1. Non-pedicled vs vascular pedicled nasal flap in repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea
- Author
-
A. Jurado-Ramos, J. Gutiérrez Jodas, F. Muñoz del Castillo, N. Müller Locatelli, J. Aguilar Cantador, and E. Cantillo Baños
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea ,Nasal Surgical Procedures ,Nose ,Surgical Flaps ,Cerebrospinal fluid ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,Nasal flap ,Retrospective Studies ,rhinorrhea ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Pedicled Flap ,Middle Aged ,respiratory system ,Surgery ,Otorhinolaryngology ,Anesthesia ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
In our study, pedicled nasal flap (NF) did not provide better results than free nasal graft (NG) for primary closure of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea. In the future, a multicenter randomized study would be needed to confirm this result. The choice of surgical technique will depend on the surgeon's experience, and the position and size of the defect.To evaluate our results in repairing CSF leaks, comparing the two techniques we used: free NG and pedicled NF.A total of 33 patients diagnosed with CSF rhinorrhea were operated on between June 2000 and May 2010; 17 were women. The mean age was 44.7 years (± 13.0). Twenty-two (66.6%) NFs of the middle and lower turbinate and septum were performed, the rest being NGs of the middle and lower turbinate only. A descriptive statistical analysis and a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were carried out and the log-rank statistic was used to compare both techniques.In the present study, 78% of defects were closed in all cases; NF was used in 86% (19) and NG in 63.63% (7). The mean follow-up was 71.5 (95% confidence interval (CI), 56.9-86.1) months. There were no statistically significant differences (p0.05).
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF