It is generally accepted that the overall process of carcinogenesis, with its long latent period, usually comprises at least two steps, initiation and promotion, each of which is probably controlled or modified by genetic and environmental factors. Retinoblastoma is a malignant neoplasm arising from the transformation of an embryonic retinal cell that may involve the minimal number of carcinogenic steps. For this and several other reasons, it is a cancer most suitable for studying the mechanisms of carcinogenesis in humans. This article reviews recent studies on the genetics and genesis of retinoblastoma with special reference to the host resistance theory proposed by the author (Matsunaga, 1978; 1979). Main conclusions are as follows: 1) Among all retinoblastomas, the ratio of unilateral to bilateral cases is approximately 2∶1. The vast majority occur sporadically, and familial cases represent less than 5% (Table 1). Follow-up studies of survivors of sporadic cases showed that all bilateral and about 10% of the unilateral cases are of the hereditary form, the rest being nonhereditary and presumably due to somatic mutation. Thus, of all sporadic cases that are heritable, the ratio of unilateral to bilateral disease is estimated at 0.17∶0.83. Although sporadic cases may contain a few inherited from an unaffected carrier parent, this ratio may be regarded approximately as referred to the general population who developed retinoblastoma as a result of fresh germinal mutation in the gonads of a healthy parent. 2) There are two types in the hereditary form; one is attributable to an autosomal dominant gene with variable penetrance and expressivity, and the other, referred to a minority of cases usually accompanied by developmental retardation, is associated with chromosomal deletion of 13q14. Fifty-seven cases of the deletion type, collected from the literature, included 25 unilateral and 32 bilateral cases (Table 2). Most of them were sporadic in origin, while some were familial, transmitted from a parent carrying an insertional translocation (Stronget al., 1981); in the latter instance, the non-expression of retinoblastoma in the parent was due to the balanced type of translocation and not to any host resistance factor. Therefore, with respect to host factors, the 57 cases are comparable to those sporadic cases that are heritable owing to the mutant gene. Comparison of the distribution of unilateral and bilateral cases between the two groups reveals a significant excess of unilateral disease in the cases associated with 13q-, indicating somewhat reduced carcinogenic potential of deletion of 13q14 as compared with the mutant gene. Since the gene has been assigned to 13q14 by linkage to Esterase D (Sparkeset al., 1982), this finding suggests that the mutant gene is probably not of null type. 3) Analysis of two-generation data from published pedigrees with familial cases of retinoblastoma showed that not only penetrance of the gene in children but also expressivity, as measured by the proportion of bilateral disease or age at diagnosis of the affected children, vary consistently with the degree of expressivity in the carrier parents (Tables 3–5). Maternal effect can be excluded because the variation in expressivity in the affected children did not change with the sex of the parents who transmitted the gene. The possibility of multiple alleles with different penetrance and expressivity can also be ruled out because all the three phenotypes occurred frequently among members of the same family who share the identical mutant gene. The distribution of the three phenotypes among the gene carriers is consistent with a multifactorial model with two thresholds (Fig. 1), but not with the two-mutation model (Knudson, 1971). These findings indicate that inherited host resistance plays a significant role in the malignant transformation of an already initiated or mutated cell. 4) Although the transmission pattern of retinoblastoma in certain kindreds showing affected collateral relatives who were connectedvia unaffected persons may be explained by a chromosomal mechanism as well as by successive selection of host resistance genes, the possibility of delayed mutation cannot be excluded. However, examination of these pedigrees revealed no sign of cytoplasmic inheritance associated with a vertically transmitting virus. 5) In most bilateral cases of retinoblastoma, the disease is already bilateral when the diagnosis was first made in either eye (Table 6), although the tumor in the first eye with the diagnosed disease had usually more progressed in terms of the Reese group than had the tumor in the second eye. Based on the data for sequentially bilateral cases (Table 7), the time required for a growing tumor to progress by one grade in the Reese group was estimated at less than 2 months and probably about 1 month. After removal of the bias due to the fact that the diagnosis for each eye is never independent, the correlation between ages of the patients at diagnosis in the right and left eyes was estimated at 0.82 (p