Search

Background: It is unknown which maintenance therapy is the most effective option for patients admitted for an acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) episode responding to intravenous steroids., Methods: We conducted a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised controlled trial among 23 French centres in thiopurine and biologics-naïve adults admitted for ASUC responding to intravenous steroids. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive infliximab (IFX) and azathioprine (AZA) with a 7-day steroid tapering scheme (IFX+AZA arm) or AZA and conventional standardised steroid tapering regimen (AZA arm). The primary composite endpoint was treatment failure at week 52, defined as the absence of steroid-free clinical remission, the absence of endoscopic response, the use of a prohibited treatment for relapse, severe adverse event leading to treatment interruption, colectomy or death. Multiple imputation for missing data was performed., Findings: Among the 64 patients randomised (Lichtiger score 13.5±2.0; median age of 34.5 (P25-P75 26.3-50.3) years, median C reactive protein of 29.0 (12.8-96.8) mg/L at baseline): 32 were assigned to the IFX+AZA arm and 32 to the AZA arm. In the ITT population, treatment failure at week 52 was observed in 22/27 (81.5%) in the AZA arm and 16/30 (53.3%) in the IFX+AZA arm (risk ratio 3.85, 95% CI (1.15 to 12.88), p=0.03). 29 adverse events were severe, including 13 disease exacerbations, 6 severe infections without any difference between both arms., Interpretation: Combination therapy with IFX+AZA was more effective at 1 year than AZA alone to avoid treatment failure in patients with ASUC responding to intravenous steroids., Trial Registration Number: NCT02425852., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AA received consulting fees from Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Tillotts Pharma, Janssen and Sandoz as well as lecture fees and travel accommodations from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Biogen, Fresenius Kabi, Amgen and Celltrion. PS reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Astellas, Janssen, Fresenius Kabi, Takeda, Abbvie, Merck-MSD, Pilège, Lilly, Celltrion and Biocodex; and grants from Biocodex and Janssen. CS declare lecture and/or consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Takeda, Tillots. PW received board membership, consultancy, or lecture fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Ferring, Janssen, and Takeda. LV received fees from Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Ferring, Takeda, Pfizer, Celltrion, Janssen, Galapagos, Dr Falk. RA declares lecture fees from MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, and Janssen. GB received lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Takeda and Pfizer and consultant fees from Takeda, Janssen, Lilly, Celltrion, Sandoz, Abbvie. MB has received lecture fees and travel accommodation from Abbvie, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Pfizer and Takeda. DL has received counseling, boards, transports and/or fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche, Takeda, Tillots. MA has served as a speaker, consultant, and/or advisory board member for Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech, IQVIA, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Tillotts. FG declares counseling, boards, transports and lectures fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda. NR has received lecture fees from AbbVie and Takeda. LP-B received consulting fees from Merck, Abbvie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Shire, Therakos, Pharmacosmos, Pilège, BMS, UCB-Pharma, Hospira, Celltrion, Takeda, Biogaran, Boerhinger-Ingelheim, Lilly, Pfizer and HAC-Pharma. This author also received lecture fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen Cilag, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Therakos, HAC-Pharma and Mitsubishi. No conflicts of interest are claimed by the remaining authors., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The exact rate of contraindications to anti-TNF therapy and physician perspectives on treatment choices facing to anti-TNF contraindication, are poorly reported., Methods: A two-week cross-sectional study was conducted in 31 centres. Physicians completed a questionnaire for a total of 1,314 consecutive outpatients with Crohn's disease, assessing each patient's potential contraindications to anti-TNF therapy, the choice of alternative therapy to anti-TNFs, and their preference in an unrestricted reimbursement setting., Results: Among the 1,293 responses to the first item, 148 (11.5%) reported 32 absolute contraindications (2.5%) and 116 relative contraindications (9.0%) to anti-TNF therapy. When asked about their preference of alternative therapies in those cases with contraindications to anti-TNF, physicians chose ustekinumab and vedolizumab, 75.6% and 23.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the choice of vedolizumab was the preferred choice for patients aged > 60 years with the L2 phenotype and the absence of perianal lesions. In a hypothetical setting of unrestricted reimbursement, anti-TNFs remained physicians' preferred first-line biological therapy choice for 78.2%., Conclusion: Anti-TNF contraindications occurred in up to 11.5% of patients with Crohn's disease. Physicians' choices for alternative therapy to anti-TNF relied on ustekinumab in 75.6% and vedolizumab in 23.9% of these cases. This choice was driven mainly by phenotypical criteria and age., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maria Nachury has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie, Adacyte, Amgen, Arena, Biogen, CTMA, Ferring, Gilead, Janssen, Mayoli Spindler, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda Melanie Serrero has received lecture or consulting fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Amgen, Celltrion, Janssen, Ferring, Takeda and Tillotts. Philippe Seksik received consulting fees from Takeda, Abbvie, Merck-MSD, Biocodex, Janssen, Amgen, Astellas and Pfizer, grants from Biocodex and travel accommodation from Merck-MSD, Takeda and Amgen. Charlotte Gagniere received transport fees from Takeda Arnaud Bourreille received counselling, boards or transport fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Ferring, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma. Stéphane Nahon reported a relationship with Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, MSD, Gilead, Ferring Marion Simon reported a relationship with Abbvie, Mylan, Takeda and Amgen Lucas Guillo has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie Xavier Roblin reported a relationship with MSD, Pfizer, Celltrion, Abbvie, Amgen, Takeda, Janssen, Ferring, Theradiag. Anthony Buisson has received research funding from Pfizer, lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Hospira, MSD, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda and Vifor Pharma and consulting fees from Abbvie, Biogen, Janssen, Pfizer and Takeda. Stephane Nancey has received consulting fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Ferring, Norgine, Vifor Pharma, Novartis, Janssen Cilag, Hospira, Takeda and HAC Pharma Vered Abitbol has received lecture fees from Amgen, Biogen, Mylan, Sandoz, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen, Tillots, Gilead, Ferring Jean-Marie Reimund has received consulting fees from Hospira and Pfizer. This author has also received lectures fees from Abbvie, Biocodex, Ferring, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer and Takeda, as well as travel accommodations from Ferring, Abbvie, MSD, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, Hospira and Takeda Lucine Vuitton has received lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Ferring, Janssen, Amgen, Gilead, Celltrion and Pfizer, and research grants from MSD, Takeda and Pfizer. Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet has received consulting fees from Merck, Abbvie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Shire, Therakos, Pharmacosmos, Pilège, BMS, UCB-Pharma, Hospira, Celltrion, Takeda, Biogaran, Boerhinger-Ingelheim, Lilly, Pfizer, and HAC-Pharma. This author has also received lecture fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen Cilag, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Therakos, HAC-Pharma, and Mitsubishi. Cyrielle Gilletta received lecture fees from Abbvie, Takeda, Pfizer and Janssen and consulting fees from Abbvie, Janssen and Takeda. Matthieu Allez has received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, MSD, Abbvie, Ferring, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, GSK, Hospira, UCB, Novartis, Takeda, Mayolo-Spindler. Stephanie Viennot has received consulting fees from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Vifor Pharma and Ferring. Claire Painchart has received travel accommodation from Abbvie, Janssen, Biogene, Fresenius Kabi, Takeda and Pfizer. Mathurin Fumery has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie, MSD, Boehringer, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen and Ferring. David Laharie has received counseling, boards, transports and/or fees from Abbvie, Biogaran, Biogen, Ferring, HAC-pharma, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche, Takeda, Theradiag, Tillots. Aurelien Amiot has received consulting fees from Abbvie, Hospira, Takeda, Gilead and Biocodex as well as lecture fees and travel accommodations from Abbvie, Janssen, Biocodex, Hospira, Ferring, Takeda and MSD. This author has also received advisory board fees from Gilead, Takeda and Abbvie. No conflicts of interest are claimed by the remaining authors., (Copyright © 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: New therapeutic options for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) with perianal lesions failing anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are needed. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of ustekinumab in perianal CD (pCD) and predictors of clinical success in a real-life multicenter cohort., Methods: We conducted a national multicenter retrospective cohort study in patients with either active or inactive pCD who received ustekinumab. In patients with active pCD at treatment initiation, the success of ustekinumab was defined by clinical success at 6 months assessed by the physician's judgment without additional medical or surgical treatment for pCD. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of success. In patients with inactive pCD at ustekinumab initiation, the pCD recurrence-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Two hundred seven patients were included, the mean age was 37.7 years, the mean duration of CD was 14.3 years, and the mean number of prior perianal surgeries was 2.8. Two hundred five (99%) patients had previously been exposed to at least 1 anti-TNF and 58 (28%) to vedolizumab. The median follow-up time was 48 weeks; 56/207 (27%) patients discontinued therapy after a median time of 43 weeks. In patients with active pCD, success was reached in 57/148 (38.5%) patients. Among patients with setons at initiation, 29/88 (33%) had a successful removal. The absence of optimization was associated with treatment success (P = 0.044, odds ratio 2.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.96-7.82). In multivariable analysis, the number of prior anti-TNF agents (≥3) was borderline significant (P = 0.056, odds ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.15-1.08). In patients with inactive pCD at initiation, the probability of recurrence-free survival was 86.2% and 75.1% at weeks 26 and 52, respectively., Discussion: Ustekinumab appears as a potential effective therapeutic option in perianal refractory CD. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Background: The management of Crohn's disease patients with perianal lesions and anti-TNF failure is challenging., Aims: To assess the effectiveness of vedolizumab in perianal Crohn's disease and the predictors of success in a real-life cohort., Methods: We conducted a nationwide multicentre cohort study in patients with perianal Crohn's disease who received vedolizumab. In patients with active perianal Crohn's disease, the success of vedolizumab was defined by clinical success (no draining fistula at clinical examination and no anal ulcers for primary lesions) at 6 months without medical or surgical treatment for perianal Crohn's disease. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of success. In patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease, recurrence was defined by the occurrence of lesions and/or the need for medical or surgical treatments., Results: One hundred and fifty-one patients were included. Among them 102 patients had active perianal disease, 33 (32.4%) males, mean age 39.8 years, mean Crohn's disease duration 14.6 years; 101 (99%) had received at least one anti-TNF. The median follow-up time was 52 weeks. Sixty-eight per cent of patients discontinued therapy after a median time of 33 weeks. Vedolizumab success was reached in 23/102 (22.5%). Among patients with setons at initiation, 9/61(15%) had a successful removal. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with success were the number of prior biologic agents (≥3, odds ratio, OR: 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.98) and no antibiotics at initiation (OR: 4.76, 95% CI 1.25-18.19). In 49 patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease, perianal disease recurred in 15/49 (30.6%), 11/49 (22.4%) needed dedicated treatments. Median time to recurrence was 22 weeks., Conclusions: We identified a low rate of success of vedolizumab in patients with active perianal Crohn's disease, and nearly one third of patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease had perianal recurrence. Further evaluation is warranted in prospective studies., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: to describe the characteristics of incident cases of tuberculosis [TB] despite negative TB screening tests, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] undergoing anti-TNF treatment, and to identify the risk factors involved., Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted at GETAID centers on all IBD patients undergoing anti-TNF treatment who developed TB even though their initial screening test results were negative. The following data were collected using a standardized anonymous questionnaire: IBD, and TB characteristics and evolution, initial screening methods and results, and time before anti-TNF treatment was restarted., Results: A total of 44 IBD patients [including 23 men; median age 37 years] were identified at 20 French and Swiss centers at which TB screening was performed [before starting anti-TNF treatment] based on Tuberculin Skin Tests [n = 25], Interferon Gamma Release Assays [n = 12], or both [n = 7]. The median interval from the start of anti-TNF treatment to TB diagnosis was 14.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 25-75: 4.9-43.3). Pulmonary TB involvement was observed in 25 [57%] patients, and 40 [91%] had at least one extrapulmonary location. One TB patient died as the result of cardiac tamponade. Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure was thought to be a possible cause of TB in 14 cases [32%]: 7 patients [including 6 health care workers] were exposed to occupational risks, and 7 had travelled to endemic countries. Biotherapy was restarted on 27 patients after a median period of 11.2 months [IQR 25-75: 4.4-15.2] after TB diagnosis without any recurrence of the infection., Conclusion: Tuberculosis can occur in IBD patients undergoing anti-TNF treatment, even if their initial screening results were negative. In the present population, TB was mostly extrapulmonary and disseminated. TB screening tests should be repeated on people exposed to occupational risks and/or travelers to endemic countries. Restarting anti-TNF treatment seems to be safe., (Copyright © 2016 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Faecal calprotectin is a reliable tool for predicting Crohn's disease (CD) relapse in patients with sustained remission. Prediction of relapse with faecal calprotectin has been less studied in patients with severe CD treated with anti-TNF., Aim: To identify an association between faecal calprotectin concentration and CD clinical relapse in patients achieving remission with infliximab (IFX)., Methods: From February 2007 to October 2008, consecutive patients with refractory luminal CD were prospectively included when they received three IFX infusions (5mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6) followed by maintenance with an immunomodulator alone. Faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured at entry and at week 14 (w14)., Results:   Sixty-five patients (43W; median age: 30.4years) were included, and 50 (77%) were in clinical remission off steroids at w14; twenty-three of fifty (46%) experienced CD clinical relapse during the first year of follow-up. Median faecal calprotectin level at w14 was similar in patients with and without CD clinical relapse (200 and 150μg/g respectively). When considering two suggested faecal calprotectin cut-offs to predict CD relapse, sensitivities and specificities were 61% and 48% for 130μg/g, respectively, and 43% and 57% for 250μg/g. Neither faecal calprotectin nor CRP at baseline and at w14 could predict relapse even when CD location subgroup analysis was considered., Conclusion: In patients responding to an infliximab induction regimen, faecal calprotectin measurement at w14 cannot predict Crohn's disease clinical relapse at 1year., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: In Crohn's disease (CD) patients naïve to immunomodulators primary responding to infliximab (IFX) induction, maintenance with scheduled IFX or with immunomodulators is possible. The benefit of additional IFX infusions after failure of maintenance with immunomodulators is not known., Aim: To assess the efficacy and factors associated with efficacy of postponed IFX retreatment., Methods: All CD primary responders to an IFX induction regimen in maintenance with immunomodulators were retrospectively included when they received at least one additional IFX infusion after week 14. Efficacy was defined as clinical response at week 4 and absence of intolerance leading to discontinuation., Results: Sixty-one patients were retreated with IFX with a 38-week median time from induction. Efficacy was achieved in 80% patients. Twelve patients had no clinical benefit: seven acute hypersensitivity reactions and five loss of response. By multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with no efficacy was a median time >50 weeks from induction to retreatment (odds ratio = 7.38; 95%CI: 1.38-39.59; P = 0.02)., Conclusion: Postponed retreatment with IFX in CD primary responders should be administered within 50 weeks after induction, for better efficacy and tolerance.

The recent advent of non-invasive methods for assessment of fibrosis allows serial assessments in all patients with hepatitis C. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate changes in liver fibrosis, as measured with non-invasive methods, in a large cohort of HCV-infected patients with and without treatment. From May 2003 through March 2006, all previously untreated HCV-infected patients were enrolled in this study. Liver fibrosis was staged with FibroScan and Fibrotest at inclusion, then every year in untreated patients, and at the end of treatment and 6 months later in treated patients. The study population consisted of 416 patients, of whom 112 started treatment after enrolment. In the treatment group, FibroScan and Fibrotest values were significantly higher before and after treatment than in untreated patients at baseline and after 1 year. However, there was no significant difference between treated and untreated patients at the end of follow-up. FibroScan and Fibrotest values fell in all treated patients, whatever their virological response. In multivariate analysis, treatment was the only factor independently associated with a fall in the FibroScan value. In conclusion, whatever the virological response, treatment for HCV infection is associated with an improvement of FibroScan and Fibrotest values. Further studies are needed to compare these non-invasive methods with liver biopsy. These non-invasive methods, and especially FibroScan, should be useful for assessing treatment efficacy in clinical trials of new drugs.

Methotrexate is proposed for the treatment of inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn's disease. The liver toxicity of methotrexate has been investigated and prolonged treatment can induce liver fibrosis. Moreover, alcohol consumption, diabetes and obesity are associated with liver fibrosis in patients treated with this drug. Therefore, liver fibrosis associated with methotrexate could be due to associated factors instead of methotrexate itself. Recommendations to monitor and diagnose methotrexate induced liver damage vary depending on the disease. Frequent evaluation of liver fibrosis with liver biopsy is recommended during therapy, especially in patients treated for psoriasis. Noninvasive methods, such as the FibroScan, could be useful for the assessment of liver fibrosis associated with methotrexate and hence, need further evaluation.

Background: The role of hepatic iron overload in the development of hepatic fibrosis in patients with hemochromatosis is well-established. Transient elastography (FibroScan) is a new noninvasive, rapid, reproducible bedside method, allowing assessment of liver fibrosis by measuring liver rigidity., Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate liver fibrosis with FibroScan and other noninvasive biochemical methods in patients with hemochromatosis (C282Y homozygosity) compared with control patients., Patients and Methods: From January 2004 through October 2006, all consecutive patients with hemochromatosis were evaluated for liver fibrosis using noninvasive methods (FibroScan and biochemical markers). These patients were compared with patients who had chronic cytolysis and no fibrosis on liver biopsy., Results: One hundred and three consecutive patients (57 cases and 46 controls) were fully investigated. Median FibroScan values were similar in both groups, 5.20 kPa versus 4.9 kPa, respectively. No differences were observed between cases and controls for all biochemical markers. A strong correlation was observed between FibroScan and many biochemical markers, although ferritin levels did not correlate with FibroScan values. The prevalence of patients with FibroScan values greater than 7.1 kPa (cut-off level for significant fibrosis) was 22.8% in patients with hemochromatosis and 0% in the controls (P<0.0001)., Conclusion: FibroScan and biochemical markers could be reliable noninvasive methods for detecting liver fibrosis in patients with hemochromatosis. Such patients have high FibroScan values more often than do control patients. Further longitudinal and prospective studies are necessary to confirm these preliminary data.

Background: Transient elastography (FibroScan) is a new, non-invasive, rapid, and reproducible method allowing evaluation of liver fibrosis by measurement of liver stiffness. In cirrhotic patients, liver stiffness measurements range from 12.5 to 75.5 kPa. However, the clinical relevance of these values is unknown. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the detection of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease., Methods: A total of 711 patients with chronic liver disease were studied. Aetiologies of chronic liver diseases were hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus infection, alcohol, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, other, or a combination of the above aetiologies. Liver fibrosis was evaluated according to the METAVIR score., Results: Stiffness was significantly correlated with fibrosis stage (r=0.73, p<0.0001). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) were 0.80 (0.75-0.84) for patients with significant fibrosis (F>2), 0.90 (0.86-0.93) for patients with severe fibrosis (F3), and 0.96 (0.94-0.98) for patients with cirrhosis. Using a cut off value of 17.6 kPa, patients with cirrhosis were detected with a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90%. Liver stiffness was significantly correlated with clinical, biological, and morphological parameters of liver disease. With an NPV>90%, the cut off values for the presence of oesophageal varices stage 2/3, cirrhosis Child-Pugh B or C, past history of ascites, hepatocellular carcinoma, and oesophageal bleeding were 27.5, 37.5, 49.1, 53.7, and 62.7 kPa, respectively., Conclusion: Transient elastography is a promising non-invasive method for detection of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Its use for the follow up and management of these patients could be of great interest and should be evaluated further.

Background and Aims: Transient elastography (FibroScan; Echosens, Paris, France) is a novel, noninvasive, and rapid bedside method to assess liver fibrosis by measuring liver stiffness. We prospectively assessed the performance of FibroScan in patients with chronic hepatitis C, in comparison with and combined with currently available biochemical markers (Fibrotest; Biopredictive; and the aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index [APRI]); a liver biopsy examination performed the same day served as the reference., Methods: We studied 183 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C (METAVIR fibrosis stage F1, n = 47; F2, n = 53; F3, n = 37; F4, n = 46)., Results: FibroScan values ranged from 2.4 to 75.4 kilopascals (median, 7.4 kilopascals). Cut-off values were 7.1 kPa for F > or = 2, 9.5 kPa for F > or = 3, and 12.5 kPa for F = 4. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of FibroScan, FibroTest, and APRI values were of the same order (.83, .85, and .78, respectively, for F > or = 2; .90, .90, and .84, respectively, for F > or = 3; and .95, .87, and .83, respectively, for F = 4). The best performance was obtained by combining the FibroScan and FibroTest, with areas under the ROC curve of .88 for F > or = 2, .95 for F > or = 3, and .95 for F = 4. When the FibroScan and FibroTest results agreed, liver biopsy examination confirmed them in 84% of cases for F > or = 2, in 95% for F > or = 3, and in 94% for F = 4., Conclusions: FibroScan is a simple and effective method for assessing liver fibrosis, with similar performance to FibroTest and APRI. The combined use of FibroScan and FibroTest to evaluate liver fibrosis could avoid a biopsy procedure in most patients with chronic hepatitis C.