Search

Niacin is an effective lipid-modifying therapy whose use has been limited by suboptimal tolerability. The adverse effect of flushing is due to prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2))-mediated cutaneous vasodilation. Adjunctive treatment with the PGD(2) receptor antagonist laropiprant significantly reduces the incidence and severity of niacin-induced flushing. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of aspirin pretreatment on flushing symptoms with extended-release (ER) niacin/laropiprant in healthy volunteers. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study compared patient-rated flushing following pretreatment with aspirin 325 mg versus placebo administered 30 minutes before ER niacin 2 g/laropiprant 40 mg. Flushing responses were assessed using participant-reported overall symptom severity score (OSSS), including individual characteristics of redness, warmth, tingling, or itching. The overall incidence and severity of flushing were comparable for participants receiving aspirin or placebo before ER niacin 2 g/laropiprant 40 mg. The difference in 3-day average OSSS between treatments was 0.2 (P = .180). Profiles of flushing severity, frequency, and bothersomeness were comparable for the aspirin/ER niacin/laropiprant and ER niacin/laropiprant regimens. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. Coadministration of aspirin 325 mg daily with ER niacin 2 g/laropiprant 40 mg does not further reduce residual flushing symptoms associated with ER niacin 2 g/laropiprant 40 mg alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy may also require administration of corticosteroids, particularly patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To investigate the effect of rofecoxib on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of oral prednisone and intravenous prednisolone, the authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in 12 healthy subjects. Oral rofecoxib (250.0 mg/day for 14 days) failed to influence prednisone or prednisolone pharmacokinetics after intravenous prednisolone or oral prednisone administration. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval) of prednisolone AUC infinity (rofecoxib/placebo) following intravenous and oral corticosteroid was 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) and 0.99 (0.91, 1.08), respectively. Similarly, the prednisone AUC infinity GMRs (rofecoxib/placebo) after intravenous and oral corticosteroid were 1.03 (0.95, 1.11) and 1.08 (0.92, 1.28), respectively. The absence of an effect of rofecoxib on the pharmacokinetics of oral prednisone or intravenous prednisolone indicates that no adjustment in dose of this corticosteroid is necessary when administered concurrently with rofecoxib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effect of rofecoxib, a highly selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norethindrone (NET), two common components of a combination oral contraceptive product, was examined. A double-blind, two-period crossover study was conducted in 18 healthy women who received ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35, a combination of EE (35 microg) and NET (1 mg), concurrently for 14 days with either 175 mg rofecoxib or matching placebo during two consecutive menstrual cycles. Plasma was sampled for EE, NET, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and albumin. The AUC(0-24 h) geometric mean ratio (GMR: rofecoxib/placebo) with corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) of EE and NET was 1.13 (1.06, 1.19) and 1.18 (1.13, 1.24), respectively. The Cmax GMR of EE and NET was 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) and 1.04 (0.99, 1.09), respectively. In each case, the 90% CIs satisfied the predefined bioequivalence limits of (0.80, 1.25). Measures of SHBG and albumin and routine clinical and laboratory safety parameters showed no clinically meaningful changes. The addition of rofecoxib to the oral contraceptive was not associated with any clinically important changes in EE or NET pharmacokinetics and thus would not be anticipated to influence the efficacy of this contraceptive regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rofecoxib is a highly selective and potent inhibitor of cyclooxgenase-2 (COX-2). Methotrexate is a disease-modifying agent with a narrow therapeutic index frequently prescribed for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of clinical doses of rofecoxib on the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 25 rheumatoid arthritis patients on stable doses of methotrexate. Patients received oral methotrexate (7.5 to 20 mg) on days -1, 7, 14, and 21. Nineteen patients received rofecoxib 12.5, 25, and 50 mg once daily on days 1 to 7, 8 to 14, and 15 to 21, respectively. Six patients received placebo on days 1 to 21 only to maintain a double-blinded design for assessment of adverse experiences. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed for methotrexate and its major although inactive metabolite, 7-hydroxymethotrexate. The AUC(0-infinity) geometric mean ratios (GMR) and their 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) (rofecoxib + methotrexate/methotrexate alone) for day 7/day -1, day 14/day -1, and day 21/day -1, for rofecoxib 12.5, 25, and 50 mg, were 1.03 (0.93, 1.14), 1.02 (0.92, 1.12), and 1.06 (0.96, 1.17), respectively (p > 0.2 for all comparisons to day -1). All AUC(0-infinity), GMR and Cmax GMR 90% CIs fell within the predefined comparability limits of (0.80, 1.25). Similar results were observed for renal clearance of methotrexate and 7-hydroxymethotrexate at the highest dose of rofecoxib tested (50 mg). It was concluded that rofecoxib at doses of 12.5, 25, and 50 mg once daily has no effect on the plasma concentrations or renal clearance (tested at the highest dose of rofecoxib) of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit both cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), whose inhibition is associated with gastrointestinal ulceration, and COX-2, whose inhibition is associated with therapeutic benefits. Although agents that do not produce COX-1 activity may have fewer adverse effects, targeted disruption of the COX-2 allele in mice has resulted in severe renal problems, suggesting that COX-2 inhibition may also produce adverse effects.Objective: To determine the effect of rofecoxib, a member of the coxib class of drugs and a specific inhibitor of the COX-2 enzyme, on renal function in elderly patients.Design: A randomized, three-period, single-dose crossover study and a randomized, parallel-group, multiple-dose study.Setting: Clinical research units.Patients: 75 patients 60 to 80 years of age.Intervention: In the first study, single doses of rofecoxib, 250 mg (about 5-fold to 20-fold the recommended dose); indomethacin, 75 mg; and placebo were administered to 15 patients. In the second study, multiple doses of rofecoxib, 12.5 or 25 mg/d; indomethacin, 50 mg three times daily; or placebo were administered to 60 patients. Patients in both studies received a low-sodium dietMeasurements: Glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, and urinary and serum sodium and potassium values.Results: Compared with placebo, single doses of rofecoxib and indomethacin decreased the glomerular filtration rate by 0.23 m/s (P < 0.001) and 0.18 mL/s (P = 0.003), respectively. In contrast, respective decreases of 0.14, 0.13, and 0.10 mL/s were observed after multiple doses of rofecoxib, 12.5 mg/d (P = 0.019); rofecoxib, 25 mg (P = 0.029), and indomethacin (P = 0.086) were administered. Changes in creatinine clearance and serum and urinary sodium and potassium were less pronounced.Conclusions: The effects of COX-2 inhibition on renal function are similar to those observed with nonselective NSAIDs. Thus, COX-2 seems to play an important role in human renal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is known for the progressive decline of cognition and memory. In addition to these disease-defining symptoms, impairment of respiratory function is frequently observed and often expressed by sleep-disordered breathing or reduced ability to adjust respiration when oxygen demand is elevated. The mechanisms for this are widely unknown. Postmortem analysis from the brainstem of AD patients reveals pathological alterations, including in nuclei responsible for respiratory control. In this study, we analyzed respiratory responses and morphological changes in brainstem nuclei following intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of streptozotocin (STZ), a rat model commonly used to mimic sporadic AD. ICV-STZ induced significant astrogliosis in the commissural part of the nucleus tractus solitarii, an area highly involved in respiration control. The astrogliosis was identified by a significant increase in S100B-immunofluorescence that is similar to the astrogliosis found in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Using plethysmography, the control group displayed a typical age-dependent decrease of ventilation that was absent in the STZ rat group. This is indicative of elevated minute ventilation at rest after STZ treatment. Peripheral chemoreflex responses were significantly blunted in STZ rats as seen by a reduced respiratory rate and minute ventilation to hypoxia. Central chemoreflex responses to hypercapnia, on the other hand, only decreased in respiratory rate following STZ treatment. Overall, our results show that ICV-STZ induces respiratory dysfunction at rest and in response to hypoxia. This provides a new tool to study the underlying mechanisms of breathing disorders in clinical AD.

