Search

IntroductionMultiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common causes of disability in young adults. Nearly, 85% of MS cases start with attacks and remissions, classified as relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). With repeating attacks, MS causes brain-spinal cord atrophy and enhanced disability as disease progresses. PLP-induced EAE is one of the most established models for pathophysiology and treatment of RRMS. Recent studies demonstrated the possible role of pericytes in perivascular and intra-lesional fibrosis in PLP-induced EAE, whose importance remains elusive. Hence, we have investigated the possible role of pericytes in fibrosis formation and amelioration with a hemichannel blocker, Carbenoxolone (CBX).MethodsPLP-induced experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) model is used and the effect of CBX is investigated. Clinical scores were recorded and followed. Perivascular Collagen 1 and 3 accumulations were demonstrated as markers of fibrosis in the spinal cord. To delineate the role of pericytes, human brain vascular pericytes (HBVP) were incubated with the sera of MS patients to induce in-vitro MS model and the fibrosis formation was investigated.ResultsIn the PLP induced in-vivo model, both intracerebroventricular and intraperitoneal CBX have significantly mitigated the disease progression followed by clinical scores, demyelination, and fibrosis. Moreover, CBX significantly mitigated MS-serum-induced fibrosis in the HBVP cell culture.DiscussionThe study demonstrated two important findings. First, CBX decreases fibrosis formation in both in-vivo and in-vitro MS models. Secondly, it improves neurological scores and decreases demyelination in the EAE model. Therefore, CBX can be potential novel therapeutic option in treating Multiple Sclerosis.

Background: Dynamic lumbar stabilization aims to preserve spinal movement, offering stability and controlled motion. However, screw loosening, especially in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis, remains challenging. Method: Between 2018 and 2022, a retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 119 patients diagnosed with osteopenia and osteoporosis who underwent spinal dynamic instrumentation surgery. These patients were categorized into two groups: single-stage surgery (n = 67) and two-stage surgery (n = 52). Over the 48-month follow-up period, the occurrence and percentage of screw loosening were examined at each surgical level per patient, as well as by screw location (pedicular, corpus, tip). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Results: Total screw loosening rates were significantly lower in the two-stage group (2.83%) compared to the single-stage group (14.63%, p < 0.001). Patient-based loosening occurred in 5 patients (9.6%) in the two-stage group and 16 patients (23.9%) in the single-stage group. Loosening rates were lower in the two-stage group at L2 (7.78%, p = 0.040), L3 (5.56%, p < 0.001), L4 (8.89%, p = 0.002), and L5 (10.00%, p = 0.006), but higher at S1 (21.11%, p = 0.964), T12 (15.56%, p = 0.031), and iliac levels (15.56%, p = 0.001). Pedicular section exhibited the highest loosening (37 cases). VAS and ODI scores improved significantly in both groups, with better outcomes in the two-stage group at the 48. months (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The two-stage surgical approach significantly reduces screw loosening in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis undergoing dynamic stabilization surgery, offering enhanced stability and better clinical outcomes.

Background: Adult spinal deformities (ASD) present complex challenges in spine surgery. The diverse nature of these deformities requires a comprehensive understanding of their classification and treatment options. Traditional approaches, such as fusion and rigid stabilization are associated with complications, including screw loosening, breakage, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and pseudoarthrosis. Dynamic stabilization techniques have emerged as promising alternatives, to reduce these complications and preserve spinal motion. Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of dynamic stabilization using the Dynesys system in the surgical treatment of adult degenerative spinal deformities, with a particular emphasis on their classification. Methods: ASDs were classified according to the Berjano–Lamartina (BL) and Silva–Lenke (SL) classifications. We analyzed the efficacy of the Dynesys system in enhancing sagittal balance, radiological parameters, and clinical outcomes in this context. Results: Dynamic stabilization of patients with ASDs using the Dynesys system significantly improved the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores and decreased the complication rates. Patients with BL types 2, 3, and 4 experienced a significant improvement in sagittal balance followed by sagittal vertical axis measurements (p = 0.045, p = 0.015, and p < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: The SL and BL classifications, which were originally developed for rigid spinal stabilization, can be applied in dynamic stabilization. Furthermore, dynamic stabilization using the Dynesys system can be used as an alternative to rigid stabilization in SL levels 2 and 3, and BL types 1, 2, and 3, and in some patients with type 4 ASDs.