Search

BACKGROUND There is currently limited evidence on the level and intensity of physical activity in individuals with hemophilia A. Mobile technologies can offer a rigorous and reliable alternative to support data collection processes but they are often associated with poor user retention. The lack of longitudinal continuity in their use can be partly attributed to the insufficient consideration of stakeholder inputs in the development process of mobile apps. Several user-centered models have been proposed to guarantee that a thorough knowledge of the end user needs is considered in the development process of mobile apps. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to design and validate an electronic patient-reported outcome mobile app that requires sustained active input by individuals during POWER, an observational study that aims at evaluating the relationship between physical activity levels and bleeding in patients with hemophilia A. METHODS We adopted a user-centered design and engaged several stakeholders in the development and usability testing of this mobile app. During the concept generation and ideation phase, we organized a need-assessment focus group (FG) with patient representatives to elicit specific design requirements for the end users. We then conducted 2 exploratory FGs to seek additional inputs for the app’s improvement and 2 confirmatory FGs to validate the app and test its usability in the field through the mobile health app usability questionnaire. RESULTS The findings from the thematic analysis of the need-assessment FG revealed that there was a demand for sense making, for simplification of app functionalities, for maximizing integration, and for minimizing the feeling of external control. Participants involved in the later stages of the design refinement contributed to improving the design further by upgrading the app’s layout and making the experience with the app more efficient through functions such as chatbots and visual feedback on the number of hours a wearable device had been worn, to ensure that the observed data were actually registered. The end users rated the app highly during the quantitative assessment, with an average mobile health app usability questionnaire score of 5.32 (SD 0.66; range 4.44-6.23) and 6.20 (SD 0.43; range 5.72-6.88) out of 7 in the 2 iterative usability testing cycles. CONCLUSIONS The results of the usability test indicated a high, growing satisfaction with the electronic patient-reported outcome app. The adoption of a thorough user-centered design process using several types of FGs helped maximize the likelihood of sustained retention of the app’s users and made it fit for data collection of relevant outcomes in the observational POWER study. The continuous use of the app and the actual level of engagement will be evaluated during the ongoing trial. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04165135; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04165135

Background There is currently limited evidence on the level and intensity of physical activity in individuals with hemophilia A. Mobile technologies can offer a rigorous and reliable alternative to support data collection processes but they are often associated with poor user retention. The lack of longitudinal continuity in their use can be partly attributed to the insufficient consideration of stakeholder inputs in the development process of mobile apps. Several user-centered models have been proposed to guarantee that a thorough knowledge of the end user needs is considered in the development process of mobile apps. Objective The aim of this study is to design and validate an electronic patient-reported outcome mobile app that requires sustained active input by individuals during POWER, an observational study that aims at evaluating the relationship between physical activity levels and bleeding in patients with hemophilia A. Methods We adopted a user-centered design and engaged several stakeholders in the development and usability testing of this mobile app. During the concept generation and ideation phase, we organized a need-assessment focus group (FG) with patient representatives to elicit specific design requirements for the end users. We then conducted 2 exploratory FGs to seek additional inputs for the app’s improvement and 2 confirmatory FGs to validate the app and test its usability in the field through the mobile health app usability questionnaire. Results The findings from the thematic analysis of the need-assessment FG revealed that there was a demand for sense making, for simplification of app functionalities, for maximizing integration, and for minimizing the feeling of external control. Participants involved in the later stages of the design refinement contributed to improving the design further by upgrading the app’s layout and making the experience with the app more efficient through functions such as chatbots and visual feedback on the number of hours a wearable device had been worn, to ensure that the observed data were actually registered. The end users rated the app highly during the quantitative assessment, with an average mobile health app usability questionnaire score of 5.32 (SD 0.66; range 4.44-6.23) and 6.20 (SD 0.43; range 5.72-6.88) out of 7 in the 2 iterative usability testing cycles. Conclusions The results of the usability test indicated a high, growing satisfaction with the electronic patient-reported outcome app. The adoption of a thorough user-centered design process using several types of FGs helped maximize the likelihood of sustained retention of the app’s users and made it fit for data collection of relevant outcomes in the observational POWER study. The continuous use of the app and the actual level of engagement will be evaluated during the ongoing trial. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04165135; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04165135

Tigecycline is a new first-in-class glycylcycline antimicrobial agent with expanded broad-spectrum activity. It was developed to overcome the two key resistance mechanisms, efflux pumps and ribosomal protection, that limit the use of tetracycline. The spectrum of activity extends to clinically relevant susceptible and multidrug resistant bacteria, as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus pneumoniae, vancomycin resistant Enterococci, Acinetobacter spp, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacteriaceae, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains (ESBLs). Tigecycline has been introduced into clinical practice as part of the effort to combat the growing problem of bacterial resistance to anti-infective therapy: tigecycline could replace some broad-spectrum agents for approved indications reducing the selective pressure provided by antibiotic administration. The expanded in vitro activity against a broad range of bacteria, including resistant pathogens, of tigecycline suggest that this novel antimicrobial agent should offer clinicians an option for the treatment of patients with serious bacterial infections.

We tested the in vitro bactericidal activity of moxifloxacin, a new 8-methoxyquinolone, alone and in combination with vancomycin or teicoplanin at different multiples of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against 8 methicillin-ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (M-C-RSA) and 1 methicillin-ciprofloxacin susceptible S. aureus (M-C-SSA) recently isolated from device-associated infections unresponsive to or relapsing after glycopeptide therapy, despite device removal. MICs of vancomycin ranged from 1 to 4 microg/ml, MICs of teicoplanin ranged from 2 to 8 microg/ml; MICs of moxifloxacin were always 2 microg/ml against M-C-RSA isolates and 0.125 microg/ml against the M-C-SSA isolate. The 9 strains resulted tolerant when tested for vancomycin, teicoplanin, and moxifloxacin used alone at 2 x MIC. In all cases the combination of moxifloxacin and teicoplanin or vancomycin appeared to be bactericidal already at MIC concentration for glycopeptides plus 0.5 x MIC concentration for moxifloxacin. If these results are confirmed in vivo in animal experiments, the combination of moxifloxacin with glycopeptides might be useful for treating device-associated infections, and in preventing the frightening phenomenon of increasing MICs for glycopeptides.

Descending necrotizing mediastinitis is a rare life-threatening complication of odontogenic or oropharyngeal infection spreading into the mediastinum through the cervical fasciae. Despite improvements in diagnostic imaging and treatment, its mortality rate remains relatively high. We describe a unique case of descending necrotizing mediastinitis leading to the formation of a fistula in the lateral wall of the hypopharynx. The fistula, providing spontaneous drainage of the purulent mediastinitis, contributed to the successful outcome of the patient requiring only transcervical surgical drainage.

Glycopeptides have been considered the antimicrobials of choice for serious meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) infections for several years. Daptomycin is a new option for the treatment of these infections, including those exhibiting reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. The aim of this study was to compare glycopeptides and daptomycin for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA or MR-CoNS. Data for 106 patients with bloodstream infections (bacteraemia or infective endocarditis) or skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) were retrospectively reviewed, of which 43 were treated with daptomycin (DAP group) and 63 were treated with vancomycin or teicoplanin (GLYCO group). Patients included in the two comparison groups were homogeneous in terms of age, risk factors and clinical severity. Aetiology was mainly represented by MRSA in both groups, followed by various species of MR-CoNS. Daptomycin was used more frequently in patients with central venous catheter-associated bacteraemia or pacemaker-associated infection. Patients with SSTIs included in the GLYCO group had a longer mean duration of antibiotic therapy (18.2 days vs. 14.6 days; P=0.009) and a longer mean length of hospital stay (28.2 days vs. 19.6 days; P=0.01) compared with those included in the DAP group. A longer mean duration of antibiotic therapy was also observed in patients with bloodstream infections receiving glycopeptide therapy (25.6 days vs. 18 days; P=0.004). In conclusion, the good clinical efficacy of daptomycin is associated with a more rapid resolution of the clinical syndrome and a reduced length of hospitalisation. This latter aspect may have important pharmacoeconomic implications, promoting the use of daptomycin in the clinical setting.

Treatment of Nocardia infections continues to be difficult, especially for central nervous system infections or disseminated diseases and when sustained by highly drug-resistant species such as Nocardia farcinica. Linezolid, the first oxazolidinone approved for clinical use, shows an excellent in vitro activity against all species of Nocardia, and achieves good central nervous system and lung concentrations. We describe the case of a patient with pulmonary nocardiosis and intolerance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole successfully treated with linezolid, and review all the published cases of systemic nocardiosis treated with this agent. On the basis of the available evidence, linezolid appears an effective option for the treatment of nocardiosis.

Fosfomycin is a molecule that inhibits the early stage of peptidoglycan synthesis and shows a broad-spectrum bactericidal activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Using the Killing-curve method, we tested the in vitro bactericidal activity of fosfomycin alone or in combination with vancomycin or teicoplanin at a concentration of 8 microg/mL, that is easily achievable in serum at standard dosing regimens, against seven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains, isolated from patients with well documented device-associated infections unresponsive to or relapsing after glycopeptide therapy. MICs of vancomycin ranged from 1 to 4 microg/mL, MICs of teicoplanin from 2 to 8 microg/mL; MICs of fosfomycin were 8 microg/mL for two strains and128 microg/mL for the remaining strains. The seven strains proved tolerant when tested for vancomycin and teicoplanin used alone at 2x MIC concentration. Fosfomycin was bactericidal (reduction of 2 log of the inoculum) only against the two susceptible strains. In all cases both vancomycin and teicoplanin in combination with fosfomycin developed bactericidal synergism already at a concentration of 1x MIC. If these results are confirmed by in vivo experiments, the combination of fosfomycin with glycopeptides might be useful for treating device-associated infections, and in preventing the phenomenon of increasing MICs for glycopeptides.

Although Staphylococcus haemolyticus (SH) represents an emerging etiology of methicillin-resistant (MR) coagulase-negative staphylococcal nosocomial bacteremia, little is known of clinical significance of this infection. Thus, we performed case-control retrospective comparative analysis of MRSH bacteremias (MRSHB), methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis bacteremias (MRSEB), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremias (MRSAB) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Most patients in the three groups were neutropenic and had a central venous catheter (CVC) in place at the onset of bacteremia. However, MRSHB patients had a CVC in place prior to bacteremia for a time significantly more prolonged than MRSEB and MRSAB ones (p