Search

Patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory myeloid malignancies have a poor prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in patients with active, chemotherapy-refractory myeloid disease is historically associated with high rates of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). A MAC regimen combining clofarabine with busulfan (Clo/Bu4) has been reported to exhibit antileukemic activity with acceptable toxicity in patients age ≤70 years. Here we describe the clinical outcomes of a real-world population of patients with active myeloid malignancies undergoing allogeneic HCT with Clo/Bu4 MAC. In a single-center retrospective descriptive analysis, we identified patients who underwent HCT for myeloid malignancies not in remission using Clo/Bu4 MAC between 2012 and 2020. We report event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), cumulative incidences of relapse and NRM, and the incidence and severity of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We identified 69 patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 22 to 70 years). Most patients had relapsed/refractory or primary refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML; n = 55) or refractory myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 12); 1 patient had chronic myelogenous leukemia, and 1 patient had a blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Fifty patients (72.5%) had complete remission at day 100 post-transplantation. Two-year EFS and OS were 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20% to 44%) and 40% (95% CI, 29% to 54%), respectively. Patients with AML had a 2-year EFS and OS of 28% (95% CI, 18% to 44%) and 38% (95% CI, 27% to 54%), respectively; those with MDS had a 2-year EFS and OS of 47% (95% CI, 25% to 88%) and 56% (95% CI, 33% to 94%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 39% (95% CI, 27% to 51%) for all patients, including 45% (95% CI, 31% to 58%) in the patients with AML and 18% (95% CI, 2% to 45%) in those with MDS. NRM at 2 years was 31% (95% CI, 20% to 42%), including 27% (95% CI, 15% to 39%) in patients with AML and 35% (95% CI, 10% to 63%) in those with MDS. The total incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) of any severity was 80%, and the incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was 22%. In patients who achieved remission, those who required systemic immunosuppression for aGVHD (58%) had poorer 2-year EFS (29% versus 54%; P = .05) and 2-year OS (39% versus 70%; P = .04) compared to those who did not. The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 44% (95% CI, 28% to 58%). Clo/Bu4 MAC followed by allogeneic HCT for patients with active myeloid malignancies is an effective transplantation strategy for patients up to age 70, particularly those with advanced MDS. The high incidence of and poor outcomes associated with aGVHD highlight the importance of optimizing preventative strategies.

We conducted a phase I clinical trial of anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART-BCMA) with or without anti-CD19 CAR T cells (huCART19) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients responding to third- or later-line therapy (phase A, N = 10) or high-risk patients responding to first-line therapy (phase B, N = 20), followed by early lenalidomide or pomalidomide maintenance. We observed no high-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and only one instance of low-grade neurologic toxicity. Among 15 subjects with measurable disease, 10 exhibited partial response (PR) or better; among 26 subjects responding to prior therapy, 9 improved their response category and 4 converted to minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative complete response/stringent complete response. Early maintenance therapy was safe, feasible, and coincided in some patients with CAR T-cell reexpansion and late-onset, durable clinical response. Outcomes with CART-BCMA + huCART19 were similar to CART-BCMA alone. Collectively, our results demonstrate favorable safety, pharmacokinetics, and antimyeloma activity of dual-target CAR T-cell therapy in early lines of MM treatment.Significance:CAR T cells in early lines of MM therapy could be safer and more effective than in the advanced setting, where prior studies have focused. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of CAR T cells in patients with low disease burden, responding to current therapy, combined with standard maintenance therapy.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 101

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is indicated for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) and remains the sole potential cure. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is commonly used because of older patient age, comorbidities, and a high incidence of transplantation-related mortality. Patients with MF are at increased risk of graft failure (GF), which is more common with RIC regimens, and is associated with shortened overall survival (OS). Owing to the high rate of GF with conventional fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (Bu) RIC, we added low-dose total body irradiation (TBI; 200 cGy) for patients with MF. We retrospectively compared alloHCT outcomes in adult patients with MF who received RIC with Flu/Bu/TBI and those who received RIC with Flu/Bu. The primary endpoint was the incidence of GF. Secondary endpoints included time to engraftment, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), nonrelapse mortality, overall response rate, progression-free survival, and OS. Of 33 patients who underwent alloHCT, 8 received Flu/Bu RIC and 25 received Flu/Bu/TBI RIC. GF occurred in 50% of the Flu/Bu recipients (all secondary GF) and in 4% of the Flu/Bu/TBI recipients (1 case of primary GF; relative risk, .08; 95% confidence interval [CI], .01 to .62; P = .0016). GF incidence was similar with related or unrelated donors and in patients who did and did not receive Janus-associated kinase inhibitors prior to alloHCT. Molecular remission and donor chimerism ≥99% were significantly more common with Flu/Bu/TBI. No significant differences in acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, or time to engraftment were observed. SOS occurred in none of the 8 patients who received Flu/Bu and in 6 of the 25 patients who received Flu/Bu/TBI, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Progression or relapse at 1 year was less common with Flu/Bu/TBI (0% versus 63%; P.001). The median OS was 49 months for Flu/Bu/TBI recipients and 30.8 months for Flu/Bu recipients (hazard ratio, .98; 95% CI, .33 to 2.88; P = .97). Flu/Bu/TBI resulted in a significant reduction in GF and a significant improvement in the frequency of molecular remission and full donor chimerism compared with Flu/Bu. The addition of low-dose TBI to Flu/Bu successfully mitigates against GF in patients with MF without increased rates of complications.

CPX-351 and venetoclax and azacitidine (ven/aza) are both indicated as initial therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older adults. In the absence of prospective randomized comparisons of these regimens, we used retrospective observational data to evaluate various outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving either CPX-351 (n = 217) or ven/aza (n = 439). This study used both a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database and the University of Pennsylvania EHR. Our study includes 217 patients who received CPX-351 and 439 who received ven/aza. Paitents receiving ven/aza were older, more likely to be treated in the community, and more likely to have a diagnosis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Other baseline covariates were not statistically significantly different between the groups. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 12 months and did not differ based on therapy (13 months for CPX-351 vs 11 months for ven/aza; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.08; P = .22). OS was similar across multiple sensitivity analyses. Regarding safety outcomes, early mortality was similar (10% vs 13% at 60 days). However, documented infections were higher with CPX-351 as were rates of febrile neutropenia. Hospital length of stay, including any admission before the next cycle of therapy, was more than twice as long for CPX-351. In this large multicenter real-world dataset, there was no statistically significant difference in OS. Prospective randomized studies with careful attention to side effects, quality of life, and impact on transplant outcomes are needed in these populations.

Supplemental tables: (1) Subject characteristics. (2) Cytogenetic profiles and high-risk features. (3) Prior treatment exposures and refractoriness. (4) CAR T cell product characteristics. (5) Products that did not meet target dose. (6) Adverse events of grade 3-4. (7) Cytokine release syndrome and ICANS. (8). Maintenance therapy. Supplemental Figures: (1) Study schematic and subject disposition, (2) Correlates of manufacturing success, (3) Hematopoietic recovery, (4) Post-infusion T cell phenotypes, (5) Correlates of in vivo expansion and manufacturing success, (6) Late post-infusion CAR T cell re-expansion, (7) Soluble BCMA, (8) Late-onset clinical responses, (9) MM cell BCMA expression, (10) Pre- and post-treatment Sox2-specific T cell responses in CART-BCMA monotherapy patients, (11) Pre- and post-treatment Sox2-specific T cell responses in CART-BCMA + huCART19 combination therapy patients, (12) Sustained post-treatment SOX2-specific T-cell responses.

We conducted a phase I clinical trial of anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART-BCMA) with or without anti-CD19 CAR T cells (huCART19) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients responding to third- or later-line therapy (phase A, N = 10) or high-risk patients responding to first-line therapy (phase B, N = 20), followed by early lenalidomide or pomalidomide maintenance. We observed no high-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and only one instance of low-grade neurologic toxicity. Among 15 subjects with measurable disease, 10 exhibited partial response (PR) or better; among 26 subjects responding to prior therapy, 9 improved their response category and 4 converted to minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative complete response/stringent complete response. Early maintenance therapy was safe, feasible, and coincided in some patients with CAR T-cell reexpansion and late-onset, durable clinical response. Outcomes with CART-BCMA + huCART19 were similar to CART-BCMA alone. Collectively, our results demonstrate favorable safety, pharmacokinetics, and antimyeloma activity of dual-target CAR T-cell therapy in early lines of MM treatment.Significance:CAR T cells in early lines of MM therapy could be safer and more effective than in the advanced setting, where prior studies have focused. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of CAR T cells in patients with low disease burden, responding to current therapy, combined with standard maintenance therapy.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 101

Limited treatment options exist for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) has been recently approved for treatment-naïve patients unfit for intensive induction. Limited data are available to characterize the efficacy of VEN combinations in R/R AML. We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients with a median of 1 prior therapy (range 0-5) treated with VEN combinations for R/R AML or AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) progressing after HMA monotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.2-15.1). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (95% CI 8.2-15.4) with a median duration of response of 8.9 months (95% CI 5.7-13.9). Overall response rate (ORR) was 68% with a composite complete response (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate of 53%. VEN combination therapy is efficacious in R/R AML and further prospective studies are warranted.

Introduction Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) hastens neutrophil engraftment and reduces infections after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT), yet the optimal start date is unknown. Additionally, concurrent G-CSF and methotrexate for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis may potentiate myelosuppression, and prolonged G-CSF is costly. Our institution changed from day + 4 to day + 12 G-CSF initiation following reduced intensity (RIC) alloHCT with methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis. Methods We retrospectively compared day + 4 and day + 12 G-CSF initiation after RIC alloHCT from 2017–2021. The primary endpoint was the time to neutrophil engraftment. Secondary endpoints included length of stay (LOS) and the time to platelet engraftment as well as the incidence of infectious events, acute GVHD (aGVHD), and mucositis. Results Thirty-two patients were included in each group with similar baseline characteristics. We observed faster neutrophil engraftment (median 12 vs. 15 days, p = 0.01) and platelet engraftment (median 13 vs. 15 days, p = 0.026) with day + 4 vs. day + 12 G-CSF initiation. Median LOS was 23 days (range, 19–32) with day + 4 initiation vs. 24 days (21–30) with day + 12 (p = 0.046). The incidence of culture-negative febrile neutropenia (p = 0.12), any grade aGVHD (p = 0.58), and grade 2-4 mucositis (p = 0.8) were similar between groups. Conclusion Compared to day + 4, day + 12 G-CSF initiation following RIC alloHCT had a longer time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Day + 12 initiation also resulted in longer LOS, which while statistically significant, was potentially of limited clinical significance. These findings are hypothesis generating.

Patients undergoing haploidentical or mismatched unrelated donor (haplo/MMUD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) are at high risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Experience with letermovir (LET) in this population is limited. This single center retrospective cohort study compared CMV and transplant outcomes between LET and a historical control with high-dose valacyclovir (HDV) prophylaxis in adults undergoing haplo/MMUD alloHCT. Thirty-eight CMV seropositive patients were included, 19 in each arm. LET reduced the incidence of CMV infection (5% vs. 53%, RR 0.01, 95% CI 0.014-0.71

