Search

Competing Interests: François Girardin is the representative of Swiss hospitals at the Federal Drug Commission (Federal Office of Public Health) and expert for InnoSuisse - the Federal Agency for Innovation (section Life Sciences). Francesco Negro advises Gilead, Merck and AbbVie, and has received a research grant from Gilead. Lucy Eddowes is an employee of Costello Medical. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.

Background & Aims: Patients hospitalised because of mental illness often have risk factors for contracting HCV. Scaling-up HCV screening for all psychiatric inpatients as a case-detection strategy for viral elimination is underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of scaling-up HCV screening and treatment for psychiatry hospital admissions in Switzerland vs. the current standard-of-care risk-based approach, where only those with a history of substance misuse disorder are offered testing., Methods: HCV prevalence by history of substance misuse disorder was analysed in medical records from inpatient admissions to a Swiss psychiatry department. Cost-effectiveness was analysed from a healthcare provider perspective through a decision-tree screening model, using these HCV prevalence data. Model and parameter uncertainty were assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses., Results: Prevalence of HCV in psychiatry inpatients with a history of substance misuse disorder (n = 1,013) was 25.7%, compared with 3.5% among the remaining inpatients (n = 3,535). Scaling up HCV screening and treatment for all psychiatry admissions was cost-effective vs. the risk-based approach, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$9,188 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio remained cost-effective considering a HCV prevalence as low as 0.07%. The population-level net monetary benefit of the generalised screening approach was US$435,156,348, with 917 additional patients per year detected and treated at a cost of US$3,294 per person ( vs. US$2,122 under risk-based screening)., Conclusions: Scaling up HCV screening and treatment at diagnosis with all-oral, interferon-free regimens as a generalised approach for psychiatric admissions was cost-effective and could support reaching World Health Organization targets for HCV elimination by 2030., Lay Summary: Patients hospitalised because of mental illness often have risk factors for HCV. We found that testing all psychiatry patients in hospital for HCV was cost-effective compared with testing only patients who have a history of substance misuse. Scaling up HCV testing and treatment could help to wipe out HCV., Competing Interests: F.G. is the representative of Swiss hospitals at the Federal Drug Commission (Federal Office of Public Health) and expert for InnoSuisse - the Federal Agency for Innovation (section Life Sciences). S.K. has received honoraria for cognitive test and training software from Schuhfried. F.N. advises Gilead, Merck and AbbVie, and has received a research grant from 10.13039/100005564Gilead. L.E. and N.H. are employees of Costello Medical, and C.P. was an employee of Costello Medical at the time of the study. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2021 The Author(s).)

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) among people living in detention (PLD) is typically high in many countries including Switzerland, where it is estimated that the HCV prevalence rate is between 5.7% and 6.2%. In Switzerland, the existing screening strategy involves routine screening of PLD who indicate they are from HCV high-risk populations based on questionnaire responses upon entry to the detention center, rather than an offer to screen all PLD., Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss healthcare provider perspective was conducted by combining a 5-year decision tree screening model with results from a Markov model of HCV treatment outcomes. This model explored the cost-effectiveness of increased HCV screening to cover all PLD compared to the current approach, using a standard test package and subsequent treatment with a single-tablet regimen in Swiss custodial settings. Sensitivity and scenario analyses examined the uncertainty of results., Results: At the willingness-to-pay threshold of 100 000 Swiss Francs (CHF) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), comprehensive general screening was cost-effective compared to current risk-based screening, with a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 14 312 per QALY. The net monetary benefit of screening the whole PLD population was CHF 23 298 046 and CHF 4298 per person. The proportion of PLD tested was predicted to increase from 13.6% to 67.0% under comprehensive screening., Conclusion: The results showed that comprehensive screening strategies in detention centers in Switzerland can be cost-effective, with the probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimating an 82.3% probability of cost-effectiveness., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

People who inject drugs (PWID) are a key high-risk group for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection due to the sharing of needles and drug-preparation equipment. However, only approximately 50% of PWID are currently screened for HCV in Switzerland. At present, screening of PWID occurs in general practice via venepuncture. Compared to venepuncture, screening via rapid antibody saliva and dried blood spot (DBS) tests is well adapted to PWID, who typically have difficult venous access. The cost-effectiveness of an increased access screening programme of PWID (increased screening using rapid antibody saliva tests and DBS tests [semi-quantitative viraemia and viral genotype]) was analysed through a decision tree screening model combined with the outputs of a Markov treatment model. Sensitivity and scenario analyses examined the uncertainty of results. At a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of CHF 100 000 (USD 105 000) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), the increased access screening programme was cost-effective compared to current screening, with a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 7 940 (USD 8337) per QALY. The net monetary benefit was CHF 959 802 668 (USD 1 007 792 801) for the PWID population and CHF 94 469 (USD 99 192) per person. The increased access screening programme had a 97.0% probability of being cost-effective compared to the current screening method at the WTP threshold of CHF 100 000 (USD 105 000). The results showed an increased access screening programme that uses tests which are better suited to the PWID population to be more cost-effective, due to the increased uptake that rapid antibody saliva and DBS tests generate., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Alkaptonuria (AKU) is a rare disorder with no licensed treatment; nitisinone may reduce symptoms and progression. The All Alkaptonuria Severity Score Index (AKUSSI) measures disease severity in clinical, joint and spine domains, with 57 subcomponent feature scores. Our primary aim was to assess tools for validating scores such as the AKUSSI by detecting relationships between features both before and during nitisinone treatment., Methods: AKUSSI measurements from nitisinone-treated patients visiting the National AKU Centre between 01-Jun-2012 and 31-May-2016 were analysed pre-treatment, at first treatment and annually to Year 3 post-treatment. Principal component analysis (PCA) and redundancy analysis assessed whether any AKUSSI features contributed little information to the overall score., Results: 65 AKU patients were included: 17 with a pre-treatment AKUSSI measurement (10 later received nitisinone) and 48 with a first measurement at their first treatment visit. In PCA, the first four principal components (PC1-PC4) explained ≥50% of AKUSSI variance at all visits (54.1-87.3%). Some features regularly dominated their domain's PC1: ears, aortic sclerosis, and nasal/temporal eye scores (clinical), pain-related scores (joint) and cervical, lumbar and thoracic spine scores (spine). Only the right-hand/wrist score was consistently redundant. Right eye (nasal) and left ear scores were redundant pre-treatment, potentially correlating with other dominant clinical PC1 features., Conclusions: PCA and redundancy analysis supported the AKUSSI as a robust AKU disease severity measure, although some AKUSSI features could be removed for simplicity. For small patient populations and rare diseases, PCA and redundancy analysis together can aid validation of disease severity metrics.