Search

Background: Since 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has recommended an annual eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv for radiation workers, averaged over 5 years, with no year exceeding 50 mSv. However, limited research has been conducted on dose rate conversion coefficients (DCCs) for direct contamination of the eye. Purpose: This study aimed to accurately determine DCCs for the eye lens and cornea for ocular contamination with radionuclides used in nuclear medicine. Methods: DCCs for 37 radionuclides used in nuclear medicine were determined using two different methods. Method 1 involved conducting Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of an ICRU cylinder to determine the absorbed dose at a depth of 3 mm resulting from a point source. The accuracy of this simulation approach was validated by experimental thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements for 18F, 68Ga, 99mTc, and 177Lu. In method 2, average DCCs were calculated for the eye lens (complete and radiosensitive parts) and the cornea for both a point source and thin surface contamination centered on the cornea using MC simulations on the adult mesh‐type reference computational phantom of the eye from the ICRP (MRCP). Results: DCCs determined from TLD measurements showed excellent agreement (deviations: +1.4%, +4.7%, −3.1%, and −2.5% for 18F, 68Ga, 99mTc, and 177Lu, respectively) compared to MC simulations of the experimental set‐up. For the 37 radionuclides, DCCs of the complete eye‐lens for a point source ranged from 2.53 × 10−7 to 4.15 × 10−2 mGy MBq−1 s−1 for the adult MRCPs, being substantially smaller compared to DCCs determined via MC simulations of a ICRU cylinder. In general, point source and surface contamination showed comparable DCCs for the eye lens. Radionuclides emitting low‐energy beta radiation or conversion electrons (e.g., 177Lu, 99mTc) showed low DCCs as the radiation does not penetrate to the depth of the eye lens, while radionuclides emitting high‐energy beta radiation (e.g., 90Y) showed high DCCs. Overall, DCCs for the radiosensitive part of the eye lens were larger (up to a factor of 3) compared to the complete eye lens. DCCs for the cornea were larger than for the eye lens with a factor that strongly depended on the emitted radiation type. Especially alpha emitters (e.g., 211At, 223Ra) showed high DCCs for the cornea because of the short range of alpha radiation, leading to local maxima in the cornea and not reaching the eye lens. Conclusion: DCCs at a depth of 3 mm in an ICRU cylinder and adult MRCP DCCs for both the complete and sensitive parts of the eye lens and cornea were determined for 37 radionuclides having applications in nuclear medicine. These DCCs are highly useful in radiation safety assessments and radiation dose calculations in ocular contamination incidents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is widely treated using large radiotherapy margins, resulting in substantial irradiation of the surrounding cerebral structures. In this context, the question arises whether these margins could be safely reduced. In 2018, clinical target volume (CTV) expansion was reduced in our institution from 20 to 15 mm around the gross target volume (GTV) (ie, the contrast-enhancing tumor/cavity). We sought to retrospectively analyze the impact of this reduction. Methods All adult patients with GBM treated between January 2015 and December 2020 with concurrent chemoradiation (60Gy/2Gy or 59.4Gy/1.8Gy) were analyzed. Patients treated using a 20 (CTV20, n  = 57) or 15 mm (CTV15, n  = 56) CTV margin were compared for target volumes, dose parameters to the surrounding organs, pattern of recurrence, and survival outcome. Results Mean GTV was similar in both groups (ie, CTV20: 39.7cm3; CTV15: 37.8cm3; P  = .71). Mean CTV and PTV were reduced from 238.9cm3 to 176.7cm3 (P  = .001) and from 292.6cm3 to 217.0cm3 (P  < .001), for CTV20 and CTV15, respectively. As a result, average brain mean dose (Dmean) was reduced from 25.2Gy to 21.0Gy (P  = .002). Significantly lower values were also observed for left hippocampus Dmean, brainstem D0.03cc, cochleas Dmean, and pituitary Dmean. Pattern of recurrence was similar, as well as patient outcome, ie, median progression-free survival was 8.0 and 7.0 months (P  = .80), and median overall survival was 11.0 and 14.0 months (P  = .61) for CTV20 and CTV15, respectively. Conclusions In GBM patients treated with chemoradiation, reducing the CTV margin from 20 to 15 mm appears to be safe and offers the potential for less treatment toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Currently, there is no global consensus regarding the treatment