Josip Kusak, Håkan Sand, Robert W. Mysłajek, Luis Llaneza, Claudia Greco, Elena Fabbri, Alejandro Rodríguez, Astrid Vik Stronen, Francesca Marucco, David Benson, Raquel Godinho, José Vicente López-Bao, Valerio Donfrancesco, Ettore Randi, Claudia Capitani, Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski, Nibedita Mukherjee, Guillaume Chapron, Pietro Milanesi, Olivier Gimenez, Cino Pertoldi, Peep Männil, John D. C. Linnell, Valeria Salvatori, Massimo Scandura, Paolo Ciucci, Elena Bassi, Urmas Saarma, Elena Tsingarska, Hans Christian Pedersen, Luca Mattioli, Juan Carlos Blanco, Liselotte Wesley Andersen, Ana Galov, Antonio Canu, Romolo Caniglia, Pavel Hulva, Sylwia D. Czarnomska, Marco Galaverni, Cyril Milleret, Djuro Huber, Maris Hindrikson, Andrés Ordiz, Vicente Palacios, Luigi Boitani, Malgorzata Pilot, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. [Cambridge], Brown Bear Foundation, Department of Human and Animal Biology, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' [Rome], JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES), European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC), Department of Wildlife (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UM3), Instituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), Instituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Faculty of Science, Charles University [Prague], Progetto Lupo Piemonte, Centro Gestione e Conservazione Grandi Carnivori, Servizio Piano Faunistico, Provincia di Arezzo, Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Universitat de València (UV), University of Granada [Granada], Dipartimento di Zoologia e Genetica Evoluzionistica, Universita di Sassari, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' = Sapienza University [Rome], Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud]), Charles University [Prague] (CU), Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' = Sapienza University [Rome] (UNIROMA), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Universidad de Granada = University of Granada (UGR), and Università degli Studi di Sassari = University of Sassari [Sassari] (UNISS)
Anthropogenic hybridization is widely perceived as a threat to the conservation of biodiversity. Nevertheless, to date, relevant policy and management interventions are unresolved and highly convoluted. While this is due to the inherent complexity of the issue, we hereby hypothesize that a lack of agreement concerning management goals and approaches, within the scientific community, may explain the lack of social awareness on this phenomenon, and the absence of effective pressure on decision-makers. By focusing on wolf x dog hybridization in Europe, we hereby (a) assess the state of the art of issues on wolf x dog hybridization within the scientific community, (b) assess the conceptual bases for different viewpoints, and (c) provide a conceptual framework aiming at reducing the disagreements. We adopted the Delphi technique, involving a three-round iterative survey addressed to a selected sample of experts who published at Web of Science listed journals, in the last 10 years on wolf x dog hybridization and related topics. Consensus was reached that admixed individuals should always be defined according to their genetic profile, and that a reference threshold for admixture (i.e., q-value in assignment tests) should be formally adopted for their identification. To mitigate hybridization, experts agreed on adopting preventive, proactive and, when concerning small and recovering wolf populations, reactive interventions. Overall, experts' consensus waned as the issues addressed became increasingly practical, including the adoption of lethal removal. We suggest three non-mutually exclusive explanations for this trend: (i) value-laden viewpoints increasingly emerge when addressing practical issues, and are particularly diverging between experts with different disciplinary backgrounds (e.g., ecologists, geneticists); (ii) some experts prefer avoiding the risk of potentially giving carte blanche to wolf opponents to (illegally) remove wolves, based on the wolf x dog hybridization issue; (iii) room for subjective interpretation and opinions result from the paucity of data on the effectiveness of different management interventions. These results have management implications and reveal gaps in the knowledge on a wide spectrum of issues related not only to the management of anthropogenic hybridization, but also to the role of ethical values and real-world management concerns in the scientific debate.