In-vitro studies were conducted to assess the impact of CYP2C9 genotype on the metabolism (methyl hydroxylation) and pharmacokinetics of celecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and CYP2C9 substrate. When compared to cDNA-expressed wild-type CYP2C9 (CYP2C9*1), the Vmax/Km ratio for celecoxib methyl hydroxylation was reduced by 34% and 90% in the presence of recombinant CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3, respectively. These data indicated that the amino acid substitution at position 359 (Ile to Leu) elicited a more pronounced effect on the metabolism of celecoxib than did a substitution at position 144 (Arg to Cys). The Vmax/Km ratio was also decreased in microsomes of livers genotyped CYP2C9*1/*2 (47% decrease, mean of two livers), or CYP2C9*1/*3 (59% decrease, one liver). In all cases, these changes were largely reflective of a decrease in Vmax, with a minimal change in Km. Based on simulations of the in-vitro data obtained with the recombinant CYP2C9 proteins, it was anticipated that the pharmacokinetics of celecoxib (as a much as a five-fold increase in plasma AUC) would be altered (versus CYP2C9*1/*1 subjects) in subjects genotyped heterozygous or homozygous for the CYP2C9*2 (Cys144) or CYP2C9*3 (Leu359) allele. In a subsequent clinical study, the AUC of celecoxib was increased (versus CYP2C9*1/*1 subjects) approximately 2.2-fold (range, 1.6-3-fold) in two CYP2C9*1/*3 subjects and one CYP2C9*3/*3 subject receiving a single oral dose (200 mg) of the drug. In contrast, there was no significant change in celecoxib AUC in two subjects genotyped CYP2C9*1/*2.

The authors examined the effect of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, rofecoxib, at steady state on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin following a single dose in healthy subjects. Each healthy subject (N = 10) received rofecoxib (75 mg once daily) or placebo for 11 days in a double-blind, randomized, balanced, two-period crossover study. A single 0.5 mg oral dose of digoxin elixir was administered on the 7th day of each 11-day period. Each treatment period was separated by 14 to 21 days. Samples for plasma and urine immunoreactive digoxin concentrations were collected through 120 hours following the digoxin dose. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were observed for any of the calculated digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters. For digoxin AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-24), and Cmax, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for (rofecoxib + digoxin/placebo + digoxin) were 1.04 (0.94, 1.14), 1.02 (0.94, 1.09), and 1.00 (0.91, 1.10), respectively. The digoxin median tmax was 0.5 hours for both treatments. The harmonic mean elimination half-life was 45.7 and 43.4 hours for rofecoxib + digoxin and placebo + digoxin treatments, respectively. Digoxin is eliminated renally. The mean (SD) cumulative urinary excretion of immunoreactive digoxin after concurrent treatment with rofecoxib or placebo was 228.2 (+/- 30.8) and 235.1 (+/- 39.1) micrograms/120 hours, respectively. Transient and minor adverse events occurred with similar frequency on placebo and rofecoxib treatments, and no treatment-related pattern was apparent. Rofecoxib did not influence the plasma pharmacokinetics or renal elimination of a single oral dose of digoxin.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of 3 doses of rofecoxib (12.5, 25, and 50 mg) on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin., Methods: Two single-dose (12.5 or 50 mg of rofecoxib with 25 mg or 30 mg of oral warfarin, respectively, on day 7 of each period) trials (N = 12 men) and 1 steady-state warfarin trial (25 mg rofecoxib; N = 15, 13 men and 2 women) were completed as two-period, randomized, balanced, crossover, double-blind designs. The prothrombin time international normalized ratio (INR) and S(-) and R(+) warfarin enantiomers were assessed during 144 hours after the single warfarin doses. In the steady-state warfarin trial, after the attainment of a stable INR (1.4-1.7), the stable warfarin dose was co-administered with rofecoxib (25 mg) and placebo over two 21-day periods. After the dose of warfarin on day 21, INR and S(-) and R(+) warfarin were assessed during 24 hours., Results: Compared with placebo, rofecoxib slightly increased the INR by approximately 5% (90% confidence interval on the geometric ratio, 1.03, 1.08) and 11% (1.04, 1.19) for the two single-dose warfarin trials with 12.5 and 50 mg of rofecoxib, respectively. In the steady-state warfarin study with 25 mg of rofecoxib, the INR was increased by 8% (1.02, 1.15). Rofecoxib had no significant effect (versus placebo) on the pharmacokinetics of S(-) warfarin. However, in the 3 studies, treatment with 12.5, 25, and 50 mg of rofecoxib was associated with a 27%, 38%, and 40% increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the biologically less active R(+) warfarin., Conclusions: Rofecoxib increased plasma concentrations of the biologically less active R(+) warfarin, which accounted for a small increase in INR. The approximately 8% increase in INR at steady state with warfarin co-administered with 25 mg of rofecoxib is not likely to be clinically important in most patients taking warfarin. However, standard monitoring of INR values should be conducted when therapy with rofecoxib is initiated or changed, particularly in the first few days, for patients receiving warfarin.

Steady-state inhibitory activity of rofecoxib (Vioxx) on COX-2 versus COX-1 was compared with that of commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in 76 healthy volunteers randomized to placebo, rofecoxib 12.5 mg qd, rofecoxib 25 mg qd, diclofenac 50 mg tid, ibuprofen 800 mg tid, sodium naproxen 550 mg bid, or meloxicam 15 mg qd. All of these doses include the high end of the approved clinical dose range. Ex vivo whole-blood assays were used to determine the effect on COX-2 and COX-1 activity, respectively. Urinary prostanoids were also measured. Mean inhibition of COX-2 (measured as the weighted average inhibition [WAI] of lipopolysaccharide [LPS]-induced PGE2 generation over 8 hours on day 6 vs. baseline) was -2.4%, 66.7%, 69.2%, 77.5%, 93.9%, 71.4%, and 71.5% for placebo, rofecoxib 12.5 mg, rofecoxib 25 mg, meloxicam, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen, respectively. Corresponding values for mean inhibition of COX-1 (measured as TXB2 generation in clotting whole blood) were -5.15%, 7.98%, 6.65%, 53.3%, 49.5%, 88.7%, and 94.9%. Rofecoxib had no significant effect on urinary excretion of 11-dehydro TXB2, a COX-1-derived product. These data support the contention that rofecoxib is the only drug of the regimens tested that uniquely inhibits COX-2 without affecting COX-1.

Two isozymes (types 1 and 2) of 5alpha-reductase (5alphaR; EC 1.3.99.5), with differential tissue distribution, catalyze the reduction of testosterone (T) to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in humans. This study examined sequentially increasing oral doses of MK-386 (4,7beta-dimethyl-4-aza-5alpha-cholestan-3-one), an azasteroid that specifically inhibits the human 5alphaR1 isozyme in vitro. Finasteride, a selective inhibitor of 5alphaR2, was included for comparison. One hundred men were evaluated in a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential, increasing dose, parallel group trial. Ten to 20 subjects received MK-386, and 2 to 5 received placebo in each of 6 panels. In 1 panel, 10 subjects received finasteride (5 mg), and 5 received placebo. Treatments were given once daily for 14 days, except in 1 panel in which MK-386 was administered 10 mg twice daily for comparison to 20 mg daily. Serum, sebum, and semen DHT concentrations and serum and sebum T concentrations were measured before and after treatment. The mean changes from baseline on day 14 for serum DHT after placebo and 0.1, 0.5, 5, 20, and 50 mg MK-386 were 6.9%, 4.6%, -2.7%, -1.2%, -14.1% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), and -22.2% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), respectively. No significant alterations in serum T were observed after any dose of MK-386. Serum DHT fell 65.8% from the baseline 14 days after finasteride treatment (P < 0.05 vs. placebo). The mean changes from baseline on day 14 in sebum DHT were 5.0%, 3.0%, -25.4% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), -30.1% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), and -49.1% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo) for the placebo and 0.5, 5, 20, and 