Search

To estimate the efficacy of growth hormone (GH) co-treatment within an antagonist protocol in IVF/ICSI cycles in poor responders. A prospective observational study involving 50 patients underwent a standard antagonist protocol with or without GH co-treatment. GH was administered by a daily subcutaneous injection of 1,33 mg (equivalent to 4 IU) starting from day 1 of ovarian stimulation until the day of 10,000 human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggering . Concentrations of GH, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in serum and follicular fluid were the subject matter of analysis. The GH co-treatment significantly lowered the effective dose of gonadotropins, duration of stimulation, IGFBP-3 level in serum and follicular fluid on the day of oocyte retrieval. The total number of oocytes as well as the number of metaphase II stage (MII) oocytes, two pronucleus (2 pn) zygotes, good-quality transferred embryos was significantly higher in the GH + group. Pregnancy was achieved in patients GH + group only. Positive correlation was found between IGF-I level in follicular fluid, dynamics of IGFBP-3 level changes during stimulation protocol and the number of good-quality transferred embryos in the GH + group. GH administration in IVF/ICSI cycles for poor responders raises ovarian sensitivity to the gonadotropin exogenous influence, increasing number of high-quality embryos and the probability of pregnancy.

Severe forms of genital endometriosis are known to be associated with infertility and its subsequent treatment failure. Both gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (a-GnRH) and dienogest have been suggested as additional hormone therapy for patients with endometriomas. However, the result of hormonal suppression before an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle remains undetermined.A prospective cohort study of 144 infertile women planning IVF after laparoscopic surgery of ovarian endometriomas was conducted at our department in 2012-2015. Patients were divided into three groups: group I (N = 38) with dienogest course, group II (N = 70) with a-GnRH group III (N = 70) without any hormonal therapy within 6 months preceding IVF.The study groups did not differ by removed endometriomas size and ovarian reserve indicators. The gonadotropin dose per Cycle was higher, while the number of retrieved oocytes was lower in group III patients (p .001). In women with dienogest pretreatment, clinical pregnancy rate was 2.5 times (44.7% versus 16.7%, p = .012) and delivery rate - three times higher (36.8% versus 11.1%, p = .013) as compared with those from group III.The present study confirms the necessity of pre-cycle medical interventions in women with ovarian forms of endometriosis undergoing IVF. We suggest dienogest to be possibly more efficient treatment option for this kind of patients.