Search

This paper presents the design and commissioning of a novel pseudo‐static test apparatus for underground structures that accounts for soil‐structure interaction by simulating the soil with suitably designed springs. The developed apparatus was employed to conduct 1:10 large scale tests on a two‐story three‐span prefabricated subway station structure. Two comparative cyclic load tests were conducted: one involved the developed springs‐structure system; and one involved the structure alone (no springs). The test results demonstrated important differences in the damage location, damage degree, bearing capacity, and deformation capacity of the prefabricated subway station structure under the two loading conditions (i.e., with and without springs). The presence of springs (i.e., soil‐structure interaction) enhanced the lateral collapse resistance of the underground structure and affected the inter‐story displacement ratio (IDR) between the upper and lower layers of the two‐story prefabricated subway station structure. However, it did not affect the deformation coordination of the walls and columns of each layer. A finite element model of the prototype station was also established to conduct dynamic time history analysis simulating the soil‐structure interaction. The results from the dynamic analysis validated the effectiveness of the pseudo‐static test method employing the spring‐structure system. The excellent agreement between the calculated dynamic responses and the responses obtained from the pseudo static tests confirmed the ability of the developed apparatus to conduct seismic tests on complex large‐scale underground structures such as prefabricated subway stations. Thus, this test methodology might be utilized to attain valuable insights into the seismic performance of prefabricated subway stations at a relatively low cost and effort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Many geotechnical problems such as seismic resistant designs and machine vibrations require the installation of dampers or isolators to control the amplitude of vibrations. Engineered fills designed with increased capability of dissipating energy can provide a more economical approach to control excessive vibrations. This study presents a novel technique to increase the damping ratio of sand without affecting its stiffness and shear strength. The increase in damping ratio is evaluated by performing resonant column tests on the engineered sand. The damping ratio of the sand is increased by adding a controlled amount of viscoelastic material to the voids. The resonant column tests indicate that the damping ratio of the sand can be increased manifold without affecting the shear modulus. The micromechanical evaluation of the results shows a good correlation between the particle surface area in contact with the pore-mixture and the damping ratio of the sand. The suitability of engineered sand as foundation material is also evaluated by performing direct shear tests. The direct shear tests on mixtures indicate similar or better shear strength parameters compared to pure sand. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]