50 mg MK-386 groups, respectively. Finasteride also reduced sebum DHT, but to a lesser extent (- 14.9%; P < 0.05 vs. placebo). Reciprocal increases in sebum T concentration were noted at doses of 5 mg or more of MK-386, but not with finasteride. The mean reduction in semen DHT with 5 mg finasteride was approximately 88% (P < 0.01 vs. placebo); no significant change in semen DHT was noted with 20 or 50 mg MK-386. Serum 3alpha-androstanediol glucuronide values were also reduced after the 20- and 50-mg MK-386 treatments in parallel with the changes in serum DHT. No meaningful changes were observed in serum LH after MK-386 treatment. MK-386 was generally well tolerated by all subjects; reversible aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase elevations were observed in two subjects at the 50-mg dose. The differential responses in serum, sebum, and semen DHT concentrations associated with MK-386 and finasteride treatments are consistent with those changes anticipated for selective inhibitors of the human 5alphaR isozymes. Dose-dependent suppression of sebum DHT by a 5alphaR1 inhibitor suggests the potential utility of such compounds in the treatment of acne.

Two isozymes (types 1 and 2) of 5 alpha-reductase (5 alpha R; EC 1.3.99.5), with differential tissue distribution, have been identified in humans. These enzymes catalyze the reduction of testosterone (T) to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). The contributions of each of these isozymes to serum and tissue concentrations of DHT remain to be fully defined. Finasteride, a selective inhibitor of type 2 5 alpha R, lowers circulating DHT levels by approximately 70% in men after treatment with 5 mg daily. MK-386 (4,7 beta-dimethyl-4-aza-5 alpha-cholestan-3-one) is a new selective inhibitor of type 1 5 alpha R. A single rising dose, alternating panel, trial in 16 healthy males (age range, 21-25 yr) studied the effect of 0.1-100 mg MK-386. DHT was maximally reduced by 20-30% relative to placebo at MK-386 doses of 10 mg or more, orally, by 24 h posttreatment (P < 0.01 vs. placebo). No consistent effect on T concentrations was evident. In a second trial, finasteride (5 mg) was given for 19 days to 10 healthy young men (age range, 24-47 yr); a 25-mg dose of MK-386 was added for 2 days of combination therapy after at least 10 days of finasteride treatment. Withdrawal of MK-386 was followed by 5-6 days of finasteride follow-up treatment. Finasteride alone reduced DHT, on the average, by 68.7% (SE = 3.4%). Addition of MK-386 suppressed DHT by 89.5% (SE = 1.4%) relative to baseline (P < 0.01 vs. effect of finasteride alone). Small increases in serum T were observed with finasteride alone and in combination with MK-386 (approximately 10% and 19%, respectively). These data are consistent with selective 5 alpha R type 1 inhibition in man by MK-386 and the prediction that types 1 and 2 5 alpha R account for all, or nearly all, of circulating DHT. Further clinical trials are needed to assess the therapeutic utility of type 1 5 alpha R inhibition as well as that of combined inhibition of types 1 and 2 5 alpha R.

A famotidine wafer that rapidly disperses on the tongue without water is a novel alternative to other histamine2 (H2)-antagonist dosage forms. Benefits associated with such a dosage form include convenience and potentially improved compliance for patients who dislike or have difficulty taking tablets and capsules. This report describes the research of three studies on the famotidine wafer dosage form. In the first trial, the bioequivalence and tolerability of the new 40-mg famotidine wafer and the marketed 40-mg famotidine tablet were studied in a 2-period crossover study (n = 18). The two formulations were bioequivalent as assessed by area under the plasma concentration versus time curve and maximum plasma concentration of famotidine. The plasma concentration of famotidine associated with 50% inhibition of pentagastrin stimulated gastric acid secretion (EC50; 10 ng/mL) was attained on average within 0.5 hours post-dose for the wafer and tablet. In a second trial, the tolerability of the famotidine 20-mg and 40-mg wafers or placebo given twice daily (bid) for 14 days were evaluated (n = 192). Both wafer strengths were well and equally tolerated. In a third trial of 450 subjects, the 40-mg wafer was preferred over tablets by 75% of the subjects, when they were asked to consider the method of administration and flavor. When used as an alternative to tablets and other conventional dosage forms, the wafers have the potential therapeutic benefit of improved compliance. It is concluded that similar systemic exposure, excellent tolerability, palatability, and preference make the famotidine wafer a clinically acceptable and convenient dosage from for patients on H2-antagonist therapy.

MK-679 (R(-)-3-((3-(2-(7-chloro-2-quinolinyl)ethenyl)phenyl)(3- (dimethylamino)-3-oxo-propyl)thio)methyl)thio)propanoic acid) is a potent and specific LTD4-receptor antagonist. The disposition of MK-679 was investigated in a three-way crossover study in 12 healthy males receiving single intravenous doses of 75, 250, and 500 mg of MK-679. A greater than proportional increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of MK-679 was observed with increase in dose. The plasma concentration data for each subject fitted well to the differential equations for a two-compartment model with linear tissue distribution and Michaelis-Menten elimination from the central compartment, indicating that the elimination of MK-679 in humans is saturable. In a previous study, the disposition of MK-679 in humans was also dose-dependent when given together with its S(+)-isomer, L-668,018. Thus, the disposition of MK-679 in humans is dose-dependent regardless of the presence of its stereoisomer. Also, the bioavailability of MK-679 was determined in six healthy males receiving simultaneously an oral dose of 250 mg of MK-679 and intravenous infusion of 1 mg 14C-MK-679. Results of this study indicate that the oral bioavailability of MK-679 is nearly quantitative.

One hundred ten patients of both sexes with mild to moderate essential hypertension were studied in this double-blind, multicenter study. In the double-blind portion of this study, which covered weeks 11 to 14, 71 patients were evaluated to determine the effect of Clinoril (sulindac, MSD), piroxicam, and placebo on the hypotensive effect of propranolol. All 110 patients were considered for safety evaluation. Patients treated with propranolol alone were distributed randomly into three groups (Clinoril, piroxicam and placebo) and compared in a 15-week study with four periods (I through IV). Having fulfilled the criteria for hypertension (I) and having been successfully controlled with propranolol alone (II), patients were entered into a double-blind period (III) comparing the three drug treatments during four weeks followed by one week of propranolol alone (IV). During period III, patients treated with piroxicam had significantly greater (p less than 0.05) increases in supine and standing diastolic blood pressure than patients treated with Clinoril. No clinical difference was shown between patients treated with Clinoril and placebo. At the end of period IV patients treated with piroxicam maintained the increase in their diastolic blood pressure, in contrast to Clinoril and placebo where no clinical difference was noted. Significantly more patients treated with piroxicam than Clinoril had a 10 mmHg or greater increase of their supine diastolic blood pressure. These results show that Clinoril does not blunt the antihypertensive effect of propranolol in patients with mild to moderate hypertension in contrast to piroxicam. This is an extension of a report previously published in Advances in Therapy, Vol. 2, No. 4, July/August 1985.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was carried out to compare the efficacy and tolerance of sulindac (200 mg twice daily) with placebo in the symptomatic treatment for 7 days of 312 adult patients with upper respiratory tract infection. Investigators and patients rated sulindac superior to placebo in the overall evaluations of response to treatment, but the differences were not significant. In general, patients treated with sulindac had greater mean decreases from baseline scores for individual signs and symptoms than did placebo patients. Fever was relieved better by sulindac than by placebo. The mean decrease from baseline pain scores was also greater in the sulindac group. More patients receiving sulindac reported clinical adverse experiences compared with those on placebo, the most common adverse experiences reported being in the digestive system.