Search

The increasing importance of preventive measures in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery becomes apparent because of the demographic changes and the high risk for secondary fractures following osteoporotic fractures. Within the fracture treatment chain, orthopedics and trauma surgery are in the "pole position" to initiate these measures in geriatric patients. In the past orthopedists and trauma surgeons have constantly accused of neglecting secondary fracture prevention in fragility fracture patients. There are several reasons that speak in favor of us undertaking a role in secondary fracture prevention: osteoporosis medication is highly effective in fracture prevention when correctly indicated, the positive effects of osteoporosis therapy on fracture healing and legal issues. Arguments that have been used to justify neglect of secondary fracture prevention are undesired side effects related to osteoporosis medications, such as atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaws, interference of some specific drugs with fracture healing and the working conditions in emergency departments. These run contrary to the consideration of chronic diseases such as osteoporosis, secondary osteoporosis and the underlying disease could be overlooked and the increasing complexity of medicinal osteoporosis therapy. In the first part of the article these arguments are weighed against each other. In the second part the concept of a fracture liaison service (FLS) is discussed. The FLS framework now allows an active role to be taken with respect to secondary fracture prevention despite the busy daily routine schedule. Implementation of an FLS is facilitated by dedicated instruction protocols and programs. Self-financing of an FLS is currently possible only in some specific healthcare systems. In healthcare systems in German-speaking areas a cross-financing must be available and the value of an FLS indirectly presented. Apart from the financial aspects, implementation of a FLS is also worthwhile because it can be looked on as the future driving force of innovation.

The increasing importance of preventive measures in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery becomes apparent because of the demographic changes and the high risk for secondary fractures following osteoporotic fractures. Within the fracture treatment chain, orthopedics and trauma surgery are in the "pole position" to initiate these measures in geriatric patients. In the past orthopedists and trauma surgeons have constantly accused of neglecting secondary fracture prevention in fragility fracture patients. There are several reasons that speak in favor of us undertaking a role in secondary fracture prevention: osteoporosis medication is highly effective in fracture prevention when correctly indicated, the positive effects of osteoporosis therapy on fracture healing and legal issues. Arguments that have been used to justify neglect of secondary fracture prevention are undesired side effects related to osteoporosis medications, such as atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaws, interference of some specific drugs with fracture healing and the working conditions in emergency departments. These run contrary to the consideration of chronic diseases such as osteoporosis, secondary osteoporosis and the underlying disease could be overlooked and the increasing complexity of medicinal osteoporosis therapy. In the first part of the article these arguments are weighed against each other. In the second part the concept of a fracture liaison service (FLS) is discussed. The FLS framework now allows an active role to be taken with respect to secondary fracture prevention despite the busy daily routine schedule. Implementation of an FLS is facilitated by dedicated instruction protocols and programs. Self-financing of an FLS is currently possible only in some specific healthcare systems. In healthcare systems in German-speaking areas a cross-financing must be available and the value of an FLS indirectly presented. Apart from the financial aspects, implementation of a FLS is also worthwhile because it can be looked on as the future driving force of innovation.