of skull-base chondrosarcoma. Some believe surgery is sufficient, while others administer adjuvant radiotherapy regardless of the extent of surgical resection. This review aims to gather the latest available evidence regarding the treatment of skull-base chondrosarcoma and to analyze the long-term prognosis to ascertain the potential added value of adjuvant radiotherapy and its application. Surgery and radiotherapy are key elements to the treatment of skull-base chondrosarcomas; however, there is currently no consensus regarding whether or not adjuvant radiotherapy has to be administered. This study searched the EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases for clinical studies evaluating the long-term prognosis of surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. After reviewing the search results, a total of 22 articles were selected for this review. A total of 1388 patients were included in this cohort, of which 186 received surgery only. With mean follow-up periods ranging from 39.1 to 86 months, surgical treatment provided progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 83.7 to 92.9% at 3 years, 60.0 to 92.9% at 5 years, and 58.2 to 64.0% at 10 years. Postoperative radiotherapy provides PFS rates ranging between 87 and 96.2% at 3 years, 57.1 and 100% at 5 years, and 67 and 100% at 10 years. Recurrence rates varied from 5.3% to 39.0% in the surgery-only approach and between 1.5% and 42.90% for the postoperative radiotherapy group. When considering prognostic variables, higher age, brainstem/optic apparatus compression, and larger tumor volume prior to radiotherapy were found to be significant factors for local recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Meningiomas are the most common primary tumours of the central nervous system. This study aimed to provide comprehensive nationwide estimates on the incidence, prevalence and prognostic impact of meningioma diagnosis in the Netherlands. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with meningioma in 2000–2019 were selected from the Dutch Brain Tumour Registry (DBTR), part of the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Time trends in age‐adjusted incidence and prevalence rates were evaluated using the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Relative survival rates were calculated using the Pohar Perme estimator. Case completeness of the DBTR/NCR was estimated through record linkage with one of the Dutch neuro‐oncology centres. Results: From a total of 23,454 cases of meningioma, 11,306 (48.2%) were histologically confirmed and 12,148 (51.8%) were radiological diagnoses. Over time, the incidence of diagnosis increased from 46.9 per 1,000,000 inhabitants (European Standardized Rate [ESR]) to 107.3 (EAPC 4.7%, p < 0.01), with an increase in the incidence of radiological diagnoses from 14.0 to 70.2 per 1,000,000 ESR (EAPC 9.1%, p < 0.01). The prevalence of meningioma was estimated at 1012/1,000,000 on 1 January 2020, with almost 17,800 individuals having had a diagnosis of meningioma. Relative survival rate at 10 years for grade 1 meningiomas was 91.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.4%–92.3%), 71.3% (95% CI 66.8%–75.2%) for grade 2 meningiomas and 36.4% (95% CI 27.3%–45.6%) for grade 3 meningiomas. Local case completeness was estimated at 97.6% for histologically confirmed meningiomas and 84.5% for radiological diagnoses. Conclusion: With a near‐complete registry, meningioma prevalence was estimated at over 1000 per 1,000,000 inhabitants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) have a prolonged survival expectancy due to better discriminative tumor classification and multimodal treatment. Consequently, long-term treatment toxicity gains importance. Contemporary radiotherapy techniques such as intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), tomotherapy (TOMO) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enable high-dose irradiation of the target but they differ regarding delivered dose to organs at risk (OARs). The aim of this comparative in silico study was to determine these dosimetric differences in delivered doses. Material and methods: Imaging datasets of 25 LGG patients having undergone postoperative radiotherapy were included. For each of these patients, in silico treatment plans to a total dose of 50.4 Gy to the target volume were generated for the four treatment modalities investigated (i.e., IMRT, VMAT, TOMO, IMPT). Resulting treatment plans were analyzed regarding dose to target and surrounding OARs comparing IMRT, TOMO and IMPT to VMAT. Results: In total, 100 treatment plans (four per patient) were analyzed. Compared to VMAT, the IMPT mean dose (Dmean) for nine out of 10 (90%) OARs was statistically significantly (p<.02) reduced, for TOMO this was true in 3/10 (30%) patients and for 1/10 (10%) patients for IMRT. IMPT was the prime modality reducing dose to the OARs followed by TOMO. Discussion: The low dose volume to the majority of OARs was significantly reduced when using IMPT compared to VMAT. Whether this will lead to a significant reduction in neurocognitive decline and improved quality of life is to be determined in carefully designed future clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study tests whether using a screening instrument improves referral to psychosocial care providers (e.g. psychologist) and facilitates patient-radiotherapist communication. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was used. Fourteen radiotherapists were randomly allocated to the experimental or control group and 568 of their patients received care in accordance with the group to which their radiotherapist was allocated. Patients in the experimental group were asked to complete a screening instrument before and at the end of the radiation treatment period. All patients were requested to complete questionnaires concerning patient-physician communication after the first consultation and concerning psychosocial care 3 and 12 months post-intervention. Results: Patients who completed the screening instrument were referred to social workers at an earlier stage than patients who did not (P<0.01). No effects were observed for numbers of referred patients, or for improved patient-radiotherapist communication. Conclusions: Our results suggest that a simple screening procedure can be valuable for the timely treatment of psychosocial problems in patients. Future efforts should be directed at appropriate timing of screening and enhancing physicians' awareness regarding the importance of identifying, discussing and treating psychosocial problems in cancer patients. Practice Implications: Psychosocial screening can be enhanced by effective radiotherapist-patient communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Meningiomas classified as grade 2-3 according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) require combined surgery and in most cases radiotherapy (RT). Their initial management was evaluated using the Dutch Brain Tumour Registry., Methods: The study included 393 patients aged ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed meningioma WHO grade 2-3 between 2016 and 2021. Factors associated with adjuvant RT < 6 months following surgery were identified using logistic regression analyses, thereby accounting for variation between CNS regional tumour boards through mixed-effect modelling. This variation was further assessed by funnel plots for case-mix adjusted ratios of RT across tumour boards. The association with patients' survival at 5 years was evaluated with inverse probability-weighted accelerated failure (Weibull) models. Analyses were performed on multiple imputed datasets (m = 10) to account for missing data., Results: Adjuvant RT was administered to 22.2% (59/266) of patients with WHO grade 2 meningioma following a total resection, to 61.1% (58/95) following a partial resection, and to 68.8% (22/32) of patients with WHO grade 3 meningioma (61.5% after partial and 73.7% after total resection). RT was associated with grade 3, partial resection, bone invasion, and absence of multiple lesions. Management varied across tumour boards for grade 2 meningioma following total resection. Adjuvant RT was associated with survival benefit in case of grade 3 disease (hazard ratio: 0.40, 95%-confidence interval: 0.16-0.95, p = 0.04)., Conclusion: This national review revealed variation across CNS regional tumour boards in the management of grade 2 meningioma following total resection, and demonstrated survival benefit of adjuvant RT in grade 3 meningioma., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This retrospective study examined bone flap displacement during radiotherapy in 25 post-operative brain tumour patients. Though never exceeding 2.5 mm, the sheer frequency of displacement highlights the need for future research on larger populations to validate its presence and assess the potential clinical impact on planning tumour volume margins., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. This publication is part of the project “Making radiotherapy sustainable” with project number 10070012010002 of the Highly Specialised Care & Research programme (TZO programme) which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is widely treated using large radiotherapy margins, resulting in substantial irradiation of the surrounding cerebral structures. In this context, the question arises whether these margins could be safely reduced. In 2018, clinical target volume (CTV) expansion was reduced in our institution from 20 to 15 mm around the gross target volume (GTV) (ie, the contrast-enhancing tumor/cavity). We sought to retrospectively analyze the impact of this reduction., Methods: All adult patients with GBM treated between January 2015 and December 2020 with concurrent chemoradiation (60Gy/2Gy or 59.4Gy/1.8Gy) were analyzed. Patients treated using a 20 (CTV 20 , n  = 57) or 15 mm (CTV 15 , n  = 56) CTV margin were compared for target volumes, dose parameters to the surrounding organs, pattern of recurrence, and survival outcome., Results: Mean GTV was similar in both groups (ie, CTV 20 : 39.7cm 3 ; CTV 15 : 37.8cm 3 ; P  = .71). Mean CTV and PTV were reduced from 238.9cm 3 to 176.7cm 3 ( P  = .001) and from 292.6cm 3 to 217.0cm 3 ( P  < .001), for CTV 20 and CTV 15 , respectively. As a result, average brain mean dose (D mean ) was reduced from 25.2Gy to 21.0Gy ( P  = .002). Significantly lower values were also observed for left hippocampus D mean , brainstem D 0.03cc , cochleas D mean , and pituitary D mean . Pattern of recurrence was similar, as well as patient outcome, ie, median progression-free survival was 8.0 and 7.0 months ( P  = .80), and median overall survival was 11.0 and 14.0 months ( P  = .61) for CTV 20 and CTV 15 , respectively., Conclusions: In GBM patients treated with chemoradiation, reducing the CTV margin from 20 to 15 mm appears to be safe and offers the potential for less treatment toxicity., Competing Interests: None., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: Atlas-based and deep-learning contouring (DLC) are methods for automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs). The European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) published a consensus-based atlas for delineation of OARs in neuro-oncology. In this study, geometric and dosimetric evaluation of automatically-segmented neuro-oncological OARs was performed using CT- and MR-models following the EPTN-contouring atlas., Methods: Image and contouring data from 76 neuro-oncological patients were included. Two atlas-based models (CT-atlas and MR-atlas) and one DLC-model (MR-DLC) were created. Manual contours on registered CT-MR-images were used as ground-truth. Results were analyzed in terms of geometrical (volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (vDSC), surface DSC (sDSC), added path length (APL), and mean slice-wise Hausdorff distance (MSHD)) and dosimetrical accuracy. Distance-to-tumor analysis was performed to analyze to which extent the location of the OAR relative to planning target volume (PTV) has dosimetric impact, using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests., Results: CT-atlas outperformed MR-atlas for 22/26 OARs. MR-DLC outperformed MR-atlas for all OARs. Highest median (95 %CI) vDSC and sDSC were found for the brainstem in MR-DLC: 0.92 (0.88-0.95) and 0.84 (0.77-0.89) respectively, as well as lowest MSHD: 0.27 (0.22-0.39)cm. Median dose differences (ΔD) were within ± 1 Gy for 24/26(92 %) OARs for all three models. Distance-to-tumor showed a significant correlation for ΔD max,0.03cc -parameters when splitting the data in ≤ 4 cm and > 4 cm OAR-distance (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: MR-based DLC and CT-based atlas-contouring enable high-quality segmentation. It was shown that a combination of both CT- and MR-autocontouring models results in the best quality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess how often-medical oncology professionals encounter difficult consultations and if they desire support in the form of training., Methods: In February 2022, a survey on difficult medical encounters in oncology, training and demographics was set up. The survey was sent to 390 medical oncology professionals part of the OncoZON network of the Southeast region of the Netherlands., Results: Medical oncology professionals perceive a medical encounter as difficult when there is a dominant family member ( n  = 27), insufficient time ( n  = 24), or no agreement between medical professional and patient ( n  = 22). Patients involved in these encounters are most often characterized with low health literacy ( n  = 12) or aggressive behavior ( n  = 10). The inability to comprehend difficult medical information or perceived difficult behavior complicates encounters. Of the medical oncology professionals, 27-44% preferred a training as a physical group meeting (24%) or an individual virtual meeting (19%)., Conclusion: Medical oncology professionals consider dominant or aggressive behavior and the