Search

The impact of body mass index (BMI) on long-term survival outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery is debated.A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed to compare long-term survival outcomes of patients of different BMI categories after colorectal cancer surgery.Of the 2588 articles screened, 56 articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 72,582 participants. Patients with BMIlt;18.5 had significantly worse overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.91; P lt; 0.0001], cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.91; P lt; 0.0001), disease-free survival (HR = 1.50; P lt; 0.0001) and recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.13; P = 0.007) compared to patients with a BMI of 18.5-25. There was no significant difference between those with BMI 25-30 and 18.5-25 in overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival, except for the subgroup of patients with colon cancer where patients with BMI 25-30 had significantly improved overall survival (HR = 0.90; P = 0.05) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.90; P = 0.04). Patients with BMIgt;30 had significantly worse disease-free survival (HR = 1.05; P = 0.03) compared to patients with a BMI of 18.5-25, but no significant difference in overall survival, cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival. Patients with BMIgt;35 compared to 18.5-25 had significantly worse overall survival (HR = 1.24; P = 0.02), cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.36; P = 0.01), disease-free survival (HR = 1.15; P = 0.03) and recurrence-free survival for colon (HR = 1.11; P = 0.04) and rectal (HR = 4.10; P = 0.04) cancer.Being underweight (BMI lt; 18.5) or class II/III obese (BMI gt; 35) at the time of colorectal cancer surgery may result in worse long-term survival outcomes, whereas being overweight (BMI 25-30) may improve survival in a subgroup of patients with colon cancer. Optimising BMI may preoperatively improve long-term survival after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Metastatic oesophagogastric cancers carry a prognosis of generally less than 2 years despite current treatment. There has been recent excitement in the field focused on immune checkpoint inhibition though anti-PD-1 antibodies. In this article, we review recent phase 3 clinical trials evaluating first line PD-L1 inhibition in metastatic HER-2-negative oesophagogastric cancers and discuss future questions and challenges in the field.Prior studies have shown promise using PD-L1 inhibition as third and fourth line treatment but recent phase 3 clinical trials have shown clear benefit to overall survival as first line treatment. PD-L1 inhibition as monotherapy demonstrated earlier death rates but there are a subset of patients with a long-term durable benefit when compared with chemotherapy. PD-L1 inhibition when combined with chemotherapy showed benefit in overall survival and progression-free survival and is enhanced in subsets of patients with increased PD-L1 expression.Although there are still open questions how best to assess PD-L1 status, these studies provide clear evidence for use of PD-L1 inhibition combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy as first-line treatment in metastatic or unresectable oesophagogastric cancers that express PD-L1. In addition, they lay the groundwork for future studies evaluating PD-1 inhibition in earlier stages of disease.

PURPOSE The US Food and Drug Administration has granted regulatory approval for the use of nivolumab—an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)—in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC), regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, the efficacy of ICIs in low PD-L1–expressing tumors remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study aims to reconstruct unreported Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots of PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) subgroups of randomized phase III trials comparing the addition of ICIs with conventional chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of GEAC. A graphical reconstructive algorithm was adopted to estimate time-to-event outcomes from reported overall survival and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) KM plots describing overall or subgroup cohorts. Using reconstructed time-to-event outcomes, KMSubtraction conducts bipartite matching of patients from the reported subgroup among the overall cohort. By excluding matched patients, KM plots and survival analyses of the unreported subgroups were retrieved. RESULTS CheckMate-649, KEYNOTE-062, and KEYNOTE-590 were included. Two PD-L1 subgroups were identified with data unreported in the primary manuscripts: PD-L1 CPS 1-4 from CheckMate-649 and PD-L1 CPS 1-9 from KEYNOTE-062. No significant differences in OS and PFS were demonstrated in ICI-chemotherapy combinations when compared with chemotherapy among CheckMate-649 PD-L1 CPS 1-4 (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.950, 95% CI, 0.747 to 1.209, P = .678; PFS: HR = 0.958, 95% CI, 0.743 to 1.236, P = .743) and KEYNOTE-062 PD-L1 CPS 1-9 subgroups. In the KEYNOTE-062 PD-L1 CPS 1-9 subgroup, patients treated with pembrolizumab had an increased hazard of tumor progression (HR = 2.092, 95% CI, 1.661 to 2.635, P < .001). CONCLUSION Using KMSubtraction, data of PD-L1 subgroups previously unreported by primary manuscripts of pivotal clinical trials were retrieved. These data suggest the lack of benefit in the addition of ICI to chemotherapy in low PD-L1–expressing GEAC tumors.

BACKGROUND Most patients presenting with oesophageal cancer do so with advanced disease not suitable for surgery. However, there are examples of encouraging survival following surgery in highly selected patients who respond well to chemotherapy. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented with advanced but nonvisceral metastatic oesophageal cancer. Consecutive patients on a prolonged primary chemotherapy pathway who underwent surgical resection following a favourable response to chemotherapy were included. Survival and recurrence rates were analysed using Cox regression, providing hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS A total of 57 patients included in the cohort operated between 2007 and 2015, the overall median survival was 44 months and the 5-year survival was 42%. Prechemotherapy cN0/cN1 (HR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.62) conferred an independent survival advantage compared to cN2 and cN3 disease. Poor differentiation (HR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.11-5.42), R1 resection (HR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.14-5.19) and advanced nodal status (HR: 3.28, 95% CI: 1.44-7.47) predicted worse survival on univariable analysis. Poor differentiation (HR: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.62-9.56) was independently associated with poor survival when adjusted for other variables. CONCLUSION Patients who present with advanced inoperable oesophageal cancer who have a favourable response to chemotherapy represent a limited group of patients who may benefit from surgery.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a rare gastrointestinal tumour with high mortality. A multimodality treatment based on chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the standard of care in the case of non-metastatic disease; chemotherapy has historically been the gold standard in the metastatic setting. However, the rate of relapse after curative treatment is high and the prognosis of ESCC is poor. In this context, immunotherapy is a novel and intriguing chance to improve survival. Therefore, in this narrative review, we depict the current scenario in the field of immunotherapy for ESCC according to the stage of disease and alongside the discussion of promising biomarkers and future perspectives. The Checkmate-577 trial showed that nivolumab is the best option as adjuvant treatment in patients with non-metastatic ESCC and residual disease after a multimodality approach. In the metastatic setting, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, camrelizumab, sintilimab and toripalimab improved survival outcomes as a first-line treatment in addition to chemotherapy. In the second-line, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, camrelizumab and tislelizumab showed positive results, with differences according to the subgroups, agents and study population included in the trials. Then, the finding of valid molecular biomarkers is crucial in selecting patients for immunotherapy.