Background: Circulating IL-6, an activator of JAK/STAT signaling, is associated with poor outcomes and aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We previously presented clinical outcomes of JAKEE, a single arm, phase II, Simon two-stage clinical trial that tested Ruxolitinib (Rux), an oral selective inhibitor of JAK1/2, and exemestane (EXE) in 25 participants (pts) with HR+ MBC that relapsed/progressed on non-steroidal AI (NSAI); specifically, the primary endpoint of safety was met, but there were no complete or partial responses and 6/25 (24%) achieved stable disease (SD) for ≥6 cycles. We investigated whether host circulating inflammatory markers, IL-6 genotypes, and estrogen levels were associated with differential response to therapy.Methods: Responders (R) were defined as having achieved SD≥6 cycles. Flow cytometry was performed on baseline and on-treatment peripheral blood samples to assess downstream CD3+ T-cell phosphoSTAT3 inhibition by Rux. Serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, serum amyloid A (SAA), Estrone (E1) and Estradiol (E2) were measured at baseline and serially on treatment. Sanger sequencing was performed to assess for three functional variants of the IL-6 promoter: −572G>C (rs1800796), −597G>A (rs1800797), and −174G>C (rs1800795), with high-risk polymorphisms being -597G/G and/or -174G/G. Non-parametric median testing was employed to test for differences in circulating markers by response groups given non-normal distribution, with a two-sided alpha of 0.05.Results: The cohort was heavily pre-treated: 28% received ≥2 lines of chemotherapy for MBC and 20% had CNS disease at enrollment. Among 17/25 pts with samples for pharmacodynamic assessment, Rux exhibited a 25% median inhibition (range 0-77%) of phosphoSTAT3. There was no differential effect in R vs non-responders (NR) (median inhibition 20% vs 29%, p=0.15). Frequency of high-risk IL-6 genotypes and distribution of baseline serum CRP, IL-6, SAA, E1 and E2 are depicted in the table. 15/25 (60%) harbored a high-risk IL-6 promoter polymorphism, with no significant difference in frequency between R and NR (50% vs 63%, p=0.65). 19 pts had samples for inflammatory biomarker analysis. 16/19 had baseline CRP≥10mg/L. While median levels of baseline CRP, SAA, and IL-6 were above upper limit of normal, there was no difference between R and NR (table). The proportion of pts with baseline undetectable E1 and E2 were similar between R and NR (E1: 36.9% vs 33.3%, p=1.0, E2: 52.6% vs 50%, p=1.0); notably, a significantly lower proportion with high-risk IL-6 genotype had undetectable baseline E1 (20% vs 60%, p=0.041), while no difference was noted for baseline E2, nor in the % change in E1 or E2 levels from baseline to cycle 4 by responder status.Conclusions: The JAKEE cohort represents an inflamed population with elevated circulating inflammatory markers and a high proportion with high-risk IL-6 genotypes. Examination of host inflammatory markers, IL-6 genotypes and estrogen levels did not reveal a differential response to the combination of Rux and EXE in patients with HR+ MBC that had progressed on prior NSAI. At tolerable dosing, Rux exhibited only a modest inhibition of phosphoSTAT3. Further work is needed to optimize strategies for targeting inflammation and JAK/STAT signaling in HR+ MBC. IL-6 GenotypeFrequencyFrequency by ResponderSignificanceHigh-Risk -174G/G and/or -597G/G15/25 (60%)Non-responder12/19 (63.2%)Responder3/6 (50%)p-value0.56Pretreatment Inflammatory Biomarkers [Upper limit of normal]Median (Range)Median Level by Responder GroupSignificanceCRP [8mg/L]SAA [10mg/L]IL-6 [2pg/mL]24.0 (0.2-146.8)12.8 (2.8-162.5)4.2 (1.8-11.5)Non-responder23.219.84.5Responder24.7 12.42.7p-value0.510.150.15Baseline Estrogen BiomarkersMedian (Range)Non-responderResponderp-valueEstrone (E1) (pg/mL)Estradiol (E2) (pg/mL)79.5.0 (0.2-1039.0)0.2 (0.2-44.1)79.8 0.247.8 4.20.410.91 Citation Format: Igor Makhlin, Nicholas McAndrew, E. Paul Wileyto, Amy Clark, Robin Holmes, Lisa N Bottalico, Grace R Jeschke, Kevin R Fox, Susan M Domcheck, Jennifer M Matro, Angela R Bradbury, Natalie Shih, Michael D Feldman, Elizabeth O Hexner, Jacqueline F Bromberg, Angela DeMichele. Analysis of host inflammatory and estrogen biomarkers in JAKEE: A phase II trial of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in combination with exemestane for estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-04.

PDF file - 33K, Supplementary Figure S3. Plasma cytokine concentration in MPN patients and normal donors.

PDF file - 33K, Supplementary Figure S1: Basal STAT5 and STAT3 expression and phosphorylation are similar across MPNs and normal donors

Purpose: Recent results have shown that myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are strongly associated with constitutive activation of the Janus-activated kinase (JAK)2 tyrosine kinase. However, JAK2 inhibitors currently approved or under development for treating myeloproliferative neoplasms do not selectively deplete the malignant clone, and the inhibition of activity of the drug target (JAK2) has not been rigorously evaluated in the clinical studies. Therefore, in this study we developed an in vitro assay to gain insight into how effectively JAK2 activity is inhibited in the samples of patients.Experimental Design: We treated primary cells from normal donors and patients with MPN with JAK2 inhibitors and measured phosphorylation of downstream targets STAT5 and STAT3 by flow cytometry. Obtained results were next correlated with JAK2 V617F allele burden and plasma cytokine level.Results: We observed a dose-dependent decrease in pSTAT5 and pSTAT3 in ex vivo treated granulocytes. However, phosphorylation of STAT3 and STAT5 in cells from patients with myelofibrosis was significantly less inhibited when compared with cells from patients with polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and normal donors. Sensitivity to inhibition did not correlate with JAK2 V617F clonal burden. Mixing studies using plasma from patients with myelofibrosis did not transfer resistance to sensitive cells. Likewise, no single cytokine measured seemed to account for the observed pattern of resistance.Conclusions:Taken together, these observations suggest that there are cell intrinsic mechanisms that define a priori resistance to JAK2 inhibition in myelofibrosis, and the lesion is localized upstream of STAT3 and STAT5. Clin Cancer Res; 19(7); 1729–39. ©2013 AACR.