inability to comprehend medical information by patients during consultations as difficult encounters for which they would appreciate support., Innovation: Our results highlight concrete medical encounters in need of specific education programs within daily oncology practice., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Objective: Vestibular schwannoma (VS) growth of ≥2 mm during serial MRI observation, irrespective of size, is the benchmark for treatment initiation in almost all centers. Although the probability of less optimal outcomes significantly increases in VS closer to the brainstem, early intervention does not improve long-term quality of life. Moving beyond the recommendation of definitive treatment for all VS after detected growth, we subclassified Koos 2 tumors based on extrameatal extension and relation to the brainstem. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the Koos 2 subclassification's validity and the inter-and intra-rater reliability of the entire Koos classification., Methods: Six experts, including neurosurgeons, otorhinolaryngologists and radiologists from two tertiary referral centers, classified 43 VS MRI scans. Validity of the Koos 2 subclassification was evaluated by the percentage agreement against the multidisciplinary skull base tumor board management advice. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: Validity was almost perfect in Koos 2a VSs with a 100% agreement and 87.5% agreement for Koos 2b. Inter-rater reliability for all Koos grades was significantly excellent (ICC 0.91; 95%CI 0.866 to 0.944, p= <0.001). Five raters had an excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC > 0.90; p= <0.01) and one rater had a good intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.88; 95% CI 0.742 to 0.949)., Conclusions: Although multiple factors influence decision-making, the classification of Koos 2a and 2b with excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability, can aid in recommending treatment initiation, moving beyond detected tumor growth, aiming to optimize patient centered care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Mobile health data capture applications (mHDA's) may improve communication between healthcare providers and patients. However, there is limited literature about the use of mHDA's facilitating clinical trials. In this study, the effectiveness of an application, supporting follow-up visits of cancer trial participants was investigated. Twenty participants were provided with an e-questionnaire via the mHDA. Participants rated the usability of the application as high performing (mean Systems Usability Scale 87 points). The research team rated the mHDA as highly applicable and efficient in preparing visits. Anamnesis, physical examination and agreement on further policy were performed within an average of 31 min., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Temporary alopecia is a common side-effect in brain tumour patients receiving cranial radiotherapy with a significant psychological burden for the affected patient. The purpose of this study was to generate a method in our treatment planning system (TPS) to visualize the expected radiation-induced alopecia 4 weeks after treatment, in order to inform the patients thereupon before the start of radiotherapy., Material and Methods: A pilot study was conducted in ten patients receiving hypo- (HF) or conventionally fractionated (CF) photon beam Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for an intracranial lesion. Dose calculations were correlated to visible alopecia four weeks after the end of treatment to create a structure predictive of alopecia in our TPS. These alopecia structures for both fractionation schedules were validated in two cohorts of 69 HF and 78 CF patients undergoing radiotherapy between 2016 and 2019., Results: In the pilot cohort, a total physical dose of 4 Gy for HF and 12.6 Gy for CF radiotherapy were found to be predictive of alopecia 4 weeks after treatment. Applying these doses to our validation cohort, we found an accurate prediction of alopecia in 59/69 (86%) HF and 73/78 (96%) CF patients. For the total patient group of 147 patients, the predicted amount of alopecia was accurate in 90% of the cases. All inaccurate predictions overestimated the expected extent of alopecia., Conclusion: The presented straightforward method to visualize predicted alopecia 4 weeks after treatment has proven to predict the extent alopecia highly accurate in the vast majority of patients. Sharing these results with the patients pre-treatment may result in stress reduction before cranial irradiation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.)

