Search

This article discusses two legal cases involving medical and mental health issues. In the first case, a court rejected the argument that a medical institution should be protected under federal law during the COVID-19 pandemic, ruling that it was a state medical malpractice case. In the second case, the Supreme Court of Iowa affirmed a ruling denying a patient's motion to represent himself in an involuntary civil commitment proceeding. The court determined that the patient did not have the right to self-representation in this type of proceeding, as there is no provision in Iowa law allowing for the waiver of the right to counsel in civil commitment cases. The court ultimately upheld the patient's continued commitment due to his dangerous behavior. [Extracted from the article]

I. Introduction 2 II. Background 3 III. The Seven Major Changes Implemented by the 2018 Regulations 5 IV. Analysis of Outcomes After Five Years 6 A. Avoiding Conflicts of Interest [...]

Byline: Courtney Degen Ali Khawar, principal deputy assistant secretary for the Labor Department's Employee Benefits Security Administration, defended two department rules facing litigation and addressed the concerns surrounding the lost-and-found [...]

Byline: Robert Steyer The U.S. Supreme Court has again been asked to create uniform guidance for the retirement industry over whether ERISA complaints should be addressed by arbitration or by [...]

Byline: Robert Steyer What started as a small law firm filing a handful of suits against 401(k) plans' use of forfeited funds has metastasized into a broad attack on sponsors [...]

FAEGRE DRINKER'S BRADFORD CAMPBELL: 'ERISA is the most important law that most people have never heard of.' PIonline.com/ERISA2024 Copyright 2024 Crain Communications Inc. All Rights [...]

Ahead TOPIC A PROTECTING YOUR RETIREMENT SECURITY ERISA, which turns 50 this year, safeguards pensions and 401(k) plans. But it has limitations. BY SANDRA BLOCK MILLIONS of employees have contributed [...]

This document is an excerpt from the Internal Revenue Bulletin, which provides information on tax laws. It discusses final regulations regarding prevailing wage and registered apprenticeship requirements for taxpayers involved in construction. The regulations outline the requirements, exceptions, correction procedures, and penalties associated with these provisions. The document also addresses comments and revisions made to proposed regulations, including the incorporation of Davis-Bacon Act requirements and the application of prevailing wage requirements to clean energy projects. The final regulations provide clarity and guidance for taxpayers, contractors, and subcontractors in meeting these requirements. Additionally, the document covers topics such as prevailing wage requirements, apprenticeship requirements, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and the utilization of carbon oxide for claiming credits. It includes guidelines, examples, and explanations of the regulations, as well as information on penalties, compliance, and the impact on small entities. The aim of the document is to provide clarity and guidance for taxpayers seeking to qualify for these tax benefits while ensuring compliance with the requirements. [Extracted from the article]

This document, titled "Part III," provides updated static mortality tables for defined benefit pension plans for the year 2025. It also includes a modified unisex version of the mortality tables for determining minimum present value for distributions with annuity starting dates in 2025. The document provides detailed information on the regulations and rules regarding the use of these mortality tables for different types of plans and purposes. Additionally, the document announces the intention to amend regulations related to the reporting of qualified derivative payments (QDPs) and provides guidance for compliance with regulations on dividend equivalents. The document also extends the enforcement standards for section 871(m) regulations and provides relief for qualified derivatives dealers. [Extracted from the article]

Notice 2024-22 brings important initial guidance on appropriate matching restrictions for Pension-Linked Emergency Savings Accounts (PLESAs), which was added to the Internal Revenue Code by Section 127 of SECURE 2.0, [...]

The document titled "Part I" provides information on federal income tax rates for May 2024 and discusses changes to short-term, limited-duration insurance and fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage. It explains the laws that regulate health coverage and promote affordable healthcare, such as HIPAA, the Mental Health Parity Act, the ACA, and the No Surprises Act. The document highlights the limitations and risks of short-term limited-duration insurance and fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive coverage. It also addresses concerns about deceptive marketing practices and the lack of coverage for COVID-19-related treatments. The Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services have made changes to the regulations governing these types of coverage to protect consumers and promote access to comprehensive coverage. The changes include a revised definition of short-term, limited-duration insurance, a notice requirement for consumers, and a maximum coverage period of 4 months. The document also discusses feedback and recommendations regarding the duration of short-term, limited-duration insurance policies and the need for consumer education. The revised notice standard aims to inform consumers about the limitations of this coverage and prevent it from being marketed as a substitute for comprehensive coverage. The rules are expected to increase enrollment in comprehensive coverage, improve market stability, and reduce out-of-pocket expenses. [Extracted from the article]