The CheckMate 649 trial, recently published in Nature, established chemotherapy plus nivolumab as a standard in advanced, treatment-naive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, with best results seen in patients with high PD-L1 expression and microsatellite unstable tumors. In contrast, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, compared with chemotherapy, showed early progression and no overall survival benefit.

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and squamous esophageal cancer (ESCC) are responsible for1 million deaths annually globally. Until now, patients with metastatic GEA and ESCC could anticipate survival of1 year. Anti- programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy has demonstrated modest efficacy in previously treated GEA and ESCC. In 2020, four pivotal trials have established anti-PD-1 therapy as a new standard of care for selected GEA and ESCC patients as first-line advanced and adjuvant therapy. In this review, we discuss the recent results of the CheckMate 649, ATTRACTION-4, KEYNOTE-590 and CheckMate 577 trials. We consider these results in the context of current standards of care and historical trials of immune checkpoint blockade in GEA and ESCC. We explore biomarker selection for anti-PD-1 therapy and appraise the future of combination therapies. In CheckMate 649, treatment with oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy plus nivolumab in patients with combined positive score ≥5 GEA tumors provided a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in overall survival. The ATTRACTION-4 trial did not see a similar overall survival benefit, despite a clear improvement in progression-free survival. We review potential explanations for this result. KEYNOTE-590 showed profoundly improved survival when pembrolizumab was added to cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in ESCC patients with combined positive score ≥10 tumors; this benefit was less convincing in unselected ESCC. Finally, CheckMate 577 provides proof-of-concept for the improvement in disease-free survival with adjuvant nivolumab in high-risk resected GEA and ESCC following trimodality therapy. Immune checkpoint blockade has come of age in GEA and ESCC, and will now be integrated into first-line and earlier lines of therapy, providing benefit for a larger proportion of patients. Biomarker standardization will be critical to select the patients most likely to benefit from treatment. For patients with immune evasive tumors, novel combinations under development show promise; however, global trials are needed.

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is rapidly rising and has a 5-year survival rate of20%. Beyond TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) staging, no reliable risk stratification tools exist and no large-scale studies have profiled circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at relapse in EAC. Here we analyze the prognostic potential of ctDNA dynamics in EAC, taking into account clonal hematopoiesis with indeterminate potential (CHIP).A total of 245 samples from 97 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery were identified from the prospective national UK Oesophageal Cancer Clinical and Molecular Stratification (OCCAMS) consortium data set. A pan-cancer ctDNA panel comprising 77 genes was used. Plasma and peripheral blood cell samples were sequenced to a mean depth of 7082× (range 2196-28 524) and ctDNA results correlated with survival.Characteristics of the 97 patients identified were as follows: 83/97 (86%) male, median age 68 years (SD 9.5 years), 100% cT3/T4, 75% cN+. EAC-specific drivers had higher variant allele fractions than passenger mutations. Using stringent quality criteria 16/79 (20%) were ctDNA positive following resection; recurrence was observed in 12/16 (75%) of these. As much as 78/97 (80%) had CHIP analyses that enabled filtering for CHIP variants, which were found in 18/78 (23%) of cases. When CHIP was excluded, 10/63 (16%) patients were ctDNA positive and 9/10 of these (90%) recurred. With correction for CHIP, median cancer-specific survival for ctDNA-positive patients was 10.0 months versus 29.9 months for ctDNA-negative patients (hazard ratio 5.55, 95% confidence interval 2.42-12.71; P = 0.0003). Similar outcomes were observed for disease-free survival.We demonstrate in a large, national, prospectively collected data set that ctDNA in plasma following surgery for EAC is prognostic for relapse. Inclusion of peripheral blood cell samples can reduce or eliminate false positives from CHIP. In future, post-operative ctDNA could be used to risk stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups for intensification or de-escalation of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Background: The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery is contentious. In UK practice, surgical resection margin status is often used to classify patients into receiving adjuvant treatment. This study aimed to assess any survival benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with clear resection margins. Methods: This was a retrospective collaborative cohort study combining two prospectively collected UK institutional databases of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity matched analyses were used to compare overall and recurrence-free survival according to the adjuvant treatment. Results: Of 374 patients with clear resection margins, 221 patients (59%) had no adjuvant treatment, 137 patients (37%) had adjuvant chemotherapy and 16 patients (4%) had adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. For patients who had received NAC (290, 76%), when adjuvant chemotherapy was compared to no adjuvant treatment, hazard ratios (HRs) favoured adjuvant chemotherapy but did not reach independent significance (overall survival [OS] HR 0.65 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.06; p.0.087). Responders to NAC (Mandard 1–3) were seemingly more likely to demonstrate a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.42 95% CI 0.15–1.11; p.1.081). Conclusions: Although no independent survival benefit was observed, the point estimates favoured adjuvant treatment, predominantly in patients with chemo-responsive tumours. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Esophagogastric cancers remain a considerable health burden and among the top causes of global cancer-related deaths. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for patients with advanced disease. Doublet platinum/fluoropyrimidine therapy is established as first-line treatment with the option of adding a taxane in selected patients. Irinotecan, taxanes, and ramucirumab are approved as second-line treatments. Results from the trials KEYNOTE-059, ATTRACTION-2, and TAGS have established the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment. High PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and Epstein-Barr virus status may also be used to enrich for responses to immunotherapy.In this review, we discuss the outcome of recent trials in the later lines of therapy for esophagogastric cancer and place these in the context of current treatment paradigms. We also discuss the biology of esophagogastric cancers and how this might inform the development of new treatments. Finally, we comment on promising new drugs in development.Recent advances in the treatment of chemo-refractory esophagogastric cancer add to the improving survival of patients with this disease. Further research is needed to improve patient selection to therapies and the earlier incorporation of these agents in the treatment journey.

Initial studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors in biomarker unselected gastro-oesophageal cancer yielded limited improvement in survival. However, emerging data from recent clinical trials suggest immunotherapies may offer a meaningful clinical benefit within selected populations. Gastro-oesophageal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with respect to histopathological and molecular features; hypermutation and the biology of immune checkpoint pathways are key to appropriate selection of populations most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression, typically measured using the combined positive score, is an important biomarker in determining which patients may benefit from immunotherapy agents. However, combined positive score thresholds are not standardised across trials and the benefit in programmed death-ligand 1-negative cohorts is uncertain. Data suggest that patients with tumours with microsatellite instability, high tumour mutational burden and Epstein-Barr Virus positivity are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy, which may be of importance within programmed death-ligand 1-negative populations. Here, we describe the current evidence base for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and adjuvant treatment of high-risk oesophageal cancer, as well as the ongoing studies of immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal cancers across an increasing range of clinical settings.

Purpose of review Surgery represents the only curative approach for resectable gastric cancer. However, rates of recurrence remain high. This review summarizes the state of the art and future perspectives regarding perioperative, neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer with insights regarding precision medicine. Recent findings Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has significantly improved outcomes for non-Asian patients with resectable gastric cancer, removing the role for anthracyclines. Preliminary results demonstrate that the perioperative approach is an option for Asian patients; however, long-term outcomes are awaited. For adjuvant treatment in Asian gastric cancer patients, S-1 as well as docetaxel may be a new treatment option. In this context, the right selection of patients is crucial. Among several biomarkers, microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency has been linked with a lack of benefit from chemotherapy as well as better prognosis. Summary Multimodality treatment represents the standard of care for resectable gastric cancer. Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT is the standard treatment in western countries; in patients who are not suitable for triplet, a platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublet can be considered. In Asian countries, adjuvant chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or in association with oxaliplatin/docetaxel are options. Validation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers is needed in order to improve patient selection.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide. Although GC was historically considered a single entity within the organ of origin, nowadays it is acknowledged that GC represents a heterogeneous disease. Nevertheless, in this field there is still a lack of biomarkers able to guide the choice of the best treatment options for each patient. This review aims to summarize the prognostic and predictive biomarkers evaluated in GC and their role as a guide for treatment for precision medicine. Summary: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression represents the only predictive molecular biomarker validated in GC, while its prognostic role is still controversial. Microsatellite instability and Epstein-Barr virus status are promising for prediction of the response to immunotherapy. The role of other biomarkers (ctDNA, programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1], and TMB), as well as the practical application of molecular classifications, requires further evaluation before use in clinical practice. 18-FDG-PET scan could be useful as a predictive tool in non-metastatic GC patients receiving a perioperative approach. Finally, the tumor microenvironment may have an evolving role in the future. Key Messages: GC is a heterogeneous disease and targeted approaches are needed. The finding of prognostic and predictive factors is a hot topic in the field of GC personalized medicine.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2). The primary objective of the NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 trial was to establish whether trastuzumab improves disease-free survival when combined with trimodality treatment (paclitaxel plus carboplatin and radiotherapy, followed by surgery) for patients with untreated HER2-overexpressing oesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 was an open label, randomised, phase 3 trial for which patients were accrued from 111 NRG-affiliated institutions in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed pathologically confirmed oesophageal adenocarcinoma, American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition T1N1–2 or T2–3N0–2 stage disease, and a Zubrod performance status of 0–2. Patients were stratified by adenopathy (no vs yes [coeliac absent] vs yes [coeliac present ≤2 cm] ) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly intravenous paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2) intravenously over 1 h) and carboplatin (area under the curve 2, intravenously over 30–60 min) for 6 weeks with radiotherapy 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions (chemoradiotherapy) followed by surgery, with or without intravenous trastuzumab (4 mg/kg in week one, 2 mg/kg per week for 5 weeks during chemoradiotherapy, 6 mg/kg once presurgery, and 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 13 treatments starting 21–56 days after surgery). The primary endpoint, disease-free survival, was defined as the time from randomisation to death or first of locoregional disease persistence or recurrence, distant metastases, or second primary malignancy. Analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01196390; it is now closed and in follow-up. FINDINGS: 606 patients were entered for HER2 assessment from Dec 30, 2010 to Nov 10, 2015, and 203 eligible patients who were HER2-positive were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab (n=102) or chemoradiotherapy alone (n=101). Median duration of follow-up was 2·8 years (IQR 1·4–5·7). Median disease-free survival was 19·6 months (95% CI 13·5–26·2) with chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab compared with 14·2 months (10·5–23·0) for chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0·99 [95% CI 0·71–1·39], log-rank p=0·97). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 41 (43%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group versus 52 (54%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group and grade 4 events occurred in 20 (21%) versus 21 (22%). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events for both groups were haematological (53 [56%] of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group vs 55 [57%] of 96 patients in the chemotherapy group) or gastrointestinal disorders (28 [29%] vs 20 [21 %]). 34 (36%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group and 27 (28%) of 96 patients in the chemoradiotherapy only group had treatment-related serious adverse events. There were eight treatment-related deaths: five (5%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group (bronchopleural fistula, oesophageal anastomotic leak, lung infection, sudden death, and death not otherwise specified), and three (3%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group (two multiorgan failure and one sepsis). INTERPRETATION: The addition of trastuzumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for HER2-overexpressing oesophageal cancer was not effective. Trastuzumab did not lead to increased toxicities, suggesting that future studies combining it with or using other agents targeting HER2 in oesophageal cancer are warranted.

BACKGROUND: A uniform definition and treatment for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer is currently lacking. However, a comprehensive definition of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer is necessary to initiate studies on local treatment strategies (e.g. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy) and new systemic therapy agents in this group of patients. For this purpose, the OligoMetastatic Esophagogastric Cancer (OMEC) project was established. The OMEC-project aims to develop a multidisciplinary European consensus statement on the definition, diagnosis, and treatment for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer and provide a framework for prospective studies to improve outcomes of these patients. METHODS: The OMEC-project consists of five studies, including 1) a systematic review on definitions and outcomes of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer; 2) real-life clinical scenario discussions in multidisciplinary expert teams to determine the variation in the definition and treatment strategies; 3) Delphi consensus process through a starting meeting, two Delphi questionnaire rounds, and a consensus meeting; 4) publication of a multidisciplinary European consensus statement; and 5) a prospective clinical trial in patients with oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer. DISCUSSION: The OMEC project aims to establish a multidisciplinary European consensus statement for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer and aims to initiate a prospective clinical trial to improve outcomes for these patients. Recommendations from OMEC can be used to update the relevant guidelines on treatment for patients with (oligometastatic) esophagogastric cancer. ispartof: EJSO vol:49 issue:1 pages:21-28 ispartof: location:England status: published

The advent of ctDNA has the potential to be a game changer in some cancers, but limited data is available in oesophago-gastric cancers (OGC). The prognostic value of ctDNA and the potential for false positive results due to clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) was recently reported in operable OGC.

PURPOSE Early-onset (EO) colorectal cancer (CRC, age < 50 years) incidence is increasing. Decisions on optimal adjuvant therapy should consider treatment adherence, adverse events, and expected outcomes in a population with life expectancy longer than later-onset (LO) CRC (age ≥ 50 years). MATERIALS AND METHODS Individual patient data from six trials in the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy database were analyzed. Characteristics, treatment adherence, and adverse events in stage II or III EO-CRC and LO-CRC were compared. To reduce confounders of non–cancer-related deaths because of age or comorbidities, time to recurrence (3-year relapse-free rate) and cancer-specific survival (5-year cancer-specific mortality rate) were considered. RESULTS Out of 16,349 patients, 1,564 (9.6%) had EO-CRC. Compared with LO-CRC, EO-CRC had better performance status (86% v 80%, P < .01), similar T stage (% T1-3/T4: 76/24 v 77/23, P = .97), higher N2 disease rate (24% v 22%, P < .01), more likely to complete the planned treatment duration (83.2% v 78.2%, P < .01), and received a higher treatment dose intensity, especially with 6-month regimens. Gastrointestinal toxicity was more common in EO-CRC; hematologic toxicity was more frequent in LO-CRC. Compared with LO-CRC, significantly worse cancer-specific outcomes were demonstrated especially in high-risk stage III EO-CRC: lower 3-year relapse-free rate (54% v 65%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.33; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.55; P value < .001) and higher 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate (24% v 20%; HR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.47; P value < .06). In this subgroup, no difference was observed with 3 or 6 months of therapy, with equally poor disease-free survival rates (57% v 56%; HR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.29; P value = .85). CONCLUSION Young age is negatively prognostic in high-risk stage III CRC and associated with significantly higher relapse rate; this is despite better treatment adherence and higher administered treatment intensity, suggesting more aggressive disease biology.

Biliary tract cancer; Colorectal cancer; Drug development Cáncer del tracto biliar; Cáncer colorrectal; Desarrollo de fármacos Càncer del tracte biliar; Càncer colorectal; Desenvolupament de fàrmacs Last year the field of immunotherapy was finally introduced to GI oncology, with several changes in clinical practice such as advanced hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal MSI-H. At the virtual ASCO-GI symposium 2021, several large trial results have been reported, some leading to a change of practice. Furthermore, during ASCO-GI 2021, results from early phase trials have been presented, some with potential important implications for future treatments. We provide here an overview of these important results and their integration into routine clinical practice. Open Access funding provided by Université de Genève.

Summary: Most, but not all, patients with microsatellite-unstable gastric cancer respond to anti–PD-1 therapy. In this issue, Kwon and colleagues show, first, that differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB) may drive this variation in outcomes and, second, that treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors leads to further immunoediting and a reduction in TMB in responding patients. See related article by Kwon et al., p. 2168.

Chapter 8 discusses gastric tumours. Gastric adenocarcinoma is the fifth most common cancer globally and the third most common cause of cancer death. Although diagnosis is largely by endoscopy, imaging is integral to accurate staging and subsequent treatment decisions. The mobility and volume changes of the stomach can make interpretation of imaging difficult unless measures are taken to compensate for the differences in volume and relative collapse or distension of the mucosa and gastric wall. Other tumour types include lymphoma, stromal tumours, and metastases, but this chapter will focus on the imaging of adenocarcinoma. In addition there is a crossover between pure gastric tumours and tumours of the gastroesophageal junction. These are subclassified into Siewert types I, II, and III, the latter centred in the proximal stomach. The type III tumours are therefore staged and managed as gastric cancers.

PURPOSE: Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) has a poor prognosis and few therapeutic options. Utilizing a 73-gene plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA-NGS) test, we sought to evaluate the role of ctDNA-NGS in guiding clinical decision-making in GEA. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated a large cohort (n=2140 tests; 1630 patients) of ctDNA-NGS results (including 369 clinically-annotated pts). Patients were assessed for genomic alteration (GA) distribution and correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Treatment history, tumor site, and disease burden dictated tumor-DNA shedding and consequent ctDNA-NGS maximum somatic variant allele frequency (maxVAF). Patients with locally advanced disease having detectable ctDNA post-operatively experienced inferior median disease-free survival (mDFS) (p=0.03). The genomic landscape was similar but not identical to tissue-NGS, reflecting temporospatial molecular heterogeneity, with some targetable GAs identified at higher frequency via ctDNA-NGS compared to previous primary tumor-NGS cohorts. Patients with known microsatellite instability-high (MSI-High) tumors were robustly detected with ctDNA-NGS. Predictive biomarker assessment was optimized by incorporating tissue-NGS and ctDNA-NGS assessment in a complementary manner. HER2-inhibition demonstrated a profound survival benefit in HER2 amplified patients by ctDNA-NGS and/or tissue-NGS (mOS 26.3 versus 7.4 months (p=0.002)), as did EGFR inhibition in EGFR amplified patients (mOS 21.1 versus 14.4 months (p=0.01)). CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA-NGS characterized GEA molecular heterogeneity and rendered important prognostic and predictive information, complementary to tissue-NGS.

Gastrointestinal cancers are very common cancers with colorectal being the fourth most common type, gastric the sixth, and esophageal the tenth. Although recent advances have been made in management including incorporation of antiangiogenic, anti-EGFR, and anti-HER2 directed therapies, overall their prognosis remains poor. Anti-PD-1 therapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab are licensed for advanced chemorefractory gastroesophageal cancer and many other checkpoint inhibitor therapies are being assessed alone and in combination in these diseases. One of the challenges posed in assessing response to immunotherapy treatment is the phenomenon of pseudoprogression. This phenomenon, which is well described in patients with malignant melanoma is most frequently described as a size increase of contrast enhancing lesions or appearance of new lesions that stabilize or reduce in size with time. Most other solid tumors have a low incidence of pseudoprogression although cases have been reported for lung, head, and neck cancer and a range of gliomas. Herein we present 6 cases of patients with gastrointestinal cancers who were treated with anti-PD1 (programmed cell death) and anti-PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand-1) antibodies, and experience pseudoprogression.

Importance Perioperative chemotherapy and surgery are a standard of care for operable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Anti-HER2 therapy improves survival in patients with advanced HER2-positive disease. The safety and feasibility of adding lapatinib to perioperative chemotherapy should be assessed. Objectives To assess the safety of adding lapatinib to epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) chemotherapy and to establish a recommended dose regimen for a phase 3 trial. Design, Setting, and Participants Phase 2 randomized, open-label trial comparing standard ECX (sECX: 3 preoperative and 3 postoperative cycles of ECX with modified ECX plus lapatinib (mECX+L). This multicenter national trial was conducted in 29 centers in the United Kingdom in patients with histologically proven, HER2-positive, operable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Registration forERBB/HER2testing took place from February 25, 2013, to April 19, 2016, and randomization took place between May 24, 2013, and April 21, 2016. Data were analyzed May 10, 2017, to May 25, 2017. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 open-label to sECX (3 preoperative and 3 postoperative cycles of 50 mg/m2of intravenous epirubicin on day 1, 60 mg/m2intravenous cisplatin on day 1, 1250 mg/m2 of oral capecitabine on days 1 through 21) or mECX+L (ECX plus lapatinib days 1 through 21 in each cycle and as 6 maintenance doses). The first 10 patients in the mECX+L arm were treated with 1000 mg/m2of capecitabine and 1250 mg of lapatinib per day, after which preoperative toxic effects were reviewed according to predefined criteria to determine doses for subsequent patients. Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 diarrhea with mECX+L. A rate of 20% or less was considered acceptable. No formal comparison between arms was planned. Results Between February 2013, and April 2016, 441 patients underwent central HER2 testing and 63 (14%) were classified as HER2 positive. Forty-six patients were randomized; 44 (24 sECX, 20 mECX+L) are included in this analysis. Two of the first 10 patients in the mECX+L arm reported preoperative grade 3 diarrhea; thus, no dose increase was made. The primary endpoint of preoperative grade 3 or 4 diarrhea rates were 0 of 24 in the sECX arm (0%) and 4 of 20 in the mECX+L arm (21%). One of 24 in the sECX arm and 3 of 20 in the mECX+L arm stopped preoperative treatment early, and for 4 of 19 in the mECX+L arm, lapatinib dose was reduced. Postoperative complication rates were similar in each arm. Conclusions and Relevance Administration of 1250 mg of lapatinib per day in combination with ECX chemotherapy was feasible with some increase in toxic effects, which did not compromise operative management. Trial Registration ISRCTN.org identifier:46020948; clinicaltrialsregister.eu identifier:2006-000811-12

Background The UK Medical Research Council ST03 trial compared perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (B) in gastric and oesophagogastric junctional cancer. No difference in survival was noted between the arms of the trial. The present study reviewed the standards and performance of surgery in the context of the protocol-specified surgical criteria. Methods Surgical and pathological clinical report forms were reviewed to determine adherence to the surgical protocols, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and final histopathological stage for all patients treated in the study. Results Of 1063 patients randomized, 895 (84·2 per cent) underwent resection; surgical details were available for 880 (98·3 per cent). Postoperative assessment data were available for 873 patients; complications occurred in 458 (52·5 per cent) overall, of whom 71 (8·1 per cent) developed complications deemed to be life-threatening by the responsible clinician. The most common complications were respiratory (211 patients, 24·2 per cent). The anastomotic leak rate was 118 of 873 (13·5 per cent) overall; among those who underwent oesophagogastrectomy, the rate was higher in the group receiving ECX-B (23·6 per cent versus 9·9 per cent in the ECX group). Pathological assessment data were available for 845 patients. At least 15 nodes were removed in 82·5 per cent of resections and the median lymph node harvest was 24 (i.q.r. 17–34). Twenty-five or more nodes were removed in 49·0 per cent of patients. Histopathologically, the R1 rate was 24·9 per cent (208 of 834 patients). An R1 resection was more common for proximal tumours. Conclusion In the ST03 trial, the performance of surgery met the protocol-stipulated criteria. Registration number: NCT00450203 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionised the treatment of multiple cancers including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, urothelial and renal cell cancers. For patients with chemorefractory gastroesophageal cancer, treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy results in modest benefits in overall survival; nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been licenced in Japan and the USA, respectively, for this indication. However, initial enthusiasm has been tempered by the results of several large negative trials; immune checkpoint blockade is not superior to chemotherapy in the second-line setting or beyond in unselected or low PD-L1-expressing patients. Microsatellite instability is uncommon in patients with metastatic gastric cancer; however, it is associated with response rates of more than 50% and long-term survival benefit. Combining anti-PD-1 with cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapies also shows promise to extend the benefit of immune checkpoint blockade to a larger proportion of gastroesophageal cancer patients. In this review we discuss recently reported and ongoing clinical research in immunotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer, and consider molecular biology associated with sensitivity and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in gastroesophageal cancer patients.

