Search

Objectives: Edaravone (EDR) is an effective neuroprotective agent in various neurological diseases; however, its use is restricted due to poor oral absorption. Bile salts are known for improving solubility and inhibiting drug crystallization in supersaturated conditions of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). In our previous work, we prepared coamorphous dispersion (COAM) of EDR with sodium taurocholate (NaTC) using spray drying. The optimized EDR COAM exhibited superior in vitro performance compared to plain EDR. EDR is well absorbed in fasted-over-fed conditions., Methods: The present work, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study for EDR and EDR COAM in fasted and fed conditions to check effect of food on its oral absorption. The LC-MS/MS-based method was developed and validated to determine the amount of EDR in plasma., Results: The results suggested that EDR COAM did not show a significant difference in C max (P=0.3544) and AUC (P=0.1696) of fasted and fed states. On the other hand, plain EDR showed 2-fold and 3-fold reduced C max (P<0.0001) and AUC (P=0.0094) in the fed condition, respectively. The C max and AUC of EDR COAM were improved in fasted (AUC: 2.56-fold) and fed states (AUC: 5.74-fold) than plain EDR, suggesting better oral absorption of COAM than crystalline EDR without having the effect of food., Conclusions: The unique structural attributes of NaTC had the potential to inhibit the recrystallization of EDR in GIT, while concurrently reducing the impact of food on the oral absorption of EDR., (Copyright © 2024 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Edaravone is a neuroprotective agent approved as an intravenous treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The intravenous administration of edaravone places a burden on patients and there is a clinical need for oral agents for the treatment of ALS. This report aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of an edaravone oral suspension in patients with ALS after oral and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube administration., Methods: Two single-dose, open-label phase 1 clinical studies were conducted. Edaravone oral suspension (105 mg of edaravone in 5 mL aqueous suspension) was administered orally and via PEG tube to 9 and 6 Japanese patients with ALS, respectively. Plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of unchanged edaravone and its metabolites (sulfate and glucuronide conjugates) were determined. Safety was also evaluated., Findings: After reaching maximum plasma concentration, the mean plasma concentration-time of unchanged edaravone showed a triphasic elimination. Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of the metabolites were higher than those of unchanged edaravone. The mean urinary excretion ratios were higher for the glucuronide conjugate than for either unchanged edaravone or the sulfate conjugate. In patients administered edaravone orally, a single adverse event occurred (blood urine present), which was mild and improved without medical intervention. No adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events were reported. In patients administered edaravone via PEG tube, 5 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 3 patients; none were related to the study drug. No adverse drug reactions were reported., Implications: In patients with ALS, a single dose of edaravone oral suspension was well absorbed and mainly eliminated in urine as the glucuronide conjugate. No safety concerns emerged. Pharmacokinetics were similar to those previously reported in healthy participants following oral administration. This indicates that effective drug concentrations were achieved and edaravone can be successfully administered both orally and via a PEG tube in patients with ALS., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04176224 (oral administration) and NCT04254913 (PEG tube administration), www., Clinicaltrials: gov., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest H. Shimizu, Y. Nishimura, Y. Shiide, M. Akimoto, M. Yashiro, M. Ueda, and M. Hirai are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. H. Yoshino has received honoraria from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. T. Mizutani and H. Sekino have received grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. K. Kanai and O. Kano have received grants and honoraria from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. H. Kimura and K. Ito have no conflicts of interest. The study sponsor had a role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Two established disease-specific therapies for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are riluzole and edaravone. Limitations of these medications include minimal progression slowing or survival benefit, and effectiveness only in selected populations, particularly for edaravone. AMX0035 and tofersen received US FDA approval in September 2022 and April 2023, respectively. However, phase 3 trials, further examining both medications' efficacy, are ongoing. CNM-Au8 is an efficient catalyst of energy metabolism and is therefore a potential disease-modifying treatment for ALS, a neurodegenerative condition in which there is bioenergetics impairment., Areas Covered: In this review, we provide an overview of the current ALS treatment market, followed by a description of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of CNM-Au8. The main preclinical and available early clinical evidence of CNM-Au8 is then described, as well as its potential as an ALS treatment., Expert Opinion: Oral treatment with CNM-Au8 failed to meet primary clinical and electrodiagnostic endpoints in phase 2/3 clinical trials. Despite this failure, a number of exploratory endpoints included in phase 2/3 trials suggest CNM-Au8 has the potential to significantly slow clinical worsening, improve quality of life, and prolong survival in ALS. Further study of CNM-Au8 in a phase 3 clinical trial is currently underway.

The clinical application of EDV, a potent antioxidant drug approved for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is limited by its short biological half-life and poor water solubility necessitating hospitalization during intravenous infusion. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery constitutes a powerful tool through inferring drug stability and targeted drug delivery improving drug bioavailability at the diseased site. Nose-to-brain drug delivery offers direct access to the brain bypassing the blood brain barrier and reducing systemic biodistribution. In this study, we designed EDV-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based polymeric nanoparticles (NP-EDV) for intranasal administration. NPs were formulated by the nanoprecipitation method. Morphology, EDV loading, physicochemical properties, shelf-life stability, in vitro release and pharmacokinetic assessment in mice were conducted. EDV was efficiently loaded into ∼90 nm NPs, stable up to 30 days of storage, at ∼3% drug loading. NP-EDV reduced H 2 O 2 -induced oxidative stress toxicity in mouse microglial cell line BV-2. Optical imaging and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) showed that intranasal delivery of NP-EDV offered higher and more sustained brain uptake of EDV compared to intravenous administration. This study is the first of its kind to develop an ALS drug in a nanoparticulate formulation for nose-to-brain delivery raising hope to ALS patients where currently treatment options are limited to two clinically approved drugs only., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and incurable neurodegenerative disease. While pharmacotherapy options remain limited, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved intravenous (IV) and oral edaravone for the treatment of ALS in 2017 and 2022, respectively. With the addition of oral edaravone, patients with ALS may exclusively use oral medications., Areas Covered: The authors performed a review of the published literature using the United States (US) National Library of Medicine's PubMed.gov resource to describe the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of oral edaravone, as well as pertinent completed and ongoing clinical trials, including the oral edaravone clinical trial development program. The clinical profile of oral edaravone is also discussed., Expert Opinion: Edaravone has been shown to slow the rate of motor function deterioration experienced by patients with ALS. As the oral formulation has been approved, patients with ALS may use it alone or in combination with other approved therapeutics. Additional clinical trials and real-world evidence are ongoing to gain further understanding of the clinical profile of oral edaravone.

Intravenous (IV) edaravone is approved as an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) treatment. Because IV administration places a burden on patients, development of orally administered ALS treatments is needed. Therefore, 2 phase 1 studies of oral formulations of edaravone in healthy subjects examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, racial differences, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and investigated the dose of the oral formulation considered to be bioequivalent to the approved dose of the IV formulation. Study 1 was a placebo-controlled, randomized, single-blind study of single-ascending-dose oral edaravone with the dose range of 30 to 300 mg (n = 56). Study 2 was conducted in 2 cohorts (n = 84); the first assessed DDIs with multiple-dose edaravone 120 mg/day given over 5 or 8 days (coadministered with single-dose rosuvastatin, sildenafil, or furosemide), and the second evaluated PK and racial (Japanese/White) differences in PK parameters with doses of 100-mg edaravone. The oral formulation of edaravone was well absorbed, and plasma concentrations of unchanged edaravone increased more than dose proportionally within the dose range of 30 to 300 mg. No effect of race on oral edaravone PK and no notable DDI effects possibly caused by orally administered edaravone were observed. The oral edaravone formulations were safe and tolerable under the assessed conditions. Mathematical modeling determined that equivalent exposures in plasma with the approved dose of the IV edaravone formulation, as reported previously, could be achieved when the oral edaravone formulation was administered at a dose of  ≈100 mg, with an absolute bioavailability of ≈60%., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

