Search

There is evidence that epigenetic changes occur early in breast carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that early-life exposures associated with breast cancer would be associated with epigenetic alterations in breast tumors. In particular, we examined DNA methylation patterns in breast tumors in association with several early-life exposures in a population-based case–control study. Promoter methylation of E-cadherin, p16 and RAR-β2 genes was assessed in archived tumor blocks from 803 cases with real-time methylation-specific PCR. Unconditional logistic regression was used for case–case comparisons of those with and without promoter methylation. We found no differences in the prevalence of DNA methylation of the individual genes by age at menarche, age at first live birth and weight at age 20. In case–case comparisons of premenopausal breast cancer, lower birth weight was associated with increased likelihood of E-cadherin promoter methylation (OR = 2.79, 95% CI, 1.15–6.82, for ⩽2.5 v. 2.6–2.9 kg); higher adult height with RAR-β2 methylation (OR = 3.34, 95% CI, 1.19–9.39, for ⩾1.65 v. <1.60 m); and not having been breastfed with p16 methylation (OR = 2.75, 95% CI, 1.14–6.62). Among postmenopausal breast cancers, birth order was associated with increased likelihood of p16 promoter methylation. Being other than first in the birth order was inversely associated with likelihood of ⩾1 of the three genes being methylated for premenopausal breast cancers, but positively associated with methylation in postmenopausal women. These results suggest that there may be alterations in methylation associated with early-life exposures that persist into adulthood and affect breast cancer risk. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This article presents comments on various studies related to breast cancer. It includes "Applicability of the Nipple-Areola Complex-Sparing Mastectomy: A Prediction Model Using Mammography to Estimate Risk of Nipple-Areola Complex Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients," "A Pathologic Assessment of Adequate Margin Status in Breast-Conserving Therapy" and "Breast-Conserving Therapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Long-Term Results."

Purpose.--In the current pTNM classification system, nodal status of breast cancer is based on the number of involved lymph nodes and does not account for the total number of lymph nodes removed. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR; ie, ratio of positive over excised lymph nodes) as compared with pN staging and determined its optimal cutoff points. Patients and Methods.--From the Geneva Cancer Registry, we identified all women diagnosed with node-positive breast cancer between 1980 and 2004 (n = 1,829). The prognostic value of LNRs was calculated for values ranging from 0.05 to 0.95 by Cox regression analysis and validated by bootstrapping. Based on maximum likelihood, we identified cutoff points classifying women into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk LNR groups. Results.--Optimal cutoff points classified patients into low- (≤ 0.20), intermediate- (> 0.20 and ≤ 0.65), and high-risk (> 0.65) LNR groups, corresponding to 10-year disease-specific survival rates of 75%, 63%, and 40%, and adjusted mortality risks of 1 (reference), 1.78 (95% CI, 1.46 to 2.18), and 3.21 (95% CI, 2.54 to 4.06), respectively. In contrast to LNR risk categories, survival curves of pN2 and pN3 crossed after 15 years, and their adjusted mortality risks showed overlapping CIs: 2.07 (95% CI, 1.69 to 2.53) and 2.84 (95% CI, 2.23 to 3.61), respectively. Conclusion.--LNR predicts survival after breast cancer more accurately than pN classification and should be considered as an alternative to pN staging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on research on the significance of intramammary lymph nodes (intraMLNs) in the staging of breast cancer and its correlation with tumor characteristics and outcome. It references a study by A. Nassar et al. published in the 2008 issue of "Breast Journal." According to the study, the presence of intraMLN metastases does not appear to influence the survival of patients with stage II breast cancer.

Introduction: Population based studies (eg, Hershman et al. BCRT 2006 and Lohrisch et al. JCO 2006) showed poorer survival associated with long delays in adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) initiation following definitive surgery (DS) for women with breast cancer (BC). Delays in CTX following diagnosis (DX) have not been evaluated. The ASCO/NCCN quality measures (QMs) recommend CTX <=120 days after DX for patients with stage II/III ER/PR negative disease. We sought to examine the impact of delayed CTX on survival overall and stratified by disease-specific prognostic factors. Methods: 4,608 women with stage I-III HER2 negative breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2006 at 8 NCCN centers were identified using the NCCN outcomes database. Patients with T3/4 disease or who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. The association between CTX timing and OS was evaluated using multivariate Cox models adjusted for CTX type, age, race, BMI, residential distance, insurance, SES, comorbidity, ER/PR, LVI, grade, T stage, and N stage. The impact of CTX timing was evaluated using a >90-day (d) DS-to-CTX threshold, based on poor outcomes observed in prior studies, and a >120d DX-to-CTX threshold, based on the ASCO/NCCN QMs. Results: Median follow-up was 7.2 years and OS at 7 years was 89%. Overall, 401 (8.7%) patients received CTX >120d after DX and 113 (2.4%) patients received CTX >90d after DS. The DX-to-CTX interval was more strongly correlated with the DX-to-DS (r = 0.74) interval than DS-to-CTX (r = 0.54) interval. A >90d DS-to-CTX interval was significantly associated with poorer survival (HR: 1.65, 95% CI 1.04-2.60, p = 0.03) in adjusted analyses. Shorter DS-to-CTX thresholds of >60d (n = 636, HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.89-1.43, p = 0.319) or >75d (n = 273, HR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.74-1.49, p = 0.76) were not associated with OS. The association between a >120d DX-to-CTX interval and OS was not statistically significant (HR: 1.32, 95% CI 0.99-1.76, p = 0.06). Patients who received CTX >135d(n = 231, HR1.25, 95% CI: 0.87-1.81, p = 0.22)or>150d(n = 128, HR1.15, 95% CI: 0.59-2.24, p = 0.69) after DX did not display an increased risk of death. Excluding pathological staging factors from the model had no effect on the results. In subgroup analyses stratified by ER/PR, LVI, grade, T stage or N stage, a >120d delay in CTX did not display significant associations with OS. Among ER/PR negative patients, the association between a >120d delay and OS was borderline non-significant after adjusting the p-value for multiple hypothesis testing using the false discovery rate method (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.16-2.79, p = 0.09). Conclusion: Consistent with previous studies, CTX delays of >90 days following surgery were associated with poorer survival. OS was not significantly compromised in patients with DX-to-CTX intervals >120 days although this analysis may have limited power to detect small effects. More variation in the DX-to-CTX interval was attributed to pre-surgery time which may explain the differences observed between the DX-to-CTX and DS-to-CTX intervals. Among patients with ER/PR negative disease, a non-significant association between OS and a >120 day DX-to -CTX interval was observed that warrants further examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 2001 NCCN Breast Cancer Guidelines reflect the results of 5 generations of NCCN Breast Cancer Guidelines. Evidence-based guidelines, such as the NNCN Breast Cancer Guidelines, are possible only because of the availability of high-level evidence at multiple decision points in treatment. The continued performance of high quality clinical trials is central to our ability to further improve the treatment of breast cancer. The panel believes that participation in high quality clinical trials is the preferred treatment at all points in breast cancer therapy.