Search

Background. Tumor budding is now emerging as one of the robust and promising histological factors that play an important role in colon cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between tumor budding and tumor clinicopathological factors, tumor molecular signature, and patient survival for the first time in a Moroccan population. Methods. We collected data of 100 patients operated from colon adenocarcinoma. Tumor budding was assessed on HES slides, according to the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference 2016 recommendations. The expression of MMR proteins was performed by immunohistochemistry. KRAS and NRAS mutations testing was performed by Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing. Results. High tumor budding grade (BUD 3) was found to be significantly associated with adverse clinicopathological features including older age (P = 0.03), presence of perineural invasion (P = 0.02), presence of vascular invasion (P = 0.05), distant metastases (P < 0.001), advanced TNM stage (P = 0.001), the occurrence of relapse (P = 0.04), and the high number of deceased cases (P = 0.02). Interestingly, we found that tumors with high-grade tumor budding were more likely to be microsatellite stable (MSS) (P = 0.005) and harbor more KRAS mutations (P = 0.02). Tumors with high-grade tumor budding were strongly associated with KRAS G12D mutation (P = 0.007). In all stages, high tumor budding was correlated with poorer overall survival (P = 0.04) and decreased relapse-free survival with a difference close to significance ((P = 0.09). We concluded that high tumor budding was strongly associated with unfavorable clinicopathological features and special molecular biomarkers and effectively affects the overall survival of CC patients. Conclusions. Based on these findings and the ITBCC group recommendations, tumor budding should be taken into account along with other clinicopathologic factors in the risk assessment of colorectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision as a standard of care. We aimed to explore the number, size, germinal centers, extracapsular invasion of lymph nodes (LN), and their impact on overall survival and disease free survival. Furthermore we also investigated the characteristics of lymph nodes in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and those who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2018. The count and measurement of lymph nodes was assessed by careful visual inspection and manual palpation. The predictive cut-off value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) was determined based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), method and the survival outcomes based on Kaplan-Meier curves. We found that the size and the number of lymph nodes decreased significantly after neoadjuvant treatment. The mean LN for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy was 12.68 ± 6.69 and for patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy was 16.29 ± 5.61 (P = .012). The average size for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery was 3.30 ± 1.10 versus 4.22 ± 1.18 mm for control group (surgery only) (P < .001), an LNR of 0.13 (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 47%, AUC: 60%, 95% CI, 0.41%-0.76%) predicted recurrence and metastasis. Presence of lymph nodes with germinal centers was significantly associated with absence of vascular invasion, nodal tumor deposits, distant metastasis, and lower age group (<50 years). However there was no association seen between overall survival and relapse free, total number of lymph nodes enlarged and extracapsular invasion in positive nodes. Finally there is no association between lymph nodes with germinal centers and tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]