Search

Shipra Gandhi,1 Hongbin Chen,2 Yujie Zhao,2 Grace K Dy2 1Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York, 2Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA Abstract: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths, both within the US and worldwide. There have been major treatment advances in NSCLC over the past decade with the discovery of molecular drivers of NSCLC, which has ushered in an era of personalized medicine. There are several actionable genetic aberrations in NSCLC, such as epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). In 3%–7% of NSCLC, a chromosomal inversion event in chromosome 2 leads to fusion of a portion of the ALK gene with the echinoderm microtubule–associated protein-like 4 (EML4) gene. The constitutive activation of the ALK fusion oncogene renders it vulnerable to therapeutic intervention. This review focuses on the first-line treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC using ALK inhibitors. Crizotinib was the first agent proven to be efficacious as first-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC. However, acquired resistance inevitably develops. The central nervous system is a sanctuary site that represents a common site for disease progression as well. Hence, more potent, selective next-generation ALK inhibitors that are able to cross the blood–brain barrier have been developed for treatment against crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive NSCLC and are also currently being evaluated for first-line therapy as well. In this review, we provide summary of the clinical experience with these drugs in the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. Keywords: non-small-cell lung cancer, ALK, first line, crizotinib, pemetrexed

Neha Gupta, Hassan Hatoum, Grace K DyDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USAAbstract: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide in both men and women. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for more than 80% of cases. Paclitaxel has a broad spectrum of activity against various malignancies, including NSCLC. Paclitaxel is poorly soluble in water and thus, until recently, its commercially available preparations contained a non-ionic solvent Cremophor EL®. Cremophor EL® improves the solubility of paclitaxel and allows its intravenous administration. However, certain side-effects associated with paclitaxel, such as hypersensitivity reactions, myelosuppression, and peripheral neuropathy, are known to be worsened by Cremophor®. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel ([nab-paclitaxel] ABRAXANE® ABI-007) is a new generation formulation of paclitaxel that obviates the need for Cremophor®, resulting in a safer and faster infusion without requiring the use of premedications to avoid hypersensitivity. Albumin-binding receptor-mediated delivery and lack of sequestering Cremophor® micelles allow higher intratumoral concentration of pharmacologically active paclitaxel. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated a superior tolerability profile of nab-paclitaxel in comparison to solvent-bound paclitaxel (sb-paclitaxel). A recent Phase III trial compared the effects of weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus sb-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin given every 3 weeks for first line treatment of NSCLC. This trial highlights the weekly nab-paclitaxel combination as an alternate treatment option for NSCLC, with higher response rate in squamous cell NSCLC and longer survival in elderly patients. This review will focus on the properties of nab-paclitaxel and its use in the first line treatment of NSCLC.Keywords: ABI-007, Abraxane, nab-paclitaxel, lung neoplasms

Nicolas Batty,1 Ellen Kossoff,2 Grace K Dy11Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA; 2Department of Pharmacy, Roswell Park Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USAAbstract: Vismodegib (GDC-0449, 2-chloro-N-(4-chloro-3-(pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-4-(methylsulfonyl)benzamide, Erivedge™) is a novel first-in-human, first-in class, orally bioavailable Hedgehog pathway signaling inhibitor of the G-protein coupled receptor-like protein smoothened (SMO) which was approved in the United States on January 2012. This signaling pathway is involved in the carcinogenesis of several types of tumor, as exemplified by basal cell carcinoma. This review focuses on the role of the Hedgehog pathway in the pathogenesis of basal cell carcinoma, the pharmacology and the clinical activity of vismodegib, as well as a brief summary of investigational agents in development targeting this pathway.Keywords: hedgehog inhibitors, metastatic basal cell carcinoma, hedgehog signalling pathway

Background: The current study was conducted to assess the efficacy and toxicity of sorafenib as front-line therapy in patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: Patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily by mouth continuously, and were evaluated every 2 weeks during the first 8 weeks. Patients who manifested clinical progression during this period proceeded to receive standard of care. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective tumor response. A 2-stage Fleming design was used such that if at most 1 confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response was observed in the first 20 patients (stage 1), the treatment would be considered ineffective, and further enrollment would be discontinued.Results: Only 1 PR was observed in the first 20 patients. By the time of study closure, 5 additional patients who were already being screened for study inclusion were enrolled. Of the 25 patients (15 women, 10 men; 4 stage IIIB, 21 stage IV; median age, 67 years [range, 45-85 years]), there were 3 (12%) PRs and 6 (24%) cases with stable disease observed. The median time-to-progression and progression-free survival was 2.8 months. Seven (28%) patients remained progression-free at 24 weeks. No grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events were observed. Thirteen (52%) patients had a grade 3 nonhematologic adverse event, with fatigue (20%), diarrhea (8%), and dyspnea (8%) being the most common.Conclusions: Sorafenib is not effective as front-line therapy in the general unselected NSCLC population. The window of opportunity design is feasible for estimating the activity of novel compounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a fast-growing class of cancer drugs designed to selectively deliver cytotoxic payloads through antibody binding to cancer cells with high expression of the target antigen, thus reducing systemic exposure and minimizing off-target effects. However, ADCs are associated with various ocular adverse events (AEs) that may impact treatment administration and patient outcomes. In this review, we provide a summary of ocular AEs associated with approved and investigational ADCs, recommendations for the mitigation and management of ocular AEs, current guidelines and expert opinions, and recommendations for clinical practice. A literature search was performed, using PubMed and Google Scholar, for English-language articles published between January 1985 and January 2023 to identify studies reporting ocular AEs associated with ADC use. Search terms included generic and investigational names of all identified ADCs, and further searches were performed to identify strategies for managing ADC-associated ocular AEs. ADC-associated ocular AEs include symptoms such as blurred vision and foreign-body sensation and signs such as corneal fluorescein staining, corneal pseudomicrocysts, and conjunctivitis. Reported management strategies include ADC dose modification (eg, dose delay or reduction), cool compresses, artificial tears, topical vasoconstrictors, and topical steroids. Although ADC dose modification appears to be beneficial, the preventive and/or therapeutic benefits of the remaining interventions are unclear. Although the exact mechanisms are not fully understood, most ADC-associated ocular AEs are reversible with dose delay or dose reduction. Management of ocular AEs requires a multidisciplinary approach to minimize treatment discontinuation and optimize clinical outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Cancer cohorts are now known to be associated with increased rates of clonal hematopoiesis (CH). We sort to characterize the hematopoietic compartment of patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) given our recent population level analysis reporting evolving rates of secondary leukemias. The advent of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has dramatically changed our understanding of cancer biology and has altered the standards of care for patients. However, the impact of ICB on hematopoietic myeloid clonal expansion remains to be determined. We studied if exposure to ICB therapy affects hematopoietic clonal architecture and if their evolution contributed to altered hematopoiesis. Blood samples from patients with melanoma and NSCLC ( n = 142) demonstrated a high prevalence of CH. Serial samples (or post ICB exposure samples; n = 25) were evaluated in melanoma and NSCLC patients. Error-corrected sequencing of a targeted panel of genes recurrently mutated in CH was performed on peripheral blood genomic DNA. In serial sample analysis, we observed that mutations in DNMT3A and TET2 increased in size with longer ICB exposures in the melanoma cohort. We also noted that patients with larger size DNMT3A mutations with further post ICB clone size expansion had longer durations of ICB exposure. All serial samples in this cohort showed a statistically significant change in VAF from baseline. In the serial sample analysis of NSCLC patients, we observed similar epigenetic expansion, although not statistically significant. Our study generates a hypothesis for two important questions: (a) Can DNMT3A or TET2 CH serve as predictors of a response to ICB therapy and serve as a novel biomarker of response to ICB therapy? (b) As ICB-exposed patients continue to live longer, the myeloid clonal expansion may portend an increased risk for subsequent myeloid malignancy development. Until now, the selective pressure of ICB/T-cell activating therapies on hematopoietic stem cells were less known and we report preliminary evidence of clonal expansion in epigenetic modifier genes (also referred to as inflammatory CH genes).

Pre-cancerous lung lesions are commonly initiated by activating mutations in the RAS pathway, but do not transition to lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) without additional oncogenic signals. Here, we show that expression of the extracellular matrix protein Tenascin-C (TNC) is increased in and promotes the earliest stages of LUAD development in oncogenic KRAS-driven lung cancer mouse models and in human LUAD. TNC is initially expressed by fibroblasts and its expression extends to tumor cells as the tumor becomes invasive. Genetic deletion of TNC in the mouse models reduces early tumor burden and high-grade pathology and diminishes tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity. TNC stimulates cultured LUAD tumor cell proliferation and migration through engagement of αv-containing integrins and subsequent FAK activation. Intringuingly, lung injury causes sustained TNC accumulation in mouse lungs, suggesting injury can induce additional TNC signaling for early tumor cell transition to invasive LUAD. Biospecimens from patients with stage I/II LUAD show TNC in regions of FAK activation and an association of TNC with tumor recurrence after primary tumor resection. These results suggest that exogenous insults that elevate TNC in the lung parenchyma interact with tumor-initiating mutations to drive early LUAD progression and local recurrence.

Background: The ADAURA trial confirmed adjuvant Osimertinib's efficacy in EGFR-mutated Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the limited mature overall survival (OS) data at approval poses a challenge. This study explores patient preferences in the absence of complete OS information, hypothesizing that disease-free survival (DFS) benefit alone may influence adjuvant Osimertinib pursuit., Methods: At Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (Jan-Dec 2021), patients assessed for adjuvant therapy received a survey probing OS and DFS preferences. Scenarios were (a) minimum OS justifying Osimertinib, (b) minimum DFS improvement justifying 3-years of adjuvant Osimertinib, (c) minimum 5-year DFS percent change, and (d) minimum OS justifying copay changes. Results were analyzed., Results: Of 524 NSCLC patients, 51 participated. Scenario 1 saw 56% requiring a 12-month OS benefit for Osimertinib justification. In scenario 2, 72% deemed a 12-month DFS benefit sufficient. Scenario 3 revealed 31% opting out despite a 10% OS increase. Scenario 4 showed varied willingness to pay, with 33% unwilling to any shoulder copayment even with a 10-year OS benefit., Conclusion: This study explores patient preferences without complete OS data, revealing diverse thresholds. Factors include employment, education, and willingness to pay. Findings underscore shared decision-making importance. Limitations include sample size, potential biases, and regional focus; larger cohorts are needed for validation., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sotorasib 960 mg once daily is approved to treat KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sotorasib exhibits non-dose proportional pharmacokinetics and clinical responses at lower doses; therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sotorasib 960 mg and 240 mg., Methods: In this phase 2, randomized, open-label study, adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC received sotorasib 960 mg or 240 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pharmacokinetics. The study was not powered for formal statistical hypothesis testing., Results: In the 960 mg group (n = 104), ORR was 32.7 % and DCR was 86.5 %. In the 240 mg group (n = 105), ORR was 24.8 % and DCR was 81.9 %. Median PFS was 5.4 months (960 mg) and 5.6 months (240 mg). At a median follow-up of 17.5 months, median OS was 13.0 months (960 mg) and 11.7 months (240 mg). AUC 0-24 h and C max were 1.3-fold numerically higher with the 960 mg dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥10 %) for 960 mg and 240 mg doses, respectively, were diarrhea (39.4 %; 31.7 %), nausea (23.1 %; 19.2 %), increased alanine aminotransaminase (14.4 %; 17.3 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (13.5 %; 13.5 %)., Conclusions: Patients treated with sotorasib 960 mg once daily had numerically higher ORR and DCR, and longer DOR and OS, than patients treated with 240 mg in this descriptive analysis. TEAEs were manageable with label-directed dose modifications., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03600883., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: M. J. Hochmair: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory role: Takeda, Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche, Amgen. K. Vermaelen: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Support for Attending Meetings: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Patents Planned/Issued/Pending: Ghent University; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck. G. Mountzios: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca/Greece, BMS GmbH & Co. KG, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, BMS GmbH & Co. KG, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Roche. E. Carcereny: No conflicts to disclose. C. Dooms: No conflicts to disclose. S.-H. Lee: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Lilly, Merck, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, BMS/Ono, IMBdx, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Lunit, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis. E. Morocz: No conflicts to disclose. T. Kato: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Speaker, Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Speaker: Pfizer, Amgen, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy: Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Taiho; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy, Speaker: Chugai; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono, Novartis, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BeiGene, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Steering Committee: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or Part-Time Employment, Family Member: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Chugai, MSD, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Regeneron, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Biopharma, Haihe Biopharma, Blueprint Medicines, Turning Point, BeiGene, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Bayer, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Local PI: AstraZeneca. T.-E. Ciuleanu: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma, Janssen, BMS, Merck Serono, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Sanofi, Novartis, Servier, A&D Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Support: Pfizer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Servier, Ipsen, Amgen, A&D Pharma, AstraZeneca, Genentech, BMS, MSD Oncology, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Astellas Pharma. G. K. Dy: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Mirati Therapeutics, Lilly, Amgen, Regeneron, Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Mirati Therapeutics, Lilly, Sanofi, BioAtla, Regeneron, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Revolution Medicines. B. Parente: No conflicts to disclose. K. J. O’Byrne: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Carpe Vitae Pharmaceuticals, DGC Diagnostics, Replica Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Group, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Takeda, TriStar, Yuhan; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or advisory Role: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seagen, Yuhan; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: three active patents. Q. S. Chu: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, Amgen, AnHeart Therapeutics, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, Jazz Pharmaceutical, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. G. De