1. [Cervical sample-taking in the primary health service].
- Author
-
Gjerde PB, Tollånes MC, Tropé A, Eide ML, Natvik M, and Puntervoll HE
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Early Detection of Cancer, Lubricants, Primary Health Care, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Norway, General Practice, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Specimen Handling methods, Specimen Handling standards, Physicians, Primary Care
- Abstract
Background: In Norway, approximately 360 000 cervical screening samples were taken in 2020, of which 11 000 were registered as inadequate. We therefore wished to investigate doctors' knowledge of cervical sample-taking in the primary health service., Material and Method: An anonymous survey on cervical sample-taking was sent by email to around 4 700 members of the Norwegian College of General Practice in September 2021., Results: Of the 1 039 doctors who responded to the survey, 820 (79 %) reported that they always indicate the reason for taking the sample in the requisition form, and 898 (86 %) reported that they avoid taking a sample during menstruation. Only one in three doctors (343) correctly indicated the location of the squamocolumnar junction in postmenopausal women. In response to a question aimed at users of the ThinPrep method, which is particularly sensitive to sampling errors, 426 out of 697 (61 %) answered that they either avoid using a lubricant or use a water-based lubricant, while only 35 % of the doctors responded that they stop taking the sample if bleeding occurs., Interpretation: The results show that although many doctors have satisfactory knowledge, a continuous focus on cervical sample-taking is essential. Correct sampling and knowledge of anatomical factors in postmenopausal women may be significant for reducing the number of inadequate samples.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF