1. An Automated Insulin Delivery System with Automatic Meal Bolus Based on a Hand-Gesturing Algorithm.
- Author
-
Roy A, Grosman B, Benedetti A, Engheta B, Miller D, Laron-Hirsh M, Cohen Y, Ré R, Edd SN, Vigersky R, Cohen O, and Tirosh A
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Dietary Carbohydrates administration & dosage, Feasibility Studies, Meals, Smartphone, Algorithms, Blood Glucose analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 drug therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 blood, Hypoglycemic Agents administration & dosage, Insulin administration & dosage, Insulin Infusion Systems
- Abstract
Background: Carbohydrate counting (CC) and meal announcements, before eating, introduce a significant burden for individuals managing type 1 diabetes (T1D). An automated insulin delivery system with automatic bolusing that eliminates the need for CC and premeal bolusing (i.e., a hands-free closed-loop [HFCL] system) was assessed in a feasibility trial of adults with T1D. Methods: The system included the MiniMed™ 780G pump and a smartphone-paired smartwatch with the Klue application (Klue, Inc.) that detects eating and drinking gestures. A smartphone algorithm converted gestures into carb amounts that were transmitted to the pump for automatic bolusing. For 5 days, participants ( N = 17, 18-75 years of age) used the system at home with meal announcements based on traditional CC, with the Klue application disabled (Home-stay phase). Thereafter, participants moved to a supervised hotel setting, where the Klue application was enabled for 5 days and meals were not announced (Hotel-stay phase). Participants consumed the same eight test meals (six solid and two liquid) of varying caloric and carb size at the same time and day of the week for both phases, and glycemic metrics were compared. Otherwise, there were no other meal restrictions. Results: The overall time in range (70-180 mg/dL) was 83.4% ± 7.0% and 80.6% ± 6.7% for the Home-stay and Hotel-stay, respectively ( P = 0.08). The average time at <70 mg/dL was 3.1% and 3.0% ( P = 0.9144), respectively, and the average time at >180 mg/dL was 13.5% and 16.3% ( P = 0.1046), respectively. Postprandial glycemia following low-carb test meals was similar between the two phases. The system's ability to accommodate high-carb meals was somewhat limited. There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. Conclusion: Preliminary findings show that a HFCL system was safe and maintained overall glycemic control, similar to that observed with traditional CC and manual meal bolusing. By eliminating these daily T1D burdens, a HFCL system may improve quality of life for individuals with T1D. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04964128.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF