Search

Purpose: Epidemiologic and clinical evidence have shown an association between obesity and increased risk for breast cancer (BC) incidence and mortality. Data from human and animal studies support a potential role for weight loss in counteracting tumor-promoting properties of obesity in BC. However, dietary intervention clinical trials often show low patient adherence, especially among African American (AA) women compared to Caucasian (CC) women. They also show that AA women are disproportionately obese and lose less weight during behavior lifestyle interventions compared to CC with similar risk factors. We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of a 10-week caloric restricted diet in patients undergoing radiation and have performed analysis to determine if adherence to dietary alterations is feasible in underrepresented patients. Methods: In an IRB approved clinical trial, we determined the feasibility and toxicity of dietary intervention during radiation in breast cancer patients 18 years and older who were undergoing breast conservation therapy with T1-2N0 cancers. The dietary intervention consisted of caloric intake reduction of 25% from baseline for a total of 10 weeks during their six-week radiation treatment which was administered to the whole breast to a dose of 50Gy with a 10Gy boost to the tumor bed. To optimize adherence to caloric restriction (CR), patients received personalized counseling, maintained food diaries, and were educated on behavioral modifications at weekly visits. To characterize the effects of CR, baseline physiologic and blood parameters were collected and compared with post intervention measurements and samples. Biometric and biological data collected during the study comparing compliant participants before and after the CaReFOR intervention was stratified by race and analyzed via two-sample paired t-test. The difference between AA and CC study participants was determined to be significant if the calculated p-value was less than < 0.05 (CI 95%). Results: A total of 32 female patients were enrolled in the CaReFOR trial, 16 were AA and 16 were CC. Participant demographics were similar across age, primary tumor size (pT), nuclear grade, and hormone receptor status. Evaluation of patients’ baseline diet demonstrated similar macronutrients across races, with AA showing less fruit/vegetable and grains. AA patients were more overweight compared to their CC counterparts. They also showed a more inflamed state compared to CC patients. The baseline inflammatory biomarker levels for ESR and cholesterol were significantly higher while adiponectin was significantly lower in AA than that of CC patients. The trends for insulin, HbA1c, and leptin were also higher for AA compared to CC. Following the 10-week diet, AA patients (87.3%) were more compliant than CC’s (81.3%). Both AA and CC patients lost weight during the trial, with AA having a significant loss in body fat and gain in muscle mass compared to CC. Similarly, after completing the CR diet, biological inflammatory markers improved in AA and CC patients. Particularly, in AA, there was a significant decrease in cholesterol levels, while insulin, leptin, and ESR serum levels trended downwards, suggesting a decreased inflammatory state. Conclusions: Contrary to published studies, we found AA patients are successful in adhering to dietary alterations and have a benefit with respect to physiologic and biologic parameters. Our dietary intervention was able to positively affect our AA patients adverse baseline factors such as obesity and inflammation. Future studies should consider dietary alterations as a possible means to decrease AA patient disparate outcomes in breast cancer. Citation Format: Siani Harding, Adeseye Adekeye, Edith P. Mitchell, Nicole Simone. Caloric Restriction for Oncology Research (CaReFOR): Assessing dietary adherence and outcomes in African American patients during breast cancer treatment. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-52.

Background PD-1 inhibitors have shown significant efficacy in triple negative breast cancer (BC), however, durable responses are less common in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC. Better markers are therefore needed that will identify likely responders to PD-1 inhibitors among patients with luminal BC. While most efforts have focused on the immune checkpoint protein PD-L1, the alternative PD-1 ligand, PD-L2, has been largely overlooked. We aimed to determine if PD-L2 is associated with unfavorable prognosis in ER+ BC. Methods PD-L2 protein levels in cancer cells and stromal cells were measured retrospectively by quantitative immunofluorescence histocytometry in tissue microarrays of therapy-naïve, localized or locoregional ER+ BC and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS). Evaluable tumor PD-L2 data were derived from a main study cohort A diagnosed between 1988-2005 (n=684) with extensive clinical and outcome data and from an independent validation cohort B diagnosed between 1992-2012 (n=273). Patients received standard-of-care adjuvant therapy without immune checkpoint inhibitors after tumor resection. Results Univariate analysis of the main cohort A revealed that high PD-L2 expression in cancer cells was associated with shorter PFS (HR=1.8; 95%CI:1.3-2.6; p=0.001), an observation that was validated in an independent cohort B (HR=2.3, 95%CI:1.1-4.8; p=0.026). Approximately one third of ER+ BC cases were classified as high PD-L2. After multivariable adjustment for common clinicopathological variables, high cancer cell levels of PD-L2 remained independently predictive of early recurrence (HR=2.0; 95%CI:1.4-2.9; p< 0.001). Sub-analysis of ER+ BC cases treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n=197) suggested that high PD-L2 levels in cancer cells was associated with particularly increased risk of progression (multivariable HR=3.4; 95%CI:1.9-6.2; p< 0.001). The observed frequent expression of PD-L2 protein in BC provided scientific rationale for the design of our ongoing phase II clinical trial (NCT04243616) of neoadjuvant combined PD-1 inhibitor (cemiplimab; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc) and chemotherapy in patients diagnosed with PD-L1+ and/or PD-L2+ BC. The primary objective of this trial is to assess pathologic responses to neoadjuvant treatment with secondary objective of assessing the correlation between PD-L1/PD-L2 status and tumor responses. Pathologist review of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in an initial set of ER+ tumors (n=15) screened for trial eligibility revealed frequent discordance between cancer cell positivity for PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein (PD-L1: median=0%; range 0-2% vs. PD-L2: median=18%; range < 1-60%) as well as immune cell positivity (PD-L1: median=5%; range 0-50% vs. PD-L2: median=0; range 0-50%). Conclusions In treatment-naïve ER+ breast tumors, high cancer cell expression of PD-L2 protein was an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome, with evidence of further elevated risk of progression in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Preliminary analyses of ER+ tumors from our ongoing clinical trial showed frequent discordance between baseline PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein expression in both cancer cells and immune cells. Collectively, our analyses indicate that PD-L2 has prognostic value for ER+ BC, and our progress justify further studies to determine whether PD-L2, alone or in combination with PD-L1, may serve as a predictive marker of response to PD-1 inhibitors. Citation Format: Lubna N. Chaudhary, Inna Chervoneva, Amy R. Peck, Yunguang Sun, Misung Yi, John F. Langenheim, Julie M. Jorns, Sailaja Kamaraju, Yee Chung Cheng, John Burfeind, Christopher R. Chitambar, Jeffrey A. Hooke, Albert J. Kovatich, Craig Shriver, Hai Hu, Juan P. Palazzo, Marluce Bibbo, Terry Hyslop, Richard Pestell, Edith P. Mitchell, Hallgeir Rui. High PD-L2 Protein Expression in Cancer Cells is an Independent Marker of Unfavorable Prognosis in Luminal Breast Tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-13.

Purpose: Cyclin D/CDK4/6 is critical in controlling the G1 to S checkpoint. CCND, the gene encoding cyclin D, is known to be amplified in a variety of solid tumors. Palbociclib is an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, approved in advanced breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. We explored the efficacy of palbociclib in patients with nonbreast solid tumors containing an amplification in CCND1, 2, or 3. Patients and Methods: Patients with tumors containing a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and expression of the retinoblastoma protein were assigned to subprotocol Z1B and received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles. Results: Forty patients were assigned to subprotocol Z1B; 4 patients had outside assays identifying the CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and were not confirmed centrally; 3 were ineligible and 2 were not treated (1 untreated patient was also ineligible), leaving 32 evaluable patients for this analysis. There were no partial responses; 12 patients (37.5%) had stable disease as best response. There were seven deaths on study, all during cycle 1 and attributable to disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months. The most common toxicities were leukopenia (n = 21, 55%) and neutropenia (n = 19, 50%); neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 event (n = 12, 32%). Conclusions: Palbociclib was not effective at treating nonbreast solid tumors with a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification in this cohort. These data do not support further investigation of single-agent palbociclib in tumors with CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification.

PURPOSE National Cancer Institute–Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice is a multicohort trial that assigns patients with advanced cancers to targeted therapies on the basis of central tumor genomic testing. Arm B evaluated afatinib, an ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with ERBB2-activating mutations. METHODS Eligible patients had selected ERBB2 single-nucleotide variants or insertions/deletions detected by the National Cancer Institute–Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice next-generation sequencing assay. Patients had performance status ≤ 1, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%, grade ≤ 1 diarrhea, and no prior human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. Patients received afatinib 40 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were 6-month progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and molecular correlates. RESULTS A total of 59 patients were assigned and 40 were enrolled. The median age was 62 years, 78% were female, 68% had performance status = 1, and 58% had received > 3 prior therapies. The confirmed ORR was 2.7% (n = 1 of 37; 90% CI, 0.14 to 12.2), and 6-month progression-free survival was 12.0% (90% CI, 5.6 to 25.8). A confirmed partial response occurred in a patient with adenocarcinoma of extra-mammary Paget disease of skin who progressed after cycle 6. Two unconfirmed partial responses were observed (low-grade serous gynecological tract and estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative immunohistochemistry breast ductal carcinoma). Of 12 patients with breast cancer, 1 additional patient with lobular carcinoma (estrogen receptor–positive/HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization) had a 51% reduction in target lesions but progressed because of a new lesion at cycle 6. The most common (> 20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (68%), mucositis (43%), fatigue (40%), acneiform rash (30%), dehydration (27%), vomiting (27%), nausea (27%), anemia (27%), and anorexia (22%). Four patients (11%) discontinued because of adverse events. CONCLUSION Although afatinib did not meet the prespecified threshold for antitumor activity in this heavily pretreated cohort, the response in a rare tumor type is notable. The safety profile of afatinib was consistent with prior studies.

PURPOSE Activating mutations in PIK3CA are observed across multiple tumor types. The NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a tumor-agnostic platform trial that enrolls patients to targeted therapies on the basis of matching genomic alterations. Arm Z1F evaluated copanlisib, an α and δ isoform–specific phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with PIK3CA mutations (with or without PTEN loss). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received copanlisib (60 mg intravenous) once weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles until progression or toxicity. Patients with KRAS mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancers, and lymphomas were excluded. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival, 6-month progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the Protocol. Multiple histologies were enrolled, with gynecologic (n = 6) and gastrointestinal (n = 6) being the most common. Sixty-eight percent of patients had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. The ORR was 16% (4 of 25, 90% CI, 6 to 33) with P = .0341 against a null rate of 5%. The most common reason for protocol discontinuation was disease progression (n = 17, 68%). Grade 3/4 toxicities observed were consistent with reported toxicities for PI3K pathway inhibition. Sixteen patients (53%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0). Most common toxicities include hyperglycemia (n = 19), fatigue (n = 12), diarrhea (n = 11), hypertension (n = 10), and nausea (n = 10). CONCLUSION The study met its primary end point with an ORR of 16% ( P = .0341) with copanlisib showing clinical activity in select tumors with PIK3CA mutation in the refractory setting.

Activating mutations in PIK3CA are observed across multiple tumor types. The NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a tumor-agnostic platform trial that enrolls patients to targeted therapies on the basis of matching genomic alterations. Arm Z1F evaluated copanlisib, an α and δ isoform–specific phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with PIK3CA mutations (with or without PTEN loss). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received copanlisib (60 mg intravenous) once weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles until progression or toxicity. Patients with KRAS mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancers, and lymphomas were excluded. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival, 6-month progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the Protocol. Multiple histologies were enrolled, with gynecologic (n = 6) and gastrointestinal (n = 6) being the most common. Sixty-eight percent of patients had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. The ORR was 16% (4 of 25, 90% CI, 6 to 33) with P = .0341 against a null rate of 5%. The most common reason for protocol discontinuation was disease progression (n = 17, 68%). Grade 3/4 toxicities observed were consistent with reported toxicities for PI3K pathway inhibition. Sixteen patients (53%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0). Most common toxicities include hyperglycemia (n = 19), fatigue (n = 12), diarrhea (n = 11), hypertension (n = 10), and nausea (n = 10). CONCLUSION: The study met its primary end point with an ORR of 16% (P = .0341) with copanlisib showing clinical activity in select tumors with PIK3CA mutation in the refractory setting.

Background Patients with advanced esophageal cancer carry poor prognoses; limited data exist to guide second-line therapy in the metastatic setting. Paclitaxel has been used yet is associated with limited efficacy. There is preclinical evidence of synergy between paclitaxel and cixutumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. We conducted a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel (arm A) versus paclitaxel plus cixutumumab (arm B) in the second-line for patients with metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers. Methods The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); 87 patients (43 in arm A, 44 in arm B) were treated. Results Median PFS was 2.6 months in arm A [90% CL 1.8-3.5] and 2.3 months in arm B [90% 2.0-3.5], P = .86. Stable disease was observed in 29 (33%) patients. Objective response rates for Arms A and B were 12% [90% CI, 5-23%] and 14% [90% CI, 6-25%]. Median overall survival was 6.7 months [90% CL 4.9-9.5] in arm A and 7.2 months [90% CL 4.9-8.1] in arm B, P = 56. Conclusion The addition of cixutumumab to paclitaxel in second-line therapy of metastatic esophageal/GEJ cancer was well tolerated but did not improve clinical outcomes relative to standard of care (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01142388).

Representativeness of Study Participants

Purpose:Cyclin D/CDK4/6 is critical in controlling the G1 to S checkpoint. CCND, the gene encoding cyclin D, is known to be amplified in a variety of solid tumors. Palbociclib is an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, approved in advanced breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. We explored the efficacy of palbociclib in patients with nonbreast solid tumors containing an amplification in CCND1, 2, or 3.Patients and Methods:Patients with tumors containing a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and expression of the retinoblastoma protein were assigned to subprotocol Z1B and received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles.Results:Forty patients were assigned to subprotocol Z1B; 4 patients had outside assays identifying the CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and were not confirmed centrally; 3 were ineligible and 2 were not treated (1 untreated patient was also ineligible), leaving 32 evaluable patients for this analysis. There were no partial responses; 12 patients (37.5%) had stable disease as best response. There were seven deaths on study, all during cycle 1 and attributable to disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months. The most common toxicities were leukopenia (n = 21, 55%) and neutropenia (n = 19, 50%); neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 event (n = 12, 32%).Conclusions:Palbociclib was not effective at treating nonbreast solid tumors with a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification in this cohort. These data do not support further investigation of single-agent palbociclib in tumors with CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification.

PURPOSE NCI-MATCH is a precision medicine trial using genomic testing to allocate patients with advanced malignancies to targeted treatment subprotocols. This report combines two subprotocols evaluating trametinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1 ( NF1[S1] or GNA11/Q [S2]) altered tumors. METHODS Eligible patients had tumors with deleterious inactivating NF1 or GNA11/Q mutations by the customized Oncomine AmpliSeq panel. Prior MEK inhibitor treatment was excluded. Glioblastomas (GBMs) were permitted, including malignancies associated with germline NF1 mutations (S1 only). Trametinib was administered at 2 mg once daily over 28-day cycles until toxicity or disease progression. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, PFS, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses included co-occurring genomic alterations and PTEN loss. RESULTS Fifty patients were eligible and started therapy: 46 with NF1 mutations (S1) and four with GNA11 mutations (S2). In the NF1 cohort, nonsense single-nucleotide variants were identified in 29 and frameshift deletions in 17 tumors. All in S2 had nonuveal melanoma and GNA11 Q209L variant. Two partial responses (PR) were noted in S1, one patient each with advanced lung cancer and GBM for an ORR of 4.3% (90% CI, 0.8 to 13.1). One patient with melanoma in S2 had a PR (ORR, 25%; 90% CI, 1.3 to 75.1). Prolonged stable disease (SD) was also noted in five patients (four in S1 and one in S2) with additional rare histologies. Adverse events were as previously described with trametinib. Comutations in TP53 and PIK3CA were common. CONCLUSION Although these subprotocols did not meet the primary end point for ORR, significant responses or prolonged SD noted in some disease subtypes warrants further investigation.

1) Eligible mutations/fusions, 2) identified mutations/fusions, 3) Treatment-related toxicities, 4) Number of treatment cycles and reasons for discontinuation

Supplementary Legend

Purpose:MAVERICC compared the efficacy and safety of modified leucovorin/5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab (mFOLFOX6-BV) with leucovorin/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-BV) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and Methods: MAVERICC was a global, randomized, open-label, phase II study. Primary objectives were to assess associations between (i) excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) expression with progression-free survival (PFS), and (ii) plasma VEGF A (VEGF-A) with PFS in patients with previously untreated mCRC receiving mFOLFOX6-BV or FOLFIRI-BV. Before randomization, patients were stratified by tumoral ERCC1/β-actin mRNA expression level and region.Results:Of 376 enrolled patients, 188 each received mFOLFOX6-BV and FOLFIRI-BV. PFS and overall survival (OS) were comparable between FOLFIRI-BV and mFOLFOX6-BV, with numerically higher PFS [HR = 0.79; 95% CI (confidence interval): 0.61–1.01; P = 0.06] and OS (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56–1.04; P = 0.09) observed for FOLFIRI-BV. In the high ERCC1 subgroup, PFS and OS were comparable between treatment groups (PFS, HR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.56–1.26; P = 0.40; OS, HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.51–1.26; P = 0.33). Across treatment groups, high plasma VEGF-A levels (>5.1 pg/mL) were observed with shorter PFS (HR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.93–1.53; P = 0.17) and significantly shorter OS (HR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.20–2.24; P < 0.01) versus low levels (≤5.1 pg/mL). Safety findings for FOLFIRI-BV or mFOLFOX6-BV were comparable with those reported previously.Conclusions:First-line FOLFIRI-BV and mFOLFOX6-BV had comparable PFS and OS, similar to results in patients with high baseline tumor ERCC1 levels. There were no new safety signals with these bevacizumab-containing regimens.

Supplemental Table

Supplementary Figure 7: Schematic representation of structure of wildtype Stat5a and Stat5b, dominant-negative Stat5 (DN-Stat5) and constitutively-active Stat5 (CA-Stat5) proteins.

Purpose:Preclinical and clinical data suggest that downstream inhibition with an MEK inhibitor, such as binimetinib, might be efficacious for NRAS-mutated cancers.Patients and Methods:Patients enrolled in the NCI-MATCH trial master protocol underwent tumor biopsy and molecular profiling by targeted next-generation sequencing. Patients with NRAS-mutated tumors, except melanoma, were enrolled in subprotocol Z1A, a single-arm study evaluating binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A post hoc analysis examined the association of NRAS mutation type with outcome.Results:In total, 47 eligible patients with a refractory solid tumor harboring a codon 12, 13, or 61 NRAS mutation were treated. Observed toxicity was moderate, and 30% of patients discontinued treatment because of binimetinib-associated toxicity. The ORR was 2.1% (1/47 patients). A patient with malignant ameloblastoma harboring a codon 61 NRAS mutation achieved a durable partial response (PR). A patient with NRAS codon 61–mutated colorectal cancer had an unconfirmed PR, and two other patients with NRAS codon 61–mutated colorectal had stable disease for at least 12 months. In an exploratory analysis, patients with colorectal cancer bearing a NRAS codon 61 mutation (n = 8) had a significantly longer OS (P = 0.03) and PFS (P = 0.007) than those with codon 12 or 13 mutations (n = 16).Conclusions:Single-agent binimetinib did not show promising efficacy in NRAS-mutated cancers. The observation of increased OS and PFS in patients with codon 61 NRAS-mutated colorectal cancer merits further investigation.

Purpose:Substantial preclinical evidence and case reports suggest that MEK inhibition is an active approach in tumors with BRAF mutations outside the V600 locus, and in BRAF fusions. Thus, Subprotocol R of the NCI-MATCH study tested the MEK inhibitor trametinib in this population.Patients and Methods:The NCI-MATCH study performed genomic profiling on tumor samples from patients with solid tumors and lymphomas progressing on standard therapies or with no standard treatments. Patients with prespecified fusions and non-V600 mutations in BRAF were assigned to Subprotocol R using the NCI-MATCHBOX algorithm. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).Results:Among 50 patients assigned, 32 were eligible and received therapy with trametinib. Of these, 1 had a BRAF fusion and 31 had BRAF mutations (13 and 19 with class 2 and 3 mutations, respectively). There were no complete responses; 1 patient (3%) had a confirmed partial response (patient with breast ductal adenocarcinoma with BRAF G469E mutation) and 10 patients had stable disease as best response (clinical benefit rate 34%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months, and median overall survival was 5.7 months. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed that patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 8) had particularly poor PFS. No new toxicity signals were identified.Conclusions:Trametinib did not show promising clinical activity in patients with tumors harboring non-V600 BRAF mutations, and the subprotocol did not meet its primary endpoint.