This randomized, single-blind, 3-way crossover study assessed the effect of edaravone on QT interval, including an exposure-response analysis. Twenty-seven healthy Japanese male volunteers, aged 20 to 49 years, were randomly assigned to receive a single intravenous dose of each treatment in 1 of 3 sequences (n = 9 each): ACB, BAC, and CBA, where A was edaravone 60 mg (therapeutic dose), B was edaravone 300 mg (supratherapeutic dose), and C was normal saline (placebo). Electrocardiographs were collected to assess treatment effects. In an exposure-response analysis, a linear model was determined to be valid and indicated no statistically significant positive slope for the relationship between change from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF) and edaravone concentration (0.000155 ms/(ng/mL); P = .1478); upper bounds of 2-sided 90% confidence intervals after placebo adjustment (ΔΔQTcF) were <10 milliseconds at the geometric mean maximum concentration for each edaravone dose. Overall estimated values by time point of ΔΔQTcF ≤0.9 milliseconds, no outlier values, and no morphologic changes suggestive of repolarization abnormalities were observed. Analysis of heart rate, PR interval, and QRS duration also revealed no adverse findings. These data indicate that edaravone, even at supratherapeutic doses, does not produce clinically meaningful QT prolongation and has no clinically relevant cardiac effects., (© 2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare edaravone pharmacokinetic (PK) variables and tolerability after a single intravenous (IV) infusion of 30 mg over 60 min in subjects with mild renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), moderate renal impairment (30-59 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), or normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 )., Methods: This open-label, single-dose study was conducted in Japan. After a screening period of up to 3 weeks, all subjects received a single IV dose of edaravone 30 mg/h on day 1. Blood samples were collected for PK analysis of edaravone and its sulfate conjugate for up to 48 h postdose., Findings: Edaravone was administered to 30 subjects: 11 with mild (Group 1), 8 with moderate (Group 2), and 11 with no (Group 3) renal impairment. Although geometric least-squares mean values for C max and AUC 0-∞ for unchanged edaravone were 1.15- and 1.20-fold greater in Group 1 than in Group 3, and were 1.25- and 1.30-fold greater in Group 2 than in Group 3, no statistically significant differences in exposure (C max and AUC) to edaravone were noted between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The geometric least-squares mean values for C max and AUC 0-∞ for the sulfate conjugate were 1.41- and 1.50-fold greater in Group 1 than in Group 3, and 1.41- and 1.97-fold greater in Group 2 than in Group 3. Differences in exposure (C max and AUC) to the sulfate conjugate of edaravone were statistically significant between the 3 study groups (P < 0.0001). A total of 5 treatment-emergent adverse events in 3 subjects in Group 1 were considered by the investigator to be reasonably related to edaravone: headache (2 events/2 subjects), vomiting (2 events/1 subjects), and increased blood bilirubin level (n = 1). These treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and recovered without sequelae., Implications: Mild to moderate renal impairment had no clinically significant effects on the PK profile of edaravone in Japanese subjects, relative to individuals with normal renal function, and there were no significant safety concerns. Thus, edaravone dosage adjustments are unlikely to be needed in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03289208., Competing Interests: Disclosures All authors are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. The authors have indicated that they have no other conflicts of interest regarding the content of this article., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Two studies were conducted to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and tolerability of edaravone in Japanese subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic functioning (study 1), and in white subjects with severe hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic functioning (study 2)., Methods: Studies 1 and 2 were multicenter, open-label, single-dose studies that included subjects aged 18-75 years. In study 1, subjects were stratified into 3 different groups of hepatic functioning according to Child-Pugh score: mild hepatic impairment, score 5 or 6 (n = 8); moderate hepatic impairment, score 7-9 (n = 6); or normal hepatic functioning (n = 8). In study 2, subjects had severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 10-14; n = 6) or normal hepatic functioning (n = 6). In both studies, all subjects were given edaravone 30 mg IV infused over 60 min on the morning of day 1. Blood samples for use in PK analyses were collected from days 1-3. The PK properties (C max , AUC 0-last , and AUC 0-∞ ) of edaravone and its sulfate conjugate metabolite were measured., Findings: In study 1, the geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) C max and AUC 0-∞ of unchanged edaravone were 1.203- and 1.065-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with mild hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning, and were 1.235- and 1.142-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning. In study 2, GLSM C max and AUC 0-∞ of unchanged edaravone were 1.203- and 1.190-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with severe hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning. In both studies the AUC 0-last , AUC 0-∞ , unbound AUC from time zero to infinity, and C max of unchanged edaravone were increased slightly with increases in Child-Pugh classification. No adverse events considered related to edaravone were reported, except for 1 case of sinus bradycardia in a subject with normal hepatic functioning in study 2. The event was moderate in severity, considered as possibly related to edaravone, and resolved during the study., Implications: Mild to moderate and severe hepatic impairment had no apparent clinically significant effects on the PK profile of edaravone in Japanese and white subjects, respectively, relative to individuals with normal hepatic functioning, and there were no notable tolerability concerns. Thus, edaravone dosage adjustments are unlikely to be needed in edaravone-treated patients with mild to moderate and severe hepatic impairment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03289234 (mild to moderate hepatic impairment) and NCT03664544 (severe hepatic impairment)., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Two high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods were developed and validated for the quantification of edaravone (method A) or taurine (method B) in human plasma. After protein precipitation, separations were achieved on an Ultimate XB-C8 (2.1 × 50 mm, 3.0 µm) column for edaravone and a ZORBAX SB-Aq column (2.1 × 100 mm, 3.5 µm) for taurine, respectively. The detection used electrospray ionization source via multiple reaction monitoring in positive-ion mode for edaravone and negative-ion mode for taurine, respectively. The lower limits of quantification were 10.0 ng/mL for edaravone and 3.00 μg/mL for taurine. The selectivity, accuracy, and precision of the methods were all within acceptable limits. Two methods were successfully applied to a drug-drug interaction study and a pharmacokinetic study of edaravone and taurine in healthy Chinese volunteers after intravenous infusion of single or compound injection. The results showed that co-administration of edaravone with taurine increased the C max and AUC 0-24 of taurine in human plasma while taurine did not affect the systemic exposure of edaravone. Edaravone and taurine have the dose-dependent pharmacokinetic profiles in human., (© 2020 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Purpose: Edaravone is a free-radical scavenger with relatively favorable properties of brain penetration. It has been approved for the indications of acute ischemic stroke and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to establish a pharmacokinetic (PK) model to fit the PK profile of edaravone after a single sublingual (SL) dose of a novel edaravone tablet and single IV infusion of injectable edaravone in healthy Chinese volunteers participating in a bioavailability study. The model is expected to be useful for predicting the concentration-time profiles of edaravone following different dosing regimens in a healthy Chinese population. The purposes were to identify an optimal dose and dosing regimen for the new SL formulation and to support future clinical exploration of this tablet product in its approved indications and other therapeutic fields being developed., Methods: The PK profiles after a single SL dose or IV infusion of edaravone 30 mg can be well described by a 3-compartment linear disposition model, on which a first-order absorption model with a lag time and a parameter for bioavailability was incorporated to fit the absorption phase of the SL dose. Performance of these PK models was evaluated for goodness of fit, residual trends, visual predictive checks, as well as precision of model predictions against external data. The validated models were employed for simulating the PK profiles of edaravone after a single SL dose of 60 mg and IV infusion of 60 mg for 60 min., Findings: The resultant estimates support the possibility and feasibility of demonstrating bioequivalence between an SL administration of edaravone 60 mg and the currently approved dosing regimen for ALS (ie, 60 mg IV over 60 min) once per day. The calculation of sample size suggested that the requirement for subject number was acceptable considering the general capacity of a Phase I study center, and so were the procedures defined in the protocol., Implication: The models can be further applied to simulate favorable concentration-time profiles in diseases with different underlying courses of oxidative stress, and hence facilitate the optimization of current dosing regimens., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive fatal disorder that affects all skeletal muscles, leading to death, mostly within 2-4 years from onset. To date, the anti-glutamatergic drug riluzole is the only drug that has been approved for the treatment of this disease; however, its efficacy is modest. Oxidative stress is considered to be involved in the pathology of ALS, and in this regard, the free radical scavenger edaravone, which was originally developed for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, has also been developed for the treatment of ALS. Areas covered: This review describes the pharmacological properties of edaravone and the progress of clinical trials conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this drug in the treatment of ALS. Expert commentary: Edaravone is the first drug to show effective inhibition of the motor function deterioration experienced by ALS patients with early-stage probable and definite types. In order to effectively prolong the quality of motor function, edaravone treatment should be initiated as soon as the diagnosis has been confirmed; however, the respiratory function should be carefully monitored when a deterioration in breathing capacity is detected.

The recent approval of edaravone has provided an intravenous option to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in addition to the existing oral agent, riluzole. The present work was primarily undertaken to provide a comprehensive clinical pharmacokinetic summary of the two approved ALS therapeutics. The key objectives of the review were to (i) tabulate the clinical pharmacokinetics of riluzole and edaravone with emphasis on absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties; (ii) provide a comparative scenario of the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs wherever possible; and (iii) provide perspectives and introspection on the gathered clinical pharmacokinetic data of the two drugs with appropriate conjectures to quench scientific curiosity. Based on this review, the following key highlights were deduced: (i) as a result of both presystemic metabolism and polymorphic hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism, the oral drug riluzole exhibited more inter-subject variability than that of intravenous edaravone; (ii) using various parameters for comparison, including the published intravenous data for riluzole, it was apparent that edaravone was achieving the desired systemic concentrations to possibly drive the local brain concentrations for its efficacy in ALS patients with lesser variability than riluzole; (iii) using scientific conjectures, it was deduced that the availability of intravenous riluzole may not be beneficial in therapy due to its fast systemic clearance; (iv) on the contrary, however, there appeared to be an opportunity for the development of an oral dosage form of edaravone, which may potentially benefit the therapy option for ALS patients by avoiding hospitalization costs; and (v) because of the existence of pharmaco-resistance for the brain entry in ALS patients, it appeared prudent to consider combination strategies of edaravone and/or riluzole with suitable P-glycoprotein efflux-blocking drugs to gain more favorable outcomes in ALS patients.

This study was performed to determine the primary factor(s) governing the oral absorption of edaravone, a novel anti-oxidant for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, in rats. While the aqueous solubility of edaravone widely varied depending on the vehicle used, the oral bioavailability of the drug was not low when it was adequately solubilized, as evidenced by the fact that the oral exposure was high (in terms of the absolute bioavailability of 50-90%) at all dose ranges (i.e., 0.5-27 mg/kg) under solubilized conditions in rats. The sum of the in vitro clearance values for edaravone, 12.7 mL/(min × kg), obtained from metabolic stability studies with tissue-homogenates from the rat liver, kidney, intestine, and with the rat plasma, was found to be virtually identical to the systemic clearance of the drug in rats. It was noted that the liver represented over 83.9% of the total elimination with a hepatic extraction ratio of approximately 0.137, indicative of the minor role of hepatic first pass metabolism in the systemic absorption of edaravone after its oral administration. In studies with Ussing chamber with rat intestinal segments and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCKII) cells, edaravone was found to be highly permeable (i.e., P app over 10 × 10 -6  cm/s), and appeared to be a substrate for rat P-glycoprotein (P-gp; estimated K m of 421 μM). In contrast, however, the drug did not appear to be a substrate for human P-gp in transport studies with MDCKII-hMDR1 cells. Collectively, these observations suggest that the primary determining factor for the intestinal absorption of edaravone is its solubilization in vehicle/intestinal fluids, rather than permeability, pre-systemic first-pass metabolism, or efflux transport. Considering the fact that the newly approved indication of the drug would require prolonged administration, probably via oral administration, the findings reported herein provide relevant information regarding its use., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Edaravone is a free-radical scavenger. Edaravone 30mg IV has been approved for use in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Japan and China, and for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Japan and the United States. Considering the inconvenience of IV infusion in clinical practice, an oral tablet formulation of edaravone was developed but failed in 2011 due to poor bioavailability. More recently, a sublingual (SL) tablet formulation of edaravone 30mg was developed by a Good Manufacturing Practices-compliant manufacturer in China. This study explored the bioavailability of the SL tablet of edaravone and aimed to provide evidence to support decision making in future clinical development., Methods: This 2-way crossover study was conducted in 10 healthy male volunteers. Eligible subjects were randomized, in a 1:1 ratio, to 1 of 2 dosing sequences: (1) SL edaravone 30mg, followed by edaravone 30mg IV infusion given over 30 minutes; or (2) edaravone 30mg IV infusion given over 30 minutes, followed by SL edaravone 30mg. The washout period between the 2 dosing periods was at least 24hours. Serial blood samples were collected in each dosing period. The bioavailability of the SL tablet was assessed using bioavailability analysis. Tolerability