Search

Nitrogen in the soil-plant system is extremely complex, and any change in soil management or cultivated species can modify its dynamics. To minimize environmental problems and sustainably optimize agricultural production, it is necessary to understand the dynamics of nitrogen in the soil-plant system. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate plant nitrogen nutrition and changes in the chemical attributes of the soil for cultivars of Brachiaria brizantha intercropped with Stylosanthes in different forage systems. The experimental design consisted of randomized block experimental design was used, with three replicates. The treatments consisted of forage systems: Piata palisadegrass, Paiaguas palisadegrass, Stylosanthes cv. Campo Grande, row intercropping of Piata palisadegrass with Stylosanthes, mixed intercropping of Piata palisadegrass and Stylosanthes, row intercropping of Paiaguas palisadegrass and Stylosanthes, and mixed intercropping of Paiaguas palisadegrass and Stylosanthes. Evaluations were performed in winter, spring, summer, and autumn in the same plots and over a 2-year period. The intercropping of grasses and legumes positively influences the chemical characteristics of the soil and the nutritional status of the forage by improving the concentration of nutrients. Overall the row seeding method provided better nutrient concentrations. The second year provided higher nitrogen absorption but resulted in greater soil acidification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pastures are the most practical and cost-effective way to feed cattle and are the basis of livestock production in Central Brazil. Grass–legume intercropping is essential for increasing production in sustainable animal-feeding systems. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the productive and nutritional characteristics of Brachiaria brizantha (A.Rich.) Stapf (palisade grass) cultivars intercropped with Stylosanthes cv. Campo Grande (multiline 80% S. capitata and 20% S. macrocephala) in different forage systems, in different seasons of the year, over a 2-year period. A randomised block experimental design was used, with three replicates. The treatments consisted of the following seven forage systems: Piata palisade grass, Paiaguas palisade grass, Stylosanthes cv. Campo Grande, row intercropping of Piata palisade grass and Stylosanthes , mixed intercropping of Piata palisade grass and Stylosanthes , row intercropping of Paiaguas palisade grass and Stylosanthes , and mixed intercropping of Paiaguas palisade grass and Stylosanthes. Evaluations were performed in each season of the year (winter, spring, summer, autumn) on the same plots over the 2-year period. Piata and Paiaguas palisade grass behaved similarly in all forage systems, indicating that both can be intercropped with Stylosanthes. Grass–legume intercropping had a positive effect on the productive and nutritional characteristics of the forage plants, increasing dry matter production, crude protein concentrations and in vitro dry matter digestibility, and decreasing the fibre fractions. Row intercropping was more efficient at maintaining high proportions of legume plants in the system, resulting in greater forage production and quality. Strategies need to be defined to maintain legume persistence in grass–legume intercropping. We found that row intercropping was more efficient than mixed intercropping at maintaining high proportions of legume plants. Grass–legume intercropping had a positive effect on the productive and nutritional characteristics of the forage and maintaining sustainability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Paiaguas palisadegrass was released in order to meet the requirements of the different production systems. However, little is known about the quality of the forage. The goal of this study was to evaluate the protein and carbohydrate fractionation of the Paiaguas palisadegrass after intercropping with grain sorghum in the pasture recovery, through the integration of crop and livestock production. The experiment was conducted in the municipality of Rio Verde, State of Goias. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with four replications. The treatments were composed of the following forage systems: Paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropped, sorghum intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in the row, sorghum intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in the interrow, and sorghum intercropped with oversown Paiaguas palisadegrass. The evaluations were carried out in the four climatic seasons of the year (winter, spring, summer, and fall) in the same plots, over a period of one year, in 16 paddocks under continuous stocking system. The results showed that forage systems did not influence protein and carbohydrate fractionation. The winter season presented higher values of protein and carbohydrate fractionation, negatively affecting the animal performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Caatinga is the property of Revista Caatinga and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)