Search

Abstract Background There is growing attention to individuality in movement, its causes and consequences. Similarly to other well-established personality traits (e.g., boldness or sociability), conspecifics also differ repeatedly in their spatial behaviors, forming behavioral types (“spatial-BTs”). These spatial-BTs are typically described as the difference in the mean-level among individuals, and the intra-individual variation (IIV, i.e., predictability) is only rarely considered. Furthermore, the factors determining predictability or its ecological consequences for broader space-use patterns are largely unknown, in part because predictability was mostly tested in captivity (e.g., with repeated boldness assays). Here we test if (i) individuals differ in their movement and specifically in their predictability. We then investigate (ii) the consequences of this variation for home-range size and survival estimates, and (iii) the factors that affect individual predictability. Methods We tracked 92 barn owls (Tyto alba) with an ATLAS system and monitored their survival. From these high-resolution (every few seconds) and extensive trajectories (115.2 ± 112.1 nights; X̅ ± SD) we calculated movement and space-use indices (e.g., max-displacement and home-range size, respectively). We then used double-hierarchical and generalized linear mix-models to assess spatial-BTs, individual predictability in nightly max-displacement, and its consistency across time. Finally, we explored if predictability levels were associated with home-range size and survival, as well as the seasonal, geographical, and demographic factors affecting it (e.g., age, sex, and owls’ density). Results Our dataset (with 74 individuals after filtering) revealed clear patterns of individualism in owls’ movement. Individuals differed consistently both in their mean movement (e.g., max-displacement) and their IIV around it (i.e., predictability). More predictable individuals had smaller home-ranges and lower survival rates, on top and beyond the expected effects of their spatial-BT (max-displacement), sex, age and ecological environments. Juveniles were less predictable than adults, but the sexes did not differ in their predictability. Conclusion These results demonstrate that individual predictability may act as an overlooked axis of spatial-BT with potential implications for relevant ecological processes at the population level and individual fitness. Considering how individuals differ in their IIV of movement beyond the mean-effect can facilitate understanding the intraspecific diversity, predicting their responses to changing ecological conditions and their population management.

Many environmental and ecological studies require line of sight (LOS) and/or viewshed analyses. While tools for performing these analyses from digital elevation models (DEMs) are widespread, they are either too restrictive, inaccessible or pricey and difficult to use. This methodological gap is potentially imperative for scholars using solutions like telemetry tracking systems or spatial ecology landscape mapping. Here we present ViewShedR—a free, open-source and intuitive graphical user-interface application for performing LOS calculations, including cumulative, subtractive (areas covered by towers A + B or by A but not by B, respectively), and elevated-target analyses. ViewShedR is implemented in the widely used R environment, thus facilitating usage and further modification by end-users. We provide two working examples for ViewShedR in the context of permanent animal-tracking systems requiring simultaneous tag-detection by multiple towers (receivers): first, the ATLAS system for terrestrial animals in the Harod Valley, Israel; and second, an acoustic telemetry array for marine animals in the Dry Tortugas, Florida. ViewShedR allowed effective tower deployment and finding partially detected tagged animals in the ATLAS system. Similarly, it allowed us to identify reception shadows cast by islands in the marine array. We hope ViewShedR will facilitate deployment of tower arrays for tracking, communication networks and other ecological applications.

Time-of-arrival transmitter localization systems, which use measurements from an array of sensors to estimate the location of a radio or acoustic emitter, are now widely used for tracking wildlife. Outlier measurements can severely corrupt estimated locations. This article describes a new suite of location estimation algorithms for such systems. The new algorithms detect and discard outlier time-of-arrival observations, which can be caused by non-line-of-sight propagation, radio interference, clock glitches, or an overestimation of the signal-to-noise ratio. The new algorithms also detect cases in which two locations are equally consistent with measurements and can usually select the correct one. The new algorithms can also infer approximate altitude information from a digital elevation map to improve location estimates close to one of the sensors. Finally, the new algorithms approximate the covariance matrix of location estimates in a simpler and more reliable way than the baseline algorithm. Extensive testing on real-world data involving mobile transmitters attached to wild animals demonstrates the efficacy of the new algorithms. Performance testing also shows that the new algorithms are fast and that they can easily cope with high-throughput real-time loads.