PDF file - 22K, Supplementary Figure S2: Level of mutant JAK2 V617F allele frequency in patient granulocytes does not correlate with response to inhibition of phosphoSTAT5.

PDF file - 21K, pSTAT5 in CD15+ cells treated with CEP701 (20 μM): myelofibrosis is significantly more resistant to JAK2 inhibition than PV, ET and normal

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) is a rare hematologic neoplasm driven by the KIT D816V mutation and associated with poor survival. This phase 1 study (NCT02561988) evaluated avapritinib (BLU-285), a selective KIT D816V inhibitor, in patients with AdvSM. The primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose and safety of avapritinib. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate and changes in measures of mast cell burden. Avapritinib was evaluated at doses of 30–400 mg once daily in 86 patients, 69 with centrally confirmed AdvSM. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and 200 mg and 300 mg daily were studied in dose-expansion cohorts. The most frequent adverse events observed were periorbital edema (69%), anemia (55%), diarrhea (45%), thrombocytopenia (44%) and nausea (44%). Intracranial bleeding occurred in 13% overall, but in only 1% of patients without severe thrombocytopenia (platelets 9/l). In 53 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 75%. The complete remission rate was 36%. Avapritinib elicited ≥50% reductions in marrow mast cells and serum tryptase in 92% and 99% of patients, respectively. Avapritinib induced deep and durable responses, including molecular remission of KIT D816V in patients with AdvSM, and was well tolerated at the recommended phase 2 dose of 200 mg daily.

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) is a rare, KIT D816V-driven hematologic neoplasm characterized by mast cell infiltration and shortened survival. We report the results of a prespecified interim analysis of an ongoing pivotal single-arm phase 2 trial (no. NCT03580655) of avapritinib, a potent, selective KIT D816V inhibitor administered primarily at a once-daily starting dose of 200 mg in patients with AdvSM (n = 62). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included mean baseline change in AdvSM–Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score and quality of life, time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, changes in measures of disease burden and safety. The primary endpoint was successfully met (P = 1.6 × 10-9), with an ORR of 75% (95% confidence interval 57–89) in 32 response-evaluable patients with AdvSM who had sufficient follow-up for response assessment, including 19% with complete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery. Reductions of ≥50% from baseline in serum tryptase (93%), bone marrow mast cells (88%) and KIT D816V variant allele fraction (60%) were observed. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (16%) and anemia (16%). Avapritinib demonstrated a high rate of clinical, morphological and molecular responses and was generally well tolerated in patients with AdvSM., In a prespecified interim analysis of a pivotal phase 2 trial, avapritinib, a selective KIT inhibitor, elicited robust clinical and molecular responses, was generally well tolerated and led to improved patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis.

BACKGROUNDCOVID-19 remains a global health emergency with limited treatment options, lagging vaccine rates, and inadequate healthcare resources in the face of an ongoing calamity. The disease is characterized by immune dysregulation and cytokine storm. Cyclosporine A (CSA) is a calcineurin inhibitor that modulates cytokine production and may have direct antiviral properties against coronaviruses.METHODSTo test whether a short course of CSA was safe in patients with COVID-19, we treated 10 hospitalized, oxygen-requiring, noncritically ill patients with CSA (starting at a dose of 9 mg/kg/d). We evaluated patients for clinical response and adverse events, measured serum cytokines and chemokines associated with COVID-19 hyperinflammation, and conducted gene-expression analyses.RESULTSFive participants experienced adverse events, none of which were serious; transaminitis was most common. No participant required intensive care unit-level care, and all patients were discharged alive. CSA treatment was associated with significant reductions in serum cytokines and chemokines important in COVID-19 hyperinflammation, including CXCL10. Following CSA administration, we also observed a significant reduction in type I IFN gene expression signatures and other transcriptional profiles associated with exacerbated hyperinflammation in the peripheral blood cells of these patients.CONCLUSIONShort courses of CSA appear safe and feasible in patients with COVID-19 who require oxygen and may be a useful adjunct in resource-limited health care settings.TRIAL REGISTRATIONThis trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Investigational New Drug Application no. 149997; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04412785).FUNDINGThis study was internally funded by the Center for Cellular Immunotherapies.

Circulating IL-6, an activator of JAK/STAT signaling, is associated with poor prognosis and aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. Here we report the results of a phase 2 single-arm Simon 2-stage trial combining Ruxolitinib, an oral selective inhibitor of JAK1/2, with exemestane, a steroidal AI, in patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on non-steroidal AI (NSAI). Safety and efficacy were primary objectives, and analysis of inflammatory markers as predictors of response was a key secondary objective. Twenty-five subjects enrolled. The combination of ruxolitinib and exemestane was safe, though anemia requiring transfusion in 5/15 (33%) at the 25 mg dose in stage 1 led to a reduction to 15 mg twice daily in stage 2 (with no additional transfusions). Clinical benefit rate (CBR) in the overall study population was 24% (95% CI 9.4–45.1); 6/25 patients demonstrated stable disease for ≥6 months. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.6–3.9). Exploratory biomarkers revealed high levels of systemic inflammation and 60% harbored a high-risk IL-6 genotype. Pharmacodynamics demonstrated modest on-target inhibition of phosphorylated-STAT3 by ruxolitinib at a tolerable dose. Thus, ruxolitinib combined with exemestane at a tolerable dose was safe but minimally active in AI-resistant tumors of patients with high levels of systemic inflammation. These findings highlight the need for more potent and specific therapies targeting inflammation in MBC.

Eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes represent a heterogeneous group of neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions, characterized by more eosinophils in the peripheral blood, and may involve eosinophil-induced organ damage. In the WHO classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms, eosinophilic disorders characterized by dysregulated tyrosine kinase (TK) fusion genes are recognized as a new category termed, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2. In addition to these aforementioned TK fusion genes, rearrangements involving FLT3 and ABL1 genes have also been described. These new NCCN Guidelines include recommendations for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of any one of the myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (MLN-Eo) and a TK fusion gene included in the 2017 WHO Classification, as well as MLN-Eo and a FLT3 or ABL1 rearrangement.

PURPOSE To describe long-term outcomes of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). METHODS Between January 2013 and June 2016, 42 patients with relapsed or refractory CLL were enrolled in this study and 38 were infused with anti-CD19 CART cells (CART-19). Of these, 28 patients were initially randomly assigned to receive a low (5 × 107) or high (5 × 108) dose of CART-19, and 24 were evaluable for response assessment. After an interim analysis, 10 additional patients received the selected (high) dose and of these, eight were evaluable for response. Patients were followed for a median 31.5 months (range, 2 to 75 months). RESULTS At 4 weeks, the complete and overall responses for the 32 evaluable patients were 28% (90% CI, 16% to 44%) and 44% (90% CI, 29% to 60%), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 64 months; there was no statistically significant difference between low- and high-dose groups ( P = .84). Regardless of dose, prolonged survival was observed in patients who achieved a CR versus those who did not ( P = .035), with median OS not reached in patients with CR versus 64 months in those without CR. The median progression-free survival was 40.2 months in patients with CR and 1 month in those without a CR ( P < .0001). Toxicity was comparable in both dose groups. CONCLUSION In patients with advanced CLL, a 5 × 108 dose of CART-19 may be more effective than 5 × 107 CART-19 at inducing CR without excessive toxicity. Attainment of a CR after CART-19 infusion, regardless of cell dose, is associated with longer OS and progression-free survival in patients with relapsed CLL.

Pegaspargase (PEG) increases venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) potentially due to depletion of anticoagulation factors, including antithrombin (AT). The benefit and cost of AT supplementation in adults is unclear. We aimed to characterize VTE incidence and risk factors following AT and determine the characteristics and costs of supplementation. Fifty-three adults received PEG and AT. VTE occurred in 21% (grade ≥3 8%). T cell ALL and patients receiving prednisone during induction were at highest risk. Repeat AT levels post supplementation were subtherapeutic forty-four percent of the time. A median of 18 days elapsed between PEG and two sequential therapeutic AT levels despite supplementation. Patients received a median of 2 AT doses per PEG dose at a median cost of $11,145. VTE remains common in adults despite AT supplementation. More aggressive AT supplementation may reduce VTE but warrant prospective evaluation given the significant cost.

PURPOSE The anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy tisagenlecleucel (CTL019) has an 81% response rate in children with relapsed or chemotherapy refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a life-threatening treatment-related toxicity that limits the full therapeutic potential in adults. We report outcomes for adults with r/r ALL treated with an optimized CTL019 dosing and CRS management strategy. METHODS Adults with r/r B-cell ALL received CTL019 in 1 of 2 trials. Patients received lymphodepletion followed by CTL019 as either a one-time infusion or fractionated infusions split over 3 days (day 1, 10%; day 2, 30%; day 3, 60%), which allowed for day 2 and day 3 doses to be held for early CRS. Total planned CTL019 dose varied with adaptive protocol modifications in response to efficacy and CRS toxicity. RESULTS Thirty-five adults with r/r ALL received CTL019 in 1 of 3 dosing cohorts. The low-dose cohort (n = 9) received single or fractionated dosing and had manageable toxicity with a 33% complete remission (CR) rate. In the high-dose single infusion cohort, 3 of 6 patients with refractory CRS concurrent with culture-positive sepsis died, and 3 achieved CR. The 20 patients in the high-dose fractionated (HDF) cohort had a 90% CR rate and manageable CRS. The HDF cohort had the highest survival, with a 2-year overall survival of 73% (95% CI, 46% to 88%) and event-free survival of 49.5% (95% CI, 21% to 73%). CONCLUSION Fractionated dosing of CTL019 with intrapatient dose modification optimizes safety without compromising efficacy in adults with r/r ALL.

The graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) can prevent relapse but the risk of severe graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) leads to prolonged intensive immunosuppression and possible blunting of the GVL effect. Strategies to reduce immunosuppression in order to prevent relapse have been offset by increases in severe GVHD and non-relapse mortality (NRM). We recently validated the MAGIC algorithm probability (MAP) that predicts the risk for severe GVHD and NRM in asymptomatic patients using serum biomarkers. In this study we tested whether the MAP could identify patients whose risk for relapse is higher than their risk for severe GVHD and NRM. The multicenter study population (n=1604) was divided into two cohorts: historical (2006–2015, n=702) and current (2015–2017, n=902) with similar non-relapse mortality, relapse, and survival. On day 28 post-HCT, patients who had not developed GVHD (75% of the population) and who possessed a low MAP were at much higher risk for relapse (24%) than severe GVHD and NRM (16% and 9%); this difference was even more pronounced in patients with a high disease risk index (relapse 33%, NRM 9%). Such patients are good candidates to test relapse prevention strategies that might enhance GVL.

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who achieve a complete remission (CR) to anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART-19), remissions are remarkably durable. Preclinical data suggesting synergy between CART-19 and the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib prompted us to conduct a prospective single-center phase 2 trial in which we added autologous anti-CD19 humanized binding domain T cells (huCART-19) to ibrutinib in patients with CLL not in CR despite ≥6 months of ibrutinib. The primary endpoints were safety, feasibility, and achievement of a CR within 3 months. Of 20 enrolled patients, 19 received huCART-19. The median follow-up for all infused patients was 41 months (range, 0.25-58 months). Eighteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS; grade 1-2 in 15 of 18 subjects), and 5 developed neurotoxicity (grade 1-2 in 4 patients, grade 4 in 1 patient). While the 3-month CR rate among International Working Group on CLL (iwCLL)-evaluable patients was 44% (90% confidence interval [CI], 23-67%), at 12 months, 72% of patients tested had no measurable residual disease (MRD). The estimated overall and progression-free survival at 48 months were 84% and 70%, respectively. Of 15 patients with undetectable MRD at 3 or 6 months, 13 remain in ongoing CR at the last follow-up. In patients with CLL not achieving a CR despite ≥6 months of ibrutinib, adding huCART-19 mediated a high rate of deep and durable remissions. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02640209.

Enthusiasm about interferons for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms has recently arisen. How does a nontargeted therapy selectively target the malignant clone? Many foundational questions about interferon treatment are unanswered, including who, when, and for how long do we treat. Using an individual case, this review touches on gaps in risk assessment in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) and the history of treatment with interferons. How is it that this proinflammatory cytokine effectively treats ET and PV, themselves proinflammatory states? We summarize existing mechanistic and clinical data, the molecular context as a modifier for treatment response, the establishment of treatment goals, and the challenges that lie ahead.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have demonstrated promising efficacy, particularly in hematologic malignancies. One challenge regarding CAR T cells in solid tumors is the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), characterized by high levels of multiple inhibitory factors, including transforming growth factor (TGF)-β. We report results from an in-human phase 1 trial of castration-resistant, prostate cancer-directed CAR T cells armored with a dominant-negative TGF-β receptor (NCT03089203). Primary endpoints were safety and feasibility, while secondary objectives included assessment of CAR T cell distribution, bioactivity and disease response. All prespecified endpoints were met. Eighteen patients enrolled, and 13 subjects received therapy across four dose levels. Five of the 13 patients developed grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), including one patient who experienced a marked clonal CAR T cell expansion,98% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and death following grade 4 CRS with concurrent sepsis. Acute increases in inflammatory cytokines correlated with manageable high-grade CRS events. Three additional patients achieved a PSA reduction of ≥30%, with CAR T cell failure accompanied by upregulation of multiple TME-localized inhibitory molecules following adoptive cell transfer. CAR T cell kinetics revealed expansion in blood and tumor trafficking. Thus, clinical application of TGF-β-resistant CAR T cells is feasible and generally safe. Future studies should use superior multipronged approaches against the TME to improve outcomes.

Germline mutations in the shelterin component protection of telomeres 1 (POT1) were recently found to be associated with familial chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), melanoma, glioma, and several other familial cancer syndromes. The role of POT1 mutations in myeloid neoplasms and other hematologic malignancies, however, remains unknown. To explore the role of POT1 variants in hematologic neoplasms, we analyzed POT1 variants in 3323 consecutive patients who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a panel of hematologic malignancy-associated genes at our institution and characterized the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with germline and somatic POT1 mutations. Of 3323 consecutive patients who underwent NGS, 2770 patients had a hematologic malignancy (lymphoid n = 1299, myeloid n = 934, and both lymphoid and myeloid n = 537), while 553 patients were evaluated for non-malignant cytopenias. All 57 patients (2.06%) carrying either a POT1 disease-associated variant or variant of uncertain significance had a hematologic malignancy compared to no identified POT1 variants in 553 patients with benign cytopenias (OR = 23.5, p < 0.001), suggesting that the presence of POT1 variants was predictive of a hematologic malignancy. Of 57 patients, 33 had lymphoid malignancies, 23 had myeloid neoplasms, and 2 had a lymphoid and myeloid neoplasm (Fig 1). Patient variants were classified as germline or somatic using constitutional DNA sequencing, POT1 emergence/disappearance over time, or POT1 maintenance in remission. In the absence of these data, likely germline or likely somatic designations were made by assessing variant allele frequencies against clinical/pathologic characteristics. 18 patients (33%) were found to have germline or likely germline POT1 variants (29% and 42% in the lymphoid and myeloid malignancy groups, respectively). Another 6 patients (11%) had variants whose germline status could not be determined. Of the 17 unique germline POT1 variants, 10 were missense and located within mapped functional protein domains, while 7 were classified as predicted loss-of-function (pLOF) due to a disruption of start, premature stop, frameshift, or spice site alteration. Patients with hematological malignancies had a ~5-8x increased odds of having a germline pLOF POT1 variant compared to cancer-free individuals in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, n = 113,108 exomes, OR = 7.5, p < 0.001) or in the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB, n = 7877, OR = 5.0, p = 0.010), with a prevalence of 0.25% compared to 0.03% and 0.05%, respectively. Germline pLOF POT1 variants were significantly more enriched in patients with myeloid (gnomAD: OR = 6.1, p = 0.02) and lymphoid (gnomAD: OR = 9.8, p < 0.001; PMBB: OR = 6.5, p = 0.004) malignancies. In 33 patients with lymphoid malignancies and POT1 variants, the most common diagnoses were CLL/SLL (n = 21, germline n = 6, somatic n = 12), CD5- CD10- indolent B cell neoplasms (n = 4, germline n = 1, somatic n = 3), and multiple myeloma (n = 3, all somatic) (Table 1). Lymphoid malignancies with a germline POT1 variant had a relative paucity of additional mutations; in contrast, somatic POT1 variants frequently co-occurred with other mutations, most commonly with TP53 (Fig 2, n = 5, 23%). Among 23 patients with myeloid malignancies, patients with germline POT1 variants developed malignancies at a significantly younger age compared to those whose POT1 variants were somatic (median age 59.5 vs 70.5 years, p = 0.04). The most common diagnosis in patients with myeloid neoplasms carrying germline POT1 variants was MPN (germline n = 5, somatic n = 1). AML, MDS/MPN, and MDS occurred in 4, 3, and 1 patients respectively. All patients with myeloid neoplasms had additional disease-associated mutations, with the most common co-occurring variants in TET2 (n = 7), JAK2 (n = 6, co-occurring with 50% of germline POT1 myeloid variants), and NRAS (n = 6). In conclusion, this is the first comprehensive analysis of POT1 variants in an unselected hospital-based population undergoing molecular testing for variants associated with hematologic malignancies. Our results show that the presence of POT1 variants is predictive of having a hematologic neoplasm and that over 30% of POT1 variants in hematologic malignancy patients are germline. Our study expands the spectrum of POT1-associated familial neoplasms and highlights the needs for better recognition of familial hematologic cancer syndromes. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

INTRODUCTION Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell immunotherapy is promising for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Hypogammaglobinemia can result from normal CD19+ B-cell depletion by CAR-T cells. CLL patients are already at risk for infections due to impaired immune function, lymphodepletion prior to CAR-T cells infusion, and immunosuppressive therapies. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to manage hypogammaglobulinemia, although standard criteria for IVIG administration in this setting has not been established. We studied the incidence of hypogammaglobinemia and report infectious complications, risk factors, IVIG use, and clinical outcomes for CLL patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells. METHODS Adult CLL patients who received CD19-directed CAR-T therapy in 3 clinical trials (NCT01029366, NCT01747486, NCT02640209) from July 2010 to February 2020 were included. We reviewed demographics, available IgG levels, IVIG use, and clinical outcomes with a particular focus on infectious complications. Hypogammaglobulinemia was defined as IgG RESULTS Records of 71 adult patients with CLL were reviewed; 4 were excluded from further analysis as they did not have IgG levels after CAR-T. The median age at time of CAR-T was 63 years (range 43-78 years). 31 patients (46%) were alive, 31 (46%) were deceased, and 5 (7%) were lost to follow up at time of review. Median follow up for all patients was 33 months (range 2-114 months). Of the 55 patients with an IgG level prior to CAR-T infusion, 24 (44%) had hypogammaglobulinemia at baseline After CAR-T infusion, 54 of 67 patients (81%) developed new or persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and 40 of these patients (74%) received IVIG (Table 1). Forty-eight patients (72%) received at least one infusion of IVIG after CAR-T. Median time to initiation of IVIG after CAR-T infusion was 2.8 months (range 0.1-71.2 months). IVIG was used in 29 of 35 (83%) responders (defined as PR or CR) vs 19 of 32 (59%) in non-responders (defined as NR or PD) (p=0.056). There was no difference in survival observed based on whether or not patients had hypogammaglobulinemia (Figure). 42 patients (63%) had documented infections not related to chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Fifteen (22%) had one documented infection, and 27 (40%) had more than one documented infection. There were 13 infections documented in patients who did not have hypogammaglobulinemia; the most common were ENT/sinus infections (5), bacteremia (2), URI (2), and other (2). There were 94 infections documented in patients who developed or had persistent hypogammaglobulinemia; the most common were lower respiratory tract infection/pneumonia (21), URI (20), and ENT/sinus infections (13). Complete and partial responders had more infections compared to non-responders or those who progressed (p = 0.01). Patients with hypogammaglobulinemia after CAR-T had an average of 1.74 (range 0-15) infections vs 1 (range 0-3) in patients without hypogammaglobulinemia. Patients who received IVIG had more infections (p=0.003); without IVIG the average number of infections was 0.58 (range 0-3), and with IVIG, the average number of infections was 2.00 (range 0-15). CONCLUSION Evaluating clinical outcomes with infections after CAR-T and potential strategies to minimize infection risk may improve morbidity and mortality in CLL patients. Use of IVIG was driven by individual practice, with heterogeneity regarding indication, frequency, and duration of treatment, though there was no difference in patient characteristics or response in patients who did or did not develop hypogammaglobulinemia. Patients who responded to CAR-T had more frequent infections, as might be expected in the setting of transient or persistent B- cell aplasia or hypoplasia. Patients who had more infections were more likely to receive IVIG. Further studies to define criteria for IVIG repletion in CLL patients treated with CD19-directed CAR-T cells may be incorporated in a standard clinical management algorithm. Table 1 Disclosures Frey: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Syntax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Davis:Tmunity Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Cellares Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research: Patents & Royalties. Hexner:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Other: serves on a data safety monitoring committee, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; American Board of Internal Medicine: Other: member of the hematology exam committee. Schuster:Novartis, Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; AlloGene, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Juno/Celgene, Loxo Oncology, Nordic Nanovector, Novartis, Tessa Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gill:Fate: Consultancy; Sensei: Consultancy; Aileron: Consultancy; Tmunity Therapeutics: Research Funding; Carisma Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Grupp:Servier: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy; CBMG: Consultancy; Jazz: Other: SSC; Adaptimmune: Other: SAB; TCR2: Other: SAB; Cellectis: Other; Juno/BMS: Other; Janssen/JnJ: Consultancy; CRISPR Therapeutics/Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Other; Allogene: Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: SSC, Research Funding. Melenhorst:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Other: Speaker; Novartis: Other: Speaker, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; IASO Biotherapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics: Consultancy; Simcere of America: Consultancy. Lacey:Novartis: Patents & Royalties: CAR T cells, Research Funding; Tmunity: Research Funding; Cabaletta: Research Funding; Carisma: Research Funding. Fraietta:Tmunity: Research Funding. Hwang:Novartis: Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Research Funding. Siegel:Novartis: Patents & Royalties; Tmunity: Patents & Royalties; Poseida: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vetigenics: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levine:Terumo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Dr. Levine has a patent Methods for treatment of cancer (US 8906682) (US 8916381)(US 9101584) with royalties paid to University of Pennsylvania, a patent Compositions for treatment of cancer (US 8911993) (US 9102761) (US 9102760) with royalties paid to U; Lilly Asia Ventures: Consultancy; Avectas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Patheon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immuneel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incysus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ori Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vycellix: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company, Research Funding. June:Bluesphere Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cabaletta Bio: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Carisma Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellares: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celldex: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; DeCART Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis Pharma: Current equity holder in private company; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Ziopharm Oncology: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porter:Tmunity: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cells for CD19+ malignancies, Research Funding; American Board of Internal Medicine: Other: Member, exam writing committee (end date Oct 2019); National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other: Advisory board; Genentech/Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Spouse employment (ended Sept 2020); her salary includes stock/options; Glenmark: Other: Advisory board; Adicet bio: Other: Advisory board; Incyte: Other: Advisory board; Kite/Gilead: Other: Advisory board. OffLabel Disclosure: CAR T cells for CLL

