Search

Background: Incidence rates of Lyme borreliosis, a tickborne disease attributed to infection by Borrelia species, are increasing, and limitations to existing treatments potentiate the possibility of severe outcomes. Nevertheless, there are no licensed vaccines for Lyme borreliosis prevention in humans. This study investigated the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of VLA15, an investigational outer surface protein A (OspA)-based Lyme borreliosis vaccine that has previously shown safety and immunogenicity when administered as a primary vaccination series, following a primary VLA15 vaccination series., Methods: We report the results of the booster phase of a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 2 study that enrolled healthy adults aged 18-65 years from five US clinical study centres to receive 135 μg or 180 μg VLA15 or placebo at months 0, 2, and 6 in the main study phase. Participants who received 180 μg VLA15 in the main study phase and did not have relevant protocol deviations were eligible for the booster phase (months 18-30). Participants were randomly reassigned (2:1) to receive an intramuscular injection of a VLA15 booster or placebo 1 year after the completion of primary vaccination (month 18) via a randomisation list generated by an unmasked statistician with a block size of six. Individuals involved in data safety monitoring, rerandomisation, vaccine handling, and vaccine accountability were unmasked; the study sponsor and statisticians were only unmasked after analysis of data up to 1 month after booster administration. All other individuals remained masked throughout the booster phase. The outcomes for the booster phase were the immunogenicity (evaluated in the booster per-protocol population) and safety (evaluated for all participants who received the booster) of the booster dose up to month 30. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03970733) and is completed., Findings: Between Feb 4 and March 23, 2021, 58 participants (28 men and 30 women) were screened, randomly assigned, and received VLA15 (n=39) or placebo (n=19). One participant in the placebo group was lost to follow-up. The IgG geometric mean titres for each OspA serotype (serotypes 1-6) in the VLA15 group peaked at 1 month after the booster dose (1277·0 U/mL [95% CI 861·8-1892·3] to 2194·5 U/mL [1566·8-3073·7] vs 23·6 U/mL [18·1-30·8] to 36·8 U/mL [26·4-51·3] in the placebo group [p<0·0001 for all serotypes]), remained elevated at month 24 (137·4 U/mL [95·8-196·9] to 265·8 U/mL [202·9-348·2] vs 22·3 U/mL [17·7-28·0] to 29·1 U/mL [20·8-40·6] in the placebo group; p<0·0001 for all serotypes), and declined by month 30 (54·1 U/mL [38·6-75·7] to 101·6 U/mL [77·6-133·1] vs 21·9 U/mL [18·0-26·6] to 24·9 U/mL [19·0-32·6] in the placebo group; p<0·0001 for all serotypes except serotype 1 [p=0·0006]). Solicited local adverse events were reported more frequently in the VLA15 group (35 [92%, 95% CI 79-97] of 38 participants) than the placebo group (six [32%, 15-54] of 19 participants; p<0·0001) after booster vaccination. There was no significant difference in the frequency of solicited systemic adverse events between groups (20 [59%, 42-74] of 34 participants in the VLA15 group vs six [38%, 18-61] of 16 participants in the placebo group). Related unsolicited adverse events (none severe) were reported by two (5%, 1-17) of 39 participants in the VLA15 group and none (0%, 0-17) of 19 participants in the placebo group. There were no severe solicited local or systemic adverse events or deaths during the study., Interpretation: A booster dose of VLA15 is safe and induces substantial anamnestic immune responses against all six OspA serotypes. As with previously investigated OspA-based Lyme borreliosis vaccines, waning immune responses were observed with VLA15, and annual boosters might therefore be required., Funding: Valneva., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SKG, MS, KD, LW, VK, MO, RH, WB, SE-L, and NB are current or former employees of Valneva and may hold stock or stock options. AK, JL-S, and UD are paid consultants for Valneva., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Chikungunya is a serious and debilitating viral infection with a significant disease burden. VLA1553 (IXCHIQ®) is a live-attenuated vaccine licensed for active immunization for prevention of disease caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV)., Methods: Immunogenicity following a single dose of VLA1553 was evaluated in healthy adults aged ≥18 years in two Phase 3 trials [N = 656 participants (per protocol analysis set)]. Immunogenicity data to 180 days post-vaccination [geometric mean titres (GMTs), seroresponse rate, seroconversion rate] were pooled for the two trials. A comparison of subgroups based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race and baseline seropositivity was included. All analyses were descriptive., Results: Most participants were aged 18-64 years (N = 569/656 [86.7%]), there were slightly more females (N = 372/656 [56.7%]), most were not Hispanic/Latino (N = 579/656 [88.3%]), and most were White (N = 517/656 [78.8%]). In baseline seronegative participants, GMT peaked at Day 29 post-vaccination, and subsequently declined slightly but remained elevated until Day 180. At Days 29, 85 and 180, seroresponse rate was 98.3, 97.7 and 96.4% and seroconversion rate was 98.5, 98.4 and 98.2%. There were no differences in seroresponse rate in participants aged 18-64 years or ≥65 years at Day 29 (98.1 vs 100%), Day 85 (97.4 vs 100%) and Day 180 (96.3 vs 96.5%) nor based on sex, BMI, ethnicity or race. An immune response was shown in a small heterogenous population of baseline seropositive participants, with GMTs showing the same trend as baseline seronegative participants., Conclusions: A single dose of VLA1553 elicited a very strong immune response by Day 29 that remained elevated at Day 180 in both baseline seronegative and seropositive participants in a combined evaluation of two Phase 3 trials. The vaccine was similarly immunogenic in participants aged ≥65 years and 18-64 years, and there were no differences based on subgroup analyses for sex, BMI, ethnicity or race., (© International Society of Travel Medicine 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Zika virus (ZIKV) is an emerging public health threat, rendering development of a safe and effective vaccine against the virus a high priority to face this unmet medical need. Our vaccine candidate has been developed on the same platform used for the licensed vaccine IXIARO®, a vaccine against Japanese Encephalitis virus, another closely related member of the Flaviviridae family., Methods: Between 24 February 2018 and 16 November 2018, we conducted a randomized, observer-blinded, placebo controlled, single center phase 1 study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted, inactivated, purified whole-virus Zika vaccine candidate in the USA. A total of 67 healthy flavivirus-naïve adults aged 18-49 years were randomly assigned to one of five study arms to receive two immunizations of either high dose or low dose (6 antigen units or 3 antigen units) with both dose levels applied in two different immunization regimens or placebo as control., Results: Our vaccine candidate showed an excellent safety profile independent of dose and vaccination regimen with predominantly mild adverse events (AEs). No serious AE has been reported. The ZIKV vaccine induced neutralizing antibodies in all tested doses and regimens with seroconversion rates up to 85.7% (high dose), which remained up to 40% (high dose) at 6 months follow-up. Of note, the rapid regimen triggered a substantial immune response within days., Conclusions: The rapid development and production of a ZIKV vaccine candidate building on a commercial Vero-cell manufacturing platform resulted in a safe and immunogenic vaccine suitable for further clinical development. To optimize antibody persistence, higher doses and a booster administration might be considered., (© International Society of Travel Medicine 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Chikungunya disease, caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV), is associated with substantial morbidity, including debilitating CHIKV-related arthralgia., Methods: Three clinical trials of a CHIKV vaccine (VLA1553, IXCHIQ®) were conducted in the US: a Phase 1 dose-finding trial, a pivotal Phase 3 trial, and a Phase 3 lot-to-lot consistency trial. Participants were healthy adults (≥18 years) and received a single intramuscular dose of VLA1553 (3520 participants) or placebo (1033 participants). Solicited injection site and systemic adverse events (AEs) (10 to 14 days post-vaccination), unsolicited AEs (28 and 180 days post-vaccination), AEs of special interest (AESIs) (28 days post-vaccination), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), serious AEs (SAEs) (180 days post-vaccination), and pregnancies were evaluated. Safety data were pooled, and analyses were descriptive., Results: Overall, 63.7% of participants receiving VLA1553 experienced AEs, (44.7% for placebo), that were generally mild. Solicited injection site AEs, solicited systemic AEs, and unsolicited (Day 29) AEs were reported by 15.5%, 50.9%, 22.7% of participants who received VLA1553 and 11.1%, 26.9%, 13.4% who received placebo. Arthralgia was reported by 16.7% of participants who received VLA1553 and 4.8% of participants who received placebo; none required medical attention. MAAEs, AESIs, and SAEs were reported by 12.4%, 0.3%, 1.5% of participants who received VLA1553 and 11.3%, 0.1%, 0.8% of participants who received placebo. Protocol-defined AESIs were mild and short-lived, and two VLA1553-related SAEs resolved without sequelae. There were no clinically important differences in AE incidence based on age or medical history, and no VLA1553-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. There were 3 deaths (2 in the VLA1553 group and 1 in the placebo group), none was vaccine-related., Conclusions: A single dose of VLA1553 presented with an excellent local tolerability profile and overall safety in line with that expected for a live-attenuated vaccine. The safety profile was comparable in participants aged 18-64 years and ≥65 years., (© International Society of Travel Medicine 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Chikungunya outbreaks have been reported in Brazil since 2014. Adolescents are a sensitive population who would benefit from a prophylactic vaccine. This study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of the vaccine VLA1553 in adolescents in Brazil. With an overall trial duration of 12 months, we now report data on safety and immunogenicity over a period of 28 days after vaccination., Methods: In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, adolescents aged 12 to <18 years were recruited. The trial was performed at ten trial sites across Brazil. Eligible participants were generally healthy. The main exclusion criteria comprised immune-mediated or chronic arthritis or arthralgia, a known or suspected defect of the immune system, or any live vaccine received within the 4 weeks before trial vaccination. Randomisation was stratified by baseline serostatus in a 2:1 ratio to receive VLA1553 (at a dose of 1 × 10 4 TCID 50 per 0·5 mL [ie, 50% tissue culture infectious dose]) or placebo. VLA1553 or placebo was administered intramuscularly as a single-dose immunisation on day 1. The primary endpoint was the proportion of baseline seronegative participants with chikungunya virus neutralising antibody levels of 150 or more in μPRNT 50 (a micro plaque reduction neutralisation test), which was considered a surrogate of protection. The safety analysis included all participants receiving a trial vaccination. Immunogenicity analyses were performed in a subset. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04650399., Findings: Between Feb 14, 2022, and March 14, 2023, 754 participants received a trial vaccination (502 received VLA1553 and 252 received placebo) with a per-protocol population of 351 participants for immunogenicity analyses (303 in the VLA1553 group and 48 in the placebo group). In participants who were seronegative at baseline, VLA1553 induced seroprotective chikungunya virus neutralising antibody levels in 247 of 250 (98·8%, 95% CI 96·5-99·8) participants 28 days after vaccination. In seropositive participants, the baseline seroprotection rate of 96·2% increased to 100% after vaccination with VLA1553. Most (365 [93%] of 393) adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity, VLA1553 was generally well tolerated. When compared with placebo, participants exposed to VLA1553 had a significantly higher frequency of related adverse events (351 [69·9%] of 502 vs 121 [48·0%] of 252; p<0·0001), mostly headache, myalgia, fatigue, and fever. Among four reported serious adverse events (three in the VLA1553 group and one in the placebo group), one was classified as possibly related to VLA1553: a high-grade fever. Among 20 adverse events of special interest (ie, symptoms suggesting chikungunya-like disease), 16 were classified as related to trial vaccination (15 in the VLA1553 group and one in the placebo group), with severe symptoms reported in four participants (fever, headache, or arthralgia). 17 adverse events of special interest resolved within 1 week. Among 85 participants with arthralgia (68 in the VLA1553 group and 17 in the placebo group), eight adolescents had short-lived (range 1-5 days), mostly mild recurring episodes (seven in the VLA1553 group and one in the placebo group). The median duration of arthralgia was 1 day (range 1-5 days). The frequency of injection site adverse events for VLA1553 was higher than in the placebo group (161 [32%] vs 62 [25%]), but rarely severe (two [<1%] in the VLA1553 group and one [<1%] in the placebo group). After administration of VLA1553, there was a significantly lower frequency of solicited adverse events in participants who were seropositive at baseline compared with those who were seronegative (53% vs 74%; p<0·0001) including headache, fatigue, fever, and arthralgia., Interpretation: VLA1553 was generally safe and induced seroprotective titres in almost all vaccinated adolescents with favourable safety data in adolescents who were seropositive at baseline. The data support the use of VLA1553 for the prevention of disease caused by the chikungunya virus among adolescents and in endemic areas., Funding: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation and EU Horizon 2020., Translation: For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests VB, SH, MaS, MiS, RH, AB, KK, OZ, AP, KD, NW, SE-L, and JCJ are current or former Valneva employees and own stock and/or share options of Valneva. RH, MaS, RM, KD, SE-L, and JCJ are inventors in a patent relevant to the work (patent application number PCT/EP2024/056050 filed at the European Patent Office, The Hague). RM is a consultant of Valneva and received payments. JC declared grants or contracts with Valneva/Butantan, MSD, Sanofi Pasteur, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Takeda, and National Institutes of Health and honoraria and advisory board participations for Pfizer, Moderna, and Takeda. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Rising Lyme borreliosis incidence rates, potential for severe outcomes, and limitations in accurate and timely diagnosis for treatment initiation suggest the need for a preventive vaccine; however, no vaccine is currently available for human use. We performed two studies in adults to optimise the dose level and vaccination schedule for VLA15, an investigational Lyme borreliosis vaccine targeting outer surface protein A (OspA) serotypes 1-6, which are associated with the most common pathogenic Borrelia species in Europe and North America., Methods: Both randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 2 studies included participants aged 18-65 years without recent history of Lyme borreliosis or tick bites. Study one was conducted at nine clinical research and study centre sites in the USA (n=6), Germany (n=2), and Belgium (n=1); study two was conducted at five of the study one US sites. Based on a randomisation list created by an unmasked statistician for each study, participants were randomly assigned via an electronic case report form randomisation module to receive 90 μg (study one only), 135 μg, or 180 μg VLA15 or placebo by intramuscular injection at months 0, 1, and 2 (study one) or 0, 2, and 6 (study two). Study one began with a run-in phase to confirm safety, after which the Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended the removal of the 90 μg group and continuation of the study. In the study one run-in phase, randomisation was stratified by study site, whereas in the study one main phase and in study two, randomisation was stratified by study site, age group, and baseline B burgdorferi (sensu lato) serostatus. All individuals were masked, other than staff involved in randomisation, vaccine preparation or administration, or safety data monitoring. The primary endpoint for both studies was OspA-specific IgG geometric mean titres (GMTs) at 1 month after the third vaccination and was evaluated in the per-protocol population. Safety endpoints were evaluated in the safety population: all participants who received at least one vaccination. Both studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (study one NCT03769194 and study two NCT03970733) and are completed., Findings: For study one, 573 participants were screened and randomly assigned to treatment groups between Dec 21, 2018, and Sept, 26, 2019. For study two, 248 participants were screened and randomly assigned between June 26 and Sept 3, 2019. In study one, 29 participants were assigned to receive 90 μg VLA15, 215 to 135 μg, 205 to 180 μg, and 124 to placebo. In study two, 97 participants were assigned to receive 135 μg VLA15, 100 to 180 μg, and 51 to placebo. At 1 month after the third vaccination (ie, month 3), OspA-specific IgG GMTs in study one ranged from 74·3 (serotype 1; 95% CI 46·4-119·0) to 267·4 units per mL (serotype 3; 194·8-367·1) for 90 μg VLA15, 101·9 (serotype 1; 87·1-119·4) to 283·2 units per mL (serotype 3; 248·2-323·1) for 135 μg, and 115·8 (serotype 1; 98·8-135·7) to 308·6 units per mL (serotype 3; 266·8-356·8) for 180 μg. In study two, ranges at 1 month after the third vaccination (ie, month 7) were 278·5 (serotype 1; 214·9-361·0) to 545·2 units per mL (serotype 2; 431·8-688·4) for 135 μg VLA15 and 274·7 (serotype 1; 209·4-360·4) to 596·8 units per mL (serotype 3; 471·9-754·8) for 180 μg. Relative to placebo, the VLA15 groups had more frequent reports of solicited local adverse events (study one: 94%, 95% CI 91-96 vs 26%, 19-34; study two: 96%, 93-98 vs 35%, 24-49 after any vaccination) and solicited systemic adverse events (study one: 69%, 65-73 vs 43%, 34-52; study two: 74%, 67-80 vs 51%, 38-64); most were mild or moderate. In study one, unsolicited adverse events were reported by 52% (48-57) of participants in the VLA15 groups and 52% (43-60) of those in the placebo groups; for study two these were 65% (58-71) and 69% (55-80), respectively. Percentages of participants reporting serious unsolicited adverse events (study one: 2%, 1-4; study two: 4%, 2-7) and adverse events of special interest (study one: 1%, 0-2; study two: 1%, 0-3) were low across all groups. A single severe, possibly related unsolicited adverse event was reported (worsening of pre-existing ventricular extrasystoles, which resolved after change of relevant concomitant medication); no related serious adverse events or deaths were reported., Interpretation: VLA15 was safe, well tolerated, and elicited robust antibody responses to all six OspA serotypes. These findings support further clinical development of VLA15 using the 180 μg dose and 0-2-6-month schedule, which was associated with the greatest immune responses., Funding: Valneva., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NB, LW, VK, MO, NW, RH, MS, KD, SE-L, and WB are current or former employees of Valneva and may hold stock or stock options. UD, AK, and JL-S are paid consultants for Valneva., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Chikungunya virus infection can lead to long-term debilitating symptoms. A precursor phase 3 clinical study showed high seroprotection (defined as a 50% plaque reduction of chikungunya virus-specific neutralising antibodies on a micro plaque reduction neutralisation test [μPRNT] titre of ≥150 in baseline seronegative participants) up to 6 months after a single vaccination of the chikungunya virus vaccine VLA1553 (Valneva Austria, Vienna, Austria) and a good safety profile. Here we report antibody persistence and safety up to 2 years., Methods: In this single-arm, multicentre, phase 3b study, we recruited participants from the precursor phase 3 trial from professional vaccine trial sites in the USA. Participants (aged ≥18 years) were eligible if they had completed the previous study and received VLA1553. Chikungunya virus-specific neutralising antibodies were evaluated at 28 days, 6 months, and 1 year and 2 years after vaccination. The primary outcome was the proportion of seroprotected participants (ie, μPRNT 50 titre of ≥150) at 1 and 2 years, assessed in all eligible participants who had at least one post-vaccination immunogenicity sample available, overall and by age group at the time of vaccination (18-64 years and ≥65 years). Adverse events of special interest at the time of transition from the previous study to the current study (ie, at 6 months) and serious adverse events during the current study were recorded (ie, between 6 months and 2 years). All analyses were descriptive. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04838444, and immunogenicity follow-up is ongoing., Findings: In the precursor study, participants were screened between Sept 17, 2020, and April 10, 2021; data cutoff for this analysis was March 31, 2023. Of 2724 participants in the precursor study who received one dose of VLA1553, 363 participants were analysed in this study (310 [85%] aged 18-64 years and 53 [15%] aged ≥65 years at enrolment in the precursor study; mean age 47·7 years [SD 14·2], 207 [57%] of 363 participants were female, 156 [43%] were male, 280 [77%] were White, and 314 [87%] were not Hispanic or Latino). Strong seroprotection was observed at 1 year (98·9% [356 of 360 assessable participants; 97·2-99·7]) and 2 years (96·8% [306 of 316; 94·3-98·5]) after vaccination, and was very similar between those aged 18-64 years (at 1 year: 98·7% [303 of 307; 96·7-99·6]; at 2 years: 96·6% [256 of 265; 93·7-98·4]) and those aged 65 years and older (at 1 year: 100% [53 of 53; 93·3-100]; at 2 years: 98·0% [50 of 51; 89·6-100]) at each timepoint. No adverse events of special interest were ongoing at the time of transition. Ten serious adverse events occurred in nine (2%) participants between the 6-month and 2-year timepoints, including one death (due to drug overdose) that was determined to not be related to VLA1553., Interpretation: After a single VLA1553 vaccination, chikungunya virus-neutralising antibodies above the threshold considered to be protective persisted up to 2 years and there were no long-term serious adverse events related to vaccination. VLA1553 is an efficient and safe intervention that offers high seroprotection against chikungunya virus infection, a virus likely to spread globally with an urgent demand for long-lasting prophylaxis., Funding: Valneva Austria, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation, and EU Horizon 2020., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests All authors (except RMa) are current or former Valneva employees and all except SH and ST own stock or have share options, or both, in Valneva. NW, SH, and ST are previous employees of Valneva. NW is a current employee of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation and is an inventor in a patent (US 20220313810 A1; single shot chikungunya virus vaccine) relevant to the work. RH is an inventor in a patent (WO2021/028407 A1; single shot chikungunya virus vaccine) relevant to the work. RMa is consultant of Valneva and received payments for medical writing support on other projects and is an inventor in a patent relevant to the work (patent application number PCT/EP2024/056050 [immunogenic chikungunya compositions for administration to immunocompromised patients] filed at the European Patent Office, The Hague, Netherlands)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Controlled human infection models are important tools for the evaluation of vaccines against diseases where an appropriate correlate of protection has not been identified. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strain LSN03-016011/A (LSN03) is an LT enterotoxin and CS17-expressing ETEC strain useful for evaluating vaccine candidates targeting LT-expressing strains. We sought to confirm the ability of the LSN03 strain to induce moderate-to-severe diarrhea in a healthy American adult population, as well as the impact of immunization with an investigational cholera/ETEC vaccine (VLA-1701) on disease outcomes. A randomized, double-blinded pilot study was conducted in which participants received two doses of VLA1701 or placebo orally, one week apart; eight days after the second vaccination, 30 participants (15 vaccinees and 15 placebo recipients) were challenged with approximately 5 × 10 9 colony-forming units of LSN03. The vaccine was well tolerated, with no significant adverse events. The vaccine also induced serum IgA and IgG responses to LT. After challenge, 11 of the placebo recipients (73.3%; 95%CI: 48.0-89.1) and 7 of the VLA1701 recipients (46.7%; 95%CI: 24.8-68.8) had moderate-to-severe diarrhea ( p = 0.26), while 14 placebo recipients (93%) and 8 vaccine recipients (53.3%) experienced diarrhea of any severity, resulting in a protective efficacy of 42.9% ( p = 0.035). In addition, the vaccine also appeared to provide protection against more severe diarrhea ( p = 0.054). Vaccinees also tended to shed lower levels of the LSN03 challenge strain compared to placebo recipients ( p = 0.056). In addition, the disease severity score was lower for the vaccinees than for the placebo recipients ( p = 0.046). In summary, the LSN03 ETEC challenge strain induced moderate-to-severe diarrhea in 73.3% of placebo recipients. VLA1701 vaccination ameliorated disease severity, as observed by several parameters, including the percentage of participants experiencing diarrhea, as well as stool frequency and ETEC severity scores. These data highlight the potential value of LSN03 as a suitable ETEC challenge strain to evaluate LT-based vaccine targets (NCT03576183).

Background: The global spread of the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) increases the exposure risk for individuals travelling to or living in endemic areas. This Phase 3 study was designed to demonstrate manufacturing consistency between three lots of the single shot live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine VLA1553, and to confirm the promising immunogenicity and safety data obtained in previous trials., Methods: This randomized, double-blinded, lot-to-lot consistency, Phase 3 study, assessed immunogenicity and safety of VLA1553 in 408 healthy adults (18-45 years) in 12 sites across the USA. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios of CHIKV-specific neutralizing antibodies between three VLA1553 lots at 28 days post-vaccination. Secondary endpoints included immunogenicity and safety over 6 months post-vaccination., Results: GMTs were comparable between the lots meeting the acceptance criteria for equivalence. The average GMT (measured by 50% CHIKV micro plaque neutralization test; μPRNT50) peaked with 2643 at 28 days post-vaccination and decreased to 709 at 6 months post-vaccination. An excellent seroresponse rate (defined as μPRNT50 titre ≥ 150 considered protective) was achieved in 97.8% of participants at 28 days post-vaccination and still persisted in 96% at 6 months after vaccination. Upon VLA1553 immunization, 72.5% of participants experienced adverse events (AEs), without significant differences between lots (related solicited systemic AE: 53.9% of participants; related solicited local AE: 19.4%). Overall, AEs were mostly mild or moderate and resolved without sequela, usually within 3 days. With 3.9% of participants experiencing severe AEs, 2.7% were classified as related, whereas none of the six reported serious adverse events was related to the administration of VLA1553., Conclusions: All three lots of VLA1553 recapitulated the safety and immunogenicity profiles of a preceding Phase 3 study, fulfilling pre-defined consistency requirements. These results highlight the manufacturability of VLA1553, a promising vaccine for the prevention of CHIKV disease for those living in or travelling to endemic areas., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society of Travel Medicine.)

Background: Lyme borreliosis, potentially associated with serious long-term complications, is caused by the species complex Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. We investigated a novel Lyme borreliosis vaccine candidate (VLA15) targeting the six most common outer surface protein A (OspA) serotypes 1-6 to prevent infection with pathogenic Borrelia spp prevalent in Europe and North America., Methods: This was a partially randomised, observer-masked, phase 1 study in healthy adults older than 18 years to younger than 40 years (n=179) done in trial sites in Belgium and the USA. Following a non-randomised run-in phase, a sealed envelope randomisation method was applied with a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio; three dose concentrations of VLA15 (12 μg, 48 μg, and 90 μg) were administered by intramuscular injection on days 1, 29, and 57. The primary outcome was safety (frequency of adverse events up to day 85) assessed in participants who received at least one vaccination. Immunogenicity was a secondary outcome. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03010228, and is complete., Findings: Between Jan 23, 2017 and Jan 16, 2019, of 254 participants screened for eligibility, 179 were randomly assigned into six groups: alum-adjuvanted 12 μg (n=29), 48 μg (n=31), or 90 μg (n=31) and non-adjuvanted 12 μg (n=29 participants), 48 μg (n=29), or 90 μg (n=30). VLA15 was safe and well tolerated and the majority of adverse events were mild or moderate. Overall, adverse events were more frequent in the 48 μg and 90 μg groups (range 28-30 participants [94-97%]) when compared with the 12 μg group (25 [86%] participants, 95% CI 69·4-94·5) for adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted groups. Common local reactions were tenderness (151 [84%] participants; 356 events, 95% CI 78·3-89·4) and injection site pain (120 [67%]; 224 events, 59·9-73·5); most frequent systemic reactions were headache (80 [45%]; 112 events, 37·6-52·0), excessive fatigue (45 [25%]; 56 events, 19·4-32·0), and myalgia (45 [25%]; 57 events, 19·4-32·0). A similar safety and tolerability profile was observed between adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted formulations. The majority of solicited adverse events were mild or moderate. VLA15 was immunogenic for all OspA serotypes with higher immune responses induced in the adjuvanted higher dose groups (geometric mean titre range 90 μg with alum 61·3 U/mL-321·7 U/mL vs 23·8 U/mL-111·5 U/mL at 90 μg without alum)., Interpretation: This novel multivalent vaccine candidate against Lyme borreliosis was safe and immunogenic and paves the way to further clinical development., Funding: Valneva Austria., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests IL-R reports funding from Valneva to her institution for the conduct of this study. In addition, she received funding to her institution from several industry partners for the conduct of various vaccine trials, but none of them in the area of Lyme borreliosis. NB, RH, VK, NW, KD, SE-L, and WB are Valneva employees and own stock and share options in Valneva. AK, JL-S, and GL-R declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Booster doses for COVID-19 vaccinations have been shown to amplify the waning immune response after primary vaccination and to enhance protection against emerging variants of concern (VoCs). Here, we aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) after primary vaccination with 2 doses of either VLA2001 or ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-Astra Zeneca), including the cross-neutralization capacity against the Delta and Omicron VoCs., Methods: This interim analysis of an open-label extension of a randomized, controlled phase 3 trial assessed a single booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) in healthy or medically stable adults aged 18 years and above, recruited in 21 clinical sites in the UK, who had previously received two doses of either VLA2001 or ChAdOx1-S. Safety outcomes were frequency and severity of solicited injection site and systemic reactions within 7 days after booster vaccination as well as frequency and severity of any unsolicited adverse events (AE) after up to 6 months. Immunogenicity outcomes were the immune response to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 assessed 14 days post booster expressed as geometric mean titres (GMT), GMT fold ratios and seroconversion of specific neutralizing antibodies and S-protein binding IgG antibodies. Immunogenicity against the Delta and Omicron VoCs was assessed as a post-hoc outcome with a pseudovirus neutralization antibody assay. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04864561, and is ongoing., Results: A booster dose of VLA2001 was administered to 958 participants, of whom 712 had been primed with VLA2001, and 246 with ChAdOx1-S. Within 7 days following these booster doses, 607 (63.4%) participants reported solicited injection site reactions, and 487 (50.8%) reported solicited systemic reactions. Up to 14 days post booster, 751 (78.4%) participants reported at least one adverse event. The tolerability profile of a booster dose of VLA2001 was similar in VLA2001-primed and ChAdOx1-S-primed participants. In VLA2001-primed participants, the GMT (95% CI) of neutralizing antibodies increased from 32.5 (22.8, 46.3) immediately before to 521.5 (413.0, 658.6) 2 weeks after administration of the booster dose, this corresponds to a geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of 27.7 (20.0, 38.5). Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMFR was 3.6 (2.8, 4.7). In the ChAdOx1-S primed group, the GMT (95% CI) of neutralizing antibodies increased from 65.8 (43.9, 98.4) immediately before to 188.3 (140.3, 252.8) 2 weeks after administration of the booster dose, a geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of 3.0 (2.2, 4.0). Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMFR was 1.6 (1.1, 2.2). For S-protein binding IgG antibodies, the pre- versus post-booster GMT fold ratio (95% CI) was 34.6 (25.0, 48.0) in the VLA2001-primed group and 4.0 (3.0, 5.2) in the ChAdOx1-S-primed group. Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMT fold rise of IgG antibodies was 3.8 (3.2, 4.6) in the VLA2001-primed group and 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) in the ChAdOx1-S-primed group. The GMT against Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (BA.4/5) increased from 4.2 to 260, and from 2.7 to 56.7, respectively, when boosting subjects previously primed with VLA2001. Following the boost, 97% of subjects primed with VLA2001 had detectable Delta- and 94% Omicron-neutralizing antibodies. In subjects primed with ChAdOx1-S, the GMT against Delta and Omicron titres increased from 9.1 to 92.5, and from 3.6 to 12.3, respectively. After boosting, 99% of subjects primed with ChAdOx1-S had detectable Delta- and 70% Omicron-neutralizing antibodies. In both VLA2001 and ChAdOx1-S primed subjects, the additional VLA2001 dose boosted T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 antigens to levels above those observed before the booster dose., Conclusion: A booster dose of VLA2001 was safe and well tolerated after primary immunization with VLA2001 and ChAdOx1-S. The tolerability of a booster dose of VLA2001 was similar to the favourable profile observed after the first and second priming doses. Both in a homologous and a heterologous setting, boosting resulted in higher neutralizing antibody titres than after primary immunization and significant increases in cross-neutralization titres against Delta and Omicron were observed after the booster dose. These data support the use of VLA2001 in booster programmes in ChadOx1-S primed groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest AF is a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, until December 2022 was chair of the WHO European Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation, remains a member of the WHO Working Group on COVID19 vaccines and is an investigator or provides consulting advice on clinical trials and studies of COVID-19 vaccines produced by AstraZeneca, Janssen, Valneva, Pfizer, Moderna, and Sanofi, and of other vaccines from these and other manufacturers, including GlaxoSmithKline. He receives no personal remuneration or benefits for any of the former work but also undertakes paid consultancy for Bionet Asia, the Helmsley Charitable Trust, Hillevax, Imophoron, Janssen, RQ Bio and VB Vaccines. HD, KD, AL, SE-L, RH, JCJ, MK, GM, BQ, PW and CT are employees of Valneva Austria GmbH. RL has received grants or worked on clinical trials funded by Valneva, Moderna, Janssen, and AstraZeneca and has received support for meeting attendance, lectures, or writing from AstraZeneca. Pseudovirus neutralisation assays conducted by SP and MH were performed as contract research., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: VLA1553 is a live-attenuated vaccine candidate for active immunisation and prevention of disease caused by chikungunya virus. We report safety and immunogenicity data up to day 180 after vaccination with VLA1553., Methods: This double-blind, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial was done in 43 professional vaccine trial sites in the USA. Eligible participants were healthy volunteers aged 18 years and older. Patients were excluded if they had history of chikungunya virus infection or immune-mediated or chronic arthritis or arthralgia, known or suspected defect of the immune system, any inactivated vaccine received within 2 weeks before vaccination with VLA1553, or any live vaccine received within 4 weeks before vaccination with VLA1553. Participants were randomised (3:1) to receive VLA1553 or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of baseline negative participants with a seroprotective chikungunya virus antibody level defined as 50% plaque reduction in a micro plaque reduction neutralisation test (μPRNT) with a μPRNT 50 titre of at least 150, 28 days after vaccination. The safety analysis included all individuals who received vaccination. Immunogenicity analyses were done in a subset of participants at 12 pre-selected study sites. These participants were required to have no major protocol deviations to be included in the per-protocol population for immunogenicity analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04546724., Findings: Between Sept 17, 2020 and April 10, 2021, 6100 people were screened for eligibility. 1972 people were excluded and 4128 participants were enrolled and randomised (3093 to VLA1553 and 1035 to placebo). 358 participants in the VLA1553 group and 133 participants in the placebo group discontinued before trial end. The per-protocol population for immunogenicity analysis comprised 362 participants (266 in the VLA1553 group and 96 in the placebo group). After a single vaccination, VLA1553 induced seroprotective chikungunya virus neutralising antibody levels in 263 (98·9%) of 266 participants in the VLA1553 group (95% CI 96·7-99·8; p<0·0001) 28 days post-vaccination, independent of age. VLA1553 was generally safe with an adverse event profile similar to other licensed vaccines and equally well tolerated in younger and older adults. Serious adverse events were reported in 46 (1·5%) of 3082 participants exposed to VLA1553 and eight (0·8%) of 1033 participants in the placebo arm. Only two serious adverse events were considered related to VLA1553 treatment (one mild myalgia and one syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion). Both participants recovered fully., Interpretation: The strong immune response and the generation of seroprotective titres in almost all vaccinated participants suggests that VLA1553 is an excellent candidate for the prevention of disease caused by chikungunya virus., Funding: Valneva, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation, and EU Horizon 2020., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests All authors (except RMa and JLS) are Valneva employees and own stock and share options of Valneva. RH is an inventor in a patent relevant to the work. RMa and JLS are consultants of Valneva and have received payments., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Valneva COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001; Valneva Austria, Vienna, Austria) is an inactivated whole-virus, adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of primary vaccination with VLA2001 versus the ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-AstraZeneca) adenoviral-vectored vaccine., Methods: In this immunobridging phase 3 trial (COV-COMPARE), participants aged 18 years and older who were medically stable (as determined by an investigator) were enrolled at 26 sites in the UK. In the double-blind, randomised, controlled arm of the trial, participants aged 30 years and older were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive two doses of VLA2001 (0·5 mL; with 33 antigen units [AU] per dose) or ChAdOx1-S (0·5 mL; with 2·5 × 10 8 infectious units per dose) on days 1 and 29. In another arm, participants aged 18-29 years received two doses of VLA2001 (same dose) open label on days 1 and 29. The primary immunogenicity outcome was the immune response of a two-dose schedule of VLA2001 on day 43, in adults aged 30 years and older, versus two doses of ChAdOx1-S via superiority of geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising antibodies (GMT ratio of >1 at a two-sided significance level of 5%) and non-inferiority of the seroconversion rate (non-inferiority margin of -10% for the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference between groups). The primary safety outcome was the frequency and severity of any adverse events in all participants up to day 43. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine. GMTs were assessed in a subset of participants aged 30 years and older who were seronegative at baseline, had at least one evaluable antibody titre measurement after vaccination, and had no confirmed COVID-19 during the study (immunogenicity population); and seroconversion was assessed in the per-protocol population, which comprised the immunogenicity population but excluding any participants with major protocol violations. For each timepoint, only participants with available data were included in the analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04864561, and is ongoing., Findings: Between April 28 and June 3, 2021, 4181 individuals were screened and 4017 enrolled, of whom 2975 (74%) were aged 30 years or older and randomly assigned to receive VLA2001 (n=1978) or ChAdOx1-S (n=997), and 1042 (26%) were aged 18-29 years (all received open-label VLA2001). 4012 participants received at least one dose of vaccine (1040 in the open-label VLA2001 group, 1977 in the randomised VLA2001 group, and 995 in the ChAdOx1-S group). The immunogenicity population comprised 492 participants in the randomised VLA2001 group and 498 in the ChAdOx1-S group; three participants in the VLA2001 group were excluded from the per-protocol population. VLA2001 induced higher neutralising GMTs than did ChAdOx1-S (803·5 [95% CI 748·5-862·6] vs 576·6 [543·6-611·7]; GMT ratio 1·39 [95% CI 1·25-1·56]; p<0·0001), and non-inferior seroconversion rates (444 [97·4%] of 456 participants vs 444 [98·9%] of 449; difference -1·5% [95% CI -3·3 to 0·2]. Any adverse event was reported in 963 (92·6%) participants in the open-label VLA2001 group, 1755 (88·8%) in the randomised VLA2001 group, and 976 (98·1%) in the ChAdOx1-S group. Most adverse events reported were mild or moderate in severity., Interpretation: VLA2001 has a favourable tolerability profile and met superiority criteria for neutralising antibodies and non-inferiority criterion for seroconversion rates compared with ChAdOx1-S. The data presented here formed the basis of successful marketing approval for use of VLA2001 in primary vaccination in the EU, the UK, Bahrain, and United Arab Emirates., Funding: UK Department of Health and Social Care and Valneva Austria., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AF is a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, chair of the WHO European Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation, member of the WHO Working Group on COVID19 vaccines and is an investigator or provides consulting advice on clinical trials and studies of COVID-19 vaccines produced by AstraZeneca, Janssen, Valneva, Pfizer, Moderna, and Sanofi, and of other vaccines from these and other manufacturers, including GlaxoSmithKline, VPI Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and Bionet Asia; he receives no personal remuneration or benefits for any of this work. ICR, KD, SD, SE-L, RH, JCJ, MK, BQ, CT, and PW are employees of Valneva Austria GmbH. RL has received grants or worked on clinical trials funded by Valneva, Moderna, Janssen, and AstraZeneca and has received support for meeting attendance, lectures, or writing from AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the safety and optimal dose of a novel inactivated whole-virus adjuvanted vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: VLA2001., Methods: We conducted an open-label, dose-escalation study followed by a double-blind randomized trial using low, medium and high doses of VLA2001 (1:1:1). The primary safety outcome was the frequency and severity of solicited local and systemic reactions within 7 days after vaccination. The primary immunogenicity outcome was the geometric mean titre (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 two weeks after the second vaccination. The study is registered as NCT04671017., Results: Between December 16, 2020, and June 3, 2021, 153 healthy adults aged 18-55 years were recruited in the UK. Overall, 81.7% of the participants reported a solicited AE, with injection site tenderness (58.2%) and headache (46.4%) being the most frequent. Only 2 participants reported a severe solicited event. Up to day 106, 131 (85.6%) participants had reported any AE. All observed incidents were transient and non-life threatening in nature. Immunogenicity measured at 2 weeks after completion of the two-dose priming schedule, showed significantly higher GMTs of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titres in the highest dose group (GMT 545.6; 95% CI: 428.1, 695.4) which were similar to a panel of convalescent sera (GMT 526.9; 95% CI: 336.5, 825.1). Seroconversion rates of neutralizing antibodies were also significantly higher in the high-dose group (>90%) compared to the other dose groups. In the high dose group, antigen-specific IFN-γ expressing T-cells reactive against the S, M and N proteins were observed in 76, 36 and 49%, respectively., Conclusions: VLA2001 was well tolerated in all tested dose groups, and no safety signal of concern was identified. The highest dose group showed statistically significantly stronger immunogenicity with similar tolerability and safety, and was selected for phase 3 clinical development., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest AF is a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and immunization and chair of the WHO European Technical Advisory Group of Experts on immunization. He is an investigator or provides consultative advice on clinical trials and studies of COVID-19 vaccines produced by AstraZeneca, Janssen, Valneva, Pfizer, and Sanofi, and of other vaccines from these and other manufacturers, including GlaxoSmithKline, VPI Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and Bionet Asia. He receives no personal remuneration or benefits for any of this work. CTA, KD, SEL, RH, IC, BQ, and JCJ are employees of Valneva Austria GmbH., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Chikungunya disease, which results in incapacitating arthralgia, has been reported worldwide. We developed a live-attenuated chikungunya virus (CHIKV) vaccine candidate designed for active immunisation of the general population living in endemic regions, as well as serving as a prophylactic measure for travellers to endemic areas., Methods: This single-blind, randomised, dose-escalation, phase 1 study investigated as primary outcome safety of a live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine candidate. At two professional clinical trial centres in Illinois and Alabama, USA, healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years were randomly assigned (1:1:2) to one of three escalating dose groups (low dose 3·2 × 10 3 per 0·1 mL; medium dose 3·2 × 10 4 per 1 mL; or high dose 3·2 × 10 5 50% tissue culture infection dose per 1 mL) and received a single-shot immunisation on day 0. Individuals in all groups were revaccinated with the highest dose on either month 6 or 12, and followed up for 28 days after revaccination. The safety analysis included all individuals who received the single vaccination; the immunogenicity analysis, which was a secondary outcome, included all individuals who completed the study without major protocol deviations (per-protocol population). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03382964, and is complete., Findings: The study was done between March 5, 2018, and Jul 23, 2019, with 120 adults recruited and enrolled between March 5 and June 21, 2018, and assigned to receive a low (n=31), medium (n=30), or high (n=59) dose of the vaccine. The vaccine was safe in the high-dose group and well tolerated in the low-dose and medium-dose groups. Four (7%) of 59 vaccinees in the high-dose group reported any local reaction, and 11 (36%), 12 (40%), and 40 (68%) volunteers in the low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose groups, respectively, reported any solicited systemic reaction. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Data up to month 12 after a single immunisation of the 120 healthy volunteers showed a good immunogenicity profile with 100% seroconversion rates achieved at day 14 (103 [100%] of 103) and sustained for 1 year across all dose groups. Mean peak antibody titres at day 28 ranged from 592·6 to 686·9 geometric mean titres from the low-dose to high-dose groups, respectively. A single vaccination was sufficient to induce sustaining high-titre neutralising antibodies, as shown by the absence of an anamnestic response after any revaccination ranging from 94% to 100% of participants. Following revaccination, vaccinees were protected from vaccine-induced viraemia., Interpretation: A novel live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in an adult population and could be an effective intervention for prophylaxis of chikungunya disease worldwide., Funding: Valneva, Vienna, Austria; Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation and EU Horizon 2020., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a serious threat in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this confirmatory, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2/3 study was to assess the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of IC43 recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine in non-surgical ICU patients., Methods: Eight hundred patients aged 18 to 80 years admitted to the ICU with expected need for mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h were randomized 1:1 to either IC43 100 μg or saline placebo, given in two vaccinations 7 days apart. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality in patients 28 days after the first vaccination. Immunogenicity and safety were also evaluated., Findings: All-cause mortality rates at day 28 were 29.2% vs 27.7% in the IC43 and placebo groups, respectively (P = .67). Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, P = .46) and proportion of patients with ≥ one confirmed P. aeruginosa invasive infection or respiratory tract infection also did not differ significantly between both groups. The geometric mean fold increase in OprF/I titers was 1.5 after the first vaccination, 20 at day 28, after the second vaccination, and 2.9 at day 180. Significantly more patients in the placebo group (96.5%) had ≥ one adverse event (AE) versus the IC43 100 μg group (93.1%) (P = .04). The most frequently reported severe AEs in the IC43 and placebo groups were respiratory failure (6.9% vs 5.7%, respectively), septic shock (4.1% vs 6.5%), cardiac arrest (4.3% vs 5.7%), multiorgan failure (4.6% vs 5.5%), and sepsis (4.6% vs 4.2%). No related serious AEs were reported in the IC43 group., Interpretation: The IC43 100 μg vaccine was well tolerated in this large population of medically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. The vaccine achieved high immunogenicity but provided no clinical benefit over placebo in terms of overall mortality., Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01563263). Registration was sent to ClinicalTrials.gov on March 14, 2012, but posted by ClinicalTrials.gov on March 26, 2012. The first subject was included in the trial on March 22, 2012.

