Search

Purpose To describe the development and implementation of an enhanced recovery programme for patients undergoing total laryngectomy. Methods A feasibility study set in a tertiary head and neck unit in London, United Kingdom. The programme was developed based on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society guidelines for head and neck cancer surgery and local expert group consensus. An ERAS ‘booklet’ was devised which accompanied all laryngectomy patients during their inpatient stay. Contributors included otolaryngologists, anaesthetists, dieticians, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists and nurses. A 12-month pilot study was undertaken. The main outcome measures were feasibility and adherence. Results An enhanced recovery programme for 25 people undergoing total laryngectomy was successfully piloted in a tertiary referral head and neck unit. Median length of stay was reduced in the post-ERAS group by 1.5 days. No statistically significant difference in length of stay, time to first gastrografin swallow, rate of fistula nor postoperative normalcy of eating between the pre and post-ERAS patients who underwent laryngectomy was observed. Clavien-Dindo-grouped complication rates were significantly higher in the post-ERAS group. Conclusion This enhanced recovery programme for patients undergoing laryngectomy is the first of its kind in the literature. Implementation has been demonstrated feasible. Further longitudinal studies are required to reliably inform us on ERAS programmes’ effects on laryngectomy outcomes.

Recent reports have emphasized shortcomings in routine and emergency care leading to adverse outcomes in patients with tracheostomies. This two-part article provides a guide to the principles of care for staff looking after adult patients with tracheostomies in the hospital. The second part looks at routine and emergency care.

Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is crucial in head and neck surgery to prevent infection from clean contaminated wounds. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidance, the gold standard of practice, recommends that administration of broad spectrum antibiotics is discontinued after 24 hours post-operation. A three-audit cycle quality improvement project was conducted to assess clinical practice against SIGN guidance at a large London teaching hospital. Methods: Three change initiatives were implemented to improve antibiotic stewardship. First, an update of Trust guidelines with an associated poster campaign to educate staff and improve awareness. Second, introduction of a specific ‘prophylactic antibiotics in head and neck surgery’ bundle on the electronic hospital-wide prescribing system. Third, an update to an antibiotic prescribing guide (Microguide). Results: Over a 3-year study period the number of patients receiving antibiotics beyond 24 hours declined significantly (88% in 2015, 76% in 2016, 25% in 2018), demonstrating improved compliance with SIGN guidelines overall. Despite this, staff documentation of indications for extended antibiotic use remains suboptimal (58% in 2016 and 44% in 2018) as does the number of specimens sent for microbiological analysis (52% in 2016 and 0% in 2018). Conclusions: Appropriate prophylactic antibiotic prescribing can improve morbidity and mortality rates in head and neck cancer patients. Three change initiatives have been demonstrated which can help to improve prescribing compliance in line with SIGN guidance. Ongoing auditing is required to maintain the longevity of improvements made and encourage staff documentation of indications for extended antibiotic use and microbiology specimen analysis.

Shared airway procedures are unique in that both anaesthetist and surgeon are working in the same anatomical field. Close cooperation between anaesthetist and surgeon, an understanding of each other’s problems and knowledge of specialist equipment are often required. There is no ideal anaesthetic technique for all endoscopy procedures and the technique chosen depends on the patient’s general condition, the size, the mobility and location of the lesion, the use of a laser, and surgical requirements. Smooth emergence and recovery from anaesthesia are essential.

