Search

A large number of halogenated phenols are detected in the blood of humans, fish and wild-animals. We have characterized the estrogen-like activity of phenol, 4-bromophenol (4-BP), 2,4-dibromophenol (2,4-DBP), 2,4,6-tribromophenol (2,4,6-TBP) and 4- tert -butylphenol ( tert -BP) using the estrogen-dependent human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. 4-BP, 2,4-DBP and 4- tert -BP all bind to the estrogen receptor (ER) with approximately 10 000-fold less affinity than 17β-estradiol (17β-E). 2,4,6-TBP was only able to displace 43% of radiolabelled estrogen when tested at concentrations up to 1 μM, whereas phenol had no affinity for the ER. 4- tert -BP stimulated cell growth and induced estrogen-regulated proteins such as the progesterone receptor (PgR) and pS2. The brominated phenols, however, although binding to the ER, did not stimulate cell growth or increase the levels of the PgR or pS2, or reduce the level of 17β-E induced pS2. On the contrary, 4-BP, 2,4-DBP and partly 4- tert -BP reduced 17β-E-stimulated cell growth apparently by an ER independent mechanism.

Tetrabromobisphenol A (TeBBPA) is a four-meta-brominated variant of bisphenol A (BPA) and is one of the most commonly used brominated flame retardants worldwide. We compared the estrogenic potency of TeBBPA, BPA and the brominated analogs mono- (MBBPA), di- (DBBPA), and tribromobisphenol A (TrBBPA) in the estrogen-dependent human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. All of the compounds competed with 17β-estradiol for binding to the estrogen receptor, although the affinity of the test chemicals to the estrogen receptor was much lower than that of 17β-estradiol. TrBBPA and TeBBPA showed a considerably lower access to the estrogen receptors within intact MCF-7 cells incubated in 100% serum compared to incubation in serum-free medium, indicating a strong binding to serum proteins. BPA, MBBPA, and DBBPA showed only a slightly reduced access to the receptors. All of the test compounds induced proliferation in MCF-7 cells, the potential decreasing with increasing number of bromo-substitutions. TeBBPA did not induce maximal cell growth, indicating cytotoxic effects at high concentrations. BPA and the brominated analogs, except TeBBPA, induced progesterone receptor and pS2 to the same extent as 17β-estradiol, although at much higher concentrations. Our studies demonstrate that compared to 17β-estradiol, BPA and the brominated analogs have much lower estrogenic potencies for all of the endpoints tested, TeBBPA being the least estrogenic compound.

The development of various in vitro screening methods has led to identification of novel estrogenic chemicals of natural and anthropogenic origin. In this study, the (anti)estrogenic potential of several environmental chemicals were compared in an array of in vitro test systems comprising: (i) competitive binding to estrogen receptors derived from the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 (hER) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (rtER), (ii) a proliferation assay with MCF-7 cells (E-SCREEN), and iii) induction of vitellogenin (rtVtg) in isolated rainbow trout hepatocytes. The results showed substantial differences in assay sensitivity for potent estrogens like 17beta-estradiol, diethylstilbestrol and zearalenone (ranking order of sensitivity: E-SCREENhER approximately rtER approximately rtVtg). Chemicals like 4-n-nonylphenol and bisphenol A had higher relative binding affinity to the hER, whereas 4-t-butylphenol and 4-n-butylphenol showed highest affinity to the rtER. Zearalenone and the novel estrogen 4-t-butylhexanol displayed a considerable higher relative potency in the E-SCREEN than the rtVtg assay, whereas alkylphenols and the novel estrogen mimic 4-t-butyl-nitrobenzene were most potent in fish cells. Correlation analysis of data from the test systems suggest that interspecies differences is largely due to inter-assay variation of the ER-dependent cellular responses, whereas binding to the ER are fairly similar in the two species tested.