1. Interferon therapy in patients with SARS, MERS, and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
- Author
-
Shakila Yaribash, Mohammad Banazadeh, Mahdi Gouravani, Amene Saghazadeh, Ehsan Hajihosseinlou, Nima Rezaei, and Kiarash Saleki
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Combination therapy ,Nausea ,medicine.drug_class ,Review ,Favipiravir ,IFN ,Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ,Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome ,Antiviral Agents ,MERS-CoV ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Pharmacology ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,SARS-CoV ,medicine.disease ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment ,Regimen ,030104 developmental biology ,Meta-analysis ,SARS-CoV2 ,Cohort ,Interferon ,Corticosteroid ,Middle East respiratory syndrome ,Interferons ,medicine.symptom ,Coronavirus Infections ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Concern regarding coronavirus (CoV) outbreaks has stayed relevant to global health in the last decades. Emerging COVID-19 infection, caused by the novel SARS-CoV2, is now a pandemic, bringing a substantial burden to human health. Interferon (IFN), combined with other antivirals and various treatments, has been used to treat and prevent MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV2 infections. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of IFN-based treatments and combinational therapy with antivirals, corticosteroids, traditional medicine, and other treatments. Major healthcare databases and grey literature were investigated. A three-stage screening was utilized, and included studies were checked against the protocol eligibility criteria. Risk of bias assessment and data extraction were performed, followed by narrative data synthesis. Fifty-five distinct studies of SARS-CoV2, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV were spotted. Our narrative synthesis showed a possible benefit in the use of IFN. A good quality cohort showed lower CRP levels in Arbidol (ARB) + IFN group vs. IFN only group. Another study reported a significantly shorter chest X-ray (CXR) resolution in IFN-Alfacon-1 + corticosteroid group compared with the corticosteroid only group in SARS-CoV patients. In a COVID-19 trial, total adverse drug events (ADEs) were much lower in the Favipiravir (FPV) + IFN-α group compared with the LPV/RTV arm (P = 0.001). Also, nausea in patients receiving FPV + IFN-α regimen was significantly lower (P = 0.03). Quantitative analysis of mortality did not show a conclusive effect for IFN/RBV treatment in six moderately heterogeneous MERS-CoV studies (log OR = -0.05, 95% CI: (-0.71,0.62), I2 = 44.71%). A meta-analysis of three COVID-19 studies did not show a conclusive nor meaningful relation between receiving IFN and COVID-19 severity (log OR = -0.44, 95% CI: (-1.13,0.25), I2 = 31.42%). A lack of high-quality cohorts and controlled trials was observed. Evidence suggests the potential efficacy of several combination IFN therapies such as lower ADEs, quicker resolution of CXR, or a decrease in inflammatory cytokines; Still, these options must possibly be further explored before being recommended in public guidelines. For all major CoVs, our results may indicate a lack of a definitive effect of IFN treatment on mortality. We recommend such therapeutics be administered with extreme caution until further investigation uncovers high-quality evidence in favor of IFN or combination therapy with IFN.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF