Search

Purpose We aimed to describe physical activity (PA), obesity, and quality of life (QoL) among rural Australian cancer survivors, assess whether total and item-specific QoL are associated with sufficient PA and obesity, and assess whether PA and obesity interact with respect to QoL. Methods In a cross-sectional study, convenience sampling was used to recruit adult cancer survivors via a chemotherapy day unit and allied health professionals at a rural hospital in Baw Baw Shire, Australia. Exclusion criteria were acute malnutrition and end-of-life care. PA and QoL were measured using Godin-Shephard and 7-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G7) questionnaires, respectively. Factors associated with total and item-specific QoL were assessed via linear and logistic regression, respectively. Results Among 103 rural cancer survivors, the median age was 66 years, 35% were sufficiently physically active, and 41% presented with obesity. Mean/median total QoL scores were 17 on the FACT-G7 scale (0–28; higher scores indicate better QoL). Sufficient PA was associated with better QoL ($$\widehat{\upbeta }$$ β ^ =2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26, 4.33) and more energy (odds ratio [OR] = 4.00, 95% CI = 1.48, 10.78) while obesity was associated with worse QoL ($$\widehat{\upbeta }$$ β ^ =-2.09; 95% CI = -4.17, -0.01) and more pain (OR = 3.88, 95% CI = 1.29, 11.68). The PA-obesity interaction was non-significant (p-value = 0.83). Conclusions This is the first known study conducted among rural survivors of any cancer to find sufficient PA and obesity are associated with better and worse QoL, respectively. PA, weight management, and QoL—including energy and pain—should be considered when targeting and tailoring supportive care interventions for rural cancer survivors.

ObjectiveThis study examined rural community-based nurses' self-reported knowledge and skills in the provision of psychosocial care to rural residing palliative and end-of-life clients and carers. We further sought to determine correlates of knowledge gaps to inform workforce education and planning.MethodNurses from a rural area of Victoria, Australia, were invited to complete an electronic questionnaire rating their knowledge against 6 national palliative care standards and 10 screening and assessment tools. A 5-point scale of (1) No experience to (5) Can teach others was used to rate knowledge. Results were classified into three categories: practice gaps, areas of consolidation, and strengths. Descriptive and logistical regression was used to analyze data.ResultsA total of 122 of 165 nurses (response rate = 74%) completed the survey. Of these nurses, 87% were Registered Nurses, 43% had ≥10 years' experience in palliative care, and 40% had palliative care training. The majority of practices across the standards and screening and assessment tools were rated as knowledge strengths (N = 55/67, 82%). Gaps and areas of consolidation were in the use of client and carer assessment tools, the care of specific populations such as children, supporting carers with appropriate referrals, resources, and grief, and facilitating the processes of reporting a death to the coroner. Lack of formal training and lower years of experience were found to be associated with practice gaps.Significance of resultsOur study found rural nurses were confident in their knowledge and skills in the majority of psychosocial care. As generalist nurses make up the majority of the rural nursing workforce, further research should be undertaken on what educational strategies are needed to support and upskill rural community-based nurses to undertake formal training in palliative care.

PURPOSE To explore the cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship experiences of Aboriginal people in the Gippsland region, Victoria, Australia, and identify factors critical to the development of a culturally appropriate cancer survivorship model of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS Yarning circles were used to capture the stories of 15 people diagnosed with cancer and/or those of family members. Yarning circles were conducted in two locations in the Gippsland region. Sessions were facilitated by an Aboriginal Elder, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of the data were triangulated among three researchers and incorporated researcher reflexivity. RESULTS Cultural connections and family were critical supports on the cancer journey. Putting the needs of the family first and caring for sick family members were more important than an individual’s own health. There was “no time to grieve” for one’s own cancer diagnosis and look after oneself. Cancer was a private experience; however, the constancy of deaths highlighted the importance of raising family awareness. Health professionals did not always understand the importance of people’s cultural and family supports in their treatment and recovery. There were negatives attitudes in hospitals when family come to visit, seeing family as too large and overstaying visiting times. Health professionals did not seek family assistance with communication of information to family members whose literacy level was low, nor did they include family in treatment decision-making. Access to services depended on family support with transport, finances, and family responsibilities, often resulting in lapses in treatment and follow-up services. CONCLUSION Understanding the importance of Aboriginal peoples’ cultural and family connections can help to inform the development of culturally safe cancer survivorship models of care.

Aim To develop and implement a region wide skills matrix for palliative care and district nurses in rural Victoria in order to identify and address individual learning needs and appropriate professional development strategies based on the Australian National Palliative Care Standards. This study is the first in a series of papers discussing and evaluating the development and implementation of a skills matrix. Future papers will report on participants’ data reporting. Methods The development and implementation of a skills matrix for palliative care nurses was based on using several evidence-based strategies involving four main stages. There were: stakeholder consultation, collaboration, consolidation and implementation. The initial stage of development of the matrix involved consultation with regional stakeholders to establish and refine the project objectives. The second stage involved collection of information from regional stakeholders; brainstorming and discussion of the technical skills required for palliative care and the cross over with district nursing. The third stage involved a facilitated process whereby action plans were devised and the final stage involved a plan for the survey dissemination and evaluation of the training needs. Other evidence-based strategies used were Benner’s theoretical model of clinical competence, the Australian National Palliative Care Standards and the triple C model of project implementation. Results This study reported on the development and implementation of a self-assessment of competencies skills matrix for nurses working in palliative care based on the Australian National Standards of palliative care used by services. The matrix included all the aspects covered by the Australian National Palliative Care Standards and mapped them to various competencies using Benner’s model ranging from novice to expert. The availability of a skills matrix tool to self-assess is important to keep track of the clinical competencies gained by palliative care nurses. Targeted educational interventions identified by the skills matrix have the potential to improve quality of care provided in the palliative care setting. Conclusion The successful development and implementation of the palliative skills matrix across the Gippsland region relied on using several evidence-based strategies to standardise the competencies across the palliative care setting in rural Victoria, Australia. Examples of these strategies included using Benner’s theoretical competency model, the Australian National Palliative Standards and the triple C model, which included stakeholders’ consultation, collaboration and consolidation.

Aim To explore medication safety issues faced by general and palliative care community nurses working in rural and remote palliative care domiciliary settings. Method An online survey for nurses working in rural communities was conducted across the South East region of rural Victoria, Australia. Nurses from 18 community based health care organisations across the region were invited to participate in an anonymous survey addressing medication safety issues in the palliative care settings. Qualitative data obtained from the open-ended survey questions were analysed inductively. Results A total of 29 nurses completed the survey (response rate 28% from potential respondents). Most of the nurses were working in a rural practice providing a mixed model of community palliative care and community nursing. Medication safety issues raised by the nurses included; errors associated with dose administration aids, frequency of medications reviews undertaken by clinical pharmacists of clients’ medications, high occurrence of medications error reporting, lack of awareness of medications initiated by nurses and cytotoxic medications handling. Conclusion Targeted interventions addressing the identified issues raised by community general and palliative care nurses have the potential to improve medication safety in the domiciliary palliative care setting.

Background Prostate cancer is the most common internal malignancy in Australian men, and although most patients have good survival outcomes, treatment toxicities can impair function, leading to diminished quality of life for prostate cancer survivors. Socioeconomic disadvantage and geographical remoteness have been shown to be related to worse oncologic outcomes, and it is expected that they would similarly influence functional outcomes in prostate cancer. Methods Using data from the Victorian Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry (n = 10,924), we investigated functional outcomes as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) following prostate cancer treatment, focusing on associations with socioeconomic status and geographical remoteness and controlling for clinicopathologic characteristics. A single composite score was developed from the five separate EPIC-26 domains for use in geo-mapping. Results A total of 7690 patients had complete EPIC-26 data, allowing mapping hotspots of poor function using our composite score. These hotspots were observed to relate to areas of socioeconomic disadvantage. Significant heterogeneity in outcomes was seen in urban areas, with hotspots of good and poor function. Both socioeconomic disadvantage and geographical remoteness were found to predict for worse functional outcomes, although only the former is significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Geo-mapping of functional outcomes in prostate cancer has the potential to guide health care service provision and planning. A nuanced policy approach is required so as not to miss disadvantaged patients who live in urban areas. We have demonstrated the potential of geo-mapping to visualise population-level outcomes, potentially allowing targeted interventions to address inequities in quality of care.

Purpose To examine how socio-demographic, comorbidities and information needs influence quality of life (QoL) outcomes of survivors of breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or melanoma. Methods Cross-sectional postal survey with eligible participants identified through a population-based cancer registry. QoL outcomes were assessed by EQ-5D-5L, social difficulties index (SDI) and, for those employed at diagnosis, current employment. Regression analyses explored associations between outcome variables and cancer type, age, time since diagnosis, residential location, socio-economic disadvantage, comorbidities and unmet information needs. Mediation analyses examined whether comorbidities and information needs explained relationships between outcome variables and socio-economic disadvantage. Results 2115 survivors participated. Mean EQ-5D-5L scores (mean = 0.84) were similar to population averages and SDI scores were low for the entire sample (mean = 3.80). In multivariate analyses, being aged over 80, greater socio-economic disadvantage, comorbidities and unmet information needs decreased EQ-5D-5L scores. Higher SDI scores were associated with socio-economic disadvantage, comorbidities and unmet information needs. Not being employed was associated with being aged over 50, more comorbidities and socio-economic disadvantage. Comorbidities but not information needs partially mediated the impact of socio-economic disadvantage on EQ-5D-5L and SDI accounting for 17% and 14% of the total effect of socio-economic disadvantage respectively. Neither comorbidities nor information needs mediated the association between socio-economic disadvantage and employment outcomes. Conclusions To improve quality of life, survivorship care should be better tailored to address the needs of individuals given their overall health and impact of comorbidities, their age and type of cancer and not simply time since diagnosis.

Anticipatory medications (AM) have been widely used in various settings across many countries in people approaching end of life. Access to palliative care in rural and remote areas of Australia is lacking as are other medical services when compared with the metropolitan setting. Our aim is to identify challenges with the administration and access to AM in rural and remote communities with outcomes to guide improved delivery of care.An online survey administered using Qualtrics, a secure survey platform was distributed to a total of 18 managers from 18 rural and remote organizations across the South East of Victoria in Australia. The survey was distributed to a total of 108 nurses working in these organizations.A total of 29 nurses completed the survey (response rate 28%). Most of the nurses were working in a mixed practice providing community palliative and district nursing. A significant number of nurses (n = 9, 31%) were working in remote settings and the remainder were located in regional areas. Almost a third of all nurses surveyed did not have specific guidance regarding the use of AM for their patients. Opioids (55%) were by far the most commonly used AM followed by antiemetics (45%). The most common decisions taken by nurses to administer AM were cited as patient deterioration or in their terminal phase with a fluctuating level of anxiety, and patients agitation. Access to AM and lack of staff education were major challenges in rural and remote areas.Provision of timely AM has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients and their caregivers. Key barriers to access AM can be overcome with community-level planning and nurses' education. Advanced nurses' roles have the opportunity to provide specialized care where access to specialist physicians is challenging.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to map the existent research undertaken in Australia into broad thematic areas and identify the characteristics of the studies and areas of future research in the literature.MethodsA scoping review methodology was employed to map the current areas of research undertaken in Australia since January 2000 until the end of December 2018 according to years of publications, types of studies, populations studied, research themes, and areas of focus.ResultsOur review identified 1,405 Australian palliative care research publications between January 2000 and December 2018. Nearly 40% of the studies were quantitative (39%) and a third were qualitative studies (31%). The remainder of the studies were reviews, mixed methods, quality improvement projects, and others. One-third (30%) of the research was done with carers' participants followed by nurses (22%) and doctors and physicians (18%). The most frequently reported diagnosis in the studies was cancer with 42% of the publication total. The most frequently explored theme was physical symptoms (such as pain, breathlessness, nausea, delirium, and dyspnea) with a total of 16% of all articles followed by communication (15%). There was a large gap to the next most frequently explored theme with service delivery (9%) and coordination of care (8%). Assessment of patients (7%), end-of-life decision-making (6%), and rural/regional (6%) all produced a similar number of publications. Very few studies addressed topics such as quality of life, E-Health, after-hours care, spirituality, and health economics. Moreover, there were only 15 (1%) studies focused on the last days of life.Significance of the resultsThe current review presented a comprehensive search of the literature across almost two decades in Australia in the palliative care setting. It has covered a breadth of research topics and highlighted urgent areas for further research.

What is known and objective Community pharmacists have a key role to play in addressing drug misuse. The objective of this research was to systematically review the current evidence and investigate the attitudes and practice strategies of community pharmacists towards drug misuse management. Methods Data were extracted from 19 studies retrieved via a three-step search strategy using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews. Results and discussion The attitudes and practice strategies of pharmacists towards drug misuse management and relevance to years of practice experience were discussed in seven of the 19 studies. Pharmacists reported gaps in knowledge and insufficient education and training on drug misuse-related topics. Barriers to the effective management of drug misuse included lack of time and staff training. The most commonly reported strategy to address drug misuse was referral back to the doctor. Eight of the studies identified the benefits of real-time prescription monitoring systems. Pharmacists have a key role to play in addressing drug misuse. Opportunities exist in the development of new and innovative approaches for harm minimization led by pharmacists, and in the examination and evaluation of the pharmacists' role in referral services, interventions and screening. What is new and conclusion It is important to consider the role and contribution of early career pharmacists in the delivery of primary health care. They are the future of the pharmacy profession; therefore, it is critical that they are sufficiently trained and provided with the necessary resources to ensure high quality care in the management of drug misuse.

The aim of this study is to explore local health and wellbeing plans and priorities by Victorian local governments (LGs), specifically to: (1) analyse how LG priority areas are described in comparison to the State-level plan; (2) identify differences between regional and metropolitan health priorities; and (3) identify differences between LGs with high and low socioeconomic status. Content analysis of 79 LG health and wellbeing plans was undertaken. Differences in health and wellbeing priorities between LGs were examined using the t-test for two proportions. In total, 20% of the plans did not specify actions to address health priorities. One in three (34%) did not specify how evaluation will be done. Alcohol and other drugs, gambling and housing were prioritised more by metropolitan LGs, whereas disease prevention was prioritised more in regional LGs. There was no significant difference in health and wellbeing priorities of LGs with high and low socioeconomic status except for gambling. State-level health and wellbeing plans should be sensitive to differences in priorities of LGs. There is a need for local plans to commit to specific actions and evaluation. This analysis provides basis for more community-reflective, State-level planning and calls for more emphasis on identifying actions and evaluation in local level planning.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To investigate clinicians' experiences with supportive care screening and referral, and identify perceived barriers and benefits associated with implementation into the clinical setting. DESIGN Qualitative, exploratory approach based on interviews. SETTING A large regional hospital in Victoria, Australia, that provides chemotherapy and radiotherapy services to patients with cancer. SAMPLE 5 chemotherapy nurses and 1 radiation therapist. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted, documented, and analyzed with qualitative techniques. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Clinical benefits of supportive care screening and referral, and barriers to clinical implementation. FINDINGS Clinicians perceived that supportive care screening benefited their practice by improving communication and rapport with patients. Clinicians supported each other during screening implementation, and although they initially were hesitant about the process, they ultimately endorsed screening for wider implementation. Time constraints and scope of practice were identified as significant barriers. CONCLUSIONS Supportive care screening was endorsed as part of future clinical practice, but barriers to implementation need to be addressed. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING With current psychosocial guidelines recommending routine supportive care screening of patients with cancer and statewide mandatory screening targets set in Australia, healthcare organizations need to carefully consider implementation processes. Although nurses are ideally placed to complete screening, organizations need to ensure that appropriate training and support mechanisms have been developed, as well as adequate resources, to enable integration into routine practice.

The aim of this study was to examine the introduction of a supportive care screening and referral process into clinical practice for patients with cancer, and to determine how clinicians' actions compared to evidence-based protocols contained within the Supportive Care Resource Kit.A Supportive Care Resource Kit was developed as a resource for clinicians to enable a systematic process of screening cancer patients for unmet supportive care needs and addressing these needs by using evidence-based protocols. Clinicians were recruited and trained in supportive care and the use of the kit. Patients were recruited and screened for their supportive care needs. Patients and clinicians undertook a problem solving discussion, which was documented and analysed using content analysis.In applying the screening process, clinicians undertook discussion, referral and information provision with patients. Comparison to evidence-based protocols revealed that practice was predominantly in line with protocols. Overall, clinicians' practice matched well with guidance from the protocols on discussion and referral, but less so in providing information to patients. Actions taken between supportive care domains differed with clinician preference evident for dealing with physical problems compared with practical, emotional and family problems.Implications for practice and research include, exploring strategies for broadening clinician confidence in dealing with all areas of supportive care needs; undertaking further research into the use of protocols in health care and incorporating strategic, multidisciplinary planning in protocol implementation schemes.

Objective The aim of the present study was to compare lung cancer diagnostic and treatment intervals with agreed target measures across three large public health services in Victoria and assess any differences in interval times by treatment type and health service. Methods A retrospective medical record audit of 78 patients admitted with a new diagnosis of lung cancer was conducted. Interval times from referral to diagnosis, diagnosis to first treatment and referral to first treatment were recorded in three treatment types: surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Results There was a significant difference in the mean number of days from referral to diagnosis by treatment type. Patients who underwent surgery waited significantly longer (mean (± s.d.) 41.6 ± 38.4 days) to obtain a diagnosis than those who received radiotherapy (15.1 ± 18.6 days). Only 47% of surgical patients obtained a diagnosis within the recommended 28 days. Moreover, only 45% and 44% of patients, respectively, met the diagnosis-to-treatment target of 14 days and referral-to-treatment target of 42 days. Conclusion The present study highlights the effect of treatment type on lung cancer referral interval times. It demonstrates the benefits of using evidenced-based interval target times to benchmark and compare performance outcomes in lung cancer. What is known about the topic? Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Australia and has the lowest 5-year survival rate of all cancer types. Delays in the diagnosis of lung cancer can change the prognosis from potentially curable to incurable, particularly in faster-growing tumours. What does this paper add? This study reveals treatment type was a greater factor in explaining variations in diagnosis and treatment than health service. Surgical patients were consistently lower in meeting the recommended interval targets across referral to diagnosis, diagnosis to treatment and referral to treatment. What are the implications for practitioners? This study demonstrates the value of using evidenced-based interval target times to benchmark and compare performance outcomes in lung cancer. Such measures may further improve prognostic outcomes in lung cancer by reducing unwanted delays.

This study examined rural women's satisfaction with the interaction and communication with their surgeon during diagnosis and treatment planning for early breast cancer. Differences in satisfaction were investigated between treatment groups (mastectomy and breast conservation surgery) and demographic variables (age, marital status, education level, employment status and place of residence). Practice was compared with clinical practice guidelines.The study was designed as a cross-sectional survey.The study was set in Eastern regional Victoria, Australia.Seventy women diagnosed with early breast cancer participated in the study.The main outcome measures used by the study were satisfaction in three areas of practice: (i) telling a woman she has breast cancer; (ii) providing information and involving the woman in the decision-making; and (iii) preparing the woman for specific management.No differences in satisfaction were found between treatment groups and demographic variables. Overall, women in this study were highly satisfied (93%) with the interaction and communication with their surgeon. Women reported that the surgeon created a supportive environment for discussion, that they were provided with adequate information and referrals, and that they were actively involved in the decision-making. Practice could have been improved for women who were alone at diagnosis as women without a partner made a quicker decision about treatment.Rural women in Victoria Australia were largely satisfied with the interaction and communication with their surgeon during diagnosis and treatment planning for early breast cancer. Current practice was predominately in line with clinical practice guidelines.

Objective Effective communication between patients and clinicians is an essential aspect of supportive care for cancer patients, however many patients find this communication is inadequate. This study examined cancer patients’ perception of communication with their clinician during a supportive care screening and discussion process and the ways in which this process assisted communication. Methods One hundred and fifty-four patients undertaking treatment for cancer in chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical units in six hospitals in Australia participated in a formal supportive care screening, discussion and referral process and were interviewed about their experiences. Results The majority of patients interviewed felt that the process enhanced communication by encouraging them to reflect on their needs, assisting them to initiate a discussion with the clinician, validating their needs, encouraging them to seek help and support and focusing clinician attention on unmet needs. Conclusion Patients perceived the formal process of supportive care improved communication between themselves and their clinicians. Practice implications Undertaking a patient-centred process of supportive care can assist clinicians to meet the unmet needs of patients with cancer and can increase patient satisfaction.