Search

Background Azathioprine (AZA) and thiopurine are widely used for induction and maintenance of remission in steroid-dependent patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study has been to investigate its efficacy and safety in maintaining steroid-free remission in steroid-dependent IBD patients eight years after the institution of treatment. Methods Data from consecutive IBD outpatients referred in our Institution, between 1985–2017, were reviewed and all patients treated with AZA were included in this retrospective study. AZA was administered at the recommended dose of 2–2.5 mg/kg. Results Out of 2992 consecutive IBD outpatients visited in the index period, AZA was prescribed to 446 patients, 245 (54.9%) were affected by Crohn’s disease (CD) and 201 (45.1%) by ulcerative colitis (UC). One hundred and ninety-six patients with a follow-up < 96 months were excluded from the study. Two hundred and fifty patients were evaluated, 140 (56%) with CD and 110 (44%) with UC. One hundred and thirty-eight (55.2%) were male and 112 (44.8%) female (average age of 35.48 ± 14.26 SD years, range 14–74 years). Eight year after the institution of treatment, 123 (49.2%) patients still were in steroid-free remission (82 CD vs. 41 UC, 58.6% and 37.3%, respectively, p = 0.0009), 71 (28.4%) had a relapse requiring retreatment with steroids (29 CD vs. 42 UC, 20.7% and 38.2%, respectively, p = 0.0030), 56 (22.4%) discontinued the treatment due to side effects (29 CD vs. 27 UC, 20.7% and 24.5%, respectively). The loss of response from first to eighth year of follow-up was low, about 21%. Conclusion Eight years after the onset of treatment about 50% of patients did not require further steroid courses. After the first-year loss of response was low in seven subsequent years. In the present series, the maintenance of steroid-free remission was significantly higher in CD than in UC patients. The occurrence of side effects leading to the withdrawal of AZA treatment has been low.

The concept that motor disorders of the gallbladder, cystic duct and sphincter of Oddi can cause painful syndromes is attractive and popular, at least in the USA. However, the results of commonly performed ablative treatments (cholecystectomy and sphincterotomy) are not uniformly good. The predictive value of tests that are often used to diagnose dysfunction (dynamic gallbladder scintigraphy and sphincter manometry) is controversial. Evaluation and management of these patients is made difficult by the fluctuating symptoms and the placebo effect of invasive interventions. A recent stringent study has shown that sphincterotomy is no better than sham treatment in patients with post-cholecystectomy pain and little or no objective abnormalities on investigation, so that the old concept of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) type III is discarded. ERCP approaches are no longer appropriate in that context. There is a pressing need for similar prospective studies to provide better guidance for clinicians dealing with these patients. We need to clarify the indications for cholecystectomy in patients with Functional Gallbladder Disorder (FGBD) and the relevance of sphincter dysfunction in patients with some evidence for biliary obstruction (previously SOD type II, now called "Functional Biliary Sphincter Disorder - FBSD") and with idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is the most common form of gastrointestinal disorders associated with eosinophilia. Typically, an inappropriate accumulation of eosinophils is found in the esophageal mucosa. EoE can be well managed and treated with several options that include an elimination diet, drug therapy (oral and topical steroids) and esophageal dilatations. We herein, report a case of a 49-year-old male affected by EoE associated to chest pain, treated with proton pump inhibitor without clinical response. The patient suffered from long lasting postprandial fullness and gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms. He had a history of episodic asthmatic attacks and allergic rhinitis but had not dysphagia or food impaction. The patient recovered completely after an adequate treatment.