Search

Background: Current trends in breast reconstruction demonstrate that a majority of reconstructive procedures are now favoring alloplastic or implant-based approaches. Recent research on alloplastic reconstruction indicates that it may be safely performed in a one-stage, direct-to-implant procedure after mastectomy. This study ultimately aims to evaluate how the rates of complications requiring readmission or unplanned surgery differ among patients who were discharged on the same day as their mastectomy followed by reconstruction compared to those admitted overnight following their procedures. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients that underwent immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction between 2011 and 2021 at Emory University Hospitals was conducted. Patient demographic features, surgical technique (laterality, one vs. two-step reconstruction), and surgical outcomes (complication type, complication frequency) were considered. Results: Of 657 patients that underwent immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction, 559 (85%) patients were discharged following overnight admission, and 98 (15%) patients were discharged on the same day. Analysis of patient characteristics revealed no significant differences in age (p = 0.4937), BMI (p = 0.8607), hypertension (p = 0.7103), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.8271), or active tobacco use (p = 0.1818). Between same-day discharge and overnight admission cohorts, there was no significant difference in rates of overall complications (p = 0.2517), major complications (p = 0.8222), or minor complications (p = 0.3908). Complications included rates of hematoma (p > 0.9999), seroma (p > 0.9999), major (p = 0.7923) and minor (p > 0.9999) infection, major (p > 0.9999) and minor delayed wound healing (p = 0.7034, and implant/expander loss (p = 0.4768). Conclusions: This study presents evidence that same-day discharge following mastectomy and breast reconstruction is a safe option, associated with statistically comparable rates of complication as overnight discharges. However, patient education in the preoperative period is critical to its successful implementation and realization of healthcare savings. Level of Evidence: Level III, risk / prognostic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols optimize perioperative care and improve recovery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ERAS in one- or two-level posterior lumbar fusion surgeries, focusing on perioperative medication use, pain management, and functional outcomes. Methods: Eighty-eight patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery between March 2021 and February 2022 were allocated into pre-ERAS (n = 41) and post-ERAS (n = 47) groups. Outcomes included opioid and antiemetic consumption, pain scores (numerical rating scale (NRS)), functional recovery (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D)), and complication rates. Pain was assessed daily for the first four postoperative days and at 6 months. Linear Mixed Effects Model analysis evaluated pain trajectories. Results: The post-ERAS group showed significantly lower opioid (p = 0.005) and antiemetic (p < 0.001) use. No significant differences were observed in NRS pain scores in the first 4 postoperative days. At 6 months, the post-ERAS group reported significantly lower leg pain (p = 0.002). The time:group interaction was not significant for back (p = 0.848) or leg (p = 0.503) pain. Functional outcomes at 6 months, particularly ODI and EQ-5D scores, showed significant improvement in the post-ERAS group. Complication rates were lower in the post-ERAS group (4.3% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.024), while hospital stay and fusion rates remained similar. Conclusions: The ERAS protocol significantly reduced opioid and antiemetic use, improved long-term pain management and functional recovery, and lowered complication rates in lumbar fusion patients. These findings support the implementation of ERAS protocols in spinal surgery, emphasizing their role in enhancing postoperative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of applying different levels of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines to video-assisted thoracic day surgery (VATS). The goal is to determine the optimal degree of ERAS protocols and management requirements to improve postoperative recovery outcomes. Methods: It was designed as a single-centre, prospective pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT), including patients who underwent VATS at the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital, between January 2021 and November 2022. Patients were divided into Group A and Group B through convenience sampling to implement different levels of ERAS management protocols. Data collection included the baseline characteristics (gender, age, marital status, education level, BMI, PONV risk score, ASA classification), surgery-related indicators (type of surgery, pathological results, hospitalization costs, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative rehydration volume), postoperative recovery indicators (postoperative chest tube duration time, time to first postoperative ambulation and urination, postoperative complications, follow-up condition), pain-related indicators (pain threshold score, pain score at 6 h postoperatively, bedtime, and predischarge), psychological state indicators (anxiety level), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) scores, and social support scores. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized and statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.1. Comparisons of categorical variables were performed using the χ² test, while comparisons of continuous variables were conducted using ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. A significance level of α = 0.05 was set for statistical tests. Result: A total of 340 patients were included, with 187 in Group A and 153 in Group B. After propensity score matching (PSM), there were 142 patients in Group A and 105 in Group B, with no significant baseline differences. Group A had a significantly higher proportion of chest tube removals within 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001) and earlier mobilization (P < 0.001). Despite a higher pain threshold in Group A (P = 0.016), their postoperative pain scores were not higher than those in Group B. Additionally, Group A had a lower incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusion: The more comprehensive ERAS protocol significantly improved postoperative recovery, confirming its value in day-case VATS and supporting its clinical adoption. However, the study has limitations; future research should focus on standardizing ERAS protocols and expanding their application to a broader patient population to validate these findings further. Trail Registration: This study underwent review by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University under No. 2020 (1001). It has been officially registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry, TRN: ChiCTR2100051372 and registration date is Sept. 22, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric spinal fusion surgery is a complex procedure that poses challenges in perioperative management. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach is an evidence-based, multidisciplinary strategy to optimize patient care in an individualized, multidisciplinary way. Despite the benefits of ERAS protocol implementation, the role of ERAS in pediatric spine surgery remains understudied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the current literature regarding pediatric spinal surgery ERAS protocols and their ability to decrease the length of stay, pain, time-to-stand, and complications. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane's RevMan (version 5.4). Seventeen studies totaling 2733 patients were included in this analysis. Patients treated in an ERAS protocol had significant reductions in length of stay (P < 0.001), time-to-stand (P < 0.001), total complications (P = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.001). ERAS protocol implementation can significantly enhance outcomes for pediatric patients receiving spinal surgery. Consequently, ERAS protocols have the potential to lower healthcare expenses, increase access, and set a new standard of care. Future research should be conducted to expand pediatric ERAS protocols to a diverse range of spinal pathologies and assess the long-term advantages of this practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a proven method to improve postsurgical outcomes. While recent studies have shown the benefit of ERAS even in frail patient populations, myelopathy is another factor affecting outcomes in patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion (PCF). This study evaluated the benefit of an ERAS protocol in frail patients undergoing PCF. A retrospective chart review identified consecutive patients undergoing PCF by a single surgeon from August 2015–July 2021, with implementation of ERAS in December 2018. Outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge disposition, complications, return of physiologic function, and severe pain score. A mFI-5 score of ≥ 2 and a Nurick score of ≥ 3 defined frail and myelopathic patients, respectively. Univariate analysis (P < 0.05) and multivariate analyses using mixed-effect models (P < 0.0125) were performed. There were a total of 174 patients, 71 frail (41%). Of the frail patients, 61% were also myelopathic, and 56% underwent ERAS. Of the nonfrail patients, 43% were myelopathic, and 57% underwent ERAS. On univariate analyses, frail patients with ERAS had less drains placed (P < 0.0001), decreased urinary retention (P = 0.0002), decreased LOS (P = 0.013), and were less likely to have a nonhome discharge (P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, LOS (P = 0.0003), time to return of physiologic function (P = 0.004), complications (P = 0.001), and nonhome discharges (P < 0.0001) were decreased with ERAS, irrespective of groups. ERAS is an effective protocol in PCF patients that may expedite return of physiologic function, lessen LOS, decrease the number of nonhome discharges, and reduce complications, irrespective of frailty or myelopathy status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine has shown promise in improving postoperative gastrointestinal function. In the context of colorectal surgery, the results remain inconsistent. This review aims to provide a synthesis of studies assessing the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative gastrointestinal function in colorectal surgery patients. Methods: CENTRAL, Emcare, Embase, and MEDLINE were searched up to September 2023. Randomized controlled trials involving adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing elective colorectal surgery, comparing dexmedetomidine administration to a control group, and reporting on postoperative gastrointestinal function were included. Non-comparative and emergent procedures were excluded. Primary outcome was time to first flatus or bowel movement, and secondary outcomes included length of stay and time to solid oral intake. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized studies. Results: After screening 1194 citations, eight studies were included. Studies comprised of 570 patients in the dexmedetomidine group (mean age: 65.8 years, 43% female, mean BMI: 22.7 kg/m2) and 556 patients in control group (mean age 70.6 years, 40% female, mean BMI 22.5 kg/m2). Dexmedetomidine administration resulted in a shorter time to flatus (MD -4.55 h, 95% CI: 20.14−8.95, p < 0.005, very low certainty of evidence), a shorter time to first bowel movement (MD -11.9 h, 95% CI: 18.74−5.05, p < 0.005, very low certainty of evidence), a shorter time to solid oral intake (MD -4.34 h, 95% CI: 17.43−11.24, p < 0.005, moderate certainty of evidence), and a shorter length of stay (MD -.06 days, 95% CI: 1.99−0.12, p < 0.05, very low certainty of evidence). Conclusion: In adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine results in clinically meaningful improvements in postoperative gastrointestinal function and consequently, shorter length of stay. Therefore, dexmedetomidine may serve as a valuable adjunct in enhancing postoperative recovery of patients following elective colorectal surgery, thereby reducing healthcare utilization, and improving patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the goal of improving patient outcomes, the Integrated Spine Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center implemented an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol which includes pre- and postsurgery guidelines. Numerous studies have shown benefit of implementation of ERAS protocols to standardize perioperative care in line with best practices; however, the literature on complication rates, LOS, and readmissions shows mixed results. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of the ERAS protocol implementation on complication rates in the perioperative period, as well as hospital and ICU length of stay and hospital re-admission rates. A retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients who underwent spine surgery between September 2016 and September 2021 at a single institution. Patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into non-ERAS and ERAS groups, and comparative statistics were used to evaluate ERAS protocol effectiveness. All patients who underwent spine surgery at UT Southwestern between September 2016 and September 2021 were evaluated for inclusion in the study. The patient sample was further refined to include only complex patient cases which were able to receive the full ERAS protocol (nonemergent admissions). Presence of absence of postoperative complications including surgical site infection, AKI, DVT, MI, sepsis, pneumonia, PE, stroke, shock, and other complications were compared between groups, as were hospital and ICU length of stay, and 7, 30, and 90 day readmissions. Self-reported or functional measures were not used in outcome evaluation. A database of patient and surgery characteristics was built using an EMR query tool with spot checks performed by the authors. Control and treatment groups were matched for gender, age, BMI, ASA score, and surgery type. Total number of complication rates was compared between ERAS and non-ERAS groups, and comparative statistics were used to determine significance. Significant differences between ERAS versus non-ERAS groups were found in rates of UTI (6.8% vs 3.1%, respectively; p=.031), constipation (20.6% vs 11.4%, respectively; p=.001), and any complications (31.4% vs 19.4%, respectively; p<.001). There was no significant difference in the rates of other complications, in length of hospital or ICU stay, or readmissions at 7, 30, and 90 days. Implementation of the ERAS protocol did not decrease complication rates or length of stay, and ERAS patients had significantly higher rates of UTI, constipation, and any complications. There may have been confounding factors due to the impact of COVID-19 on delivery of care, as well as misalignment between ERAS goals and outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective study aimed to compare the complication rates and clinical outcomes of propensity-matched patients who received fast-track total knee arthroplasty (FT TKA) in outpatient versus inpatient settings. Patients (n = 629) who received FT TKA at various outpatient (n = 176) and inpatient (n = 462) surgery rates were prospectively followed until 90 days after surgery. The decision between inpatient versus outpatient FT TKA was made on a case-by-case basis, depending on consultation between the surgeon and patient. Complications were collected to distinguish between intraoperative complications, complications with no readmission, complications with readmission, and complications with reoperation. Propensity scores based on age, sex, body mass index, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists score were used to match outpatient to inpatient FT TKA. A cumulative incidence function was computed by taking the time to diagnose any postoperative complication in the first 90 days as the end point. Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) for comparison resulted in 173 outpatient FT TKAs and 316 inpatient FT TKAs. No significant differences were observed between outpatient versus inpatient FT TKA for intraoperative complication rates (2% in both groups). At 90-day follow-up, no significant differences were observed between outpatient versus inpatient FT TKA for total complications with no readmission (8.0 versus 7.9%), complications with readmission but no reoperation (1.1 versus 0.6%), and complications with reoperation (4.0 versus 4.4%). A comparison of postoperative complication diagnosis time using the cumulative incidence function revealed no significant differences between outpatient versus inpatient FT TKA. The present study revealed that there were no differences in 90-day postoperative complication rates between outpatient and inpatient FT TKA and that there were also no differences in rates of intraoperative complications, readmissions, or reoperations. These findings may encourage hesitant surgeons to move toward outpatient TKA pathways, as there is no greater risk of early postoperative complications that could be more difficult to manage after discharge. Level II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The ERAS protocol is a set of international guidelines established to expedite patients' discharge after colorectal surgery. It does this by aiming to prevent postoperative complications early, and return the patient to normal function allowing earlier discharge. Complications such as PONV, DVT, ileus and pain are common after surgery to name a few, and delay discharge. Early treatment and prevention of these complications however is suggested to aid a patients' return to home at earlier rates than traditional practice. Methods: A prospective chart review and questionnaire was performed on patients undergoing colorectal surgery in UHL in a 6-month period from February to September 2023. Patients were approached on the 3rd day postoperatively and informed about the project. Exclusion criteria included patients who went to HDU or ICU postoperatively. Results: In total, 33 patients were recruited. A target of greater than 70% compliance was reached for a variety of the elements of the ERAS protocol such as laparoscopic surgery, preoperative assessments, nutritional drinks, LMWH, oral intake within 24 h of surgery, and intraoperative antiemetics. Unsatisfactory compliance was found with documentation of postoperative antibiotics use of preoperative gabapentin. Conclusion: UHL has a satisfactory compliance of over 70% with a large variety of elements of the ERAS protocol. Areas of improvement required include postoperative antibiotic and preoperative gabapentin usage. With the collective effort of the multidisciplinary team, along with education, the ERAS protocol can successfully be applied and implemented in a model 4 hospital in Ireland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was designed to improve implant position accuracy by providing surgeons with real-time intra-operative data to tailor the operation to the patient. Proponents of robotic-assisted TKA believe that this translates into meaningful improvements in outcomes. However, there are concerns that the longer surgical duration associated with robotic-assisted TKA leads to longer length of stay (LOS). In this study, the authors investigated the outcome of MAKO® Robotic-arm Assisted TKA combined with ERAS protocol to assess its effect on LOS and short-term outcomes. All patients who had undergone unilateral MAKO® ERAS Day Surgery TKA from August 2020 to July 2021 were prospectively followed up and matched to patients who underwent conventional ERAS Day Surgery TKA in the same time period. Factors such as surgical duration, LOS, immediate reduction in pain, 30-days complications, and 6-month PROMs and knee ROM were compared between the two groups. 42 patients underwent MAKO® ERAS Day surgery TKA and were matched to 42 patients who underwent conventional ERAS Day surgery TKA. The study found that despite the longer surgical duration, LOS was comparable between both groups (1.1 ± 0.9days in the MAKO® group vs 1.0 ± 0.3days in the conventional group, p = 0.755) with successful 24-hour discharge in 88.1 % of patients in the MAKO® group. The MAKO® group achieved significantly better ROM compared to the conventional group 6-months post operatively. Post-operative PROMs were comparable between both groups. ERAS Day Surgery protocol can significantly reduce the LOS of patient undergoing MAKO® Robotic-arm Assisted TKA, conferring cost savings and making it a valid option for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the implementation of enhanced recovery protocols, a significant proportion of patients experience delayed recovery. Identifying potential determinants of delayed recovery is crucial for optimizing perioperative protocols and tailoring patient pathways. Objective: This study aims to identify possible determinants of delayed recovery. Design: Retrospective observational study based on a prospectively collected dedicated register spanning from 2015 to 2022. Setting: Twenty-two Italian hospitals specializing in high-volume colorectal surgery and trained in enhanced recovery protocols. Patients: Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer or benign disease. Main outcome measures: Recovery status on postoperative day 2. Late recovery was defined as the failure to meet at least two indicators of postoperative recovery (oral feeding, removal of the urinary catheter, cessation of intravenous fluids, and mobilization) on postoperative day 2. Results: A total of 1535 patients were analyzed. The median overall adherence to pre- and intraoperative enhanced recovery protocol items was 75.0% (range: 