Search

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare perioperative parameters and midterm clinical outcomes using two different mesh kits: transobturator vaginal mesh (TVM) (both Perigee and Apogee), versus single incision vaginal mesh (SIM) (combined Elevate anterior/apical system and Elevate posterior/apical system) in treating severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. During 2008 and 2013, those women with severe POP [POP quantification system (POP-Q), Stage III and Stage IV], who received either TVM or SIM operation, were enrolled for cohort comparison. There were 111 patients in the TVM group, and 136 in the SIM group. Those with an incomplete POP-Q record, or who did not complete postoperative urodynamic study were excluded. Perioperative characteristics and outcomes, postoperative urinary symptoms, urodynamic parameters, prolapse recurrence (defined as the leading edge > 0 using the POP-Q system), and mesh extrusion rate were compared. Results: There were no differences in the operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and the postoperative visual analog scale for pain. Urodynamic studies showed improvement in bladder outlet obstruction in both groups. The postoperative stress urinary incontinence was significantly higher in the SIM group. The recurrence of prolapse was comparable between the two groups at a median follow-up of 2 years. The mesh extrusion rate was significantly lower in the SIM group. Conclusion: At an average of 2 years of follow-up, the mesh extrusion rate was lower in the SIM group than in the TVM group, but there was no difference in postoperative visual analog scale for pain. The postoperative stress urinary incontinence was higher in the SIM group.

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study was to assess the 2-year clinical outcomes of pelvic reconstructive surgery with the single-incision Elevate system (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA). Methods: This retrospective study was conducted from November 2010 to August 2013, and included 210 patients with pelvic organ prolapse stage 3 or 4 who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery with an Elevate system and were followed for 1 to 3 years postoperatively. Assessments included pre- and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage, Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and multi-channel urodynamic examinations. Anatomical success was defined as postoperative POP-Q stage 0 or I. Results: The anatomical success rates were 95 % for the anterior vaginal wall, 99 % for the posterior vaginal wall and 94 % for the apical vaginal wall after a median 27 months of follow-up. POP-Q, UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores, maximal flow rate and post-voiding residual urine all improved significantly after surgery. Complications included 1 case of internal bleeding, 4 cases of mesh exposure, 5 cases of recurrent prolapse that required salvage operations, and 3 cases of urine retention that required intermittent catheterization. There were no bladder or bowel injuries during surgery. Conclusions: Pelvic reconstructive surgery with the Elevate system yielded good anatomical outcomes and symptom improvement after 2 years of follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare perioperative parameters and midterm clinical outcomes using two different mesh kits: transobturator vaginal mesh (TVM) (both Perigee and Apogee), versus single incision vaginal mesh (SIM) (combined Elevate anterior/apical system and Elevate posterior/apical system) in treating severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP)., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. During 2008 and 2013, those women with severe POP [POP quantification system (POP-Q), Stage III and Stage IV], who received either TVM or SIM operation, were enrolled for cohort comparison. There were 111 patients in the TVM group, and 136 in the SIM group. Those with an incomplete POP-Q record, or who did not complete postoperative urodynamic study were excluded. Perioperative characteristics and outcomes, postoperative urinary symptoms, urodynamic parameters, prolapse recurrence (defined as the leading edge > 0 using the POP-Q system), and mesh extrusion rate were compared., Results: There were no differences in the operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and the postoperative visual analog scale for pain. Urodynamic studies showed improvement in bladder outlet obstruction in both groups. The postoperative stress urinary incontinence was significantly higher in the SIM group. The recurrence of prolapse was comparable between the two groups at a median follow-up of 2 years. The mesh extrusion rate was significantly lower in the SIM group., Conclusion: At an average of 2 years of follow-up, the mesh extrusion rate was lower in the SIM group than in the TVM group, but there was no difference in postoperative visual analog scale for pain. The postoperative stress urinary incontinence was higher in the SIM group., (Copyright © 2017 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)