Castro Jr.: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Novartis, Roche, Amgen, Janssen, Merck Serono, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bayer, Roche, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Yuhan, Merck Serono, Janssen, Libbs, Sanofi, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Merck Serono, BMS, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Janssen, Amgen, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS, Merck Serono, Daiichi Sankyo. N. Girard: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sivan, Trizell; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: BMS, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sivan; Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Participation in Data Safety Monitoring Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Leadership Role: International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or Part-Time Employment, Employment of a Family Member: AstraZeneca. W. Snyder, Q. Tran, W. Kormany, B. Houk, B. Mehta: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or Part-Time Employment: Amgen Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Amgen Inc. A. Curioni-Fontecedro: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Roche, Takeda, Janssen; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Swiss Academy for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK); Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator of Clinical Trials: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, Clinical Trials: Takeda, MSD, BMS., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Trilaciclib, in comparison to placebo plus carboplatin, etoposide, ± atezolizumab (PEA), has shown significant reductions in incidence of severe neutropenia (SN) among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Despite these findings, real-world utility remains limited., Methods: A single-center quasi-experimental study compared trilaciclib + PEA (PEAT) versus PEA in ES-SCLC patients. The study period ranged from April 1, 2021 to July 31, 2022, for the PEAT recipients and February 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, for PEA recipients. The primary endpoint evaluated was incidence of SN after cycle 1 and during the treatment period. Secondary endpoints included measures related to myelopreservation and patient outcomes., Results: Among 34 PEAT and 44 PEA patients, baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher median age (69 vs 64 years) and more males (64.7% vs 38.6%) in the PEAT cohort. The PEAT cohort exhibited a lower SN rate (3%) versus the PEA cohort (18%), with statistical significance demonstrated on multivariate analysis (p = 0.015). Additionally, the PEAT cohort also demonstrated significant reductions in red blood cell transfusion requirements (3% vs 23%; p = 0.02), grade 3-4 anemia (6% vs 25%; p = 0.03), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (0% vs 11%, p = 0.045)., Conclusion: Trilaciclib, in combination with PEA, demonstrated an improvement in the safety profile without compromising survival outcomes in ES-SCLC patients. These findings underscore the potential benefits of incorporating trilaciclib in real-world clinical settings for enhanced patient care., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Exosomes are nanosized extracellular vesicles released by cells to transport biomolecules such as proteins and RNAs for intercellular communication. Exosomes play important roles in cancer development and metastasis; therefore, they have emerged as potential liquid biopsy biomarkers for cancer screening, diagnosis, and management. Many exosome cargos, including proteins, RNAs, and lipids, have been extensively investigated as biomarkers for cancer liquid biopsy. However, carbohydrates, an important type of biomolecule, have not yet been explored for this purpose. In this study, we reported a new exosomal carbohydrate biomarker, α-linked Thomsen-Friedenreich glycoantigen (TF-Ag-α; Galβ1-3GalNAc-α). To translate our discovery into clinical settings, we developed a surface plasmon resonance-based assay which utilized a unique mAb, JAA-F11, with high specificity to measure the levels of exosomal TF-Ag-α in blood. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate that exosomes carry TF-Ag-α. We detected exosomal TF-Ag-α in as low as 10 μL serum samples from patients with cancer, but in contrast, levels were negligible in those from normal controls. With a total of 233 patients with cancer and normal controls, we showed that exosomal TF-Ag-α detected lung cancer (n = 60) and breast cancer (n = 95) from normal controls (n = 78) with ≥95% and ≥97% accuracy, respectively. These results demonstrated that exosomal TF-Ag-α is a potential liquid biopsy biomarker for cancer diagnosis., Significance: Exosomes or small extracellular vesicles have emerged as potent biomarkers of cancer liquid biopsy. We discovered a new exosomal carbohydrate marker, TF-Ag-α (Galβ1-3GalNAc-α), and showed that exosomal TF-Ag-α detected both lung and breast cancers with >95% accuracy. Our findings demonstrated that exosomal TF-Ag-α is a promising liquid biopsy biomarker for cancer screening and early detection., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: EML4-ALK is an oncogenic driver, seen in around five per cent of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, which can be targeted with anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors with great response rates. Disease flare refers to sudden rapid disease worsening on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) discontinuation, which is associated with shorter survival and worse outcomes. Here, we review cases previously published in the literature where patients developed disease flares, and contrast this with our patients who had prolonged survival despite TKI discontinuation., Case Description: We report three different patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC seen at our institute, who had EML4-ALK translocation variant 1 oncogenic driver on next-generation sequencing. They received treatment with several different ALK inhibitors before opting to discontinue TKI. They were able to come off TKI safely without developing disease flare and had prolonged survival., Discussion: Shorter time to progression on TKI, presence of symptoms with disease progression or central nervous system/pleural metastasis have been previously linked with development of flare, although this was not seen in our case series. Tumour response at the time of treatment discontinuation, line of therapy, overall disease burden, fusion variant and co-alteration status can affect the prognosis of these patients after ALK TKI cessation. In particular, variant 1 and wild-type TP53 status may be a suitable patient population for dose optimisation strategies. Intermittent TKI dosing strategies may help to avoid acquiring resistance mutations and prevent long-term treatment toxicities., Conclusion: It is important for clinicians to identify patients at risk for developing disease flare on TKI discontinuation to improve outcomes. Intermittent TKI dosing strategies require further investigation., Learning Points: Patients who develop disease flare after cessation have poor survival and worse outcomes.Certain phenotypic and molecular characteristics of the tumour may help clinicians identify which patients are likely and which are unlikely to develop disease flare on TKI discontinuation.Advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with variant 1 and wild-type TP53 may be a suitable patient population for intermittent TKI dosing investigations., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interests: SAH and HF have no conflicts of interest to declare. GKD received consulting fees/honoraria from the following within the past three years: Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mirati, Novartis, Regeneron., (© EFIM 2024.)