66.6%–83.3%). Delayed recovery was observed in 487 (31.7%) patients. Multiple regression analysis revealed six enhanced recovery protocol items that independently positively influenced postoperative recovery: pre-admission counseling (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.596), a preoperative carbohydrate drink (aOR 1.948), intraoperative fluid infusions < 7 ml/kg/h (aOR 1.662), avoidance of thoracic epidural analgesia (aOR 2.137), removal of nasogastric tube at the end of surgery (aOR 4.939), and successful laparoscopy (aOR 2.341). The rate of delayed recovery progressively decreased with increasing adherence to these six positive items, reaching 13.0% when all items were applied (correlation coefficient [r] = – 0.99, p < 0.001). Limitations: This study is limited by its retrospective analysis of a register containing data from multiple centers and a diverse patient population. Conclusions: Adherence to specific pre- and intraoperative enhanced recovery protocol items, including counseling, preoperative carbohydrate intake, restrictive intraoperative fluid management, avoidance of thoracic epidural analgesia, early removal of nasogastric tube, and successful laparoscopy, appears crucial for promoting early recovery following elective colorectal resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly popular in the post-operative management of abdominal surgery. Published data suggest that patients on ERAS protocols have fewer minor and major complications, and highlight a reduction in medical morbidity (such as urinary and respiratory infections). Limited data is available on surgical complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the ERAS protocol on post-operative complications and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the impact of this protocol on cost-effectiveness. Material and methods: From January 2016 to December 2022, 532 colectomies for colorectal cancer (CRC) were performed. A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital on the cohort of patients, aged 18 years and older, operated on for non-urgent colorectal cancer. The impact on post-operative complications, hospital stay and economic impact was analysed in two groups: patients managed under ERAS and non-ERAS protocol. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed between the two groups. Results: After propensity score matching 1:1, each cohort included 71 patients, and clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced in terms of tumour type, surgical technique and surgical approach. ERAS patients experienced fewer infectious complications and a shorter postoperative stay (p < 0.001). In particular, they had an 8.5% reduction in anastomotic dehiscence (p = 0.012) and surgical wound infections (p = 0.029). After analysis of medical complications, no statistically significant differences were identified in urinary tract infections, pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding or sepsis. ERAS protocol was more efficient and cost-effective than the control group, with an overall savings of 37,673.44€. Conclusions: The implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colorectal surgery in a tertiary hospital was cost-effective and associated with a reduction in post-operative complications, especially infectious complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs with median postoperative hospitalization of 2 days improve outcomes after lung cancer surgery. This article explores nursing care practices for patients with lung cancer who remain hospitalized despite having recovered somatically. Qualitative focus group interviews were conducted with 16 nurses. Ricoeur's phenomenological hermeneutics underpins the methodology applied in this study, and we relied on Benner and Wrubel's theory. The nurses emphasized that the thoughts of patients with a recent lung cancer diagnosis revolve around more than the surgery. Nursing comprises not only practicalities but also attending to patients' stress and their coping with being struck with lung cancer and having undergone surgery. A counterculture emerged to counteract the logic of productivity, indicating that caring as a worthy end in itself may be underestimated in protocol-driven care. Prolonging hospitalization largely depends on clinical judgment. The nurses' aim is not to keep patients in the hospital but to avoid any needless suffering, allowing them to reclaim the primacy of caring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study is to establish whether implement ation of the ERAS protocol has a beneficial effect postoperatively after ileostomy reversal. Introduction: Loop ileostomy is commonly performed during anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision to protect the newly created anastomosis. Ileostomy reversal is performed after rectal anastomoses are completely healed and can be associated with complications. The use of the ERAS protocol in elective colorectal surgery has been shown to significantly reduce the complication rate and length of hospital stay without an increased readmission rate. Methods: After PROSPERO registration (CRD42023449551), a systematic review of the following databases was carried out: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus. This meta-analysis involved studies up to December 2023 without language restrictions. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed to assess complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) in ileostomy reversal patients with and without ERAS protocol implementation. Results: Six articles were analyzed, and each study reported on the elements of the ERAS protocol. There was no significant difference between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups in terms of complications rate (OR = 0.98; 95%CI: 0.64–1.52; I2 = 0%). Postoperative ileus was the most prevalent adverse event in both groups. The readmission rate did not differ significantly between the groups (OR = 1.77; 95%CI: 0.85–3.50, I2 = 0%). In comparison to the control group, the LOS in the ERAS group was noticeably shorter (MD = −1.94; 95%CI: −3.38–−0.49; I2 = 77%). Conclusions: Following the ERAS protocol can result in a shorter LOS and does not increase complications or readmission rates in patients undergoing ileostomy reversal. Thus, the ERAS protocol is recommended for clinical implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients undergoing surgery deserve the best possible peri‐operative outcomes. Each stage of the peri‐operative patient journey offers opportunities to improve care delivery, with shorter lengths of stay, less complications, reduced costs and better value. Methods: These opportunities were identified through narrative review of the literature, with consultation and consensus at the hidden pandemic (of postoperative complications) summit 2, July 2023 in Adelaide, Australia Results: Before surgery: Some patients who receive timely alternative treatments may not need surgery at all. The period of waiting after listing should be a time of preparation. Risk assessment at the time of surgical listing facilitates recognition of need for comorbidity optimisation and identifies those who will most benefit from prehabilitation, particularly frail and deconditioned patients. During surgery: During the surgical admission, ERAS programs result in less postoperative complications, shorter length of stay and better patient experience but require agreement between clinicians, and coordinated monitoring of delivery of the elements in the ERAS bundle of care. After surgery: At‐risk patients need to have the appropriate levels of monitoring for cardiovascular instability, renal impairment or respiratory dysfunction, to facilitate timely, proactive management if they develop. Access to allied health in the early postoperative period is also critical for promoting mobility, and earlier discharge, particularly after joint surgery. Where appropriate, provision of rehabilitation services at home improves patient experience and adds value. The peri‐operative patient journey begins and ends with primary care so there is a need for clear communication, documentation, around sharing of responsibility between practitioners at each stage. Conclusion: Identifying and mitigating risk to reduce complications and length of stay in hospital will improve outcomes for patients and deliver the best value for the health system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Outpatient lumbar decompression surgeries have been successfully performed in France for over twenty years, earning acceptance. However, outpatient instrumented lumbar spine procedures and arthroplasties are less documented. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of outpatient lumbar instrumented surgery. Methods: A prospective single-center study involving three experienced surgeons was conducted from September 2020 to September 2021, with a minimum six-month postoperative follow-up. Inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 18 to 75 eligible for same-day discharge, undergoing single-level lumbar spinal fusion or arthroplasty via anterior or posterior Wiltse approach. The primary endpoint was assessing the percentage of successful outpatient discharges (within twelve hours), with secondary endpoints including perioperative/postoperative complications and discharge pain prescriptions in terms of frequency and severity. Results: Forty patients (mean age: 44 years; 16/24 male/female ratio) underwent surgery, including 18 lumbar arthroplasties, twelve ALIF, and ten TLIF procedures. The majority of surgeries were performed at L4-L5 (18 procedures) and L5-S1 levels (22 procedures). 95% (38/40) of patients were successfully discharged within twelve hours, with only two patients discharged the following day. No postoperative hematomas, serious adverse events, or revision surgeries were noted. Conclusion: 95% of patients were discharged successfully within twelve hours following outpatient lumbar fusion surgery, with a 100% patient satisfaction rate. Specific technical solutions were not necessary, and oral pain relief sufficed. Patient selection and education, including early pain management, played crucial roles in complication avoidance. This study underscores the safety of outpatient instrumented lumbar spine procedures, leading to cost reduction and expedited recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol enhances bowel recovery and reduces postoperative ileus (POI) in both non‐frail and frail patients after robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC). Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 186 patients (104 with and 82 without ERAS) who underwent iRARC between 2012 and 2023. 'Frail' patients was defined as those with a low Geriatric‐8 questionnaire score (≤13). The primary outcomes were postoperative bowel recovery and the incidence of POI. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), 30‐ and 90‐day complications, 90‐day readmission rate, and POI predictors. Results: The ERAS group exhibited a significantly shorter LOS, early bowel recovery, a lower POI rate, fewer 90‐day high‐grade complications, and fewer 90‐day readmissions than the non‐ERAS group in the entire cohort. Non‐frail patients in the ERAS group had a lower rate of POI (7.1% vs. 22.1%; P = 0.008), whereas ERAS did not reduce POI in frail patients (44.1% vs. 36.6%; P = 0.50). In the multivariate analysis, ERAS was associated with a reduced risk of POI in both the entire cohort (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, P = 0.01) and in non‐frail patients (OR 0.24, P = 0.01), whereas ERAS was not likely to reduce POI (OR 1.14, P = 0.70) in frail patients. Prehabilitation was identified as a favourable predictor of POI. Conclusions: The ERAS protocol did not reduce POI in frail patients after iRARC, although it enhanced bowel recovery and reduced POI in non‐frail patients. Prehabilitation for frail patients might reduce POI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have spread after initial success in colorectal surgery decreasing length of stay (LOS) and decreasing opioid consumption. Adoption of ERAS specifically for ventral hernia patients remains in evolution. This study presents the development and implementation of an ERAS pathway for ventral hernia. Methods: A multidisciplinary team met weekly over 6 months to develop an ERAS pathway specific to ventral hernia patients. 75 process components and outcome measures were included, spanning multiple phases of care: Preoperative-Clinic, Preoperative Day of Surgery (DOS), Intraoperative, and Postoperative. Preoperative components included education and physiologic optimization. Pain control across phases of care focuses on nonopioid, multimodal analgesia. Postoperatively, the pathway emphasizes early diet advancement, early mobilization, and minimization of IV fluids. We compared compliance and outcome measures between a Pre Go-Live (PGL) period (9/1/2020-8/30/2021) and After Go-live (AGL) period (5/12/2022-5/19/2023). Results: There were 125 patients in the PGL group and 169 patients in the AGL group. Overall, ERAS compliance increased from 73.9% to 82.9% after implementation. Length of stay decreased from an average of 2.27 days PGL to 1.92 days AGL. Finally, the average daily postoperative opioid usage decreased from 25.4 to 13.5 MME after the implementation. Discussion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery can be successfully applied to the care of hernia patients with improvements in LOS and decreased opioid consumption. Institutional support and multidisciplinary cooperation were key for the development of such a program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ambulatory bariatric surgery has recently gained interest especially as a potential way to improve access for eligible patients with severe obesity. Building on our previously published research, this follow-up study delves deeper in the evolving landscape of ambulatory bariatric surgery over a 3-year period, focusing on predictors of success/failure. Methods: In a prospective single-center follow-up study, we conducted a descriptive assessment of all eligible patients as per our established protocol, who underwent a planned same-day discharge (SDD) primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) between 03/01/2021 and 02/29/2024. Trends in SDD surgeries over time were assessed over six discrete 6 month intervals. Primary endpoint was defined as a successful discharge on the day of surgery without emergency department visit or readmission within 24 h. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative morbidity. Results: A total of 811 primary SG and 325 RYGB procedures were performed during the study period. Among them, 30% (n = 244) were SDD-SGs and 6% (n = 21) were SDD-RYGBs, respectively. At baseline, median age of the entire SDD cohort was 43 years old, 81% were females, and body mass index (BMI) was 44.5 kg/m2. The planned SDD approach was successful in 89% after SG (n = 218/244) and in 90% after RYGB (n = 19/21). Nausea/vomiting was the main reason for a failed SDD approach after SG (46%). The 30-day readmission rate was 1.5% (n = 4) for the entire SDD cohort including only one readmission in the first 24 h. The percentage of SDD-SGs performed as a proportion of total SGs increased over the initial five consecutive six-month intervals (14%, 25%, 24%, 38%, and 49%). Conclusion: Our SDD protocol for bariatric surgery demonstrates a favorable safety profile, marked by high success rate and low postoperative morbidity. These outcomes have led to a continued increase in ambulatory procedures performed over time especially SG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A comprehensive preoperative assessment is imperative for patients undergoing lung surgery, ideally by way of a multidisciplinary team approach. This not only allows for clinicians to risk stratify patients and gain informed consent, but also to explore avenues in optimizing patients prior to surgery and plan for the delivery of the most appropriate postoperative care. A tripartite risk assessment combining risks of operative mortality, perioperative adverse cardiac events and postoperative dyspnoea should be assessed and discussed with patients. Those patients who continue towards surgical management may then be optimized with patient education addressing nutritional status, smoking cessation and alcohol dependency as well as the management of anaemia and physiological prehabilitation. This article aims to review existing guidelines for preoperative assessment in thoracic surgery as well as the latest preoperative guidance for enhanced recovery specific to thoracic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based, multimodal approaches to optimize patient recovery and minimize complications. Our team evaluated clinical outcomes following the implementation of an ERAS protocol for adolescents undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery. Academic hospital, New York, NY, USA. We performed a single-institution longitudinal assessment of adolescents who underwent laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) between August 2021 and November 2022. Unpaired t -tests and Fisher's exact test were used to compare means between groups and categorical factors. Forty-three patients were included in the study, 21 who participated in the ERAS protocol and 22 control patients. ERAS cohort was 52% females, with a median age of 17.5 years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 46.3 kg/m2. The non-ERAS cohort was 59% females, with a median age of 16.7 years and a median BMI of 44.0 kg/m2. There were no significant differences between baseline characteristics. Patients in the ERAS group had a shorter time to oral intake (10.7 hours versus 21.5 hours, P <.01), lower morphine milligram equivalents (18.2 versus 97.0, P <.01), and shorter length of stay (1.5 days versus 2.0 days, P =.01). There were no significant differences between return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days (3 versus 2, P =.66) or readmissions (0 versus 1, P = 1.0). The described ERAS protocol is safe and effective in adolescents undergoing laparoscopic VSG and is associated with shorter time to oral intake, reduced opioid requirements, and shorter hospital lengths of stay with no increase in return ED visits or readmissions. • Patients in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group had a shorter time to oral intake. • Patients in the ERAS group had lower morphine milligram equivalents. • Patients in the ERAS group had shorter length of stay. • ERAS protocol is effective in adolescents undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The direct bridge to urgent heart transplant (HT) with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to analyze the morbidity and mortality of patients transplanted with VA-ECMO and compare the presumed differences between various eras over a 17-year timeline. Methods: This is a prospective, observational study on consecutive patients stabilized with VA-ECMO and transplanted with VA-ECMO from July 2007 to December 2023 at a reference center (98 patients). Objective variables were mortality and morbidity from renal failure, venous thromboembolic disease (VTD), primary graft dysfunction (PGD), the need for tracheostomy, severe myopathy, reoperation, post-transplant ECMO, vascular complications, and sepsis/infection. Results: The percentage of patients who reached transplantation without the need for mechanical ventilation has increased over the periods studied. No significant differences were found between the study periods in 30-day mortality (p = 0.822), hospital discharge (p = 0.972), one-year mortality (p = 0.706), or five-year mortality (p = 0.797). Survival rates in these periods were 84%, 75%, 64%, and 61%, respectively. Comorbidities were very frequent, with an average of 3.33 comorbidities per patient. The most frequent were vascular complications (58%), the need for post-transplant ECMO (57%), and myopathy (55%). The development of myopathy and the need for post-transplant ECMO were higher in recent periods (p = 0.004 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: VA-ECMO support as a bridge to HT allows hospital discharge for 3 out of 4 transplanted patients. This survival rate has not changed over the years. The comorbidities associated with this device are frequent and significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective This study aims to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of applying different levels of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines to video-assisted thoracic day surgery (VATS). The goal is to determine the optimal degree of ERAS protocols and management requirements to improve postoperative recovery outcomes. Methods It was designed as a single-centre, prospective pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT), including patients who underwent VATS at the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital, between January 2021 and November 2022. Patients were divided into Group A and Group B through convenience sampling to implement different levels of ERAS management protocols. Data collection included the baseline characteristics (gender, age, marital status, education level, BMI, PONV risk score, ASA classification), surgery-related indicators (type of surgery, pathological results, hospitalization costs, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative rehydration volume), postoperative recovery indicators (postoperative chest tube duration time, time to first postoperative ambulation and urination, postoperative complications, follow-up condition), pain-related indicators (pain threshold score, pain score at 6 h postoperatively, bedtime, and predischarge), psychological state indicators (anxiety level), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) scores, and social support scores. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized and statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.1. Comparisons of categorical variables were performed using the χ² test, while comparisons of continuous variables were conducted using ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. A significance level of α = 0.05 was set for statistical tests. Result A total of 340 patients were included, with 187 in Group A and 153 in Group B. After propensity score matching (PSM), there were 142 patients in Group A and 105 in Group B, with no significant baseline differences. Group A had a significantly higher proportion of chest tube removals within 24 h postoperatively (P