This document contains final regulations from the IRS regarding the election to treat certain tax credits as a payment of federal income tax. The regulations provide rules for making these elections, including definitions and special rules for partnerships and S corporations. They also outline a required IRS pre-filing registration process. These regulations impact various organizations, including tax-exempt organizations, state and local governments, Indian tribal governments, and rural electric cooperatives. The regulations clarify and address comments and concerns from stakeholders, providing additional guidance for taxpayers. The document also addresses excessive payments, basis reduction, and recapture. It acknowledges requests for streamlining and simplification of the process and intends to provide plain language guidance to taxpayers. The regulations aim to benefit various industries, promote clean energy investment, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. [Extracted from the article]

The article titled "BVU News and Trends" provides a monthly update on recent developments in the field of business valuation. It covers a range of topics including fair value for financial reporting, ESOP valuations, upcoming conferences, demographic surveys, private cost of capital surveys, predictions for lower equity risk premium, DLOM study, and the usage of artificial intelligence in business valuation practices. The article acknowledges that some practitioners are skeptical of AI and choose not to use it, while also highlighting the success of NVIDIA as a brand due to its investment in AI. It also emphasizes the ongoing impact of COVID-19 on businesses and the importance of considering these effects in valuations. The article concludes by mentioning the release of the latest issue of Perspectives, a digital publication from Willamette Management Associates. [Extracted from the article]

Millions of employees have contributed to (https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/retirement-plans/401k-plans-everything-you-should-know) 401(k) plans without worrying that their employer will raid their account to fund a weekend in Vegas. For that, you can thank the [...]

Byline: Brian Croce Lawyers representing Republican-led states and the federal government on July 9 argued in federal court whether the tiebreaker provision in the Department of Labor's rule permitting retirement [...]

Byline: Robert Steyer More lawsuits and more uncertainty affecting plan management. That's the expected outcome for defined contribution plan sponsors now that the Supreme Court has tossed out the longstanding [...]

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERIS was enacted on Labor Day 1974 by President Gerald to provide greater protection for employees participating in workplace benefit plans. More particularly, as [...]

(https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk) Elon Musk's X avoids $500 million in severance after favorable court ruling. The court found insufficient evidence of ERISA governance of benefits for employees. X still faces multiple lawsuits [...]

The National Association of Specialty Pharmacy (NASP) on June 15 reported it has filed a petitionbefore the U.S. Supreme Court, asking that the Court agree to support the rights of [...]

INTRODUCTION Even as insurance companies saw record profits during the COVID-19 pandemic, they steadfastly refused to adequately respond to the other health crisis facing America: the opioid overdose epidemic. The [...]

A recent FINRA arbitration ruling has granted seven ex-Morgan Stanley advisors the opportunity to recoup over $1.5 million in deferred compensation they claim they are owed after leaving for other firms. This victory is seen as the first step in a series of lawsuits challenging the pay policies of the Wall Street giant. The lawyers representing the claimants have assembled a group of close to 150 clients seeking similar compensation. Other law firms are also pursuing arbitrations against Morgan Stanley on behalf of ex-advisors. The case hinges on whether deferred compensation should fall under guarantees offered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Morgan Stanley argues that the deferred compensation is meant as an incentive for loyalty and good guardianship, while the claimants argue that it is earned compensation that belongs to them regardless of their employment status. The recent FINRA arbitration ruling is seen as a positive development for the claimants, although it does not set a binding precedent for future cases. [Extracted from the article]

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has long been in charge of setting forth rules for the timing and use of forfeitures in a defined contribution plan. Recently, in fact, the [...]

Advisors are suing their ex-employers for pay they forfeited after leaving for rivals. Taking on banks with billion-dollar war chests is big business for a Texas firm with 11 lawyers. [...]

Byline: Rob Kozlowski The ERISA 50th Anniversary Symposium & Gala has issued a call for ERISA-related research papers, one of which will be presented at the Sept. 12 event in [...]

Byline: Marc Lutz 'Stay committed to your decisions, but flexible in your approach.' Tony Robbins One of the most significant pieces of financial legislation enacted in the last 50 years [...]