Background Perioperative fluid strategies influence clinical outcomes following major surgery. Many intravenous fluid preparations are based on simple solutions, such as normal saline, that feature an electrolyte composition that differs from that of physiological plasma. Buffered fluids have a theoretical advantage of containing a substrate that acts to maintain the body’s acid-base status - typically a bicarbonate or a bicarbonate precursor such as maleate, gluconate, lactate, or acetate. Buffered fluids also provide additional electrolytes, including potassium, magnesium, and calcium, more closely matching the electrolyte balance of plasma. The putative benefits of buffered fluids have been compared with those of non-buffered fluids in the context of clinical studies conducted during the perioperative period. This review was published in 2012, and was updated in 2017. Objectives To review effects of perioperative intravenous administration of buffered versus non-buffered fluids for plasma volume expansion or maintenance, or both, on clinical outcomes in adults undergoing all types of surgery. Search methods We electronically searched the Clinicaltrials.gov major trials registry, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 6) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966 to June 2016), Embase (1980 to June 2016), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; 1982 to June 2016). We handsearched conference abstracts and, when possible, contacted leaders in the field. We reran the search in May 2017. We added one potential new study of interest to the list of ‘Studies awaiting classification' and will incorporate this trial into formal review findings when we prepare the review update. Selection criteria Only randomized controlled trials that compared buffered versus non-buffered intravenous fluids for surgical patients were eligible for inclusion. We excluded other forms of comparison such as crystalloids versus colloids and colloids versus different colloids. Data collection and analysis Two review authors screened references for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias. We resolved disagreements by discussion and consensus, in collaboration with a third review author. We contacted trial authors to request additional information when appropriate. We presented pooled estimates for dichotomous outcomes as odds ratios (ORs) and for continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We analysed data via Review Manager 5.3 using fixed-effect models, and when heterogeneity was high (I² > 40%), we used random-effects models. Main results This review includes, in total, 19 publications of 18 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1096 participants. We incorporated five of those 19 studies (330 participants) after the June 2016 update. Outcome measures in the included studies were thematically similar, covering perioperative electrolyte status, renal function, and acid-base status; however, we found significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity among the included studies. We identified variable protocols for fluid administration and total volumes of fluid administered to patients intraoperatively. Trial authors variably reported outcome data at disparate time points and with heterogeneous patient groups. Consequently, many outcome measures are reported in small group sizes, reducing overall confidence in effect size, despite relatively low inherent bias in the included studies. Several studies reported orphan outcome measures. We did not include in the results of this review one large, ongoing study of saline versus Ringer's solution. We found insufficient evidence on effects of fluid therapies on mortality and postoperative organ dysfunction (defined as renal insufficiency leading to renal replacement therapy); confidence intervals were wide and included both clinically relevant benefit and harm: mortality (Peto OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.37 to 9.33; I² = 0%; 3 trials, 6 deaths, 276 participants; low-quality evidence); renal insufficiency (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.98; I² = 0%; 4 trials, 22 events, 276 participants; low-quality evidence). We noted several metabolic differences, including a difference in postoperative pH measured at end of surgery of 0.05 units - lower in the non-buffered fluid group (12 studies with a total of 720 participants; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.07; I² = 61%). However, this difference was not maintained on postoperative day one. We rated the quality of evidence for this outcome as moderate. We observed a higher postoperative serum chloride level immediately after operation, with use of non-buffered fluids reported in 10 studies with a total of 530 participants (MD 6.77 mmol/L, 95% CI 3.38 to 10.17), and this difference persisted until day one postoperatively (five studies with a total of 258 participants; MD 8.48 mmol/L, 95% CI 1.08 to 15.88). We rated the quality of evidence for this outcome as moderate. Authors' conclusions Current evidence is insufficient to show effects of perioperative administration of buffered versus non-buffered crystalloid fluids on mortality and organ system function in adult patients following surgery. Benefits of buffered fluid were measurable in biochemical terms, particularly a significant reduction in postoperative hyperchloraemia and metabolic acidosis. Small effect sizes for biochemical outcomes and lack of correlated clinical follow-up data mean that robust conclusions on major morbidity and mortality associated with buffered versus non-buffered perioperative fluid choices are still lacking. Larger studies are needed to assess these relevant clinical outcomes.

Recent reports have emphasized shortcomings in routine and emergency care leading to adverse outcomes in patients with tracheostomies. This two-part article provides a guide to the principles of care for staff looking after adult patients with tracheostomies in the hospital. The first part looks at indications and techniques.

Successful airway management requires an understanding of the upper and lower airway structures and functions. The nose and pharynx are important structures in the upper airway, providing: air quality control; protection of the lower airway; phonation and safe passage of food.

The anatomy of the airway is a core topic in anaesthesia, and a detailed knowledge is expected for examinations as well as in everyday practice. This article presents the most important aspects of airway anatomy from the point of view of the anaesthetist, with particular emphasis on understanding the clinical implications of the relevant structures and how they interact. The anatomy of the larynx and its innervation is discussed in detail, and put into clinical context as appropriate. Bronchial anatomy is described to aid navigation during bronchoscopy. Where possible, diagrams are used to help understanding.

This randomised double blind prospective study compared the effective intravascular volume expansion and maintenance, with two types of starches following induced haemorrhagic hypovolaemia. Twenty healthy male volunteers aged between 18 and 65 year were bled 10% of their total blood volume in fully monitored conditions and under the supervision of a trained specialist doctor and research nurse. The lost blood volume was replaced using one of the starch solutions. Effective intravascular volume expansion was monitored hourly using the Cr-51 radio-labelled red blood cell dilution technique, we compared the effects of two hydroxyethyl starch colloid preparations, one a high molecular weight and the other a low molecular weight preparation, on the plasma volume changes over time. The large molecular weight starch (Hextend) provided a less well-sustained volume expansion effect than the smaller one (Voluven).

SUMMARY Hyperchloremic acidosis is a predictable consequence of normal saline-based fluid administration. The theoretical basis for this is easily understood using Stewart's model of acid-base homeostasis. Data are emerging which describe the consequences of hyperchloremic acidosis in the surgical population.

Over 2 million units of red cells are transfused in the UK every year, half of which are used for surgical patients. A successful transfusion is the appropriate provision of blood cells or other blood components in a safe and timely manner. This article gives a practical guide to transfusion medicine.

The administration of buffered fluids to adult patients during surgery is equally safe and effective as the administration of non-buffered saline-based fluids. The use of buffered fluids is associated with less metabolic derangement, in particular hyperchloraemia and metabolic acidosis. Larger studies are needed to assess robust outcomes such as mortality.

This randomised double blind prospective study compared the effective intravascular volume expansion and maintenance, with two types of starches following induced haemorrhagic hypovolaemia. Twenty healthy male volunteers aged between 18 and 65 year were bled 10% of their total blood volume in fully monitored conditions and under the supervision of a trained specialist doctor and research nurse. The lost blood volume was replaced using one of the starch solutions. Effective intravascular volume expansion was monitored hourly using the (51)Cr radio-labelled red blood cell dilution technique, we compared the effects of two hydroxyethyl starch colloid preparations, one a high molecular weight and the other a low molecular weight preparation, on the plasma volume changes over time. The large molecular weight starch (Hextend) provided a less well-sustained volume expansion effect than the smaller one (Voluven)