Search

Despite increasing attention to the concept of a humanitarian-development nexus in recent years, limited research is available to improve health systems strengthening practice within humanitarian programmes. We used an exploratory, systematic, embedded, multiple case study design to discern systems effects of successive Save the Children chronic emergency health and nutrition projects implemented in Sudan and Pakistan between 2011 and 2018. We used textual analysis to code 63 documents focused on eight themes using NVivo 11.0. This was supplemented by six key informant interviews. Findings offer a complex and mixed picture, with contributions to systems strengthening in community systems, their linkages to health management structures, and human resources for health. Projects with primary mandates for urgent service delivery progressively found systems strengthening opportunities, through a combination of tacit choices and explicit objectives. In both countries, some ‘parallel systems’ were set in place initially, with immediate gains (e.g. quality of services) only occasionally accompanied by enhanced systems capacity to sustain them. Cycles of implementation, however, achieved financial transition of ‘macro-costs’ to the government (e.g. facilities in Sudan, staff in Pakistan) through indirect pathways and the influence of pluralistic governmental structures themselves. Opportunities were taken, or missed, based on dynamic relationships within the government-development partners eco-system. Transition steps also came with unintended effects and drops in intensity. Both project contributions to systems strengthening and our own study were limited by substantial gaps in evaluation and documentation processes. We provide cautious recommendations based on the literature and our two case studies. Even mid-size chronic emergency projects can and should make meaningful and explicit contributions to systems strengthening. This contribution will, however, depend on the development eco-system context, and development of better collective intelligence (coordination, evaluation and learning, benchmarking, accountability) to improve individual projects’ adaptive management efforts to improve fit with evolving national systems.

Integrated community case management (iCCM) has now been implemented at scale globally. Literature to-date has focused primarily on the effectiveness of iCCM and the systems conditions required to sustain iCCM. In this study, we sought to explore opportunities taken and lost for strengthening health systems through successive iCCM programmes. We employed a systematic, embedded, multiple case study design for three countries—Ethiopia, Malawi and Mozambique—where Save the Children implemented iCCM programmes between 2009 and 2017. We used textual analysis to code 62 project documents on nine categories of functions of health systems using NVivo 11.0. The document review was supplemented by four key informant interviews. This study makes important contributions to the theoretical understanding of the role of projects in health systems strengthening by not only documenting evidence of systems strengthening in multi-year iCCM projects, but also emphasizing important deficiencies in systems strengthening efforts. Projects operated on a spectrum, ranging from gap-filling interventions, to support, to actual strengthening. While there were natural limits to the influence of a project on the health system, all successive projects found constructive opportunities to try to strengthen systems. Alignment with the Ministry of Health was not always static and simple, and ministries themselves have shown pluralism in their perspectives and orientations. We conclude that systems strengthening remains ‘everybody’s business’ and places demands for realism and transparency on government and the development architecture. While mid-size projects have limited decision space, there is value in better defining where systems strengthening contributions can actually be made. Furthermore, systems strengthening is not solely about macro-level changes, as operational and efficiency gains at meso and micro levels can have value to the system. Claims of ‘systems strengthening’ are, however, bounded within the quality of evaluation and learning investments.

There is an array of youth participatory approaches relevant to health equity efforts in community psychology, adolescent health, youth development, and education. While they share some commonalities, they also reflect important distinctions regarding key processes and intended level of impact. Here, we consider the following: (a) youth-led participatory action research (YPAR), (b) youth organizing (YO), (c) youth-led planning, (d) human-centered design, (e) participatory arts, and (f) youth advisory boards. Informed by community psychology theories on empowerment and levels of change and social epidemiology frameworks that focus on the social determinants of health inequities, we aim to promote greater clarity in the conceptualization, implementation, and evaluation of youth participatory approaches; frame the "landscape" of youth participatory approaches and their similarities and differences; present an integrative review of the evidence regarding the impact of youth participatory approaches; and describe several illustrative cases so as to consider more deeply how some youth participatory approaches aim to influence the social determinants of health that lead to the physical embodiment of health inequities. We conclude by identifying areas of future policy- and practice-relevant research for advancing youth participation and health equity.