Background: In an initial study among children from non-Japanese encephalitis (JE)-endemic countries, seroprotection rates remained high 6 months after completion of the primary series with IXIARO®., Methods: In this open-label follow-up study, a subset of 23 children who received a 2-dose primary series of IXIARO® in the parent study, were evaluated for safety and neutralizing antibody persistence for 36 months., Results: Seroprotection rates (SPRs) remained high but declined from 100% one month after primary immunization to 91.3% at month 7 and 89.5% at month 36. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) declined considerably from 384.1 by day 56-60.8 at month 36. No long-term safety concerns were identified., Conclusions: The substantial decline in GMT observed in this study, together with previously published data on children vaccinated with IXIARO® support the recommendation for a booster dose in children who remain at risk of JE from 1 year after the primary series of IXIARO®, consistent with the recommendation for adults., Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT01246479., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CT, DR, SEL, SK, VK and KD are employees of Valneva SE or its affiliates, the manufacturer of IXIARO®., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: An inactivated Vero cell culture derived Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine (IXIARO) requires a booster dose 1 year after primary schedule for long-term antibody persistence in adults. The aim of this study is to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose in children 2 months to <18 years of age., Methods: This is a randomized, controlled open-label study in the Philippines. Three hundred children vaccinated with IXIARO in a previous trial were randomized 1:1 to receive either no booster or a booster 12 months after initiation of the primary series. Neutralizing antibody titers were assessed before and after the booster and up to 3 years after primary series. Safety endpoints included the rate of subjects with solicited adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs and serious AEs within 1 month after the booster., Results: Geometric mean titer declined by 1 year after the primary series, but titers remained above the established protective threshold in 85%-100% of children depending on age group. The booster led to a pronounced increase in geometric mean titer and 100% seroprotection rate in all age groups. The booster was well tolerated, with AE rates lower compared with the primary series. Most AEs were mild., Conclusions: A booster dose of IXIARO administered 12 months after the primary immunization was well tolerated and highly immunogenic.

Background: Young travelers to South-East Asia may be at risk for Japanese encephalitis (JE)., Methods: IXIARO ® (0.25 ml or 0.5 ml, depending on age) were administrated to 100 travelers aged ≥ 2 months to < 18 years. Solicited AEs were collected for 7 days after each injection, unsolicited adverse events (AEs) for a total of 7 months. JE neutralizing antibodies were assessed in 64 subjects., Results: The most common solicited local AEs were redness (3/12 subjects), induration and tenderness (both 1/12) with 0.25 ml IXIARO ® , and tenderness (44/88) and pain (22/88) with 0.5 ml IXIARO ® . Common solicited systemic AEs were diarrhea (2/12) and loss of appetite (1/12) with 0.25 ml IXIARO ® and muscle pain (27/88) and excessive fatigue (10/88) with 0.5 ml IXIARO ® . In total, up to day 56, AEs were reported by 10/12 (83.3%) of subjects who received the 0.25 ml dose and 67/88 (76.1%) of those vaccinated with the 0.5 ml dose. All subjects (62/62; 100%) developed protective levels of JE neutralizing antibodies by Day 56 and 31/34 (91.2%) retained protective titers at Month 7., Conclusions: IXIARO ® was generally well tolerated in children, with an overall AE profile similar to adults. IXIARO ® was highly immunogenic in both dose groups., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Japanese encephalitis (JE) is a major public health concern in Asia and poses a small but potentially fatal threat to travelers from nonendemic countries, including children. No JE vaccine for pediatric use has been available in Europe and the United States., Methods: Age-stratified cohorts of children between 2 months and 17 years received 2 doses of Vero cell-derived inactivated JE virus vaccine (IXIARO; Valneva Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) administered 28 days apart [<3 years, 0.25 mL (half adult dose); ≥3 years, 0.5 mL (full adult dose)]. Immunogenicity endpoints were seroconversion rate, 4-fold increase in JE neutralizing antibody titer and geometric mean titer assessed 56 days and 7 months after the first vaccination in 496 subjects of the intent-to-treat population. The immune response to JE virus at both time points was also analyzed according to prevaccination JE virus and dengue virus serostatus., Results: At day 56, seroconversion was attained in ≥99.2% of subjects with age-appropriate dosing, 4-fold increases in titer were reported for 77.4%-100% in various age groups, and geometric mean titers ranged from 176 to 687, with younger children having the strongest immune response. At month 7, seroconversion was maintained in 85.5%-100% of subjects. Pre-existing JE virus immunity did not impact on immune response at day 56; however, it led to a better persistence of protective antibody titers at month 7., Conclusions: IXIARO is highly immunogenic at both doses tested in the pediatric population, leading to protective antibody titers at day 56 in >99% of subjects who received the age-appropriate dose.

Background: Japanese encephalitis remains a serious health concern in Asian countries and has sporadically affected pediatric travelers. In the present study, we monitored the safety profile of the Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine IXIARO (Valneva Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) in a pediatric population., Methods: We randomized 1869 children between 2 months and 17 years of age in an age-stratified manner to vaccination with IXIARO or one of the control vaccines, Prevnar (formerly Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., now Pfizer Inc., Kent, United Kingdom) and HAVRIX 720 (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium). Adverse events (AEs) (unsolicited and solicited local and systemic AEs), serious AEs and medically attended AEs were assessed up to day 56 and month 7 after the first dose., Results: Incidences of AEs, serious AEs or medically attended AEs did not differ significantly between the groups in any age stratum. AEs were most frequent in children <1 year of age and decreased with age. AEs of special interest, predefined as AEs associated with potential hypersensitivity/allergy or neurologic disorders up to day 56, were reported in 4.6% (IXIARO) versus 6.3% (Prevnar) in the ≥2 months to <1 year age group and 3.4% (IXIARO) versus 3.3% (HAVRIX) in the ≥1 to <18 years age group. Fever, the most frequent systemic reaction in 23.7% of infants to 3.8% of adolescents, decreased with age and did not differ between groups., Conclusions: The safety profile of IXIARO was comparable to the control vaccines in terms of overall AE rates, serious AEs and medically attended AEs.