Objective: To explore the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of lung transplantation. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 27 lung transplant patients who underwent ERAS during the perioperative period, while 12 lung transplant patients receiving routine treatment served as controls. General information was collected, including the specific implementation plan of ERAS, the incidence of complications and survival rate during the perioperative period (0.05). The perioperative survival of the ERAS group was 81.5%, which was higher than the control group (66.7%), but there is no statistically significant difference. Comparison of post-extubation NRS scores, the ERAS group had lower NRS scores at 12 h (5.30 ± 0.14 vs 6.25 ± 0.75), 24 h (3.44 ± 0.64 vs 5.58 ± 0.9), 48 h (2.74 ± 0.66 vs 4.08 ± 0.79) and 72 h (1.11 ± 0.80 vs 2.33 ± 0.49) than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.05). Conclusion: The ERAS can be applied to lung transplant patients to relieve postoperative pain, shorten postoperative tube time, and shorten postoperative stay. Perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation exercises are beneficial to reducing the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to decrease opioid use and decrease patient hospital length of stay (LOS, days). Serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks anesthetize the T2 through T9 dermatomes of the breast and can be applied intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative opioid (OME) consumption and LOS between a control group, an ERAS group, and an ERAS/local anesthetic cocktail group in patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods: In this study, 142 women who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction between 2004 and 2020 were divided into Group A (46 patients), a historical cohort; Group B (73 patients), an ERAS/no-block control group; and Group C (23 patients), an ERAS/anesthetic cocktail study group. Primary outcomes of interest were postanesthesia care unit (PACU), inpatient and total hospital OME consumption, and PACU LOS. Results: A significant decrease was observed from Group A to C in PACU LOS (103.3 vs. 80.2 vs. 70.5; p = 0.011), OME use (25.1 vs. 11.4 vs. 5.7; p < 0.0001), and total hospital OME (120.3 vs. 95.2 vs. 35.9; p < 0.05). No difference was observed in inpatient OMEs between the three groups (95.2 vs. 83.8 vs. 30.8; p = 0.212). Despite not reaching statistical significance, Group C consumed an average of 50–60 % less opioids per patient than did Group B in PACU, inpatient, and total hospital OMEs. Conclusion: Local anesthetic blocks are important components of ERAS protocols. Our results demonstrate that a combination regional block with a local anesthetic cocktail in an ERAS protocol can decrease opioid consumption in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Background: The implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols has resulted in improved postoperative outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. The evidence regarding feasibility and impact on outcomes in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study, comparing patient trajectories before and after implementing an IBD-specific ERAS protocol at Zealand University Hospital. We assessed the occurrence of serious postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher as our primary outcome, with postoperative length of stay in days and rate of readmissions as secondary outcomes, using χ2, Mann–Whitney test, and odds ratios adjusted for sex and age. Results: From 2017 to 2023, 394 patients were operated on for IBD and included in our study. In the ERAS cohort, 39/250 patients experienced a postoperative complication of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher compared to 27/144 patients in the non-ERAS cohort (15.6% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.420) with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.73 (95% CI 0.42–1.28). There was a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (median 4 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001) in the ERAS cohort compared to the non-ERAS cohort. Readmission rates remained similar (22.4% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.125). Conclusions: ERAS in IBD surgery was associated with faster patient recovery, but without an impact on the occurrence of serious postoperative complications and rate of readmissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study is to establish whether implement ation of the ERAS protocol has a beneficial effect postoperatively after ileostomy reversal. Introduction: Loop ileostomy is commonly performed during anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision to protect the newly created anastomosis. Ileostomy reversal is performed after rectal anastomoses are completely healed and can be associated with complications. The use of the ERAS protocol in elective colorectal surgery has been shown to significantly reduce the complication rate and length of hospital stay without an increased readmission rate. Methods: After PROSPERO registration (CRD42023449551), a systematic review of the following databases was carried out: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus. This meta-analysis involved studies up to December 2023 without language restrictions. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed to assess complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) in ileostomy reversal patients with and without ERAS protocol implementation. Results: Six articles were analyzed, and each study reported on the elements of the ERAS protocol. There was no significant difference between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups in terms of complications rate (OR = 0.98; 95%CI: 0.64–1.52; I2 = 0%). Postoperative ileus was the most prevalent adverse event in both groups. The readmission rate did not differ significantly between the groups (OR = 1.77; 95%CI: 0.85–3.50, I2 = 0%). In comparison to the control group, the LOS in the ERAS group was noticeably shorter (MD = −1.94; 95%CI: −3.38–−0.49; I2 = 77%). Conclusions: Following the ERAS protocol can result in a shorter LOS and does not increase complications or readmission rates in patients undergoing ileostomy reversal. Thus, the ERAS protocol is recommended for clinical implementation.

Abstract To assess the impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in children undergoing corrective surgery for congenital scoliosis. A retrospective analysis was conducted on children undergoing surgical correction for congenital scoliosis, with participants categorized into either the ERAS group or the control group. Comparative evaluations were made across clinical, surgical, laboratory, and quality of life parameters. Following propensity score matching, 156 patients were analyzed. Within the initial 3 days following surgery, the ERAS cohort demonstrated lower pain intensity and exhibited higher daily oral intake compared to their counterparts in the control group. A mere 14.1% of patients in the ERAS group experienced a peak body temperature exceeding 38.5°, illustrating a significantly lower incidence compared to the 33.3% recorded in the control group. The ERAS cohort displayed expedited timeframes for the onset of initial bowel function and postoperative discharge when contrasted with the control group. Levels of IL-6 assessed on the third day post-surgery were markedly reduced in the ERAS group in comparison to the control group. Noteworthy is the similarity observed in postoperative hemoglobin and albumin levels measured on the first and third postoperative days between the two groups. Assessments of quality of life using SF-36 and SRS-22r questionnaires revealed comparable scores across all domains in the ERAS group when juxtaposed with the control cohort. ERAS protocol has demonstrated a capacity to bolster early perioperative recovery, alleviate postoperative stress responses, and uphold favorable quality of life outcomes in children undergoing corrective surgery for congenital scoliosis.

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a patient-centered approach to surgery designed to reduce stress responses and facilitate faster recovery. ERAS protocols have been widely adopted in high-income countries, supported by robust research demonstrating improved patient outcomes. However, in Africa, there is limited evidence regarding its implementation. This review aims to identify the existing literature on the implementation of ERAS principles in Africa, the reported clinical outcomes, and the challenges and recommendations for successful implementation. Methods We conducted a librarian-assisted literature search of electronic research databases between October and November 2023. Titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility, and duplicates were then removed, followed by full-text assessment of potentially eligible studies. We utilized the summative content analysis method to synthesize and group the data into fewer categories based on agreed-upon criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results. Results The search identified 342 potential studies resulting in 15 eligible studies for inclusion in the review. The publication years ranged from 2016 to 2023. The studies originated from three countries: Egypt (n = 10), South Africa (n = 4), and Uganda (n = 1). Successful implementation was associated with reduced hospital length of stay (n = 12), lower mortality rates (n = 3), and improved pain outcomes (n = 7). Challenges included protocol adherence (n = 5) and limitations of the research design to generate strong evidence (n = 3). Recommendations included formal adoption of ERAS principles (n = 5), the need for sustained research commitment, and exploration of the applicability of ERAS in diverse surgical contexts (n = 8). Large-scale implementation beyond individual institutions was encouraged to further validate its impact on patient outcomes and healthcare costs (n = 1). Conclusions Despite the limited number of studies on ERAS implementation in Africa, the available evidence suggests that it reduces the length of hospital stays and mortality rates. This is crucial for the region, given its higher mortality rates, necessitating more collaborative, methodically well-designed studies to establish stronger evidence for ERAS in lower-resource environments.

