Search

Large linear dunes are found in great abundance across the equatorial regions of Saturn’s moon Titan. They are similar in width and spacing to the large dunes of the Saharan, Arabian and Namibian deserts, indicating atmospheric conditions, sand sizes and winds are comparable to those on Earth. An examination of their geomorphometric properties, such as length, width, spacing and distribution can reveal aspects of their relationship with wind strength and direction and controls by underlying topography. We traced long axes of about 70% of all measurable dunes, which involved over 20,000 measurements. We mapped all of the dunes in Shangri-La, Fensal, Aztlan, and half of the Belet Sand Sea. In addition, we measured 90,000 dune widths across Titan at 500 m intervals and fit a nonstationary statistical model with a Gaussian spatial process to determine correlations of dune spacings. Dune long axes are dominantly oriented E-W, a proxy for the sand flux and wind directions. Dunes range to over 400 km in length, with an average length of 40 km. The average length may reflect a rough spacing of obstacles, large-scale topographic variations, or the availability of sand. Dunes are directed slightly NE in the Belet Sand Sea, where dunes are especially abundant and wider. The longest dunes are also found here. Belet may thus represent a fully mature sand sea, where dunes are free to grow as long and large as possible. To the east is the Shangri-La sand sea, which is the location of the Dragonfly landing site. Shangri-La hosts dunes directed dramatically southward, especially near the Xanadu region margin. Dunes here are narrower and interdunes are clearly visible near the elevated rim of the Selk impact crater and other topographic obstacles. Sand collects most densely along the eastern boundary, at the margin of Xanadu, and at the downwind margins of all sand seas. This perhaps indicates that sand is transported until major boundaries are encountered that preclude sand movement. Dune width values can be divided into about 5 major (20 minor) regions globally within the sand seas, with widest groupings at the sand sea centers and isolated, narrower groupings at higher latitudes. The narrowest dunes appear to have the most obstacles or topographic control or be at the highest latitudes. However, within each cluster, dunes of any size within the 1-3 km width range can exist. These studies reveal that while local controls are impactful, dunes will ultimately grow to the extent possible under the conditions present, which on Titan are highly favorable for large linear dunes. Further examination of dune parameters can reveal details about the landscape, basement bedrock conditions, sand transport history and regional wind effects on the dunes of Titan.