Background and Purpose: To update the digital online atlas for organs at risk (OARs) delineation in neuro-oncology based on high-quality computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with new OARs., Materials and Methods: In this planned update of the neurological contouring atlas published in 2018, ten new clinically relevant OARs were included, after thorough discussion between experienced neuro-radiation oncologists (RTOs) representing 30 European radiotherapy-oncology institutes. Inclusion was based on daily practice and research requirements. Consensus was reached for the delineation after critical review. Contouring was performed on registered CT with intravenous (IV) contrast (soft tissue & bone window setting) and 3 Tesla (T) MRI (T1 with gadolinium & T2 FLAIR) images of one patient (1 mm slices). For illustration purposes, delineation on a 7 T MRI without IV contrast from a healthy volunteer was added. OARs were delineated by three experienced RTOs and a neuroradiologist based on the relevant literature., Results: The presented update of the neurological contouring atlas was reviewed and approved by 28 experts in the field. The atlas is available online and includes in total 25 OARs relevant to neuro-oncology, contoured on CT and MRI T1 and FLAIR (3 T & 7 T). Three-dimensional (3D) rendered films are also available online., Conclusion: In order to further decrease inter- and intra-observer OAR delineation variability in the field of neuro-oncology, we propose the use of this contouring atlas in photon and particle therapy, in clinical practice and in the research setting. The updated atlas is freely available on www.cancerdata.org., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumour which has, despite extensive treatment, a median overall survival of 15 months. Radiomics is the high-throughput extraction of large amounts of image features from radiographic images, which allows capturing the tumour phenotype in 3D and in a non-invasive way. In this study we assess the prognostic value of CT radiomics for overall survival in patients with a GBM., Materials and Methods: Clinical data and pre-treatment CT images were obtained from 218 patients diagnosed with a GBM via biopsy who underwent radiotherapy +/- temozolomide between 2004 and 2015 treated at three independent institutes (n = 93, 62 and 63). A clinical prognostic score (CPS), a simple radiomics model consisting of volume based score (VPS), a complex radiomics prognostic score (RPS) and a combined clinical and radiomics (C + R)PS model were developed. The population was divided into three risk groups for each prognostic score and respective Kaplan-Meier curves were generated., Results: Patient characteristics were broadly comparable. Clinically significant differences were observed with regards to radiation dose, tumour volume and performance status between datasets. Image acquisition parameters differed between institutes. The cross-validated c-indices were moderately discriminative and for the CPS ranged from 0.63 to 0.65; the VPS c-indices ranged between 0.52 and 0.61; the RPS c-indices ranged from 0.57 to 0.64 and the combined clinical and radiomics model resulted in c-indices of 0.59-0.71., Conclusion: In this study clinical and CT radiomics features were used to predict OS in GBM. Discrimination between low-, middle- and high-risk patients based on the combined clinical and radiomics model was comparable to previous MRI-based models., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Proton therapy is expected to outperform photon-based treatment regarding organs at risk (OAR) sparing but to date there is no method to practically measure clinical benefit. Here, we introduce the novel ROCOCO Performance Scoring System (RPSS) translating dose differences into clinically relevant endpoints and apply this to a treatment plan comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in 20 pilocytic astrocytoma patients., Material and Methods: The RPSS was developed on the basis of expert-based weighting factors and toxicity scores per OAR. The imaging datasets of 20 pilocytic astrocytoma patients having undergone radiotherapy were included in this in silico dosimetric comparison trial as proof of principle. For each of these patients, treatment plans to a total dose of 54 Gy (RBE) were generated for VMAT and IMPT and these were compared regarding radiation dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and OARs. The RPSS was calculated for each treatment plan comparing VMAT and IMPT., Results: In 40 analysed treatment plans, the average and low dose volumes to various OARs were significantly reduced when using IMPT compared to VMAT ( p  < 0.05). Using the RPSS, a significant difference between both treatment modalities was found, with 85% of the patients having a lower RPSS in favour of the IMPT plan., Conclusion: There are dosimetric differences between IMPT and VMAT in pilocytic astrocytoma patients. In absence of clinically validated NTCP models we introduce the RPSS model in order to objectively compare treatment modalities by translating dosimetric differences in potential clinical differences., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.)

Proton therapy offers an attractive alternative to conventional photon-based radiotherapy in low grade glioma patients, delivering radiotherapy with equivalent efficacy to the tumour with less radiation exposure to the brain. In the Netherlands, patients with favourable prognosis based on tumour and patient characteristics can be offered proton therapy. Radiation-induced neurocognitive function decline is a major concern in these long surviving patients. Although level 1 evidence of superior clinical outcome with proton therapy is lacking, the Dutch National Health Care Institute concluded that there is scientific evidence to assume that proton therapy can have clinical benefit by reducing radiation-induced brain damage. Based on this decision, proton therapy is standard insured care for selected low grade glioma patients. Patients with other intracranial tumours can also qualify for proton therapy, based on the same criteria. In this paper, the evidence and considerations that led to this decision are summarised. Additionally, the eligibility criteria for proton therapy and the steps taken to obtain high-quality data on treatment outcome are discussed., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS) is increasingly applied in patients with brain metastases (BM) and is expected to have fewer adverse effects on cognitive functioning than whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Patients with BM are often confronted with a relatively short life expectancy, and the prevention or delay of cognitive decline to maintain quality of life is a clinically and highly relevant treatment goal. This review systematically and specifically evaluates the current literature on the cognitive effects of SRS in patients with BM., Methods and Materials: Published trials on SRS alone or in combination with WBRT, including objective assessment of cognitive functioning, were identified through a systematic search of the PubMed database up to March 2018., Results: Of the 241 records screened, 14 studies matched the selection criteria: 2 pilot studies, 7 single-group/observational trials (1 study update), and 5 randomized trials (1 secondary analysis)., Conclusions: In general, the results show little to no objective cognitive decline up to 4 months after SRS compared with WBRT. However, most trials suffered from methodologic limitations that hindered reliable conclusions. Most importantly, few studies investigated the specific cognitive effects of SRS alone or versus WBRT. Furthermore, disentangling the cognitive effects of SRS from the effects of the disease itself and from the effects of other treatments remains very difficult. By presenting this comprehensive review, we aim to encourage researchers to probe deeper into this area and to do so in a standardized and methodologically optimal manner. The ultimate objective of this line of research is to inform both doctors and patients more precisely about the cognitive effects they can expect from treatment. This study is expected to improve the quality of decision-making and maximize clinical outcomes for each individual patient.

Purpose: For unbiased comparison of different radiation modalities and techniques, consensus on delineation of radiation sensitive organs at risk (OARs) and on their dose constraints is warranted. Following the publication of a digital, online atlas for OAR delineation in neuro-oncology by the same group, we assessed the brain OAR-dose constraints in a follow-up study., Methods: We performed a comprehensive search to identify the current papers on OAR dose constraints for normofractionated photon and particle therapy in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science. Moreover, the included articles' reference lists were cross-checked for potential studies that met the inclusion criteria. Consensus was reached among 20 radiation oncology experts in the field of neuro-oncology., Results: For the OARs published in the neuro-oncology literature, we summarized the available literature and recommended dose constraints associated with certain levels of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) according to the recent ICRU recommendations. For those OARs with lacking or insufficient NTCP data, a proposal for effective and efficient data collection is given., Conclusion: The use of the European Particle Therapy Network-consensus OAR dose constraints summarized in this article is recommended for the model-based approach comparing photon and proton beam irradiation as well as for prospective clinical trials including novel radiation techniques and/or modalities., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although the majority of adult epilepsy patients respond well to the current antiepileptic drug treatment, 20-40% of them are drug-resistant. In these patients, resective epilepsy surgery is a curative treatment option, for which, however, only a limited number of patients is eligible. The purpose is to summarize the outcome of radiotherapy for drug-resistant non-neoplastic focal epilepsy and to elucidate its efficacy for seizure outcome and long-term toxicity in adults., Method: A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane library, Embase and Web of Science. The methodological quality was evaluated using an adapted QUADAS checklist., Results: Sixteen out of 170 initially identified studies were included in this systematic literature study (n = 170 patients). Twelve of the 16 studies described a positive effect of radiotherapy on seizure frequency reduction, with 98 of the patients (on average 58%, range 25%-95%) reporting no or rare seizures (defined as radiotherapy-adapted Engel class [RAEC] I and II. In total, 20% (34 patients) of the patients needed subsequent surgery due to radionecrosis, cysts formation, edema, and intracranial hypertension or remaining seizures. A dose-effect model was fitted to the available response data in an attempt to derive a relationship between prescribed dose and RAEC frequency., Conclusions: Radiotherapy is a possible non-invasive treatment option for patients with drug-resistant focal non-neoplastic epilepsy. This systematic review showed that there is only level 4 evidence of primary radiotherapy reducing seizure frequency in adult patients. Prospective randomized trials are needed to determine its exact value compared to other treatment approaches., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)