Search

Background: Macrophage activation-like syndrome (MALS) and complex immune dysregulation (CID) often underlie acute respiratory distress (ARDS) in COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the effect of personalized immunotherapy on clinical improvement of critical COVID-19. Methods: In this open-label prospective trial, 102 patients with ARDS by SARS-CoV-2 were screened for MALS (ferritin >4,420 ng/mL) and CID (ferritin ≤4,420 ng/mL and low human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression on CD14-monocytes). Patients with MALS or CID with increased aminotransferases received intravenous anakinra; those with CID and normal aminotransferases received tocilizumab. The primary outcome was ≥25% decrease in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and/or 50% increase in the respiratory ratio by day 8; 28-day mortality, change of SOFA score by day 28, serum biomarkers, and cytokine production by mononuclear cells were secondary endpoints. Results: The primary study endpoint was met in 58.3% of anakinra-treated patients and in 33.3% of tocilizumab-treated patients (p: 0.01). Most patients in both groups received dexamethasone as standard of care. No differences were found in secondary outcomes, mortality, and SOFA score changes. Ferritin decreased among anakinra-treated patients; interleukin-6, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, and HLA-DR expression increased among tocilizumab-treated patients. Survivors by day 28 who received anakinra were distributed to lower severity levels of the WHO clinical progression scale. Greater incidence of secondary infections was found with tocilizumab treatment. Conclusion: Immune assessment resulted in favorable anakinra responses among critically ill patients with COVID-19 and features of MALS.

RationaleMacrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and complex immune dysregulation (CID) often underlie acute respiratory distress (ARDS) in COVID-19.ObjectiveTo investigate the outcome of personalized immunotherapy in critical COVID-19.MethodsIn this open-label prospective trial, 102 patients with SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score ≥2 or ARDS by SARS-CoV-2 were screened for MAS (ferritin more than 4420 ng/ml) and CID (ferritin ≤4420 ng/ml and low expression of HLA-DR on CD14-monocytes). Patients with MAS and CID with increased aminotransferases were assigned to intravenous anakinra; those with CID and normal aminotransferases to tocilizumab. The primary outcome was at least 25% decrease of SOFA score and/or 50% increase of respiratory ratio by day 8; 28-day mortality, change of SOFA score by day 28; serum biomarkers and cytokine production by mononuclear cells were secondary endpoints.Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary study endpoint was met in 58.3% of anakinra-treated patients and in 33.3% of tocilizumab-treated patients (odds ratio 3.11; 95% CIs 1.29-7.73; P: 0.011). No differences were found in mortality and in SOFA score changes. By day 4, ferritin was decreased among anakinra-treated patients; interleukin (IL)-6, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and the expression of HLA-DR were increased among tocilizumab-treated patients. Anakinra increased capacity of mononuclear cells to produce IL-6. Survivors by day 28 who received anakinra were distributed to scales of the WHO clinical progression of lower severity. Greater incidence of secondary infections was found with tocilizumab treatment.ConclusionsBiomarkers may guide favourable anakinra responses in critically ill patients with COVID-19.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04339712

Summary The pandemic 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) shares certain clinical characteristics with other acute viral infections. We studied the whole-blood transcriptomic host response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using RNAseq from 24 healthy controls and 62 prospectively enrolled patients with COVID-19. We then compared these data to non-COVID-19 viral infections, curated from 23 independent studies profiling 1,855 blood samples covering six viruses (influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human rhinovirus (HRV), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1), Ebola, dengue). We show gene expression changes in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 viral infections are highly correlated (r = 0.74, p < 0.001). However, we also found 416 genes specific to COVID-19. Inspection of top genes revealed dynamic immune evasion and counter host responses specific to COVID-19. Statistical deconvolution of cell proportions maps many cell type proportions concordantly shifting. Discordantly increased in COVID-19 were CD56bright natural killer cells and M2 macrophages. The concordant and discordant responses mapped out here provide a window to explore the pathophysiology of the host response to SARS-CoV-2., Graphical Abstract, Highlights • Whole blood transcriptomics were generated via RNAseq for 62 COVID-19 patients • Curated 23 whole blood transcriptomic studies (1855 samples) of non-COVID-19 viral infections • Discovered 416 COVID-19-specific genes, despite overall correlation with non-COVID-19 • Revealed subset of immune cell proportions discordantly shifted in COVID-19 infections, Molecular Biology; Immunology: Bioinformatics; Transcriptomics

Background COVID-19 is a pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that shares and differs in clinical characteristics of known viral infections. Methods We obtained RNAseq profiles of 62 prospectively enrolled COVID-19 patients and 24 healthy controls (HC). We collected 23 independent studies profiling 1,855 blood samples from patients covering six viruses (influenza, RSV, HRV, Ebola, Dengue and SARS-CoV-1). We studied host whole-blood transcriptomic responses in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 viral infections to understand similarities and differences in host response. Gene signature threshold was absolute effect size ≥1, FDR ≤ 0.05%. Results Differential gene expression of COVID-19 vs HC are highly correlated with non-COVID-19 vs HC (r=0.74, p< 0.001). We discovered two gene signatures: COVID-19 vs HC (2002 genes) (COVIDsig) and non-COVID-19 vs HC (635 genes) (nonCOVIDsig). Pathway analysis of over-expressed signature genes in COVIDsig or nonCOVIDsig identified similar pathways including neutrophil activation, innate immune response, immune response to viral infection and cytokine production. Conversely, for under-expressed genes, pathways indicated repression of lymphocyte differentiation and activation (Fig1). Intersecting the two gene signatures found two genes significantly oppositely regulated (ACO1, ATL3). We derived a third gene signature using COCONUT to compare COVID-19 to non-COVID-19 viral infections (416 genes) (Fig2). Pathway analysis did not result in significant enrichment, suggesting identification of novel biology (Fig1). Statistical deconvolution of bulk transcriptomic data found M1 macrophages, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, CD14+ monocytes, CD4+ T cells and total B cells changed in the same direction across COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 infections. Cell types that increased in COVID-19 relative to non-COVID-19 were CD56bright NK cells, M2 macrophages and total NK cells. Those that decreased in non-COVID-19 relative to COVID-19 were CD56dim NK cells & memory B cells and eosinophils (Fig3). Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Conclusion The concordant and discordant responses mapped here provide a window to explore the pathophysiology of COVID-19 vs other viral infections and show clear differences in signaling pathways and cellularity as part of the host response to SARS-CoV-2. Disclosures Simone A. Thair, PhD, Inflammatix, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Yudong He, PhD, Inflammatix Inc. (Employee) Yehudit Hasin-Brumshtein, PhD, Inflammatix (Employee, Shareholder) Suraj Sakaram, MS in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inflammatix (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, stock options) Rushika R. Pandya, MS, Inflammatix Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) David C. Rawling, PhD, Inflammatix Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Purvesh Khatri, PhD, Inflammatix Inc. (Shareholder) Timothy Sweeney, MD, PHD, Inflammatix, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

Purpose: Dividend policy and its impact on share pricing, has been an issue of great concern for the academic society. Over the years, many theories evolved in an effort to explain dividend policy impact on corporate value. A widely accepted approach is the signaling effect theory. The purpose of this paper is to assess the value relevance of dividend announcement. Design/methodology/approach: Our empirical work uses Greek stock market data. We adopt the event study methodology and incorporate in our research elements that differentiate Greek stock market from other developing markets. Findings: Our empirical results tend to support the theory. Decisions on dividend policy seem to affect corporate value. Investors perceive incremented dividend payments as an indication of positive future prospect and vice versa. Research limitations/implications: Different results between large and medium capitalization shares comprise an interesting element for future research.

The role of probiotics in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a probiotic regimen for VAP prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated multi-trauma patients, intubated immediately after the injurious insult. In a randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolling multi-trauma patients, patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for >10 days were assigned at random to receive prophylaxis with a probiotic formula (n=59) or placebo (n=53). The probiotic formula was a preparation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 [1.75 × 109 colony-forming units (cfu)], Lactobacillus plantarum (0.5 × 109 cfu), Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 (1.75 × 109 cfu) and Saccharomyces boulardii (1.5 × 109 cfu) in sachets. Each patient received two sachets twice daily for 15 days: one through the nasogastric tube and one spread on the oropharynx. The incidence of VAP was the primary endpoint. The incidence of other infections and sepsis, and the duration of hospital stay were the secondary endpoints. Administration of probiotics reduced the incidence of VAP [11.9% vs 28.3%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13–0.92; P=0.034] and sepsis [6.8% vs 24.5%, odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.07–0.74: P=0.016]. Furthermore, probiotic prophylaxis reduced the time of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the length of hospital stay. The prophylactic use of probiotics with a combination of enteral and topical application to the oropharynx had a positive effect on the incidence of VAP and sepsis, as well as on ICU and total hospital stay in patients receiving protracted mechanical ventilation.