The 27 moons of Uranus (Figure 1) are enigmatic and remain poorly understood. Voyager 2 flew by the Uranus system in 1986, collecting fascinating images of its five largest, tidally-locked ‘classical’ moons (Figure 2), while also discovering a bevy of small moons nestled in its ring system (e.g., [1]) (Figure 3). The surfaces of Uranus’ classical moons Miranda, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon have been modified by endogenic activity, in particular Miranda and Ariel, which exhibit substantial evidence for geologic communication between their interiors and surfaces (e.g., [1-3]) (Figure 2). The available images therefore indicate that these classical moons are candidate ocean worlds, which have, or had, liquid H2O layers beneath their icy exteriors (e.g., [3-5]). Because the Voyager 2 flyby occurred near Uranus’ southern summer solstice (subsolar latitude ~81°S), the collected images are centered near the south poles of these moons, and their northern hemispheres were largely unobservable. Furthermore, only the classical moons and the largest ring moon Puck (Figure 3) were spatially resolved by Voyager 2. The other nine ring moons Cordelia, Ophelia, Bianca, Cressida, Desdemona, Juliet, Portia, Rosalina, and Belinda were not resolved. Another ring moon, Perdita, was discovered via reanalysis of Voyager 2 data [6], and two more ring moons, Cupid and Mab [7,8], were discovered by space-based telescope observations. All nine known irregular satellites, Francisco, Caliban, Stephano, Trinculo, Sycorax, Margaret, Prospero, Setebos, and Ferdinand, were not detected by Voyager 2 and were discovered later by ground-based observations (e.g., [9-11]). Voyager 2 was not equipped with a near-infrared (NIR) mapping spectrometer, and most of what we know about the compositions of Uranus’ moons has been determined using data collected by ground and space-based telescopes. The surfaces of Uranus’ classical moons are composed of H2O ice mixed with low albedo material that could be rich in organics and silicate minerals (e.g., [12-14]). Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been detected on the classical moons, primarily on their trailing hemispheres, in particular on Ariel [15,16] (Figure 4). Spectrally red material that could be rich in organics has been detected, primarily on the leading hemispheres of these moons (e.g., [17,18]) (Figure 4). Ammonia (NH3) has possibly been detected on the classical moons and may originate from their interiors [18,19]. Although useful, these prior observations are disk-integrated, limiting our ability to constrain the distribution of surface constituents and identify links between volatile species and geologic terrains. Much less is known about the surface compositions of Uranus’ 13 ring moons and nine irregular satellites, which are mostly too faint (Vmag 19.8 - 25.8) for spectroscopic analysis using existing facilities. Spectrophotometric datasets indicate that Uranus’ ring moons have dark surfaces that show hints of H2O ice features [6]. Uranus’ irregular satellites have dark, reddish surfaces (e.g., [20]) but little else is known about their surface compositions, except for Sycorax, which shows hints of H2O ice [21]. An orbiting spacecraft collecting data during close flybys of Uranus’ ring system and classical moons would reveal the surface geologies of these moons, including on their previously unobserved northern hemispheres, determine their surface compositions, and determine whether any of the classical moons are, or were, ocean worlds. Furthermore, an orbiter could spend time looking outward to characterize Uranus’ irregular satellites, providing new insight into these likely captured objects (e.g., Jewitt & Haghighipour 2007). By utilizing a Jupiter gravity assist (2030 - 2034 launch window), a mission could arrive at the Uranian system in the mid 2040’s (∼11 years flight time), using existing chemical propulsion technology [22]. This arrival time frame would allow us to observe these moons’ northern hemispheres. An orbiter making close flybys of the classical moons could search for evidence of ongoing geologic activity and characterize migration of CO2 in response to changes in subsolar heating as the Uranian system transitions into southern spring in 2050. To determine whether liquid H2O layers are present in the interiors of the classical moons, the highest priority instrument onboard an orbiter would be a magnetometer, which could detect and characterize induced magnetic fields emanating from briny subsurface oceans. Visible (VIS, 0.4 - 0.7 µm) and mid-infrared (MIR, 5 - 250 µm) cameras would also be vital to search for plume activity, hot spots, and other signs of geologic communication between the interiors and surfaces of these moons. A spectrometer (0.4 - 5 µm) would be critical for characterizing volatile species that might result from outgassing of material or recently exposed or emplaced surface deposits. The abundant evidence for geologic activity in the recent past on Ariel and Miranda likely makes them the highest priority targets for any mission that aims to characterize Uranus’ satellites. References: [1] Smith, B. A. et al. 1986, Science, 233, 43. [2] Schenk, P. M. 1991, JGR: Solid Earth, 96, 1887. [3] Beddingfield, C. B. & Cartwright, R. J. 2020, Icarus, 113687. [4] Hendrix, A. R. et al. 2019, Astrobiology, 19, 1. [5] Cartwright, R.J. et al. 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.01164. [6] Karkoschka, E. 2001, Icarus, 151, 51. [7] Showalter, M. R. & Lissauer, J. J. 2006, Science, 311, 973. [8] De Pater, I. et al. 2006, Science, 312, 92. [9] Gladman, B. J. et al. 1998, Nature, 392, 897. [10] Kavelaars, J. et al. 2004, Icarus, 169, 474. [11] Sheppard, S. S. et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 518. [12] Cruikshank, D. et al. 1977, AJ, 217, 1006. [13] Clark, R. N. & Lucey, P. G. 1984, JGR: Solid Earth, 89, 6341. [14] Brown, R. H. & Clark, R. N. 1984, Icarus, 58, 288. [15] Grundy, W. et al. 2006, Icarus, 184, 543. [16] Cartwright, R. J. et al. 2015, Icarus, 257, 428. [17] Buratti, B. J. & Mosher, J. A. 1991, Icarus, 90, 1. [18] Cartwright, R. J. et al. 2018, Icarus, 314, 210. [19] Cartwright, R. J. et al. 2020c, ApJL, 898, L22. [20] Maris, M. et al. 2007, A&A, 472, 311. [21] Romon, J. et al. 2001, A&A, 376, 310. [22] Hofstadter, M. et al. 2019, Planetary and Space Science, 177, 104680.

The comparative study of the different planetary systems accessible to our observations is a unique source of new scientific insight: it can reveal to us the diversity of these systems and of the objects within them, help us better understand their origins and how they work, find and characterize habitable worlds, and ultimately, search for alien life in our galactic neighborhood. But, in the solar system itself, two of its secondary planetary systems, the ice giant systems, as well as their two main objects, Uranus and Neptune, remain poorly explored. We will present an analysis of our current limited knowledge of these systems in the light of six key science questions about planetary systems formulated in the “Planetary Exploration, Horizon 2061” long-term foresight exercise: (Q1) What is the diversity of planetary systems objects? (Q2) What is the diversity of their architectures? (Q3) What do we know of their origins and formation scenarios? (Q4) How do they work? (Q5) Do they host potential habitats? (Q6) Where and how to search for life? We will show that a long-term plan for the space exploration of ice giants and their systems, complemented by the combination of Earth and space-based observations, will provide major contributions to answers to these six questions. In order to do so, we identify the measurements that must be performed in priority to address each of these questions, the destinations to choose (Uranus, Neptune, Triton or a subset of them), and the combinations of space platform(s) (orbiter, atmospheric entry probe(s), lander…) and of flight sequences needed. Based on this analysis, we look at the different launch windows available until 2061, using a Jupiter fly-by, to send a mission to Uranus or Neptune and find that: (1) a single mission to one of the Ice giants, combining an atmospheric entry probe and an orbiter tour starting on a high-inclination, low-periapse orbit, followed by a sequence of lower- inclination orbits, at least at one of the planets, will make it possible to address a broad range of these key questions; (2) a combination of two well-designed missions to each of the ice giant systems, to be flown in parallel or in sequence, will make it possible to address five out of the six key questions, and to establish the prerequisites for addressing the sixth one. The 2032 Jupiter fly-by window offers a unique opportunity to achieve this goal; (3) if this window cannot be met, using the 2036 Jupiter fly-by window to send a mission to Uranus first, and then the 2045 window for a mission to Neptune, will achieve the same goals. As a back-up option, the feasibility of sending an orbiter + probe mission to one of the planets and using the opportunity of a mission on its way to the interstellar medium to execute a close fly-by of the other planet and deliver a probe into its atmosphere should be studied carefully; (4) based on the expected science return of the first two missions, a third mission focusing on the search for life at a promising moon, namely Triton based on our current knowledge, or perhaps one of the active moons of Uranus after due characterization, can be properly designed. By the 2061 horizon, the first two missions of this plan can be implemented and the design of a third mission focusing on the search for life can be consolidated. Given the likelihood that such a plan may be out of reach of a single national agency, international collaboration is the most promising way to implement it.

International audience; Titan has an active methane-based hydrologic cycle1 that has shaped a complex geologic landscape2, making its surface one of most geologically diverse in the Solar System. Despite the differences in materials, temperatures and gravity fields between Earth and Titan, many of their surface features are similar and can be interpreted as products of the same geologic processes3. However, Titan’s thick and hazy atmosphere has hindered the identification of its geologic features at visible wavelengths and the study of its surface composition4. Here we identify and map the major geological units on Titan’s surface using radar and infrared data from the Cassini orbiter spacecraft. Correlations between datasets enabled us to produce a global map even where datasets were incomplete. The spatial and superposition relations between major geological units reveals the likely temporal evolution of the landscape and provides insight into the interacting processes driving its evolution. We extract the relative dating of the various geological units by observing their spatial superposition in order to get information on the temporal evolution of the landscape. The dunes and lakes are relatively young, whereas the hummocky or mountainous terrains are the oldest on Titan. Our results also show that Titan’s surface is dominated by sedimentary or depositional processes with a clear latitudinal variation, with dunes at the equator, plains at mid-latitudes and labyrinth terrains and lakes at the poles.

Objective This study examined the distribution of the sexes across Australian medical procedural specialties in 2017 and investigated the proportion of currently registered female specialists based on their graduation date from 1969 to 2008. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of current Australian procedural and surgical specialists registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Registration Agency as of January 2017 was undertaken. Participants included 4851 surgical specialists (594 female, 4257 male) and 14 948 specialists in specialties with high levels of procedural clinical work (4418 female, 10 530 male). The number of male and female specialists across each procedural specialty and the medical school graduation date of current female specialists were analysed. Results In 2017, female fellows represented only one in 10 surgeons and three in 10 procedural specialists. All surgical specialties are underrepresented by female specialists. Cardiology is least represented by female practitioners (one in 10), followed by intensive care and ophthalmology (two in 10). General surgery, otolaryngology and urology saw more female specialists with graduation dates between 1983 and 2003 compared with the other surgical specialties. Conclusion The number of female practitioners registered as specialists is increasing, but they continue to be underrepresented at specialist level across many procedural and surgical specialties. What is known about the topic? Although the number of female students entering medical school now outnumbers that of males, female practitioners remain underrepresented at the specialist level. What does this paper add? Surgery continues to be underrepresented by female specialists, but general surgery, otolaryngology and urology have shown increases in females reaching specialist level. All procedural specialties have shown increasing numbers of female practitioners reaching the specialist level. What are the implications for practitioners? All surgical specialties and nearly all procedural specialties need to adopt evidence-based practices to make their training programs both appealing and sustainable to female trainees in order to work towards achieving gender parity.

With over 750 papers published in AGU journals based on Cassini-Huygens mission data, three editors select some of the most noteworthy.