Search

Data in the form of rankings, ratings, pair comparisons or clicks are frequently collected in diverse fields, from marketing to politics, to understand assessors' individual preferences. Combining such preference data with features associated with the assessors can lead to a better understanding of the assessors' behaviors and choices. The Mallows model is a popular model for rankings, as it flexibly adapts to different types of preference data, and the previously proposed Bayesian Mallows Model (BMM) offers a computationally efficient framework for Bayesian inference, also allowing capturing the users' heterogeneity via a finite mixture. We develop a Bayesian Mallows-based finite mixture model that performs clustering while also accounting for assessor-related features, called the Bayesian Mallows model with covariates (BMMx). BMMx is based on a similarity function that a priori favours the aggregation of assessors into a cluster when their covariates are similar, using the Product Partition models (PPMx) proposal. We present two approaches to measure the covariate similarity: one based on a novel deterministic function measuring the covariates' goodness-of-fit to the cluster, and one based on an augmented model as in PPMx. We investigate the performance of BMMx in both simulation experiments and real-data examples, showing the method's potential for advancing the understanding of assessor preferences and behaviors in different applications.

The multiple-network poroelasticity (MPET) equations describe deformation and pressures in an elastic medium permeated by interacting fluid networks. In this paper, we (i) place these equations in the theoretical context of coupled elliptic-parabolic problems, (ii) use this context to derive residual-based a posteriori error estimates and indicators for fully discrete MPET solutions and (iii) evaluate the performance of these error estimators in adaptive algorithms for a set of test cases: ranging from synthetic scenarios to physiologically realistic simulations of brain mechanics., Comment: Author names appear in alphabetical order in accordance with the standard convention of the mathematical sciences. All authors contributed equally to both the research and the writing of this work

Variable selection is crucial in high-dimensional omics-based analyses, since it is biologically reasonable to assume only a subset of non-noisy features contributes to the data structures. However, the task is particularly hard in an unsupervised setting, and a priori ad hoc variable selection is still a very frequent approach, despite the evident drawbacks and lack of reproducibility. We propose a Bayesian variable selection approach for rank-based unsupervised transcriptomic analysis. Making use of data rankings instead of the actual continuous measurements increases the robustness of conclusions when compared to classical statistical methods, and embedding variable selection into the inferential tasks allows complete reproducibility. Specifically, we develop a novel extension of the Bayesian Mallows model for variable selection that allows for a full probabilistic analysis, leading to coherent quantification of uncertainties. Simulation studies demonstrate the versatility and robustness of the proposed method in a variety of scenarios, as well as its superiority with respect to several competitors when varying the data dimension or data generating process. We use the novel approach to analyse genome-wide RNAseq gene expression data from ovarian cancer patients: several genes that affect cancer development are correctly detected in a completely unsupervised fashion, showing the usefulness of the method in the context of signature discovery for cancer genomics. Moreover, the possibility to also perform uncertainty quantification plays a key role in the subsequent biological investigation., Comment: 27 pages, 12 figures, 4 tables