Search

Background: Individuals with Huntington's disease (HD) experience a variety of motor and non-motor symptoms, but little is known about how these symptoms are related to one another. It is important to characterize the deficits present and explore the relationships among these symptoms in order to provide high quality clinical care. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize gait, balance, and physical activity level in individuals with HD and explore the relationships among motor and non-motor symptoms. Methods: Individuals completed one lab visit and wore a sensor for seven days to capture physical activity level. During the lab visit, gait, balance, and cognitive status were assessed using validated measures. A 2 × 2 ANOVA (Group×Condition) was used to assess differences in gait between individuals with HD vs. controls, while t-tests were used for other clinical measures. Correlations as well as a mixed effects model explored relationships among clinical measures in the HD group. Results: Individuals with HD walk significantly slower and have significantly worse balance than controls. Gait velocity and balance were significantly correlated with cognitive status in individuals with HD. Additionally, balance performance and balance confidence were not significantly correlated, indicating that there may be a lack of self-awareness of deficits present in individuals with HD. In-lab measures were not significant predictors of physical activity. Conclusions: Motor impairments in individuals with HD are correlated with cognitive impairment. Clinicians should be aware of the impact of cognitive impairment when selecting interventions to address motor symptoms in individuals with HD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To understand therapeutic priorities, a secondary data analysis on a retrospective cohort was conducted to classify rehabilitation goals according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Materials and Methods: Therapeutic goals from an initial outpatient physical or occupational therapy evaluation for patients post-stroke or with Parkinson disease, were classified into Level 1 of the ICF. Goals in the Activity and Participation component were further sub-classified as activity capacity or activity performance (self-report or direct) in daily life. Results: 776 goals across 104 participants were classified into Level 1 of the ICF. The majority, 73% (563/776) were classified as Activity and Participation, 20% (155/776) as Body Function and 2% (17/776) as Environmental Factors. Fifty-two percent (400/776) of all goals were classified as activity capacity and 21% (163/776) as activity performance in daily life, with 21% (160/776) of goals measuring self-report activity performance in daily life and less than 1% (3/776) of goals measuring direct activity performance in daily life. Conclusions: While the majority of therapeutic goals were classified into the Activity and Participation component, less than 1% of goals measured direct activity performance in daily life. If people seek outpatient rehabilitation to improve functioning in their real-world environment, therapeutic goal setting should reflect this. PREVIOUS PRESENTATION WORK: Portions of this content were presented at the 2023 Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy Annual Conference and will be presented at the 2023 TIRR & UT Health International Stroke Rehab & Recovery Conference. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The majority of therapeutic goals for an episode of outpatient neurorehabilitation were classified into the Activity and Participation component of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. However, less than 1% of therapeutic goals measured direct activity performance in daily life. If people with neurological diagnoses seek out outpatient rehabilitation to improve functioning in their real-world environment, than therapeutic goal setting should reflect this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been increasing research on the impact of dance as a therapeutic intervention and alternative exercise for improving physical health and psychosocial outcomes. Prior reviews center on specific populations, such as those living with Parkinson’s disease or older adults, but few center on a specific dance style such as classical ballet. This review aims to synthesize the current literature on classical ballet as a therapeutic intervention for novices and analyze its effects on movement outcomes, perceived value, and other health outcomes to inform future research directions. In total, 23 articles were identified using PubMed and Scopus from inception through March 2022; 14 that met the inclusion criteria are discussed in this review. Altogether, the literature is extremely mixed–spanning different populations, intervention protocols, doses, and measurement tools–making comparisons difficult. Overall, classical ballet appears to be a safe and feasible intervention for multiple populations. Engaging in classical ballet may be associated with improvements in balance and postural control and has a high perceived value among participants and instructors, but the evidence is limited and of poor quality. Rigorous research is required to provide stronger, more credible evidence on the potential value of classical ballet as a therapeutic intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

People with Parkinson disease demonstrate increased gait variability, but the primary variability sources are poorly understood. People with Parkinson disease and freezing of gait (freezers) have greater gait impairments than people with Parkinson disease without freezing of gait (nonfreezers), which may relate to cerebellar dysfunction. Thirteen freezers and 31 nonfreezers completed backward, forward, and forward with dual task gait trials. Sagittal joint angle waveforms were extracted for the hip, knee, and ankle using 3D motion capture. Decomposition indices were calculated for the 3 joint combinations. Principal component analysis extracted variance sources from the joint waveforms. Freezers had significantly greater decomposition between hip–ankle (F1,42 = 5.1, P =.03) and hip–knee (F1,42 = 5.3, P =.03) movements. The principal component analysis did not differentiate freezers and nonfreezers; however, primary variance sources differed between conditions. Primary variance during forward and forward with dual task gait came from joint angle magnitude and peak angle timing. Backward gait showed primary variance from joint angle magnitude and range of motion. The results show that freezers decompose movement more than nonfreezers, implicating cerebellar involvement in freezing of gait. Primary variance differs between gait conditions, and tailoring gait interventions to address variability sources may improve intervention efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]