Supplementary Figure 2: "Swimmer's plot as in Figure 2B also demonstrating mutation locations in individual patients, showing treatment duration for all 32 evaluable patients and their occurrence of response (*), disease progression (+) and death (#)

Supplemental Figures

Clinical Characteristics of Outcome Cohorts 1 and 2.

Supplementary Figure Legend

Purpose:Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) is required for normal mammary gland development and biology. A PTHLH gene polymorphism is associated with breast cancer risk, and PTHrP promotes growth of osteolytic breast cancer bone metastases. Accordingly, current dogma holds that PTHrP is upregulated in malignant primary breast tumors, but solid evidence for this assumption is missing.Experimental Design:We used quantitative IHC to measure PTHrP in normal and malignant breast epithelia, and correlated PTHrP levels in primary breast cancer with clinical outcome.Results:PTHrP levels were markedly downregulated in malignant compared with normal breast epithelia. Moreover, low levels of nuclear localized PTHrP in cancer cells correlated with unfavorable clinical outcome in a test and a validation cohort of breast cancer treated at different institutions totaling nearly 800 cases. PTHrP mRNA levels in tumors of a third cohort of 737 patients corroborated this association, also after multivariable adjustment for standard clinicopathologic parameters. Breast cancer PTHrP levels correlated strongly with transcription factors Stat5a/b, which are established markers of favorable prognosis and key mediators of prolactin signaling. Prolactin stimulated PTHrP transcript and protein in breast cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo, effects mediated by Stat5 through the P2 gene promoter, producing transcript AT6 encoding the PTHrP 1-173 isoform. Low levels of AT6, but not two alternative transcripts, correlated with poor clinical outcome.Conclusions:This study overturns the prevailing view that PTHrP is upregulated in primary breast cancers and identifies a direct prolactin–Stat5–PTHrP axis that is progressively lost in more aggressive tumors.

Supplementary Data from MAVERICC, a Randomized, Biomarker-stratified, Phase II Study of mFOLFOX6-Bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI-Bevacizumab as First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE T-cell–mediated cytotoxicity is suppressed when programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) is bound by PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) or PD-L2. Although PD-1 inhibitors have been approved for triple-negative breast cancer, the lower response rates of 25%-30% in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer will require markers to identify likely responders. The focus of this study was to evaluate whether PD-L2, which has higher affinity than PD-L1 for PD-1, is a predictor of early recurrence in ER+ breast cancer. METHODS PD-L2 protein levels in cancer cells and stromal cells of therapy-naive, localized or locoregional ER+ breast cancers were measured retrospectively by quantitative immunofluorescence histocytometry and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in the main study cohort (n = 684) and in an independent validation cohort (n = 273). All patients subsequently received standard-of-care adjuvant therapy without immune checkpoint inhibitors. RESULTS Univariate analysis of the main cohort revealed that high PD-L2 expression in cancer cells was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.6; P = .001), which was validated in an independent cohort (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.8; P = .026) and remained independently predictive after multivariable adjustment for common clinicopathological variables (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9; P < .001). Subanalysis of the ER+ breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 197) revealed that high PD-L2 levels in cancer cells associated with short PFS in univariate (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.4; P = .003) and multivariable analyses (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.9 to 6.2; P < .001). CONCLUSION Up to one third of treatment-naive ER+ breast tumors expressed high PD-L2 levels, which independently predicted poor clinical outcome, with evidence of further elevated risk of progression in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Collectively, these data warrant studies to gain a deeper understanding of PD-L2 in the progression of ER+ breast cancer and may provide rationale for immune checkpoint blockade for this patient group.

Background: Alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) have emerged as promising drug targets for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a rare cancer with a poor prognosis. Futibatinib, a next-generation, covalently binding FGFR1-4 inhibitor, has been shown to have both antitumor activity in patients with FGFR-altered tumors and strong preclinical activity against acquired resistance mutations associated with ATP-competitive FGFR inhibitors. Methods: In this multinational, open-label, single-group, phase 2 study, we enrolled patients with unresectable or metastatic FGFR2 fusion-positive or FGFR2 rearrangement-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and disease progression after one or more previous lines of systemic therapy (excluding FGFR inhibitors). The patients received oral futibatinib at a dose of 20 mg once daily in a continuous regimen. The primary end point was objective response (partial or complete response), as assessed by independent central review. Secondary end points included the response duration, progression-free and overall survival, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Between April 16, 2018, and November 29, 2019, a total of 103 patients were enrolled and received futibatinib. A total of 43 of 103 patients (42%; 95% confidence interval, 32 to 52) had a response, and the median duration of response was 9.7 months. Responses were consistent across patient subgroups, including patients with heavily pretreated disease, older adults, and patients who had co-occurring TP53 mutations. At a median follow-up of 17.1 months, the median progression-free survival was 9.0 months and overall survival was 21.7 months. Common treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (in 30% of the patients), an increased aspartate aminotransferase level (in 7%), stomatitis (in 6%), and fatigue (in 6%). Treatment-related adverse events led to permanent discontinuation of futibatinib in 2% of the patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Quality of life was maintained throughout treatment. Conclusions: In previously treated patients with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the use of futibatinib, a covalent FGFR inhibitor, led to measurable clinical benefit.

Colorectal cancer mortality has decreased considerably following the adoption of national screening programs, yet, within at-risk subgroups, there continue to be measurable differences in clinical outcomes from variations in screening, receipt of chemotherapy, radiation or surgery, access to clinical trials, research participation, and survivorship. These disparities are well-described and some have worsened over time. Disparities identified have included race and ethnicity, age (specifically young adults), socioeconomic status, insurance access, geography, and environmental exposures. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, colorectal cancer care has necessarily shifted dramatically, with broad, immediate uptake of telemedicine, transition to oral medications when feasible, and considerations for sequence of treatment. However, it has additionally marginalized patients with colorectal cancer with historically disparate cancer-specific outcomes; among them, uninsured, low-income, immigrant, and ethnic-minority patients—all of whom are more likely to become infected, be hospitalized, and die of either COVID-19 or colorectal cancer. Herein, we outline measurable disparities, review implemented solutions, and define strategies toward ensuring that all have a fair and just opportunity to be as healthy as possible.

Purpose:Preclinical and clinical data suggest that downstream inhibition with an MEK inhibitor, such as binimetinib, might be efficacious for NRAS-mutated cancers.Patients and Methods:Patients enrolled in the NCI-MATCH trial master protocol underwent tumor biopsy and molecular profiling by targeted next-generation sequencing. Patients with NRAS-mutated tumors, except melanoma, were enrolled in subprotocol Z1A, a single-arm study evaluating binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A post hoc analysis examined the association of NRAS mutation type with outcome.Results:In total, 47 eligible patients with a refractory solid tumor harboring a codon 12, 13, or 61 NRAS mutation were treated. Observed toxicity was moderate, and 30% of patients discontinued treatment because of binimetinib-associated toxicity. The ORR was 2.1% (1/47 patients). A patient with malignant ameloblastoma harboring a codon 61 NRAS mutation achieved a durable partial response (PR). A patient with NRAS codon 61–mutated colorectal cancer had an unconfirmed PR, and two other patients with NRAS codon 61–mutated colorectal had stable disease for at least 12 months. In an exploratory analysis, patients with colorectal cancer bearing a NRAS codon 61 mutation (n = 8) had a significantly longer OS (P = 0.03) and PFS (P = 0.007) than those with codon 12 or 13 mutations (n = 16).Conclusions:Single-agent binimetinib did not show promising efficacy in NRAS-mutated cancers. The observation of increased OS and PFS in patients with codon 61 NRAS-mutated colorectal cancer merits further investigation.

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an aggressive tumor phenotype with a poor prognosis and few treatment options. The prevalence of mTNBC is disproportionately higher among African American (AA) women, compared with white women. Data identifying the drivers of racial differences in mTNBC or characterizations of treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in AA patients with mTNBC are limited. Methods: This retrospective study used the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database (January 2011-March 2020). Adult AA and white female patients with confirmed mTNBC treated in US community oncology practices were included. Differences in mTNBC prevalence among AA and white patients were assessed by age, health insurance coverage, geographic region and stage at initial diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and time to treatment initiation between AA and white patients. Racial differences in overall survival (OS) were examined using Kaplan-Meir analysis and a multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Of the 21,804 Flatiron patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), 2116 eligible patients with mTNBC were identified; 383 (18%) were AA and 1155 (55%) were white. TNBC prevalence was twice as high among AA patients (23%) than white patients (12%). Racial differences in TNBC prevalence (AA vs white patients) were particularly higher among patients aged 45 to 65 y (26% vs 13%), patients in the Northeast (27% vs 11%) and those with initial diagnosis at Stage II (30% vs 13%) or Stage III (27% vs 15%). AA patients with TNBC were younger (mean age: 60 vs 63 y; P < 0.001) and more likely to have Medicaid at the time of diagnosis (10% vs 3%; P < 0.001) than white patients. Clinical characteristics were generally similar between AA and white patients, including the distribution of staging at initial diagnosis, disease recurrence, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and sites and number of metastases. Regardless of race, 25% of all patients with mTNBC had no documentation of receiving anti-cancer treatment in the database. Untreated patients in both race groups were older, had poorer ECOG PS and were less likely to have visceral metastases than treated patients (all P < 0.001); they also had poorer survival than treated patients (median OS: 4.7 vs 13.1 months from diagnosis for all treated patients; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.51 [95% CI: 0.46, 0.57]). Among both AA and white treated patients, single-agent chemotherapy was the most prevalent first-line treatment (most common agent: capecitabine). More than half of treated patients initiated treatment in < 30 days, and median time-to-treatment initiation did not differ by race. Although OS was numerically lower in AA patients (median OS, 10.3 vs 11.9 months in white patients), the difference was not significant when adjusted for prognostic and treatment factors (adjusted HR, 1.09 [95% CI: 0.95, 1.25]). Conclusions: The prevalence of mTNBC was twice as high among AA compared with white patients in US community oncology practices. Unlike prior research, race did not show an association with OS in this population. Regardless of race, 1 in every 4 patients with mTNBC had not received documented anti-cancer treatment, potentially due to poor PS and concerns about treatment tolerance. OS was poor for both AA and white patients with mTNBC, particularly for untreated patients. Effective treatment remains a substantial unmet need for all patients with mTNBC. In light of the lack of racial differences in this patient cohort, prospective studies are needed to further elucidate underlying biological differences that may have predictive or prognostic significance for AA patients with TNBC. Citation Format: Amie Tan, Vincent Shen, Luciana Preger, Bann-mo Day, Edith P. Mitchell. Assessing racial differences in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Real-world evidence from US community oncology practices [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-53.

PURPOSE BRAFV600 mutations are commonly found in melanoma and thyroid cancers and to a lesser degree in other tumor types. Subprotocol H (EAY131-H) of the NCI-MATCH platform trial sought to investigate the selective BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK1/2 inhibitor trametinib in patients with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma whose tumors harbored a BRAFV600 mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS EAY131-H is an open-label, single-arm study. Patients with melanoma, thyroid, or colorectal cancer were excluded; patients with non–small-cell lung cancer were later excluded in an amendment. Patients received dabrafenib 150 mg twice per day and trametinib 2 mg per day continuously until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 29 were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the protocol. Median age was 59 years, and 45% of the patients had received ≥ 3 lines of therapy. The confirmed ORR was 38% (90% CI, 22.9% to 54.9%) with P < .0001 against a null rate of 5%, and PFS was 11.4 months (90% CI, 8.4 to 16.3 months); responses were seen in 7 distinct tumor types. Seven patients had a duration of response of > 12 months, including 4 patients with a duration of response of > 24 months. An additional 8 patients had a PFS > 6 months. The median overall survival was 28.6 months. Reported adverse events were comparable to those noted in previously reported profiles of dabrafenib and trametinib. CONCLUSION This study met its primary end point, with an ORR of 38% ( P < .0001) in this mixed histology, pretreated cohort. This promising activity warrants additional investigations in BRAFV600-mutated tumors outside of currently approved indications.

PURPOSE Therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across cancer types. The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial was designed to evaluate targeted therapy antitumor activity in underexplored cancer types. Tumor biopsy specimens were analyzed centrally with next-generation sequencing (NGS) in a master screening protocol. Patients with a tumor molecular alteration addressed by a targeted treatment lacking established efficacy in that tumor type were assigned to 1 of 30 treatments in parallel, single-arm, phase II subprotocols. PATIENTS AND METHODS Tumor biopsy specimens from 5,954 patients with refractory malignancies at 1,117 accrual sites were analyzed centrally with NGS and selected immunohistochemistry in a master screening protocol. The treatment-assignment rate to treatment arms was assessed. Molecular alterations in seven tumors profiled in both NCI-MATCH trial and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) of primary tumors were compared. RESULTS Molecular profiling was successful in 93.0% of specimens. An actionable alteration was found in 37.6%. After applying clinical and molecular exclusion criteria, 17.8% were assigned (26.4% could have been assigned if all subprotocols were available simultaneously). Eleven subprotocols reached their accrual goal as of this report. Actionability rates differed among histologies (eg, > 35% for urothelial cancers and < 6% for pancreatic and small-cell lung cancer). Multiple actionable or resistance-conferring tumor mutations were seen in 11.9% and 71.3% of specimens, respectively. Known resistance mutations to targeted therapies were numerically more frequent in NCI-MATCH than TCGA tumors, but not markedly so. CONCLUSION We demonstrated feasibility of screening large numbers of patients at numerous accruing sites in a complex trial to test investigational therapies for moderately frequent molecular targets. Co-occurring resistance mutations were common and endorse investigation of combination targeted-therapy regimens.

PURPOSE NCI-MATCH is a nationwide, histology-agnostic, signal-finding, molecular profile–driven trial for patients with refractory cancers, lymphomas, or myelomas. Patients with tumors harboring actionable aberration(s) in fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR) 1-3 were treated with AZD4547, an oral FGFR1-3 inhibitor. METHODS Patients’ tumors were screened by next-generation sequencing for predefined FGFR amplification, activating mutations, or fusions. Patients were treated with AZD4547, 80 mg orally twice daily until progression of disease or drug intolerance. A response rate of 16% was considered promising. RESULTS Between July 2016 and June 2017, 70 patients were assigned and 48 received protocol therapy and are eligible for analysis. Patients’ tumors harbored FGFR1 or FGFR2 amplification (n = 20), FGFR2 or FGFR3 single-nucleotide variants (n = 19), or FGFR1 or FGFR3 fusions (n = 9). The most common primary tumors were breast (33.3%), urothelial (12.5%), and cervical cancer (10.4%).Grade 3 adverse events were consistent with those described in previous clinical trials. Confirmed partial responses were seen in 8% (90% CI, 3% to 18%) and were observed only in patients whose tumors harbored FGFR1-3 point mutations or fusions. Stable disease was observed in 37.5% (90% CI, 25.8% to 50.4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months, and the 6-month PFS rate was 15% (90% CI, 8% to 31%). For patients with tumors harboring FGFR fusions, the response rate was 22% (90% CI, 4.1% to 55%), and 6-month PFS rate was 56% (90% CI, 31% to 100%). CONCLUSION Preliminary signals of activity appeared to be limited to cancers harboring FGFR activating mutations and fusions, although AZD4547 did not meet the primary end point. Different FGFR somatic alterations may confer different levels of signaling potency and/or oncogene dependence.

Treatment guidelines for stage I–III esophageal cancer indicate that management should include surgery in appropriate patients. Variations in utilization of surgery may contribute to racial differences observed in survival. We sought to identify factors associated with racial disparities in surgical resection of esophageal cancer and evaluate associated survival differences. Patients diagnosed with stage I–III esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2015 were identified using the National Cancer Database. Matched patient cohorts were created to reduce confounding. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of surgery. Multi-level modeling was performed to control for random effects of individual hospitals on surgical utilization. A total of 60,041 patients were included (4402 black; 55,639 white). After 1:1 matching, there were 5858 patients evenly distributed across race. For all stages, significantly fewer black than white patients received surgery. Black race independently conferred lower likelihood of receiving surgery in single-level multivariable analysis (OR (95% CI); stage I, 0.67 (0.48–0.94); stage II, 0.76 (0.60–0.96); stage III, 0.62 (0.50–0.76)) and after controlling for hospital random effects. Hospital-level random effects accounted for one third of the unexplained variance in receipt of surgery. Risk-adjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality was higher for patients who did not undergo surgery. Black patients with esophageal cancer are at higher risk of mortality compared to white patients. This increased risk may be influenced by decreased likelihood of receiving surgical intervention for resectable disease, in part because of between-hospital differences. Improving access to surgical care may improve disparities in esophageal cancer survival.

Within the microenvironment of solid tumors, stress associated with deficit of nutrients and oxygen as well as tumor-derived factors triggers the phosphorylation-dependent degradation of the IFNAR1 chain of type I interferon (IFN1) receptor and ensuing suppression of the IFN1 pathway. Here we sought to examine the importance of these events in malignant mammary cells. Expression of non-degradable IFNAR1(S526A) mutant in mouse mammary adenocarcinoma cells stimulated the IFN1 pathway yet did not affect growth of these cells in vitro or ability to form subcutaneous tumors in the syngeneic mice. Remarkably, these cells exhibited a notably accelerated growth when transplanted orthotopically into mammary glands. Importantly, in human patients with either ER+ or ER- breast cancers, high levels of IFNAR1 were associated with poor prognosis. We discuss the putative mechanisms underlying the pro-tumorigenic role of IFNAR1 in malignant breast cells.

Purpose: Substantial preclinical evidence and case reports suggest that MEK inhibition is an active approach in tumors with BRAF mutations outside the V600 locus, and in BRAF fusions. Thus, Subprotocol R of the NCI-MATCH study tested the MEK inhibitor trametinib in this population. Patients and Methods: The NCI-MATCH study performed genomic profiling on tumor samples from patients with solid tumors and lymphomas progressing on standard therapies or with no standard treatments. Patients with prespecified fusions and non-V600 mutations in BRAF were assigned to Subprotocol R using the NCI-MATCHBOX algorithm. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: Among 50 patients assigned, 32 were eligible and received therapy with trametinib. Of these, 1 had a BRAF fusion and 31 had BRAF mutations (13 and 19 with class 2 and 3 mutations, respectively). There were no complete responses; 1 patient (3%) had a confirmed partial response (patient with breast ductal adenocarcinoma with BRAF G469E mutation) and 10 patients had stable disease as best response (clinical benefit rate 34%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months, and median overall survival was 5.7 months. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed that patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 8) had particularly poor PFS. No new toxicity signals were identified. Conclusions: Trametinib did not show promising clinical activity in patients with tumors harboring non-V600 BRAF mutations, and the subprotocol did not meet its primary endpoint.

PURPOSE PIK3CA mutations frequently contribute to oncogenesis in solid tumors. Taselisib, a potent and selective inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, has demonstrated clinical activity in PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer. Whether PIK3CA mutations predict sensitivity to taselisib in other cancer types is unknown. National Cancer Institute–Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Arm EAY131-I is a single-arm, phase II study of the safety and efficacy of taselisib in patients with advanced cancers. METHODS Eligible patients had tumors with an activating PIK3CA mutation. Patients with breast or squamous cell lung carcinoma, or whose cancer had KRAS or PTEN mutations, were excluded. Patients received taselisib 4 mg, orally once daily continuously, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS), and identification of predictive biomarkers. RESULTS Seventy patients were enrolled, and 61 were eligible and initiated protocol therapy. Types of PIK3CA mutations included helical 41 of 61 (67%), kinase 11 of 61 (18%), and other 9 of 61 (15%). With a median follow-up of 35.7 months, there were no complete or partial responses. Six-month PFS was 19.9% (90% CI, 12.0 to 29.3) and median PFS was 3.1 months (90% CI, 1.8 to 3.7). Six-month OS was 60.7% (90% CI, 49.6 to 70.0) and median OS was 7.2 months (90% CI, 5.9 to 10.0). Individual comutations were too heterogeneous to correlate with clinical outcome. Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and hyperglycemia were the most common toxicities, and most were grade 1 and 2. CONCLUSION In this study, taselisib monotherapy had very limited activity in a heterogeneous cohort of heavily pretreated cancer patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumors; the presence of a PIK3CA mutation alone does not appear to be a sufficient predictor of taselisib activity.

