uganda who were older than the age of 5 years. Main outcome measures were net program cost and disabilityadjusted life-years (DALYs) gained. We examined the provision of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for (A) all HIV-infected individuals regardless of immunologic or clinical criteria; (B) those with WHO stage 2 or more advanced disease; (C) those with CD4 cell counts ,500 cells/mL; and (D) those meeting criteria B or C, the current WHO recommendation. We calculated the costs and effectiveness of these 4 screening algorithms compared with no cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We performed univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses. Results: Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for all HIV-infected individuals (algorithm A) produced 7.3 life-years and 7.55 DALYs per 100 persons over 1 year compared with no prophylaxis. Using this screening algorithm, the intervention saved $2.50 per person-year. The program costs and the DALYs gained by algorithms A, B, and D were more favorable than those for algorithm C. Among algorithms A, B, and D, strategies using screening algorithms for WHO stage or CD4 cell counts were more costly and marginally less effective than providing cotrimoxazole prophylaxis to all HIV-infected individuals. Conclusions: Daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for HIV-infected individuals is highly cost-effective in rural Uganda. The use of screening algorithms to identify individuals with advanced HIV disease may result in higher program costs and less favorable costeffectiveness.

Background : Co-infection with malaria and other infectious diseases has been shown to increase viral load and accelerate HIV disease progression. A recent study in Kenya demonstrated that providing long-lasting insecticide-treated bednets (LLIN) and water filters (WF) to HIV-positive adults with CD4 >350 cells/mm 3 significantly reduced HIV progression. Design : We conducted a cost analysis to estimate the potential net financial savings gained by delaying HIV progression and increasing the time to antiretroviral therapy (ART) eligibility through delivering LLIN and WF to 10% of HIV-positive adults with CD4 >350 cells/mm 3 in Kenya. Results : Given a 3-year duration of intervention benefit, intervention unit cost of US$32 and patient-year ART cost of US$757 (2011 US$), over the lifetime of ART patients, in Kenya, we estimated the intervention could yield a return on investment (ROI) of 11 (95% uncertainty range [UR]: 5–23), based on a cost of about US$2 million and savings in ART costs of about US$26 million (95% UR: 8–50) (discounted at 3%). Our findings were subjected to a number of sensitivity analyses. Of note, deferral of time to ART eligibility could potentially result in 3,000 new HIV infections not averted by ART and thus decrease ART cost savings to US$14 million, decreasing the ROI to 6. Conclusions : Provision of LLIN and WF could be a cost-saving and practical method to defer time to ART eligibility in the context of highly resource-constrained environments experiencing donor fatigue for HIV/AIDS programs. Keywords : cost savings; insecticide-treated bednets; water filtration; HIV disease progression; antiretroviral therapy; malaria; diarrhea; Kenya; sub-Saharan Africa (Published: 10 June 2015) Citation: Glob Health Action 2015, 8 : 27695 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27695 Supplementary Material: To access the supplementary material for this article, please see Supplementary files under ‘Article Tools’

summarizes the methods and key finding of a recent appraisal of the economics of the HIVNET 012 regimen in sub-Saharan Africa.3

There is wide agreement that an effective response to the global HIV epidemic requires very substantial resources. This consensus has been partially translated into increasing contributions to combat the epidemic (UNAIDS 2004). The need to spend this money efficiently can hardly be overstated: the lives of millions depend upon how effectively available funds are allocated. Available studies on the cost and cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention programs in developing countries are very limited in number, as well as in the range of prevention strategies and geographic settings examined (Marseille, Hofmann, and Kahn 2002). “Prevent AIDS: Network for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis” (PANCEA), is a three-year, five-country study funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. It has the purpose of providing essential information and analysis for an improved allocation of HIV prevention funds in developing countries. The study includes five countries: India, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, and Uganda. This article reviews PANCEA's data collection methods. Our purpose is two-fold. First, we aim to explicate the methods and data sources used in PANCEA. Second, we want to give other health services researchers sufficient information to judge the potential suitability of adapting PANCEA's approach to their own efforts. Further details on the project and key documents (e.g., instruments) can be found in the online-only Appendix to this article available at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com, at the PANCEA link at http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/InSite?page=pancea, and from the authors. The remainder of the paper addresses PANCEA's conceptual approach, data collection tools, data collection process, challenges and limitations, early findings, and applications for other health program assessments.