Purpose of review This article reviews recent randomised clinical trials on systemic treatment of oesophago-gastric cancers in the perioperative and metastatic setting. Recent findings Adding nivolumab to first-line chemotherapy improved survival in patients with metastatic gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction/oesophageal adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ five in a global trial and progression-free survival in metastatic gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction cancers in an Asian trial. The addition of pembrolizumab to first-line chemotherapy improved survival in metastatic oesophageal cancer patients, with the most benefit in oesophageal squamous cancer and tumours with high PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 10). Adjuvant nivolumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) in resectable oesophageal cancer patients with residual pathologic disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma, a phase II trial showed improved DFS when pertuzumab and trastuzumab were added to perioperative FLOT (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel). Another phase II trial showed improved response rates and survival in pretreated metastatic HER2-positive gastric and gastrooesophageal junction cancer patients who received the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan compared to physician's choice of chemotherapy. Summary Chemo-immunotherapy combinations will become the new standard of care for some patients with metastatic oesophago-gastric cancers. Adjuvant nivolumab is a new option for oesophageal cancer patients with poor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

The introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CKIs) has marked a major development in the standard treatment of advanced breast cancer. Extensive preclinical, translational and clinical research efforts into CKI agents are ongoing, and clinical application of this class of systemic anti-cancer therapy is anticipated to expand beyond metastatic breast cancer treatment. Emerging evidence indicates that mechanisms by which CKI agents exert their therapeutic effect transcend their initially expected impacts on cell cycle control into the realms of cancer immunology and metabolism. The recent expansion in our understanding of the multifaceted impact of CKIs on tumour biology has the potential to improve clinical study design, therapeutic strategies and ultimately patient outcomes. This review contextualises the current status of CKI therapy by providing an overview of the original and emerging insights into mechanisms of action and the evidence behind their current routine use in breast cancer management. Recent preclinical and clinical studies into CKIs across tumour types are discussed, including a synthesis of the more than 300 clinical trials of CKI-combination treatments registered as of November 2020. Key challenges and opportunities anticipated in the 2020s are explored, including treatment resistance, combination therapy strategies and potential biomarker development.

Among the most relevant highlights of the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2020 virtual meeting were several important advances for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal cancers, which were presented and discussed at the third presidential session. Two phase III randomised trials studied the addition of Nivolumab to standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas, including gastric, junctional and lower third oesophageal locations in the CheckMate649 trial1 and only gastric and junctional locations for the ATTRACTION-4 study.2 In both trials, at least one primary endpoint was met and therefore, we should consider them as positive studies. However, their practical consequences, implying modifications in clinical practice and adoption as standard of care require a careful analysis of all details in both studies. Both studies share a similar design but they also differ in some relevant aspects. CheckMate649 is a global study which accrued patients from all over the world, while ATTRACTION-4 did only so in Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Both had similar stratification factors including tumour cell PD-L1 expression ≥1% vs ≤1% and compared the addition of Nivolumab to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy (CAPOX or FOLFOX for CheckMate649 and CAPOX or S1 plus oxaliplatin for ATTRACTION-4) with the same co-primary end points: centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), although for a biomarker selected group only (PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥5) in CheckMate-649). Nivolumab was able to increase response rate and PFS in both studies. However, OS was only significantly prolonged for patients allocated to the Nivolumab plus chemotherapy …

Purpose Only 25% of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) patients have a pathological response to neo-adjuvant therapy (NAT) before oesophagectomy. Early response assessment using PET imaging may help guide management of these patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the evidence detailing response rate and diagnostic accuracy of early PET-CT assessment. Methods We systematically searched several databases including MEDLINE and Embase. Studies with mixed cohorts of histology, tumour location and a repeat PET-CT assessment after more than one cycle of NAT were excluded. Reference standard was pathological response defined by Becker or Mandard classifications. Primary outcome was metabolic response rate after one cycle of NAT defined by a reduction in maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) of 35%. Secondary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of treatment response prediction, defined as the sensitivity and specificity of early PET-CT using this threshold. Quality of evidence was also assessed. Random-effects meta-analysis pooled response rates and diagnostic accuracy. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019147034). Results Overall, 1341 articles were screened, and 6 studies were eligible for analysis. These studies reported data for 518 patients (aged 27-78 years; 452 [87.3%] were men) between 2005 and 2020. Pooled sensitivity of early metabolic response to predict pathological response was 77.2% (95% CI 53.2%-100%). Significant heterogeneity existed between studies (I2 = 80.6% (95% CI 38.9%-93.8%), P = .006). Pooled specificity was 75.0% (95% CI 68.2%-82.5%), however, no significant heterogeneity between studies existed (I2 = 0.0% (95% CI 0.0%-67.4%), P = .73). Conclusion High-quality evidence is lacking, and few studies met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The sensitivity of PET using a SUVmax reduction threshold of 35% was suboptimal and varied widely. However, specificity was consistent across studies with a pooled value of 75.0%, suggesting early PET assessment is a better predictor of treatment resistance than of pathological response. Further research is required to define optimal PET-guided treatment decisions in OAC.

IMPORTANCE: Safe and effective therapies for untreated, advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer remain an unmet need. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antitumor activity of pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone in patients with untreated, advanced G/GEJ cancer with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) of 1 or greater. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-062 randomized, controlled, partially blinded interventional trial enrolled 763 patients with untreated, locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic G/GEJ cancer with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or greater from 200 centers in 29 countries between September 18, 2015, and May 26, 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2)/d on day 1 plus fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 5 or capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily), or chemotherapy plus placebo, every 3 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or greater or 10 or greater. RESULTS: A total of 763 patients were randomized to pembrolizumab (n = 256), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 257), or chemotherapy (n = 250). The median (range) age of all patients in the study cohort was 62 (20-87) years; 554 of 763 (72.6%) were men. At final analysis, after a median (range) follow-up of 29.4 (22.0-41.3) months, pembrolizumab was noninferior to chemotherapy for OS in patients with CPS of 1 or greater (median, 10.6 vs 11.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 99.2% CI, 0.69-1.18). Pembrolizumab monotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy in patients with CPS of 1 or greater. Pembrolizumab prolonged OS vs chemotherapy in patients with CPS of 10 or greater (median, 17.4 vs 10.8 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.97), but this difference was not statistically tested. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy for OS in patients with CPS of 1 or greater (12.5 vs 11.1 months; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70-1.03; P = .05) or CPS of 10 or greater (12.3 vs 10.8 months; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62-1.17; P = .16) or for PFS in patients with CPS of 1 or greater (6.9 vs 6.4 months; HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-1.02; P = .04). Grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse event rates for pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, and chemotherapy were 17%, 73%, and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This phase 3 randomized clinical trial found that among patients with untreated, advanced G/GEJ cancer, pembrolizumab was noninferior to chemotherapy, with fewer adverse events observed. Pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy for the OS and PFS end points tested. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02494583