Pembrolizumab, a widely used immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Identifying unique tumor characteristics in patients likely to respond to pembrolizumab could help the clinical adjudication and development of a personalized therapeutic strategy. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical data and pathological features of 84 NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab. We examined the correlation between the clinical and demographic characteristics and the tumor histopathologic features obtained before immunotherapy. The response to pembrolizumab therapy was evaluated via the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The clinical data and cancer tissue characteristics were assessed and compared among three groups according to the following RECIST: the responsive group (RG), the stable disease group (SD), and the progressive disease group (PD), where the RG comprised patients with either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR). The overall survival rate of the RG group was significantly higher than the SD and PD groups. In addition, the percentage of pre-treatment viable tumor cell content in the RG and SD groups was significantly higher. At the same time, the extracellular stroma proportion was significantly lower than that of the PD group. The number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the RG group was significantly higher than in the PD group. There were no significant differences in tumor necrosis, the stroma composition, PD-L1 expression level (TPS 1-49% vs. ≥50%), and treatment response. In conclusion, our population of NSCLC patients who experienced positive treatment responses to pembrolizumab therapy had a better prognosis compared to patients with either SD or PD. Moreover, the relative proportions of viable tumor cells to tumor-associated lymphocytes were associated with responsiveness to treatment. It is expected that larger prospective clinical studies will further validate these findings.

Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1 or L1), the most abundant family of autonomous retrotransposons occupying over 17% of human DNA, is epigenetically silenced in normal tissues by the mechanisms involving p53 but is frequently derepressed in cancer, suggesting that L1-encoded proteins may act as tumor-associated antigens recognized by the immune system. In this study, we established an immunoassay to detect circulating autoantibodies against L1 proteins in human blood. Using this assay in >2,800 individuals with or without cancer, we observed significantly higher IgG titers against L1-encoded ORF1p and ORF2p in patients with lung, pancreatic, ovarian, esophageal, and liver cancers than in healthy individuals. Remarkably, elevated levels of anti-ORF1p-reactive IgG were observed in patients with cancer with disease stages 1 and 2, indicating that the immune response to L1 antigens can occur in the early phases of carcinogenesis. We concluded that the antibody response against L1 antigens could contribute to the diagnosis and determination of immunoreactivity of tumors among cancer types that frequently escape early detection., Significance: The discovery of autoantibodies against antigens encoded by L1 retrotransposons in patients with five poorly curable cancer types has potential implications for the detection of an ongoing carcinogenic process and tumor immunoreactivity., (© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Durable progression-free survivors (dPFSors) over 2 years have been reported among patients with melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD-(L)1 therapy. However, risk of progression still exists and the optimal imaging surveillance interval is unknown., Methods: Individual patient data for progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from PD-1 blockade clinical trials with a follow-up of at least 5 years. Patients with a PFS of at least 2 years were considered as dPFSors. Conditional risks of progression/death (P/D) every 3, 4, 6, and 12 months in each subsequent year were calculated. We prespecified three different levels of risk between scans (10%, 15%, or 20%) to allow clinicians and patients to decide on the scanning interval on the basis of considerations of imaging frequency and risk tolerance. An interval is considered acceptable if the upper bound of the 95% CI of the risk at each scan is lower than a prespecified level., Results: Of 1,495 and 3,752 patients with melanoma and NSCLC, 474 (31.7%) and 586 (15.6%) were dPFSors, respectively. Among them, the PFS probability for an additional 3 years was 76.4% and 48.1%, respectively. Not more than 8% of patients had P/D in any quarter in the 3 years. With a risk threshold of 10%, melanoma dPFSors can be scanned every 6 months during the third year and then every 12 months in years 4 and 5. The interval for NSCLC would be every 3 months in the third year and every 4 months in years 4 and 5. The higher risk tolerance of 15% and 20% would allow for less frequent scans., Conclusion: On the basis of their own risk tolerance level, our findings allow clinicians and dPFSors make data-driven decisions regarding the imaging surveillance schedule beyond every 3 months.

Programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) lacks sensitivity for pembrolizumab immunotherapy selection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly for tumors with low expression. We retrospectively evaluated transcriptomic PD-L1 by mRNA next-generation sequencing (RNA-seq). In an unselected NSCLC patient cohort (n = 3168) tested during standard care (2017-2021), PD-L1 IHC and RNA-seq demonstrated moderate concordance, with 80% agreement overall. Most discordant cases were either low or negative for PD-L1 expression by IHC but high by RNA-seq. RNA-seq accurately discriminated PD-L1 IHC high from low tumors by receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis but could not distinguish PD-L1 IHC low from negative tumors. In a separate pembrolizumab monotherapy cohort (n = 102), NSCLC tumors classified as PD-L1 high versus not high by RNA-seq had significantly improved response, progression-free survival, and overall survival as an individual measure and in combination with IHC high or low status. PD-L1 IHC status (high or low) trended toward but had no significant associations with improved outcomes. Conventional PD-L1 IHC testing has inherent limitations, making it an imperfect reference standard for evaluating novel testing technologies. RNA-seq offers an objective PD-L1 measure that could represent a complementary method to IHC to improve NSCLC patient selection for immunotherapy.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. In the longest follow-up, to our knowledge, for a KRAS G12C inhibitor, we assessed the long-term efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of sotorasib in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the CodeBreaK 100 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03600883). This multicenter, single-group, open-label phase I/phase II trial enrolled 174 patients with KRAS G12C-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after progression on prior therapies. Patients (N = 174) received sotorasib 960 mg once daily with the primary end points for phase I of safety and tolerability and for phase II of objective response rate (ORR). Sotorasib produced an ORR of 41%, median duration of response of 12.3 months, progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.3 months, overall survival (OS) of 12.5 months, and 2-year OS rate of 33%. Long-term clinical benefit (PFS ≥ 12 months) was observed in 40 (23%) patients across PD-L1 expression levels, in a proportion of patients with somatic STK11 and/or KEAP1 alterations, and was associated with lower baseline circulating tumor DNA levels. Sotorasib was well tolerated, with few late-onset treatment-related toxicities, none of which led to treatment discontinuation. These results demonstrate the long-term benefit of sotorasib, including in subgroups with poor prognosis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors or PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have led to remarkable improvement in outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, the significant benefits of ICI therapy are frequently limited by resistance to treatment and adverse effects, and the predictive value of pre-treatment tumor tissue PD-L1 expression is limited. Development of less invasive biomarkers that could identify responders and non-responders in early on-treatment could markedly improve the treatment regimen. Accumulating evidence suggests that baseline gut microbiota profile is associated with response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. However, change in the gut microbiome composition during PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy and its relation to response remain unclear., Methods: Here, we analyzed pre- and on-treatment fecal samples from five NSCLC patients receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, alone or in tandem with chemotherapy, and performed 16S rRNA sequencing., Results: The overall alpha diversity of the baseline gut microbiome was similar between three responders and two non-responders. While the gut microbiome composition remained stable overall during treatment (R2 = 0.145), responders showed significant changes in microbiome diversity between pre- and on-treatment samples during anti-PD-1 therapy compared to non-responders (P = 0.0274). Within the diverse microbiota, responders showed decreases in the abundance of genera Odoribacter , Gordonibacter , Candidatus Stoquefichus , Escherichia-Shigella , and Collinsella , and increase in abundance of Clostridium sensu stricto 1 . In contrast, non-responders demonstrated on-treatment increases in genera Prevotella , Porphyromonas , Streptococcus , and Escherichia-Shigella , and decrease in abundance of Akkermansia ., Conclusions: This pilot study identified a substantial change in gut microbiome diversity between pre- and on-treatment samples in NSCLC patients responding to anti-PD-1 therapy compared to non-responders. Our findings highlight the potential utility of gut microbiota dynamics as a noninvasive biomarker to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy for a wide variety of malignancies, which sets a path for future investigation in larger prospective studies., Competing Interests: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright 2023, Sarkar et al.)

