Search

Clobazam (CLB) is a 1,5‐benzodiazepine that has been widely used as an anxiolytic and antiseizure drug (ASD) since it was first synthesized over 50 years ago. CLB was approved in the United States in 2011 as adjunctive therapy for seizures in patients ≥2 years old with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome. CLB pharmacokinetics (PK) have been studied in single‐ and multiple‐dose administrations in healthy subjects. Salient features include high bioavailability, linear PK, and negligible effects from coadministration of other ASDs. CLB is highly and extensively absorbed, with little effect from food; time to maximum plasma concentration is 0.5 to 4 hours following the dose. After CLB doses of 20 to 40 mg/day, the volume of distribution is 99 to 120 L, with oral clearance ranging from 1.9 to 2.3 L/h. CLB is lipophilic and distributes throughout the body after oral administration. It is metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes CYP3A, CYP2C19, and CYP2B6, and its main active metabolite is N‐desmethylclobazam. The half‐life of CLB after a single oral dose ranges from 36 to 42 hours; the half‐life of N‐desmethylclobazam ranges from 59 to 74 hours. The metabolites of CLB are primarily excreted renally. Population PK modeling using data from healthy subjects and patients with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome indicates that race, sex, age, weight, and renal function do not influence CLB PK. As CLB has been extensively studied since the 1970s, this review is meant to provide a consolidated and comprehensive resource on CLB PK for both prescribers and scientists alike.

Oral carbamazepine (CBZ), a broad-spectrum antiseizure drug (ASD) widely used for over 50 years, remains an important treatment choice for focal (partial) epilepsy. Although CBZ is a known inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes, many prescribers fail to recognize the potential issues with CBZ induction and are therefore unaware of the risk of drug toxicity upon CBZ withdrawal. Areas covered: Managing concomitant medications in CBZ-treated patients can be difficult. Abruptly stopping CBZ treatment, as may occur when patients are unable to take oral medication, can affect plasma concentrations of other medications. An intravenous (IV) formulation of CBZ has been recently approved by the US FDA for short-term replacement therapy in patients with focal and generalized seizures. Use of IV CBZ allows maintenance of stable plasma concentrations in circumstances when oral administration is temporarily impractical. Expert commentary: CBZ remains a frequently used treatment for focal seizures. With knowledge of the potential issues related to de-induction upon CBZ withdrawal, continuity of care with IV CBZ is an important step in improving the overall care of CBZ-treated patients.

Objective The goal of this study was to characterize the drug–drug interactions between clobazam and 2 antiseizure drugs, cannabidiol and stiripentol, for treatment of refractory seizures through the use of pharmacokinetic modeling. Methods A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed to characterize the combined effect of clobazam and its active metabolite, N-desmethylclobazam (i.e., N-clobazam), on seizure protection in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome using data from the phase 3 CONTAIN trial. Drug–drug interactions between clobazam and cannabidiol were examined by comparing model-generated data to data from a study of 13 patients taking concomitant clobazam and cannabidiol. Modeling data were also descriptively compared with studies of patients administered both clobazam and stiripentol. Sedation-related adverse events from CONTAIN were analyzed to determine the exposure–somnolence relationship of clobazam. Results Exposure-efficacy analysis from the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model using CONTAIN data indicated that clobazam (half-maximal effective concentration [EC50], 303 ng/mL) was 3 times more potent than N-clobazam (EC50, 899 ng/mL). After administration of clobazam, when both clobazam and N-clobazam concentrations were each 1 to 2 times the EC50 value (clobazam dose, 20 mg), 70.0%–74.9% seizure protection was predicted; when concentrations were > 2 times the EC50 value (clobazam dose, 40 mg), 74.0%–96.9% seizure protection was predicted. Generalized additive model analyses demonstrated decreased seizure probability with higher plasma concentration of clobazam. Coadministration of stiripentol and clobazam resulted in increased respective median plasma concentrations of clobazam and N-clobazam (1.1–1.2 times and 5.2–8.2 times) compared with administration of placebo and clobazam. Probability of somnolence significantly increased with age and higher N-clobazam plasma concentration. Significance Awareness of drug–drug interactions between clobazam and cannabidiol is needed when adding cannabidiol or stiripentol to a regimen of clobazam or vice versa. Based upon our population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, we predict that an increase in N-clobazam levels, which patient data show may enhance efficacy and/or make adverse events such as somnolence more likely.