Background Patients with potentially curable oesophageal adenocarcinoma have a staging positron emission tomography (PET) examination combined with a computed tomography (CT) to assess loco-regional and distant disease. Although only 20-30% of patients are suitable for surgical resection, the majority receive neo-adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy) before their operation. However, less than 25% experience any clinically meaningful benefit from the neo-adjuvant therapy. A repeat PET/CT after one cycle of treatment can assess for early metabolic response but remains exploratory. Patients without an early response could be offered alternative treatment strategies. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to estimate the early response rate defined by PET/CT, its diagnostic accuracy and explore associated factors. Methods Primary studies reporting response rates and diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT will be identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Peer-reviewed randomised control trials, observational cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies reporting original response rate data, published from 2005 onwards will be included. Studies recruiting mixed cohorts and with PET/CT repeated after more than one neo-adjuvant treatment cycle will be excluded. The reference standard will be pathological response, defined by either validated Becker or Mandard tumour regression grade (TRG) classifications. The primary outcome will be metabolic response rate after one neo-adjuvant treatment cycle, defined by a reduction in maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) of 35%. Secondary outcome will be the sensitivity and specificity of early metabolic response to predict pathological response at this SUVmax reduction threshold. Pooled early response rate, sensitivity and specificity will be calculated using a random effects model with data extracted from selected studies. Heterogeneity between studies, risk of bias and methodological quality will be assessed. Discussion This systematic review and meta-analysis will identify and synthesise evidence to determine early response rates to neo-adjuvant therapies and the corresponding diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT to guide future clinical trials. This strategy could identify patients that will not respond to neo-adjuvant therapy and to offer this group alternative treatment strategies. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019147034)

This chapter outlines the basic science and theory of Principles of oncology and palliative care required for MRCP Part 1, before addressing the clinical aspects of Principles of oncology and palliative care for MRCP Part 2. To ensure effective revision, material is presented in short sections with bullet lists, tables, and boxes to highlight key facts.

Introduction Digital social networks have become a key player in the ecosystem of young patients with cancer, with regard to their unique perspectives and unmet needs. This study aims to investigate the web-based social community tools and to characterise the user profile, unmet needs and goals of young patients with cancer. Methods A web-based survey was distributed via large-scale social network designated for young patients with cancer (age 18–45 years) Stop Cancer. The survey collected demographic data and oncological status. Primary outcome was potential goals of accessing the network; secondary outcomes were emotional impact, effect of disease status, education, marital status and employment, on user satisfaction rate. Results The survey was available for 5 days (10/2018) and was filled by 523 participants. Breast cancer, haematological malignancies and colorectal cancer were the most common diagnoses. The majority had non-metastatic disease at diagnosis, 79% had no evidence of disease at time of the survey. Forty-five per cent considered the network as a reliable source for medical information. Academic education was associated with higher satisfaction from the platform. There were no differences between cancer survivors and patients with active disease in patterns of platform usage. The social network had an allocated section for ‘patient mentoring’ of newly diagnosed members by survivors. Discussion Our study portrayed the user prototype of a social digital network among young adult patients with cancer, indicating challenging trends. Whereas social media may prove a powerful tool for patients and physicians alike, it may also serve as a research tool to appraise wide practices within a heterogeneous population. Nevertheless, it acts as a double-edged sword in the setting of uncontrolled medical information. It is our role as healthcare providers to join this race and play an active role in shaping its medical perspectives.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) are heterogeneous and often preceded by Barrett's esophagus (BE). Many genomic changes have been associated with development of BE and EAC, but little is known about epigenetic alterations. We performed epigenetic analyses of BE and EAC tissues and combined these data with transcriptome and genomic data to identify mechanisms that control gene expression and genome integrity.METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we collected tissue samples and clinical data from 150 BE and 285 EAC cases from the Oesophageal Cancer Classification and Molecular Stratification consortium in the United Kingdom. We analyzed methylation profiles of all BE and EAC tissues and assigned them to subgroups using non-negative matrix factorization with k-means clustering. Data from whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome studies were then incorporated; we performed integrative methylation and RNA-sequencing analyses to identify genes that were suppressed with increased methylation in promoter regions. Levels of different immune cell types were computed using single-sample gene set enrichment methods. We derived 8 organoids from 8 EAC tissues and tested their sensitivity to different drugs.RESULTS: BE and EAC samples shared genome-wide methylation features, compared with normal tissues (esophageal, gastric, and duodenum; controls) from the same patients and grouped into 4 subtypes. Subtype 1 was characterized by DNA hypermethylation with a high mutation burden and multiple mutations in genes in cell cycle and receptor tyrosine signaling pathways. Subtype 2 was characterized by a gene expression pattern associated with metabolic processes (ATP synthesis and fatty acid oxidation) and lack methylation at specific binding sites for transcription factors; 83% of samples of this subtype were BE and 17% were EAC. The third subtype did not have changes in methylation pattern, compared with control tissue, but had a gene expression pattern that indicated immune cell infiltration; this tumor type was associated with the shortest time of patient survival. The fourth subtype was characterized by DNA hypomethylation associated with structure rearrangements, copy number alterations, with preferential amplification of CCNE1 (cells with this gene amplification have been reported to be sensitive to CDK2 inhibitors). Organoids with reduced levels of MGMT and CHFR expression were sensitive to temozolomide and taxane drugs.CONCLUSIONS: In a comprehensive integrated analysis of methylation, transcriptome, and genome profiles of more than 400 BE and EAC tissues, along with clinical data, we identified 4 subtypes that were associated with patient outcomes and potential responses to therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibition has transformed cancer treatment. For gastroesophageal cancer, this class of drugs have demonstrated durable responses and survival benefit in a subgroup of patients, resulting in regulatory approval. However, several recent randomized phase III studies in gastroesophageal cancer have reported negative results, blunting initial enthusiasm. Identification and validation of predictive biomarkers with appropriate patient selection for benefit from immunotherapy is an area of intense research with novel concepts rapidly emerging. In this review we describe the latest immune checkpoint inhibitor trials which have been reported in gastroesophageal cancers with a focus on predictive biomarkers. We also explore novel biomarkers being developed to improve precision oncology for immunotherapy in gastroesophageal cancers.

Background: Perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery is one recommended standard treatment for patients with resectable gastric and esophageal cancer. Even with a multimodality treatment more than half of patients will relapse following surgical resection. Patients who have a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have an incomplete (R1) resection or have metastatic lymph nodes in the resection specimen (N+) are especially at risk of recurrence. Current clinical practice is to continue with the same chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting as before surgery. In the phase II randomized EORTC VESTIGE trial (NCT03443856), patients with high risk resected gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma will be randomized to either adjuvant chemotherapy (as before surgery) or to immunotherapy with nivolumab and low dose ipilimumab (nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W plus Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV Q6W for 1 year). The primary endpoint of the study is disease free survival, with secondary endpoints of overall survival, safety and toxicity, and quality of life. This is an open label randomized controlled multi-center phase-2 superiority trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to study arms. The trial will recruit 240 patients; recruitment commenced July 2019 and is anticipated to take 30 months. Detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria, toxicity management guidelines, and statistical plans for EORTC VESTIGE are described in the manuscript. Clinical Trial Registration: The trial is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03443856.

// Elizabeth C. Smyth 1, 2, * , Catherine Cafferkey 1, * , Andrea Loehr 3 , Tom Waddell 1, 4 , Ruwaida Begum 1 , Clare Peckitt 5 , Thomas C. Harding 3 , Minh Nguyen 3 , Alicia F. Okines 1 , Mitch Raponi 3 , Sheela Rao 1 , David Watkins 1 , Naureen Starling 1 , Gary W. Middleton 6 , Jonathan Wadsley 7 , Wasat Mansoor 4 , Tom Crosby 8 , Andrew Wotherspoon 9 , Ian Chau 1 and David Cunningham 1 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, United Kingdom 2 Current affiliation: Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom 3 Clovis Oncology, San Francisco, CA, United States of America 4 Current affiliation: Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom 5 Department of Clinical Research & Development, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton, United Kingdom 6 Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom 7 Department of Medical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom 8 Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom 9 Department of Histopathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Surrey, United Kingdom * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: David Cunningham, email: david.cunningham@rmh.nhs.uk Keywords: gastric cancer; oesophageal cancer; chemotherapy; homologous recombination deficiency; loss of heterozygosity Received: August 01, 2018 Accepted: October 06, 2018 Published: November 30, 2018 ABSTRACT Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) measured using a genomic signature for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) predicts benefit from rucaparib in ovarian cancer. We hypothesized that some oesophagogastric cancers will have high-LOH which would be prognostic in patients treated with platinum chemotherapy. Methods: Diagnostic biopsy DNA from patients treated in the REAL3 trial was sequenced using the Foundation Medicine T5 next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay. An algorithm quantified the percentage of interrogable genome with LOH. Multidimensional optimization was performed to identify a cut-off dichotomizing the population into LOH-high and low groups associated with differential survival outcomes. Results: Of 158 available samples, 117 were successfully sequenced; LOH was derived for 74 of these. A cut-off of 21% genomic LOH defined an LOH-high subgroup (n=10, 14% of population) who had median overall survival (OS) of 18.3 months (m) versus 11m for the LOH-low group (HR 0.55 95% CI 0.19-0.97, p= 0.10). Progression free survival (PFS) for LOH-high and LOH-low groups was 10.7m and 7.3m (HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.21 – 1.09, p=0.09). Sensitivity analysis censoring operated patients (n=4), demonstrated OS of 18.3m vs. 10.2m (HR 0.43, 95% CI (0.20-0.92), p=0.02; PFS was 10.5m vs. 7.2m (HR 0.55, (95% CI 0.26-1.17), p=0.09 for LOH-high and LOH-low. Conclusion: HRD assessment using an algorithmically derived LOH signature on a standard NGS panel identifies oesophagogastric cancer patients with high LOH who have prolonged survival when treated with platinum chemotherapy. Validation work will determine the signature’s predictive value in patients treated with a PARP inhibitor and with platinum chemotherapy.

During the past decades, several treatment strategies such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy have been shown to improve the prognosis of resectable esophageal cancer. Patients with squamous cell tumors respond better to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to adenocarcinoma. Therefore, in squamous tumors neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the preferred strategy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both effective in patients with adenocarcinoma. Chemoradiotherapy trials have shown higher rates of pCR, pN0 and R0 resection rates compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials. Nonetheless, it is still unclear whether one strategy should be preferred over the other in terms of overall survival for adenocarcinoma. Based on the currently available evidence, the addition of targeted agents, such as VEGF and EGFR inhibitors, to the aforementioned strategies does not lead to survival benefit. Novel targeted treatment strategies that are currently being investigated include inhibition of HER2, PD-1 or the PD-1 ligand. Molecular subgroup analysis can contribute to better understanding of disease pathogenesis and prediction of response to treatment.

Aims: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains an important therapeutic option for advanced oesophageal cancer (OC). Pathological tumour regression grade (TRG) may offer additional information by directing adjuvant treatment and/or follow-up but its clinical value remains unclear. We analysed the prognostic value of TRG and associated pathological factors in OC patients enrolled in the Medical Research Council (MRC) OE02 trial.Methods and results: Histopathology was reviewed in 497 resections from OE02 trial participants randomised to surgery (S group; n = 244) or NAC followed by surgery [chemotherapy plus surgery (CS) group; n = 253]. The association between TRG groups [responders (TRG1-3) versus non-responders (TRG4-5)], pathological lymph node (LN) status and overall survival (OS) was analysed. One hundred and ninety-five of 253 (77%) CS patients were classified as 'non-responders', with a significantly higher mortality risk compared to responders [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-2.24, P = 0.026]. OS was significantly better in patients without LN metastases irrespective of TRG [non-responders HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.33-2.63, P Conclusion: Lymph node status post-NAC is the most important prognostic factor in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer, irrespective of TRG. Potential clinical implications, e.g. adjuvant treatment or intensified follow-up, reinforce the importance of LN dissection for staging and prognostication.