Background An increasing number of patients survive or are living with cancer. Anticancer treatments frequently have cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) that may severely impact patients' quality of life and interrupt anticancer treatment. The US Cutaneous Oncodermatology Management (USCOM) project aims to improve cancer patients' and survivors' quality of life by offering tools for preventing and managing cAEs. Methods An algorithm was designed to reduce the incidence of cAEs, treat cAEs, and maintain healthy skin using general measures and over-the-counter agents to support all healthcare providers treating oncology patients, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and advanced providers. The panel used a modified Delphi approach, developed, discussed, and reached a consensus on statements and an evidence-based algorithm. Results The USCOM algorithm includes education on cAEs for patients and clinicians supporting prevention, treatment, and maintenance using skincare measures before, during, and after cancer treatment. A skincare regimen including hygiene, moisturization, and sun protection products should be safe and effective in helping to minimize cAEs and improving skin conditions such as erythema, xerosis, pruritus, and photosensitivity. The number and quality of studies evaluating skincare formulations and regimens for cAEs are increasing, but the evidence on the benefits of specific formulations is still scarce. Conclusions The algorithm focuses on general measures and skincare to prevent or reduce the severity of cAEs. Increased awareness of cAEs by the multidisciplinary team treating and guiding the cancer patient throughout their care may improve patient outcomes. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20:9(Suppl):s3-19.

PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial, the largest national precision oncology study to date (> 1,100 sites) of patients with relapsed or refractory malignancies, assigned patients to targeted therapy in parallel phase II studies based on tumor molecular alterations. The anti–programmed death receptor 1 inhibitor nivolumab previously showed activity in mismatch repair (MMR)–deficient colon cancer. We hypothesized that nivolumab would have activity in patients with MMR-deficient, noncolorectal tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with relapsed or refractory tumors, good end-organ function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 1 underwent tumor biopsy for centralized screening of molecular alterations. MMR deficiency was defined by complete loss of nuclear expression of MLH1 or MSH2 MMR gene products by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients with MMR-deficient colorectal cancer were excluded. Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (28-day cycles) and 480 mg every 4 weeks after cycle 4, was administered intravenously. Disease reassessment was performed every 2 cycles. The primary end point was RECIST 1.1 objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS Two percent of 4,902 screened patients had an MMR-deficient cancer by IHC. Forty-two evaluable patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years and a median of 3 prior therapies. The most common histologies were endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (n = 13), prostate adenocarcinoma (n = 5), and uterine carcinosarcoma (n = 4). ORR was 36% (15 of 42 patients). An additional 21% of patients had stable disease. The estimated 6-, 12-, and 18-month progression-free survival rates were 51.3% (90% CI, 38.2% to 64.5%), 46.2% (90% CI, 33.1% to 59.3%), and 31.4% (90% CI, 18.7% to 44.2%), respectively. Median overall survival was 17.3 months. Toxicity was predominantly low grade. CONCLUSION A variety of refractory cancers (2.0% of those screened) had MMR deficiency as defined in NCI-MATCH. Nivolumab has promising activity in MMR-deficient noncolorectal cancers of a wide variety of histopathologic types.

PURPOSE: Understanding the molecular mediators of breast cancer survival is critical for accurate disease prognosis and improving therapies. Here, we identified Neuronatin (NNAT) as a novel antiproliferative modifier of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER+) breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Genomic regions harboring breast cancer modifiers were identified by congenic mapping in a rat model of carcinogen-induced mammary cancer. Tumors from susceptible and resistant congenics were analyzed by RNAseq to identify candidate genes. Candidates were prioritized by correlation with outcome, using a consensus of three breast cancer patient cohorts. NNAT was transgenically expressed in ER+ breast cancer lines (T47D and ZR75), followed by transcriptomic and phenotypic characterization. RESULTS: We identified a region on rat chromosome 3 (142–178 Mb) that modified mammary tumor incidence. RNAseq of the mammary tumors narrowed the candidate list to three differentially expressed genes: NNAT, SLC35C2, and FAM210B. NNAT mRNA and protein also correlated with survival in human breast cancer patients. Quantitative immunohistochemistry of NNAT protein revealed an inverse correlation with survival in a univariate analysis of patients with invasive ER+ breast cancer (training cohort: n = 444, HR = 0.62, p = 0.031; validation cohort: n = 430, HR = 0.48, p = 0.004). NNAT also held up as an independent predictor of survival after multivariable adjustment (HR = 0.64, p = 0.038). NNAT significantly reduced proliferation and migration of ER+ breast cancer cells, which coincided with altered expression of multiple related pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these data implicate NNAT as a novel mediator of cell proliferation and migration, which correlates with decreased tumorigenic potential and prolonged patient survival.

Purpose: Mutations in BRAF at codons other than V600 (non-V600) and BRAF fusions confer dependence on RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. BVD-523FB (ulixertinib) is a small molecule that potently inhibits both ERK1 and ERK2 protein kinases in the sub-nanomolar range. Based on the reports of early clinical activity in the phase 1 trial, including in non-V600 BRAF mutations, subprotocol Z1L (EAY131-Z1L) sought to investigate the clinical activity of ulixertinib in patients with tumors harboring these alterations. Methods: In this single-arm study, patients with BRAF non-V600 mutation or BRAF fusion were given ulixertinib orally at a dose of 600 mg twice daily, continuously for each 28-day cycle until progression or intolerability. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). BRAF mutation status was determined by an analytically validated assay in a CLIA-certified laboratory for all patients. Results: From August 2019 to July 2020, 35 patients were enrolled and received protocol treatment on the trial. Among the 34 patients who were eligible, median age was 66.5; 50% were female, 88% were white, 9% black, 1% Asian. Performance status was ECOG PS 1 in 74% of patients, with remaining PS 0. Median number of prior therapies was >3.Tumor types included multiple gastrointestinal malignancies (N=16), lung cancer (N=3), and melanoma (N=3), among others. Mutations were centrally confirmed in 26 patients who were deemed analyzable per protocol. Twenty-two patients had a single nucleotide variant (SNV) in BRAF; one patient had an insertion/deletion (indel) in BRAF, and three patients harbored BRAF fusions. No patients achieved CR or PR, resulting in ORR = 0%. Stable disease was the best response in 7/26 centrally confirmed cases. Median PFS was 1.8 months (90% CI: 1.6, 2.2), 6-month PFS rate was 11% (90% CI: 4%, 22%), and median OS was 4.0 months (90% CI: 2.8, 7.4). Twenty patients (57%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity; there were no grade 5 toxicities. Most common toxicities include anemia (n=11), diarrhea (n=16), nausea (n=16), vomiting (n=11), fatigue (n=16), increased creatinine (n=12), and acneiform rash (n=14). Conclusion: BVD-523FB (ulixertinib) had no demonstrable evidence of clinical activity in this small, heavily pre-treated population of patients with tumors harboring BRAF fusions, or with non-V600E, non-V600K BRAF mutations Citation Format: Vivek Subbiah, Fengmin Fengmin, Ragini Kudchadkar, Ryan J. Sullivan, Edith P. Mitchell, John J. Wright, Helen X. Chen, Robert J. Gray, Xin Victoria Wang, Lisa M. McShane, Larry V. Rubinstein, David Patton, P. Mickey Williams, Tilak K. Sundaresan, Barbara A. Conley, Carlos L. Arteaga, Lyndsay N. Harris, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Alice P. Chen, Keith T. Flaherty. BVD-523FB (Ulixertinib) in Patients with Tumors with BRAF Fusions, or with Non-V600E, Non-V600K BRAF Mutations: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol EAY131-Z1L [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT160.

3010 Background: NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a platform trial enrolling patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on matching genomic alterations (NCT02465060). Subprotocol Arm T evaluated vismodegib (GDC0449), a hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in pts with tumors harboring PTCH1 and SMO mutations. Methods: Pts whose tumors had SMO or PTCH1 mutations were eligible; results were confirmed by NCI-MATCH central labs if possible. Pts received oral vismodegib (150 mg daily) for 4-week cycles until progression/toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles. Primary endpoint was ORR; secondary endpoints included PFS, 6-month PFS, OS, and predictive biomarkers. Cutaneous basal cell carcinomas were excluded. Results: Of 34 pts enrolled (6/20/16 – 9/22/20); 2 were ineligible and 1 did not start therapy. The 31 analyzable pts’ demographics were primary tumor sites/histology [gastrointestinal (n = 9), skin/soft tissue (n = 7), gynecologic (n = 5), lung (n = 4), unknown primary (n = 4), ductal breast (n = 1), meningioma (n = 1)]; median age 64 (range 19-81); 48.4% women; 61.3% (19/31) > 3 lines of prior therapy; 74% (23/31) > 1 co-occurring mutation [median 2 co-alterations (range 1-20)]. 8/31 > 4 co-occurring alterations. 9 pts had SMO mutant tumors (all SNVs); 5/9 had > 1 co-occurring gene alterations. 22 pts had PTCH1 alterations (7 SNVs and 15 indels); 18/22 pts had > 1 additional gene alteration. Of 31 analyzable pts, 22 were MATCH-confirmed (i.e. had central confirmation of tumor PTCH1/SMO mutations). MATCH-confirmed pts had ORR 9.1% (2/22) while all analyzable pts had ORR 6.5% (2/31). 2 PRs were seen in pts with a skin/soft tissue sarcoma ( PTCH) and a meningioma ( SMO) with a median duration of response 14 months. The 6-month PFS rate was similar in MATCH-confirmed and analyzable pts (22.4% and 23.2% respectively) and median PFS was identical at 1.8 months. Median OS was 9.1 months in MATCH-confirmed and 7.3 months in analyzable pts. Within analyzable SMO variants: 1 PR, 3 SD, 4 PD, and 1 unevaluable responses were documented. Within analyzable PTCH1 variants: 1 PR, 7 SD, 10 PD, and 4 unevaluable responses were seen. 4 pts (12.9%) discontinued therapy due to AE. Among 33 pts starting therapy, 18 (54.5%) had grade 1-2 toxicity, while 2 (6.1%) had grade 3 treatment-related toxicity. Most common toxicities: grade 1-2 fatigue (n = 11), anorexia (n = 8), weight loss (n = 7), alopecia (n = 7), and dysgeusia (n = 6). There were 4 on-study deaths, but none were treatment related. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, vismodegib was well-tolerated with mostly grade 1-2 toxicities and substantial responses were seen in patients with SMOPro641Ala and PTCHGlu947Ter alterations. Further study of the impact of concomitant molecular alterations may yield additional insights into vismodegib mechanisms of response. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060.

e17537 Background: Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare disease with a reported incidence of 1 in 40,000 pregnancies. There have been no studies evaluating the impact of social determinants of health (SDH) on outcomes in GTN. This study seeks to examine the influence of social and biologic prognostic factors related to survival among women with GTN. We hypothesized that older age at diagnosis, lower household income, and marginalized, racial/ethnic groups are associated with worse prognosis. Methods: In this retrospective study, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify women with GTN diagnosed from 2010-2018. Clinical-pathologic characteristics were described including initial stage of disease, presence of brain metastases at diagnosis, treatment with chemotherapy or surgery, and treatment at a Commission on Cancer (CoC) accredited center. Demographic factors were collected, including race/ethnicity, age at diagnosis, marital status, median household income, and rural or urban location. Log-logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between various prognostic factors and the odds of survival. We compared overall survival distributions across race/ethnicity using the log-rank test. Results: Of the 1,149 eligible patients (pts), 36% were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 21% non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 28% Hispanic, and 14% Other (Native American, Alaska Native, Asian, Pacific Islander). Mean age was 33.8 years (range 14-87 years). The majority was in the 21-35 age group (51%). Compared to NHW pts, Hispanic pts had over two times the odds of increased survival (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-3.27; p = 0.032). NHB pts had similar survival compared to NHW pts (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.50-1.76; p = 0.860). Poor prognostic factors demonstrating decreased odds of survival included age ≥40 years (OR 0.139; 95% CI 0.025-0.478; p < 0.001) and widowed status (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.018-0.375; p < 0.001). Localized stage (OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.13-5.53; p = 0.03), the absence of brain metastases (OR 4.58; 95% CI 1.96-7.91; p = 0.002), and rural location (OR 5.62; 95% CI 1.25-15.2; p = 0.028) were significantly associated with increased odds of survival. Household income and race/ethnicity were not independent predictors of survival. Conclusions: Compared to NHW pts, Hispanic pts have an increased cause-specific survival for GTN. NHB pts and NHW pts have similar survival. Additionally, rural location was significantly associated with greater odds of survival. Further research is needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms linking race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, considering structural racism, bias, and discrimination. Our findings highlight the importance of recognizing the role of racism and SDH on health disparities and call to attention the need for addressing social inequities in GTN.

e18572 Background: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) through the CDC has provided uninsured women access to breast and cervical cancer screening/diagnostic services. The uninsured face obstacles which include fear, lack of access and trust in the system, financial and logistical barriers to accessing health care services (Natale-Pereira, et.al, 2011) Disparities in access to screening and diagnostic testing, cancer treatment and survivorship is well documented for medically vulnerable populations that impact stage of diagnosis and mortality (Guadagnolo, Dohan & Raich 2011). The Jefferson's program participates in the NBCCEDP program and uses other private resources which incorporate Social Work core competencies that provide assistance to address barriers. The program navigates along the continuum of cancer care (e.g, prevention, screening, treatment and survival). We have found in a comparative analysis that TJUH’s program has higher rates of diverse racial and ethnic participation of key medically underserved demographics than the National Program. Methods: TJUH's program employs a clinical model, Clinical Patient Navigation with a Licensed Clinical Social Worker operating from a strengths based framework to direct care with administrative support. The program utilizes best practices for working with the at risk population: translation services for the Limited English Proficient, appointment confirmation, transportation assistance and psychosocial support from initial point of contact through final diagnosis. Program staff coordinate internal and external referrals from multiple providers. Results: The study population includes 3144 participants who received breast and cervical cancer screening services through the program from 2012 through 2020. 13.9% were white, 41.7% were African-American, 24.5% were Asian and 19.1% Latinx participated in the program, Table. The age of the participants was slightly younger than the National program as well with 15% under 40, 46% between the ages of 40-49. Conclusions: TJUH’s program provides comprehensive psychosocial support to address barriers along the continuum of screening and diagnostic services leading with increased participation among at risk populations. This further reduces no show rates and participants being lost to follow up. TJUH’s program screens a larger proportion of African American and Asian and younger women compared to the NBCCED program. Additionally, we serviced a slightly younger population than the national program. TJUH’s program addresses health disparities and inequity in access to cancer screening services as shown by the data of the diversity of the participants.