was evaluated throughout the study., Findings: The plasma concentration-time profile of the SL tablet was similar to that with the IV infusion. Amean (SD) C max of 2030.2 (517.2) ng/mL was reached within a median T max of 0.875hour, which was statistically significantly longer than the median T max with IV administration (0.5 hour). The C max with SL administration corresponded to 83.92% (90% CI, 73.22%-96.18%) of the C max with the start of IV infusion (2354.0 [336.6] ng/mL). The mean AUC 0-t with SL dosing was 5420.07 (1429.75) h · ng/mL, which corresponded to 91.94% (90% CI, 86.81%-97.39%) of the AUC 0-t with IV administration (5824.42 [1338.48] h · ng/mL). Two cases of adverse events were reported during the study; both were considered by the investigator to have been possibly not related to the study treatment., Implications: The bioavailability of the SL tablet of edaravone was 91.94%. Compared with IV administration, C max with SL administration was ∼17% lower and T max was statistically significantly longer. The exposure differences can be addressed by modifying the strength of the SL tablet, and then conducting a second study to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic bioavailability of the sublingually administered new strength versus IV infusion of edaravone., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cerebral vasculature and neuronal networks will be largely destroyed due to the oxidative damage by overproduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) during a stroke, accompanied by the symptoms of ischemic injury and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption. Ceria nanoparticles, acting as an effective and recyclable ROS scavenger, have been shown to be highly effective in neuroprotection. However, the brain access of nanoparticles can only be achieved by targeting the damaged area of BBB, leading to the disrupted BBB being unprotected and to turbulence of the microenvironment in the brain. Nevertheless, the integrity of the BBB will cause very limited accumulation of therapeutic nanoparticles in brain lesions. This dilemma is a great challenge in the development of efficient stroke nanotherapeutics. Herein, we have developed an effective stroke treatment agent based on monodisperse ceria nanoparticles, which are loaded with edaravone and modified with Angiopep-2 and poly(ethylene glycol) on their surface (E-A/P-CeO 2 ). The as-designed E-A/P-CeO 2 features highly effective BBB crossing via receptor-mediated transcytosis to access brain tissues and synergistic elimination of ROS by both the loaded edaravone and ceria nanoparticles. As a result, the E-A/P-CeO 2 with low toxicity and excellent hemo/histocompatibility can be used to effectively treat strokes due to great intracephalic uptake enhancement and, in the meantime, effectively protect the BBB, holding great potentials in stroke therapy with much mitigated harmful side effects and sequelae.

Background: Edaravone (EDR) is known for its free radical scavenging, antiapoptotic, antinecrotic, and anticytokine effects in neurological and non-neurological diseases. It is currently available clinically as Radicava ® and Radicut ® , intravenous medications, recently approved for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and cerebral infarction. However, the oral use of EDR is still restricted by its poor oral bioavailability (BA) due to poor aqueous solubility, stability, rapid metabolism, and low permeability. The present study reports the development of novel EDR formulation (NEF) using self-nanomicellizing solid dispersion (SNMSD) strategy with the aim to enable its oral use., Materials and Methods: The selection of a suitable carrier for the development of NEF was performed based on the miscibility study. The optimization of EDR-to-carrier ratio was conducted via kinetic solubility study after preparing SNMSDs using solvent evaporation technique. The drug-polymer carrier interaction and self-nanomicellizing properties of NEF were investigated with advanced characterization studies. In vitro permeation, metabolism, and dissolution study was carried out to examine the effect of the presence of a carrier on physico-chemical properties of EDR. Additionally, the dose-dependent pharmacokinetic study of NEF was conducted and compared with the EDR suspension., Results: Soluplus ® (SOL) as a carrier was selected based on the potential for improving aqueous solubility. The NEF containing EDR and SOL (1:5) resulted in the highest enhancement in aqueous solubility (17.53-fold) due to amorphization, hydrogen bonding interaction, and micellization. Moreover, the NEF demonstrated significant improvement in metabolism, permeability, and dissolution profile of EDR. Furthermore, the oral BA of NEF showed 10.2-, 16.1-, and 14.8-fold enhancement compared to EDR suspension at 46, 138, and 414 µmol/kg doses., Conclusion: The results demonstrated that SNMSD strategy could serve as a promising way to enhance EDR oral BA and NEF could be a potential candidate for the treatment of diseases in which oxidative stress plays a key role in their pathogenesis., Competing Interests: Disclosure AP, X-FZ, and SG are the named inventors of Chinese patent 200610149832.9. Fujian Kangshimei Co, China, owns the intellectual property. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.