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) characterized by an increased risk of developing venous and arterial thromboses and of evolution to myelofibrosis or acute leukemia (1). MPNs are recognized as a major cause of splanchnic vein thromboses (SVT), which include hepatic, splenic, portal and mesenteric vein thromboses (2). Patients with SVT are at an increased risk of developing bleeding events and arterial thrombotic events (3), as well as recurrent SVT and the use of anticoagulation and cytoreduction do not clearly modify this risk (3–5). Management of SVT in MPN patients remains a challenge and most therapeutic recommendations are based on retrospective analyses (6). Recently, De Stefano reported that hydroxyurea failed to prevent recurrent thromboses in the splanchnic vasculature in patients with a prior SVT (7). We conducted a prospective, open-label, multi-center phase II clinical trial of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a (PEG) in 20 subjects with SVT and an MPN, who represented a cohort of patients who participated in the Myeloproliferative Disorders - Research Consortium (MPD-RC) 111 trial (). MPD-RC 111 was a prospective study of patients with high-risk ET/PV who were resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea (HU), but prior HU therapy was not a requirement for patients to enter the SVT cohort. Here we report the outcomes of the 20 SVT patients who were treated with PEG.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the most common treatment-related complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Lymphocyte migration plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of GVHD. A previous phase I/II trial demonstrated that CCR5 blockade with maraviroc in the first 30days after allo-HCT resulted in a low incidence of early acute GVHD, primarily in visceral organs, but with no impact on late acute or chronic GVHD. We conducted a phase II trial to examine the efficacy of an extended course of maraviroc, administered through post-transplantation day +90 in addition to standard prophylaxis in 37 recipients of reduced-intensity-conditioned unrelated donor allo-HCT performed to treat hematologic malignancies. Extended maraviroc treatment was safe and feasible. The primary study endpoint, day +180 rate of grade II-IV acute GVHD, was 22 ± 7%, liver GVHD was not observed, and gut GVHD was uncommon. The day +180 rate of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 5 ± 4%. The 1-year rate of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 8 ± 5% and that of disease relapse was 30 ± 8%. Overall survival at 1 year was 70 ± 8%. Compared with the previously studied short course of maraviroc, the extended course resulted in a significantly higher GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], .45; 95% confidence interval [CI], .25 to .82; P = .009) and overall survival (adjusted HR, .48; 95% CI, .24 to .96; P = .037). A combined analysis of both trials showed that high maraviroc trough concentrations on the day of hematopoietic cell infusion were associated with lower rates of acute GVHD. An extended course of maraviroc after reduced-intensity-conditioned unrelated donor allo-HCT is safe and effective in preventing acute and chronic GVHD and is associated with favorable survival.

PURPOSE CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)–modified T cells demonstrate unprecedented responses in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL); however, relapse remains a substantial challenge. Short CAR T-cell persistence contributes to this risk; therefore, strategies to improve persistence are needed. METHODS We conducted a pilot clinical trial of a humanized CD19 CAR T-cell product (huCART19) in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL (n = 72) or B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (n = 2), treated in two cohorts: with (retreatment, n = 33) or without (CAR-naive, n = 41) prior CAR exposure. Patients were monitored for toxicity, response, and persistence of huCART19. RESULTS Seventy-four patients 1-29 years of age received huCART19. Cytokine release syndrome developed in 62 (84%) patients and was grade 4 in five (6.8%). Neurologic toxicities were reported in 29 (39%), three (4%) grade 3 or 4, and fully resolved in all cases. The overall response rate at 1 month after infusion was 98% (100% in B-ALL) in the CAR-naive cohort and 64% in the retreatment cohort. At 6 months, the probability of losing huCART19 persistence was 27% (95% CI, 14 to 41) for CAR-naive and 48% (95% CI, 30 to 64) for retreatment patients, whereas the incidence of B-cell recovery was 15% (95% CI, 6 to 28) and 58% (95% CI, 33 to 77), respectively. Relapse-free survival at 12 and 24 months, respectively, was 84% (95% CI, 72 to 97) and 74% (95% CI, 60 to 90) in CAR-naive and 74% (95% CI, 56 to 97) and 58% (95% CI, 37 to 90) in retreatment cohorts. CONCLUSION HuCART19 achieved durable remissions with long-term persistence in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL, including after failure of prior CAR T-cell therapy.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a global health emergency with limited treatment options, lagging vaccine rates and inadequate healthcare resources in the face of an ongoing calamity. The disease is characterized by immune dysregulation and cytokine storm. Cyclosporine A (CSA) is a calcineurin inhibitor that modulates cytokine production and may have direct antiviral properties against coronaviruses. To test whether a short course of treatment was safe in COVID-19 patients, we treated 10 hospitalized, oxygen requiring, non-critically ill patients with CSA at a starting dose of 9mg/kg/day. Five patients experienced adverse events, none were serious, and transaminitis was most common. No subject enrolled in this trial required intensive care unit (ICU)-level care and all patients were discharged alive from the hospital. Further, CSA treatment was associated with significant reductions in serum cytokines and chemokines important in COVID-19 hyper-inflammation, including CXCL10. In conclusion, short courses of CSA appear safe and feasible in COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen and therefore, may be a useful adjunct in resource-poor or resource-limited health care settings.