To describe the use of a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model incorporating weight and ontogeny to identify effective clobazam (CLB) dosing for use in a clinical trial in pediatric patients with Dravet syndrome.Pharmacokinetic data were combined from 3 CLB trials (OV-1012, OV-1017, and study 301) and a simulated study (study 401) for a total of 1306 CLB and 1305 N-desmethyl clobazam (N-CLB) samples from 193 Lennox-Gastaut syndrome patients and healthy subjects aged 6 months to 45 years. A structured approach based on US Food and Drug Administration guidance and pharmacometric knowledge discovery was developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach. Graphing and fitting using logistical weight regression were used to identify covariates for inclusion in the final model, which was evaluated using goodness-of-fit criteria and validated using prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pcVPC). Using the final PopPK model, a simulation study determined CLB and N-CLB distributions after 4 weeks of 1.5 and 2.0 mg/kg CLB.The parameters of the final PopPK model were similar to previous reports. Fixed-effect parameters were precisely estimated, with no significant increase in NONMEM objective function value. Intersubject variability estimates were similar to previous reports, with35% shrinkage associated with parameter variability, except for intercompartmental clearance and apparent volumes of distribution of peripheral compartments. Goodness-of-fit plots and pcVPC show that the model adequately described CLB and N-CLB data. The CLB/N-CLB ratio in virtual study subjects aged3 years was 0.23 for 1.5 and 2.0 mg/kg and was 0.14 for subjects aged ≥3 years, which is 2 to 3 times those reported in a previous stiripentol/CLB/valproate study in which seizure improvement was reported.The PopPK model dosing parameters of 1.5 and 2.0 mg/kg are likely to result in efficacious concentrations of CLB and N-CLB in pediatric patients as young as 16 months. Dosages exceeding 1.5 mg/kg should be monitored for tolerability, particularly in patients aged2 years, as there may be a higher incidence of sedation.

A metabolic mechanism-based characterization of antiepileptic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with clobazam in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) was performed using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) approach. To characterize potential DDIs with clobazam, pharmacokinetic (PK) data from 153 patients with LGS in study OV-1012 (NCT00518713) and 18 healthy participants in bioavailability study OV-1017 were pooled. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were grouped based on their effects on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes responsible for the metabolism of clobazam and its metabolite, N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB): CYP3A inducers (phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine), CYP2C19 inducers (valproic acid, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine), or CYP2C19 inhibitors (felbamate, oxcarbazepine). CYP3A4 inducers-which did not affect the oral clearance of clobazam-significantly increased the formation of N-CLB by 9.4%, while CYP2C19 inducers significantly increased the apparent elimination rate of N-CLB by 10.5%, resulting in a negligible net change in the PK of the active metabolite. CYP2C19 inhibitors did not affect N-CLB elimination. Because concomitant use of AEDs that are either CYP450 inhibitors or inducers with clobazam in the treatment of LGS patients had negligible to no effect on clobazam PK in this study, dosage adjustments may not be required for clobazam in the presence of the AEDs investigated here.