Background: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) provides an effective alternative procedure for the management of complex hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an evidence-based approach that was developed to reduce surgical stress and accelerate postoperative recovery. However, little is known regarding PTCSL in the context of ERAS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PTCSL within ERAS programs. Patient and methods: The clinical data of patients who underwent PTCSL within ERAS programs consulted at our hospital between November 2017 and November 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Individualized perioperative ERAS items were evaluated for all patients. The demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 43 patients who underwent PTCSL were included in the study. There were 13 men and 30 women aged between 39 and 89 years with an average age of 60 years (60.49 ± 12.37). The stone clearance rate was 77 % after the first operation, and the final clearance rate was 95 %. The incidence of complications in this study is 18.6 % (8/43), including 6 patients with Clavien-Dindo I-II, and 2 patients with Clavien-Dindo III. Pleural effusion, abdominal effusion, infection, bile leakage, and biliary bleeding are the most common complications, however, all patients recovered after aggressive treatment. Conclusion: PTCSL is a relatively safe, feasible, and efficient method for treating complex hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis within ERAS programs. Individualized ERAS entries and precise disease management are required to minimize the occurrence of complications and to provide effective treatment.

Introduction: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation in remote areas by operating hospital ships is immensely helpful due to high patient turnover, reducing costs, and minimizing the effects of surgical stress. Utilization of regional anesthetics, namely ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block or Quadratus Lumborum (QL) block, is applicable and beneficial in this setting. Objective: Due to the limited time, facilities, and health personnel available in floating hospital services surgery, several adjustments in anesthetic methods are required to rapidly return patients to their preoperative physiologic state. Therefore, we wrote this case report. Case Series: We presented case series of lower abdominal surgery performed in Ksatria Airlangga Floating Hospital with the implementation of peripheral nerve blocks as one of the ERAS protocols in one of the remote islands in Indonesia, Gili Iyang Island. Two patients underwent TAP blocks, while the remaining two received QL Blocks. A peripheral nerve block was performed under ultrasound guidance and a 20-mL injection of 0.25% levobupivacaine to QL muscle or TAP. During the observation, we found Visual Analogue Score (VAS) of 1-2 after surgery, no post-operative sedation needed, only 1 patient experienced nausea without vomiting, and the length of health facility stay were less than 3 days. Discussion: Nearly all of our patients who underwent lower abdomen surgery got benefits from the application of peripheral nerve block. Because there was no opioid consumption in our cases, the risk of unwanted effect of opioids like postoperative nausea and vomiting, were also decreased. Conclusion: Peripheral nerve block, as mentioned TAP Block and QL Block, has emerged as a promising alternative to prevent and manage post-operative pain in remote medicine settings, namely Ksatria Airlangga Floating Hospital, particularly in areas with few medical facilities.

Abstract Background Effects of preoperative drinks on muscle metabolism are unclear despite general recommendations. The aim of the present study was therefore to compare metabolic effects of a preoperative oral nutrition drink, recommended by protocols for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), compared to overnight preoperative peripheral total parenteral nutrition (PPN) on skeletal muscle metabolism in patients aimed at major gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Methods Patients were randomized, based on diagnosis and clinical characteristics, to receive either a commercial carbohydrate-rich nutrition drink (Drink); or overnight (12 h) peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) as study regimens; compared to isotone Ringer-acetate as Control regimen. Arterial blood- and abdominal muscle tissue specimens were collected at start of surgery. Blood chemistry included substrate- and hormone concentrations. Muscle mRNA transcript analyses were performed by microarray and evaluated for changes in gene activities by Gene Ontology algorithms. Results Patient groups were comparable in all measured preoperative assessments. The Nutrition Drink had significant metabolic alterations on muscle glucose metabolism (p

Objective: Postoperative nausea (PN) and vomiting (PONV) in cardiac surgery increases adrenergic stimulation, limits mobilization and oral intake, and can be distressing for patients. The primary aim of our study was to investigate the effect of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia on the incidence of PONV in cardiac surgery patients undergoing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods: Following ethics committee approval, 62 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery with ERAS protocol were included in this prospective randomized study. After standard induction of anaesthesia, Group S received 1.5-2% sevoflurane and Group P received 50-100 µg kg-1 min-1 propofol infusion as maintenance anaesthetic agent with a bispectral index of 40-50. The incidence of PN and PONV between 0-6 hours (early) and 6-24 hours (late) after extubation was compared as the primary outcome. The incidence of delirium was analyzed as a secondary outcome for similar periods. Results: In the propofol group, 3 patients were excluded due to postoperative tamponade revision and prolonged mechanical ventilation. PN in the early post-extubation period (29% vs. 7.1%, P=0.031) was significantly higher in Group S. The incidence of delirium was similar between the groups in both periods. Conclusion: Propofol may reduce the incidence of PN in the first 6 hours after extubation compared with sevoflurane. We believe that this period will be beneficial for gastrointestinal tolerance as it is the period when oral intake is initiated in patients. In conclusion, propofol maintenance in cardiac surgery patients may facilitate patient rehabilitation as part of the ERAS protocol.

Abstract Background and purpose Preoperative anaemia including iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a well-established perioperative risk factor. However, most studies on iron therapy to treat IDA have been negative and few have been conducted within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Furthermore, patients with IDA often have comorbidities not necessarily influenced by iron, but potentially influencing traditional study endpoints such as length of stay (LOS), morbidity, etc. The aim of this paper is to discuss patient-related challenges when planning outcome studies on the potential benefits of iron therapy in patients with IDA, based upon a large detailed prospective database in ERAS total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A prospective observational cohort study in ERAS THA and TKA from 2022 to 2023. Detailed complete follow-up through questionnaires and electronic medical records. Results Of 3655 included patients, 276 (7.6%) had IDA defined as a haemoglobin (Hb) of 2 days occurred in 11.6% of patients with IDA vs. 4.3% in non-anaemics. The proportion with 30- or 90-day readmissions was 6.5% vs. 4.1% and. 13.4% vs6.0%, in patients with IDA and non-anaemics, respectively. However, potentially anaemia or iron deficiency-related causes of LOS > 2 days or 90-day readmissions were only 5.4% and 2.2% in patients with IDA and 1.9% and 1.0% in non-anaemics. Conclusion Conventional randomised trials with single or composite “hard” endpoints are at risk of being inconclusive or underpowered due to a considerable burden of other patient-related risk factors and with postoperative complications which may not be modifiable by correction of IDA per se. We will propose to gain further insights from detailed observational and mechanistic studies prior to initiating extensive randomised studies.

Abstract Background Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, significant pain persists, affecting patient recovery and sleep quality on the day of surgery. We compared the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block with or without rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Methods The study was registered before patient enrollment at the Clinical Research Information Service (registration number: KCT0006468, 19/08/2021). 88 American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups. RS-TAP group received right lateral and right subcostal TAP block, and RS block with 0.2% ropivacaine (30 mL); Bi-TAP group received bilateral and right subcostal TAP block with same amount of ropivacaine. The primary outcome was visual analogue scale (VAS) for 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the use of rescue analgesics, cumulative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and incidence of adverse events. Results There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups for 48 h postoperatively. We found no difference between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes: the use of rescue analgesics, consumption of IV-PCA, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, sleep quality, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. Conclusion Both RS-TAP and Bi-TAP blocks provided clinically acceptable pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although there was no significant difference between two combination blocks in postoperative analgesia or sleep quality.

Fast-track or enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a care pathway for surgical patients based on a multidisciplinary team approach aimed at optimising recovery without increasing risk with protocols based on scientific evidence, which is monitored continuously to ensure compliance and improvement. These protocols have been shown to reduce the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) following paediatric cardiac surgery. We present the first structured implementation of ERAS in paediatric cardiac surgery in Australia. All patients enrolled in the ERAS pathway between October 2019 and July 2023 were identified. Demographic and perioperative data were collected retrospectively from hospital records for patients operated before June 2021 and prospectively from June 2021. A control group (non-ERAS) was identified using propensity matching from patients who underwent similar procedures and were not enrolled in the ERAS pathway (prior to October 2019). Patients were matched for age, weight, and comprehensive Aristotle score. Outcomes of interest were duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS, readmission to the ICU, hospital LOS, cardiac reintervention rate, postoperative complication rate, and number of 30-day readmissions. Of 1,084 patients who underwent cardiac surgery during the study period (October 2019–July 2023), 121 patients (11.2%) followed the ERAS pathway. The median age at the time of surgery was 4.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8–8.8 years). The most common procedure was the closure of atrial septal defect (n=58, 47.9%). The median cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 40 min (IQR 28–53.5 minutes) and 24.5 min (IQR 13–34 minutes) respectively. The majority were extubated in the operating theatre (n=108, 89.3%). The median ICU and hospital LOS were 4.5 hrs (IQR 4.1–5.6 hours) and 4 days (IQR 4–5 days) respectively. None of the patients required readmission to the ICU within 24 hrs of discharge from the ICU. Three (3) patients (2.5%) required reintervention. When compared with the non-ERAS group, the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital LOS were significantly lower in the ERAS group. There was no significant difference in the ICU readmission rate, reintervention rate, complication rate, and number of 30-day readmissions between both groups. ERAS after paediatric cardiac surgery is feasible and safe in select patients with low preoperative risk. This pathway reduces the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital LOS without increasing risks, enabling the optimisation of resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a patient-centered approach to surgery designed to reduce stress responses and facilitate faster recovery. ERAS protocols have been widely adopted in high-income countries, supported by robust research demonstrating improved patient outcomes. However, in Africa, there is limited evidence regarding its implementation. This review aims to identify the existing literature on the implementation of ERAS principles in Africa, the reported clinical outcomes, and the challenges and recommendations for successful implementation. Methods: We conducted a librarian-assisted literature search of electronic research databases between October and November 2023. Titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility, and duplicates were then removed, followed by full-text assessment of potentially eligible studies. We utilized the summative content analysis method to synthesize and group the data into fewer categories based on agreed-upon criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results. Results: The search identified 342 potential studies resulting in 15 eligible studies for inclusion in the review. The publication years ranged from 2016 to 2023. The studies originated from three countries: Egypt (n = 10), South Africa (n = 4), and Uganda (n = 1). Successful implementation was associated with reduced hospital length of stay (n = 12), lower mortality rates (n = 3), and improved pain outcomes (n = 7). Challenges included protocol adherence (n = 5) and limitations of the research design to generate strong evidence (n = 3). Recommendations included formal adoption of ERAS principles (n = 5), the need for sustained research commitment, and exploration of the applicability of ERAS in diverse surgical contexts (n = 8). Large-scale implementation beyond individual institutions was encouraged to further validate its impact on patient outcomes and healthcare costs (n = 1). Conclusions: Despite the limited number of studies on ERAS implementation in Africa, the available evidence suggests that it reduces the length of hospital stays and mortality rates. This is crucial for the region, given its higher mortality rates, necessitating more collaborative, methodically well-designed studies to establish stronger evidence for ERAS in lower-resource environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Protocols surrounding opioid reduction have become commonplace in plastic surgery to improve peri-operative outcomes. Within such protocols, opioid requirement is a frequently analyzed outcome. Though often examined, there is no literature standard conversion for morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at present, leading to questionable external validity. We hypothesized significant heterogeneity in MME reporting would exist within plastic surgery literature. Following the PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic review of 16 journals. Clinical studies focused on opioid reduction within plastic surgery were identified. Primary outcomes included reporting of morphine equivalents (ME) delivery (IV/oral), operative ME, inpatient ME, outpatient ME, timeline, and method of calculation. Among the 101 studies analyzed, 73% reported opioid requirements in the form of ME. Among those that used ME, 3% reported IV ME, 41% reported oral, 32% reported both, and 25% gave no indication of either. Operative ME were reported in 19% of studies. Furthermore, 54% of studies reported inpatient ME whereas 32% of studies reported outpatient ME. Only 19% reported the number of days opioids were consumed postoperatively. Moreover, 27% of the studies reported the actual method of ME conversion, with 17 unique methods described. Only 8 studies (8%) reported using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for ME conversion. There is significant variability among the reported ME conversion methodology within plastic surgery literature. Highlighting these discrepancies is an essential step in creating and implementing a single, standard method to mitigate opioid morbidity in plastic surgery and to optimize enhanced recovery protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chest tube management represents a major issue after lung surgery as no protocol is widely accepted and tube management is generally based on local or personal habits. Aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a standardized protocol for chest tube management after pulmonary resections on the post-operative outcomes. We performed a single center retrospective analysis of all adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection from January 2020 to December 2021. Starting from January 2021 a standardized protocol of chest tube management was applied after all procedures. Patients were divided into two groups according to the chest tube management strategy. he two groups had similar pre-operative characteristics and the extent of lung resection was comparable. Intervention group had significantly shorter time to chest tube removal (median 1 vs 3 days, p < 0.001) and post-operative length of stay (median 3 vs 4 days, p < 0.001). Despite earlier chest tube removal, there was not an increased incidence of post-removal complications. On multivariable analysis, the new chest drain management strategy was an independent predictor of earlier chest tube removal. A standardized protocol of chest tube management allows for an earlier chest tube removal and a shorter hospital stay, without an increase in post-operative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi is the property of Istanbul Gelisim Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Yuksekokulu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Simple Summary: Prehabilitation is a multimodal intervention including preoperative exercises, a high-protein diet, psychological support, smoking/alcohol cessation, and the optimization of preoperative laboratory results. The effectiveness of prehabilitation is different for each patient and depends on many factors. Ensuring reliable compliance with prehabilitation recommendations and active patient involvement are pivotal. To accurately assess patient adherence to prehabilitation guidelines, it is crucial to employ innovative assessment tools. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study utilizing a LUNA EMG device as a marker of prehabilitation compliance. In this study, we implemented a prehabilitation program in a group of patients with suspected ovarian cancer and compared the results with those of the control group in which only the ERAS protocol was used. We observed an improvement in muscle strength and tension during the prehabilitation program and found an association between prehabilitation using this device and fewer complications and shorter hospital stays compared to the control group. Background: Prehabilitation is a novel strategy in preoperative management. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prehabilitation programs on peri- and postoperative outcomes and to verify if LUNA EMG has the capacity to monitor compliance with prehabilitation programs. Methods: A total of seventy patients with suspected ovarian cancer were recruited between April 2021 and September 2022 and were divided into a prehabilitation group (36 patients) or a control group (34 patients). A LUNA EMG device was utilized to monitor muscle strength and tension. Results: Within the prehabilitation group, we observed a significant increase in the 6-Minute Walk Test distance by 17 m (median, IQR: 0–42.5, p < 0.001) and a significant increase in muscle strength measured with LUNA EMG. In comparison to the control group, the prehabilitation group showed fewer complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification (47.2% vs. 20.6%, p = 0.02) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (median 5.0 days [IQR: 4.0–6.2] vs. 7.0 days [IQR: 6.0–10.0], p < 0.001). Conclusion: Prehabilitation has a positive effect on physical capacity and muscle strength and is associated with a reduction in the number of complications after surgery. LUNA EMG can be a useful tool for monitoring patients' adherence to prehabilitation programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery (ARS) have a history of preoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. It is well-established that ARS is effective in restoring the anti-reflux barrier, eliminating the ongoing need for costly PPIs. Current literature lacks objective evidence supporting an optimal postoperative PPI cessation or weaning strategy, leading to wide practice variations. We sought to objectively gauge current practice and opinion surrounding the postoperative management of PPIs among expert foregut surgeons and gastroenterologists in the United States. Methods: We created a survey of postoperative PPI management protocols, with an emphasis on discontinuation and timing of PPI cessation, and aimed to determine what factors played a role in the decision-making. An electronic survey tool (Qualtrics XM, Qualtrics, Provo, UT) was used to distribute the survey and to record the responses anonymously for a period of three months. Results: The survey was viewed 2658 times by 373 institutions and shared with 644 members. In total, 121 respondents participated in the survey and 111 were surgeons (92%). Fifty respondents (42%) always discontinue PPIs immediately after ARS. Of the remaining 70 respondents (58%), 46% always wean or taper PPIs postoperatively and 47% wean or taper them selectively. The majority (92%) of practitioners taper within a 3-month period postoperatively. Five respondents never discontinue PPIs after ARS. Overall, only 23 respondents (19%) stated their protocol is based on medical literature or evidence-based medicine. Instead, decision-making is primarily based on anecdotal evidence/personal preference (42%, n = 50) or prior training/mentors (39%, n = 47). Conclusions: There are two major protocols used for PPI discontinuation after ARS: Nearly half of providers abruptly stop PPIs, while just over half gradually tapers them, most often in the early postoperative period. These decisions are primarily driven by institutional practices and personal preferences, underscoring the need for evidence-based recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Postoperative Ileus (POI) negatively impacts patient outcomes and increases healthcare costs. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been found to improve gastrointestinal (GI) motility following abdominal surgery. However, its effectiveness in this context is not well‐established. This study was designed to evaluate the role of TENS on the recovery of GI motility after exploratory laparotomy. Methods: Patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into control (standard treatment alone) and experimental (standard treatment + TENS) arms. TENS was terminated after 6 days or after the passage of stool or stoma movement. The primary outcome was time for the first passage of stool/functioning stoma. Non‐passage of stool or nonfunctioning stoma beyond 6 days was labeled as prolonged POI. Patients were monitored until discharge. Results: Median (interquartile range) time to first passage of stool/functioning stoma was 82.6 (49–115) hours in the standard treatment group and 50 (22–70.6) hours in the TENS group [p < 0.001]. Prolonged POI was noted in 11 patients in the standard treatment group (35.5%) and one in the TENS group (3.2%) [p = 0.003]. Postoperative hospital stay was similar in the two groups. Conclusion: TENS resulted in early recovery of GI motility by shortening the duration of POI without any improvement in postoperative hospital stay. Trial Registration Number: CTRI/2021/10/037054. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative management after surgery for perforated peptic ulcer is still burdened by old traditions. All available data for fast‐track recovery in this setting are either very unspecific or underpowered. The aim of this study was to evaluate fast‐track recovery in this diagnosis‐specific context in a larger sample. Methods: Electronic data sources were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fast‐track recovery and traditional management after surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in adults. A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines regulated the process. Quality and risk of bias assessments of individual RCTs were performed by means of the Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision criteria and the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool. Primary endpoints were length of hospital stay and risk of complications. Random or fixed effects modeling were applied as indicated. Outcomes were measured by mean difference and risk difference. Results: Six RCTs with a total cohort of 356 patients were included. Results of our meta‐analysis showed significantly shortened length of hospital stay (mean difference −3.50 days [95% CI ‐4.51 to −2.49], p ≤ 0.00001), significantly less superficial and deep surgical‐site infections (risk differences −0.12 [95% CI −0.20, −0.05], p = 0.002 and −0.03 [95% CI −0.09, 0.03], and p = 0.032, respectively), and significantly fewer pulmonary complications (risk difference −0.10 [95% CI −0.17, −0.03], p = 0.004) in the fast‐track group. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta‐analysis shows that fast‐track recovery after surgery for perforated peptic ulcer significantly shortened hospital stay in the studied cohort without increasing the risk of postoperative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Research on anastomotic leakage (AL) in colonic procedures within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has not yet been conducted. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for AL after colonic surgery. Methods: The study included all consecutively recorded patients operated with colonic resection surgery in the Swedish part of the international ERAS® Interactive Audit System (EIAS) between September 2009 and June 2022. The cohort was analyzed and evaluated regarding risk factors for AL. Results: Altogether 10,632 patients were included, 10,219 were without AL and 413 (3.9%) were with AL. After adjusted analysis, male sex (4.6% AL), OR: 1.49; 95% CI (1.16–1.90), obesity (4.8% AL), OR: 1.62; 95% CI (1.18–2.24), previous surgery (4.4% AL), OR: 1.45; 95% CI (1.14–1.86), open surgery (4.4% AL), OR: 1.36; 95% CI (1.02–1.83), anastomosis between small bowel and rectum (13.1% AL), OR: 3.97; 95% CI (2.23–7.10), stapled anastomosis (5.3% AL), OR: 2.46; 95% CI (1.79–3.38), inhalation anesthesia (4.2% AL), OR: 1.80; 95% CI (1.26–2.57), and conversion to open surgery (5.5% AL), OR 1.49; 95% CI (1.02–2.19) were significant risk factors for AL. Although pre and intraoperative compliance to the ERAS‐protocol was similar, excess of fluids day 0 was an independent predictor for AL. Conclusion: Male sex, obesity, previous surgery, open surgery, stapled anastomotic technique, anastomosis between small bowel and rectum, inhalation anesthesia, conversion to open surgery, and among ERAS interventions, excess of fluids day 0, were significant risk factors for AL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prehabilitation, or "prehab," helps patients optimize strength, function, and nutrition before surgery. This evidence-based practice project presents strategies for implementing a prehab program to prepare patients for spinal surgery. Nurses play an integral role in educating patients preoperatively about the myriad lifestyle changes associated with spinal surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: When managing elective and emergency cesarean births in the same operating room, unpredictable variations in the start times of the cesareans can prolong fasting periods. Methods: The fasting times were retrospectively analyzed on 279 consecutive cesarean births at Helsinki University Women's Hospital, Finland, during January–February 2023. The fasting times were compared between the urgency groups and for elective cesareans according to their scheduled order on the operation list. The primary outcome was the difference in the fasting times for food and drink, while the secondary outcome was fasting for both food >12 h and fluids >4 h. The fasting times were compared by one-way ANOVA and chi-squared test, respectively. Dichotomous data are presented as unadjusted odds ratios (OR with 95% CI). Results: Increasing urgency was associated with shorter fasting times. Fasting times for elective cesareans increased with the scheduled order on the daily list. The mean fasting periods (SD) increased from 10.55 h (SD=1.57) to 14.75 h (SD=2.02) from the first to the third cesarean of the day (p<0.01). The unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for fasting of the scheduled cesareans to exceed 12 h for solid foods and 4 h for clear fluids was 6.53 (95% CI: 2.67–15.9, p<0.001), for the third and fourth cesareans compared to the first two cesareans of the day. Conclusions: When elective and emergency cesareans are performed by the same team, the woman undergoing the third elective surgery of the day should be advised to have breakfast before 5 a.m. at home. While waiting for the operation, a carbohydrate drink should be offered to limit the fast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe the technique for surgeon-administered, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (SU-TAP) blocks performed during radical cystectomy as a component of multimodal, perioperative pain management. Methods: Retrospective, case series of patients receiving SU-TAP blocks just prior to incision for RC. TAP blocks were performed by the surgeon with a standard technique using US guidance to instill an anesthetic solution. The primary outcome was opioid consumption at the intervals of 0–12, 12–24, 24–36, and 36–48 h postoperatively. Opioid consumption was reported as oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included time to perform SU-TAP blocks, and safety of block procedure. Results: 34 patients were included. During the median length of stay of 4 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3–7), only 30/34 (88%) of patients required opioids within the first 12 h post-op, decreasing to 38% by 48 h post-op. The median consumption decreased in the first 48 h from 21 MMEs (IQR 9–38) to 10 MMEs (IQR 8–15) at the 0–12 and 36–48 h intervals, respectively. The median time to perform block procedure was 6 min (IQR 4–8 min) and there were no safety events related to the SU-TAP blocks. Limitations include no comparative arm for opioid consumption. Conclusion: Our data suggest that urologists may feasibly perform US-guided TAP blocks as a practical, efficient, and safe method of regional anesthesia. SU-TAP blocks should be considered in ERAS protocols for RC. Future comparative studies on opioid consumption compared to local infiltration and alternative block techniques are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]