Tumor derived exosomes (TEXs) have emerged as promising biomarkers for cancer liquid biopsy. Conventional methods (such as ELISA and qRT-PCR) and emerging biosensing technologies mainly detect a single type of exosomal biomarker due to the distinct properties of different biomolecules. Sensitive detection of two different types of TEX biomarkers, i.e., protein and microRNA combined biomarkers, may greatly improve cancer diagnostic accuracy. We developed an exosome protein microRNA one-stop (Exo-PROS) biosensor that not only selectively captured TEXs but also enabled in situ , simultaneous detection of TEX protein-microRNA pairs via a surface plasmon resonance mechanism. Exo-PROS assay is a fast, reliable, low sample consumption, and user-friendly test. With a total of 175 cancer patients and normal controls, we demonstrated that TEX protein-microRNA pairs measured by Exo-PROS assay detected lung cancer and breast cancer with 99% and 96% accuracy, respectively. Exo-PROS assay also showed superior diagnostic performance to conventional ELISA and qRT-PCR methods. Our results demonstrated that Exo-PROS assay is a potent liquid biopsy assay for cancer diagnosis.

Introduction: In stage IV NSCLC with solitary or oligometastatic brain metastasis, surgical resection of the primary and definitive management of the brain metastasis is an accepted standard. However, the effect of systemic chemotherapy after surgical resection on overall survival is not well-established., Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to retrospectively identify individuals with NSCLC as the primary tumor along with synchronous brain metastases who underwent thoracic resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively, across the treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional modeling were done to determine the survival benefit., Results: A total of 310 ( 71.9%) of the cohort received perioperative chemotherapy, most of whom (79.4%) received it in the adjuvant setting. Patients receiving chemotherapy were likely to be younger ( p  = 0.002), privately insured ( p  = 0.01), and receive radiation ( p < 0.001). Perioperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with survival on both univariate (hazard ratio = 0.71[0.52 - 0.99]) and multivariable (hazard ratio = 0.66 [0.47 - 0.92]) in addition to age ( p  = 0.03), Charlson-Deyo score ( p  = 0.02), pathologic N stage ( p  = 0.02), and adenocarcinoma histology (p = 0.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed this result with a significantly better survival with perioperative chemotherapy (p = 0.02). Further subgroup analysis using pathologic N stage revealed similar effect in pN1 (p = 0.001), but not pN0 (p = 0.2) patients., Conclusions: Perioperative chemotherapy for pN0-1 NSCLC with synchronous brain metastasis is associated with improved OS in this analysis., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Lack of reliable predictive biomarkers is a major limitation of combination therapy with chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) therapy (chemo-immunotherapy). We previously observed that the increase of peripheral blood CD8 + T cells expressing CX3CR1, a marker of differentiation, correlates with response to anti-PD-1 therapy; however, the predictive and prognostic value of T-cell CX3CR1 expression during chemo-immunotherapy is unknown. Here, we evaluated the utility of circulating CX3CR1 + CD8 + T cells as a predictive correlate of response to chemo-immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At least 10% increase of the CX3CR1 + subset in circulating CD8 + T cells from baseline (CX3CR1 score) was associated with response to chemo-immunotherapy as early as 4 weeks with 85.7% overall accuracy of predicting response at 6 weeks. Furthermore, at least 10% increase of the CX3CR1 score correlated with substantially better progression-free ( P = 0.0051) and overall survival ( P = 0.0138) on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Combined single-cell RNA/T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing of circulating T cells from longitudinally obtained blood samples and TCR sequencing of tumor tissue from the same patient who received a long-term benefit from the treatment demonstrated remarkable changes in genomic and transcriptomic signatures of T cells as well as evolution of TCR clonotypes in peripheral blood containing highly frequent tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte repertoires overexpressing CX3CR1 early after initiation of the treatment despite stable findings of the imaging study. Collectively, these findings highlight the potential utility of T-cell CX3CR1 expression as a dynamic blood-based biomarker during the early course of chemo-immunotherapy and a marker to identify frequent circulating tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte repertoires., Significance: Current approaches to combined chemotherapy and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (chemo-immunotherapy) for patients with NSCLC are limited by the lack of reliable predictive biomarkers. This study shows the utility of T-cell differentiation marker, CX3CR1, as an early on-treatment predictor of response and changes in genomic/transcriptomic signatures of circulating tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte repertoires in patients with NSCLC undergoing chemo-immunotherapy., (© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

The Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen (TF-Ag-α) is found on ~85% of human carcinomas but is cryptic on normal tissue. The humanized highly specific hJAA-F11-H2aL2a and -H3L3 antibodies target TF-Ag-α without binding to TF-Ag-beta (found on surface glycolipids of some normal cells). The relative affinity of H3L3 is 17 times that of H2aL2a, which would seem to favor superior efficacy, however, increased affinity can result in less tumor penetration. To assess the potential therapeutic efficacy of these antibodies, four human cancer- mouse xenograft models were treated with H2aL2a and H3L3. The tumor xenograft models used were human non-small cell lung cancer, H520, and small cell lung cancer, HTB171 in nude mice and human triple negative breast cancer, MDA-MB-231 and HCC1806 in SCID mice. H2aL2a significantly decreased tumor growth in both breast and both lung cancer models. H2aL2a showed statistically equal or better efficacy than H3L3 and has superior production capabilities. These results suggest that H2aL2a may be superior as a naked antibody, as an antibody drug conjugate or as a radiolabeled antibody, however the higher affinity of H3L3 may lead to better efficacy in bi-specific therapies in which the binding is decreased due to the presence of only one TF-Ag-α binding site.

Background: CIMAvax-EGF is an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-depleting immunotherapy which has shown survival benefit as a switch maintenance treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective of this trial is to establish the safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of CIMAvax-EGF in combination with nivolumab as second-line therapy for NSCLC., Methods: Patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive metastatic NSCLC were enrolled using a "3+3" dose-escalation design. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE V4.03. Thirteen patients (one unevaluable), the majority with PD-L1 0%, were enrolled into two dose levels of CIMAvax-EGF., Findings: The combination was determined to be safe and tolerable. The recommended phase 2 dose of CIMAvax-EGF was 2.4 mg. Humoral response to CIMAvax-EGF was achieved earlier and in a greater number of patients with the combination compared to historical control. Four out of 12 evaluable patients had an objective response., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Evans, Lee, Wallace, Reid, Muhitch, Dozier, Mesa, Luaces, Santos-Morales, Groman, Cedeno, Cinquino, Fisher, Puzanov, Opyrchal, Fountzilas, Dai, Ernstoff, Attwood, Hutson, Johnson, Mazorra, Saavedra, Leon, Lage, Crombet and Dy.)

Purpose: Oraxol is an oral formulation of paclitaxel administered with a novel, minimally absorbed P-glycoprotein inhibitor encequidar (HM30181A). This phase Ib study was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of Oraxol administered at a fixed dose for up to 5 consecutive days in patients with advanced malignancies., Methods: Part 1 of this study utilized a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design to determine the MTD of oral paclitaxel 270 mg plus oral encequidar 15 mg administered daily. Dose escalation was achieved by increasing the number of consecutive dosing days per week (from 2 to 5 days per week). Dosing occurred for 3 consecutive weeks out of a 4-week cycle. Part 2 treated additional patients at the MTD to determine tolerability and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Adverse events, tumor responses, and pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed., Results: A total of 34 patients (n = 24 in Part 1, n = 10 in Part 2) received treatment. The MTD of Oraxol was determined to be 270 mg daily × 5 days per week per protocol definition and this was declared the RP2D. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, neutropenia, and nausea/vomiting. Hypersensitivity-type reactions were not observed. Of the 28 patients evaluable for response, 2 (7.1%) achieved partial response and 18 (64.3%) achieved stable disease. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed rapid absorption of paclitaxel when administered orally following encequidar. Paclitaxel daily exposure was comparable following 2-5 days dose levels., Conclusion: The oral administration of encequidar with paclitaxel was safe, achieved clinically relevant paclitaxel levels, and showed evidence of anti-tumor activity., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed has shown survival benefit in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The recommended dose schedule is 500 mg/m 2 in 21-day cycles. Prolonged treatment with maintenance pemetrexed can result in cumulative toxicities. We sought to compare treatment outcomes in patients receiving an alternate maintenance schedule in realworld practice., Methods: This single-center, retrospective study investigated patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV) NSCLC receiving at least two doses of maintenance pemetrexed from May 1, 2011 to June 30, 2016. The objective was to compare time on treatment with maintenance pemetrexed therapy initiated at a standard schedule (q3 weeks) versus an alternate schedule (q4 weeks or longer). Also evaluated were progressionfree survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) differences between the two groups., Results: 129 patients were included, of whom 40 started the alternate schedule no later than cycle 3 of treatment (29 of 40 patients initiated maintenance treatment on the alternate schedule). Average time on maintenance treatment for patients appeared to be longer in the patients who received the alternate schedule regimen (195 vs 263 days, p =0.008). OS trended towards better survival among patients receiving the alternate schedule regimen (11.9 vs 18.1 months, p =0.3). Limiting the analysis to ALK wildtype, the patients showed a similar trend, with median PFS (7.6 vs 11.5 months, p =0.46) and OS (11.9 vs 17.6 months, p =0.38), still favoring the alternate schedule., Conclusions: The alternate dosing schedule of maintenance pemetrexed (q4 weeks or longer) is feasible and not detrimental to OS. Future investigations evaluating the optimal administration schedule of maintenance pemetrexed is warranted., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors may synergize with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors to enhance adaptive and innate antitumor immune responses. In the phase 2 JASPER study (NCT04475939), the PARP inhibitor niraparib was evaluated in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Patients whose tumors had programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥50% (cohort 1) or 1%-49% (cohort 2) received first-line niraparib (200 mg once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics., Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2. In cohort 1, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 56.3% (9 of 16 patients; 29.9%-80.2%); 2 of 16 patients had complete responses and 7 of 16 had partial responses (PRs). In cohort 2, ORR was 20.0% (5.7%-43.7%) with 4 of 20 PRs. In cohorts 1 and 2, the median DoR was 19.7 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to not estimable [NE]) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to NE), the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-22.1 months) and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.0-6.2 months), and the median OS was NE (95% CI, 6.0 months to NE) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-12.5 months), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% and 85.7% of patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Safety was consistent with known profiles of single-agent niraparib and pembrolizumab., Conclusions: Niraparib plus pembrolizumab showed clinical activity in patients with advanced and/or metastatic NSCLC., Lay Summary: The JASPER clinical trial studied a new combination treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pembrolizumab, a drug approved for NSCLC, was given with niraparib. Previous research showed that these 2 drugs together might work better than either drug alone. This study found that more than half of patients with high levels of a tumor marker responded to the combination, and one-fifth of patients with lower levels of the marker responded. The types of side effects from the combination were similar to side effects from both drugs alone. These results support more research on this combination., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Background: Sotorasib showed anticancer activity in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced solid tumors in a phase 1 study, and particularly promising anticancer activity was observed in a subgroup of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: In a single-group, phase 2 trial, we investigated the activity of sotorasib, administered orally at a dose of 960 mg once daily, in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with standard therapies. The primary end point was objective response (complete or partial response) according to independent central review. Key secondary end points included duration of response, disease control (defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease), progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarkers were evaluated for their association with response to sotorasib therapy., Results: Among the 126 enrolled patients, the majority (81.0%) had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and inhibitors of programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). According to central review, 124 patients had measurable disease at baseline and were evaluated for response. An objective response was observed in 46 patients (37.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28.6 to 46.2), including in 4 (3.2%) who had a complete response and in 42 (33.9%) who had a partial response. The median duration of response was 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.9 to could not be evaluated). Disease control occurred in 100 patients (80.6%; 95% CI, 72.6 to 87.2). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 8.2), and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.0 to could not be evaluated). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 88 of 126 patients (69.8%), including grade 3 events in 25 patients (19.8%) and a grade 4 event in 1 (0.8%). Responses were observed in subgroups defined according to PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and co-occurring mutations in STK11 , KEAP1 , or TP53 ., Conclusions: In this phase 2 trial, sotorasib therapy led to a durable clinical benefit without new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS p.G12C-mutated NSCLC. (Funded by Amgen and the National Institutes of Health; CodeBreaK100 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03600883.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has faced a therapeutic revolution with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) approved for first and subsequent therapies. CIMAvax-EGF is a chemical conjugate between human-recombinant EGF and P64, a recombinant protein from Neisseria meningitides , which induces neutralizing antibodies against EGF. In the last 15 years, it has been extensively evaluated in advanced NSCLC patients. CIMAvax-EGF is safe, even after extended use, and able to keep EGF serum concentration below detectable levels. In a randomized phase III study, CIMAvax-EGF increased median overall survival of advanced NSCLC patients with at least stable disease after front-line chemotherapy. Patients bearing squamous-cell or adenocarcinomas and serum EGF concentration above 870 pg/ml had better survival compared to control patients treated with best supportive care as maintenance, confirming tumors' sensitivity to the EGF depletion. This manuscript reviews the state-of-the-art NSCLC therapy and proposes the most promising scenarios for evaluating CIMAvax-EGF, particularly in combination with TKIs or ICIs. We hypothesize that the optimal combination of CIMAvax-EGF with established therapies can further contribute to transform advanced cancer into a manageable chronic disease, compatible with years of good quality of life., Competing Interests: Authors TC, OS, KL, AL currently work for the Center of Molecular Immunology, the institution that generated and originally patented CIMAvax-EGF. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Crombet Ramos, Santos Morales, Dy, León Monzón and Lage Dávila.)

Purpose: Paclitaxel injection concentrate for nano-dispersion (PICN) is a Cremophor-free, nanotechnology-driven paclitaxel formulation. This phase I study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PICN alone and in combination with carboplatin. Its early efficacy in unresectable biliary tract cancers (BTCs) was also evaluated., Methods: This multi-center study comprised two parts. Part A contained a dose-escalation cohort following "3 + 3" design using PICN monotherapy in advanced solid tumors (Part A1); Part A2 dose-expansion cohort was then conducted in advanced BTCs due to observed efficacy in Part A1. Part B1 and B2 evaluated escalating dose of PICN with carboplatin in advanced solid tumors. PICN was administered as a 30 min-infusion every 3 weeks without pre-medications for hypersensitivity reactions., Results: Thirty-six patients received PICN monotherapy in Part A and 21 received PICN plus carboplatin in Part B. The MTD of PICN was determined to be 295 mg/m 2 both as a monotherapy and in combination with carboplatin at AUC 5. Dose-proportional exposure in paclitaxel C max and AUC was observed overdose range from 175 to 325 mg/m 2 for PICN monotherapy and its combination with carboplatin. Carboplatin did not alter PICN exposure. Clinically significant toxicities mainly include neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. PICN monotherapy yielded a response rate of 20% in unresectable BTCs., Conclusion: This study demonstrated the safety and stable pharmacokinetics of PICN as a monotherapy and in combination with carboplatin. Single-agent PICN showed promising antitumor activity in advanced BTCs, warranting further studies to investigate its role in gastrointestinal cancers.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as a front-line therapy for a variety of solid tumors. With the widespread use of these agents, immune-associated toxicities are increasingly being recognized, including fatal myocarditis. There are limited data on the outcomes and prognostic utility of biomarkers associated with ICI-associated myocarditis. Our objective was to examine the associations between clinical biomarkers of cardiomyocyte damage and mortality in patients with cancer treated with ICIs., Methods: We retrospectively studied 23 patients who developed symptomatic and asymptomatic troponin elevations while receiving ICI therapy at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. We obtained serial ECGs, troponin I, and creatine kinase-MD (CK-MB), in addition to other conventional clinical biomarkers, and compared covariates between survivors and non-survivors., Results: Among patients with myocarditis, higher troponin I (p=0.037) and CK-MB (p=0.034) levels on presentation correlated with progression to severe myocarditis. Higher troponin I (p=0.016), CK (p=0.013), and CK-MB (p=0.034) levels were associated with increased mortality, while the presence of advanced atrioventricular block on presentation (p=0.088) trended toward increased mortality. Weekly troponin monitoring lead to earlier hospitalization for potential myocarditis (p=0.022) and was associated with decreased time to steroid initiation (p=0.053) and improved outcomes., Conclusions: Routine troponin surveillance may be helpful in predicting mortality in ICI-treated patients with cancer in the early phase of ICI therapy initiation. Early detection of troponin elevation is associated with earlier intervention and improved outcomes in ICI-associated myocarditis. The recommended assessment and diagnostic studies guiding treatment decisions are presented., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized treatment for various cancers; however, durable response is limited to only a subset of patients. Discovery of blood-based biomarkers that reflect dynamic change of the tumor microenvironment, and predict response to ICI, will markedly improve current treatment regimens. Here, we investigate CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1), a marker of T-cell differentiation, as a predictive correlate of response to ICI therapy. Successful treatment of tumor-bearing mice with ICI increases the frequency and T-cell receptor clonality of the peripheral CX3CR1 + CD8 + T-cell subset that includes an enriched repertoire of tumor-specific and tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells. Furthermore, an increase in the frequency of the CX3CR1 + subset in circulating CD8 + T cells early after initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy correlates with response and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Collectively, these data support T-cell CX3CR1 expression as a blood-based dynamic early on-treatment predictor of response to ICI therapy.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with few treatment options. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate that targets delta-like 3 on SCLC cells to deliver a cytotoxic payload directly to tumor cells. In this study, the cardiac safety profile of Rova-T was assessed by evaluating changes in QT interval, electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform, heart rate, and proarrhythmic adverse events (AEs) after treatment with Rova-T in patients with previously treated extensive-stage SCLC. Patients underwent ECG monitoring for 2 weeks after each of 2 i.v. infusions of 0.3 mg/kg Rova-T over 30 minutes, administered 6 weeks apart. Forty-six patients received at least one dose of Rova-T. At the geometric mean Rova-T maximum serum concentration of 7,940 ng/mL, ECG monitoring showed no significant changes in the Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) interval; the upper limit of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval did not exceed 10 msec for any time point. There were no clinically significant changes in QRS or PR intervals, ECG waveforms, or heart rate after Rova-T administration. All patients experienced a treatment-emergent AE (TEAE); 78% had a grade ≥ 3 TEAE, 59% had a serious TEAE, and 41% had a cardiac-related TEAE. The TEAEs that might signal proarrhythmia tendencies were uncommon. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 24% of patients. Based on the evaluation of ECG data collected in this study from patients treated with Rova-T at 0.3 mg/kg i.v. administered every 6 weeks, a QTcF effect of clinical concern can be excluded., (© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Purpose Combining small-molecule inhibitors of different targets was shown to be synergistic in preclinical studies. Testing this concept in clinical trials is, however, daunting due to challenges in toxicity management and efficacy assessment. This study attempted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vatalanib plus everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors and explore the utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) studies as a predictive biomarker. Patients and Methods This single-center, phase I trial containing 70 evaluable patients consisted of a dose escalation proportion based on the traditional "3 + 3" design (cohort IA and IB) and a dose expansion proportion (cohort IIA and IIB). Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events. Antitumor activity was assessed using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Results The maximum tolerated doses were determined to be vatalanib 1250 mg once daily or 750 mg twice daily in combination with everolimus 10 mg once daily. No treatment-related death occurred. The most common toxicities were hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, fatigue, vomiting, nausea and diarrhea. There was no complete response. Nine patients (12.9%) had partial response (PR) and 41 (58.6%) had stable disease (SD). Significant antitumor activity was observed in neuroendocrine tumors with a disease-control rate (PR + SD) of 66.7% and other tumor types including renal cancer, melanoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. Conclusions The combination of vatalanib and everolimus demonstrated reasonable toxicity and clinical activity. Future studies combining targeted therapies and incorporating biomarker analysis are warranted based on this phase I trial.

Background: No therapies for targeting KRAS mutations in cancer have been approved. The KRAS p.G12C mutation occurs in 13% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and in 1 to 3% of colorectal cancers and other cancers. Sotorasib is a small molecule that selectively and irreversibly targets KRAS G12C ., Methods: We conducted a phase 1 trial of sotorasib in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring the KRAS p.G12C mutation. Patients received sotorasib orally once daily. The primary end point was safety. Key secondary end points were pharmacokinetics and objective response, as assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1., Results: A total of 129 patients (59 with NSCLC, 42 with colorectal cancer, and 28 with other tumors) were included in dose escalation and expansion cohorts. Patients had received a median of 3 (range, 0 to 11) previous lines of anticancer therapies for metastatic disease. No dose-limiting toxic effects or treatment-related deaths were observed. A total of 73 patients (56.6%) had treatment-related adverse events; 15 patients (11.6%) had grade 3 or 4 events. In the subgroup with NSCLC, 32.2% (19 patients) had a confirmed objective response (complete or partial response) and 88.1% (52 patients) had disease control (objective response or stable disease); the median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (range, 0.0+ to 14.9 [with + indicating that the value includes patient data that were censored at data cutoff]). In the subgroup with colorectal cancer, 7.1% (3 patients) had a confirmed response, and 73.8% (31 patients) had disease control; the median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (range, 0.0+ to 11.1+). Responses were also observed in patients with pancreatic, endometrial, and appendiceal cancers and melanoma., Conclusions: Sotorasib showed encouraging anticancer activity in patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors harboring the KRAS p.G12C mutation. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxic effects occurred in 11.6% of the patients. (Funded by Amgen and others; CodeBreaK100 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03600883.)., (Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: RET fusions are oncogenic drivers in 1 to 2% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). In patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC, the efficacy and safety of selective RET inhibition are unknown., Methods: We enrolled patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and those who were previously untreated separately in a phase 1-2 trial of selpercatinib. The primary end point was an objective response (a complete or partial response) as determined by an independent review committee. Secondary end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety., Results: In the first 105 consecutively enrolled patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received at least platinum-based chemotherapy, the percentage with an objective response was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54 to 73). The median duration of response was 17.5 months (95% CI, 12.0 to could not be evaluated), and 63% of the responses were ongoing at a median follow-up of 12.1 months. Among 39 previously untreated patients, the percentage with an objective response was 85% (95% CI, 70 to 94), and 90% of the responses were ongoing at 6 months. Among 11 patients with measurable central nervous system metastasis at enrollment, the percentage with an objective intracranial response was 91% (95% CI, 59 to 100). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were hypertension (in 14% of the patients), an increased alanine aminotransferase level (in 12%), an increased aspartate aminotransferase level (in 10%), hyponatremia (in 6%), and lymphopenia (in 6%). A total of 12 of 531 patients (2%) discontinued selpercatinib because of a drug-related adverse event., Conclusions: Selpercatinib had durable efficacy, including intracranial activity, with mainly low-grade toxic effects in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and those who were previously untreated. (Funded by Loxo Oncology and others; LIBRETTO-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03157128.)., (Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are the standard of care treatment for patients with EGFR -mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Although initially effective, EGFR TKIs are not curative. Disease inevitably relapses due to acquired drug resistance. We hypothesized that vitamin D metabolites could be used with EGFR TKIs to prevent therapeutic failure. To test this idea, we investigated the link between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR -mutant LUAD that received EGFR TKIs (erlotinib n = 20 and afatinib n = 1). Patients who were 25(OH)D3-sufficient experienced significantly longer benefit from EGFR TKI therapy (mean 14.5 months) than those with 25(OH)D3 insufficiency (mean 10.6 months, p = 0.026). In contrast, 25(OH)D3 had no prognostic value in patients with KRAS -mutant LUAD that received cytotoxic chemotherapy. To gain mechanistic insights, we tested 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) activity in vitro. 1,25(OH)2D3 promoted epithelial differentiation and restored EGFR TKI sensitivity in models of EGFR TKI resistance that were associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). 1,25(OH)2D3 was ineffective in a non-EMT model of resistance. We conclude that vitamin D sufficiency portends increased PFS among EGFR -mutant LUAD patients that receive EGFR TKIs, and that vitamin D signaling maintains drug efficacy in this specific patient subset by opposing EMT., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Introduction: The Seneca Valley virus (NTX-010) is an oncolytic picornavirus with tropism for SCLC. This phase II double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated NTX-010 in patients with extensive-stage (ES) SCLC after completion of first-line chemotherapy., Methods: Patients with ES SCLC who did not progress after four or more cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to a single dose of NTX-010 or placebo within 12 weeks of chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A prespecified interim analysis for futility was performed after 40 events. Viral clearance and the development of neutralizing antibodies were followed., Results: From January 15, 2010, to January 10, 2013, a total of 50 patients were randomized and received therapy on study (26 received NTX-010 and 24 received placebo). At the specified interim analysis, the median PFS was 1.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-3.1 months) for the NTX-010 group versus 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.3 months) for the placebo group (hazard ratio = 1.03, p = 0.92), and the trial was terminated owing to futility. In the NTX-010 group, PFS was shorter in patients with detectable virus at days 7 and 14 versus in those in whom it was not detected after treatment (1.0 month [95% CI: 0.4-1.5 months] versus 1.8 months [95% CI: 1.3-5.5 months, p = 0.008] and 0.9 months [95% CI: 0.4-2.6 months] versus 1.3 months [95% CI: 1.0-5.3 months], respectively [p = 0.04])., Conclusions: Patients with ES SCLC did not benefit from NTX-010 treatment after chemotherapy with a platinum doublet. Persistence of NTX-010 in the blood 1 or 2 weeks after treatment was associated with a shorter PFS., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)