An integrative population pharmacokinetics (PPK)-based approach was used to characterize the effect of hepatic impairment on clobazam PK and its major metabolite in systemic circulation, N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB). At therapeutic clobazam dosages, N-CLB plasma concentrations are 3-5 times greater than the parent compound. PK data from clinical trials in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS; OV-1002 and OV-1012), healthy participants (OV-1016), and participants with and without renal impairment (OV-1032), as well as those from a publication describing the effects of hepatic impairment on clobazam PK, were merged to create the PPK model. Individual patient clobazam PK parameters from the publication were used to generate patient plasma-concentration data. Clobazam PK was linear and the formation of N-CLB was elimination-rate limited. Hepatic impairment did not affect the total apparent clearance of clobazam but may affect the PK of N-CLB. Because the formation of N-CLB is elimination-rate limited and the total apparent clearance of clobazam is unaffected by hepatic impairment, the PPK model suggests that patients with LGS and hepatic impairment may not require clobazam dosage modification.

Purpose A thorough QT study was conducted to assess the proarrhythmic potential of clobazam and its active metabolite, N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB). Methods In this Phase I, single-site, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, healthy participants were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: clobazam 40 mg/d (maximum therapeutic dosage), clobazam 160 mg/d (supratherapeutic dosage), placebo, or moxifloxacin 400 mg (active control). Findings Of 280 enrolled participants (n = 70 per treatment arm), 250 (92%) completed the study; 194 were included in the pharmacokinetics population (clobazam 40 mg/d, n = 66; clobazam 160 mg/d, n = 62; and moxifloxacin, n = 66). Mean changes from baseline in QT interval placebo-corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia formula (primary end point), Bazett formula, and individual correction method (QTcF, QTcB, and QTcI, respectively) with clobazam 40 and 160 mg/d revealed no effect on QTc. No clinically relevant or treatment-related arrhythmias were observed, and there were no instances of second- or third-degree atrioventricular block. Given that clobazam is primarily demethylated to N-CLB by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP3A4, the mean plasma time–concentration profile of clobazam was unchanged with the exclusion of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers. As N-CLB is metabolized by CYP2C19, the exclusion of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers resulted in slightly decreased mean plasma time–concentration profiles of N-CLB. Using a linear mixed-effects model, the effects of the clobazam and N-CLB Cmax values on the placebo-corrected changes from baseline in QTcF, QTcI, and QTcB were near zero or slightly negative, and are not considered clinically important. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was greatest in the clobazam groups (number of moderate AEs experienced by patients: PBO, 3/70; MOXI, 5/70; CLB 40 mg/d, 18/70; CLB 160 mg/d, 21/70; severe AEs: PBO, MOXI, & CLB 160 mg/d, 0; CLB 40 mg/d, 2/70); there were no serious AEs in any treatment group. A total of 10% of participants experienced benzodiazepine-withdrawal symptoms (16%, 23%, and 3% in the clobazam 40 and 160 mg/d groups and the moxifloxacin group, respectively). Implications The findings from this thorough QT study are consistent with existing clinical data and support the lack of proarrhythmic potential with clobazam.

Vigabatrin is an irreversible inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid transaminase (GABA-T) and is used as an adjunctive therapy for adult patients with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS). The purpose of this investigation was to describe the relationship between vigabatrin dosage and daily seizure rate for adults and children with rCPS and identify relevant covariates that might impact seizure frequency. This population dose-response analysis used seizure-count data from three pediatric and two adult randomized controlled studies of rCPS patients. A negative binomial distribution model adequately described daily seizure data. Mean seizure rate decreased with time after first dose and was described using an asymptotic model. Vigabatrin drug effects were best characterized by a quadratic model using normalized dosage as the exposure metric. Normalized dosage was an estimated parameter that allowed for individualized changes in vigabatrin exposure based on body weight. Baseline seizure rate increased with decreasing age, but age had no impact on vigabatrin drug effects after dosage was normalized for body weight differences. Posterior predictive checks indicated the final model was capable of simulating data consistent with observed daily seizure counts. Total normalized vigabatrin dosages of 1, 3, and 6 g/day were predicted to reduce seizure rates 23.2%, 45.6%, and 48.5%, respectively.

To assess withdrawal-related adverse event (AE) rates following abrupt clobazam discontinuation in Phase I trials and gradual clobazam tapering (2-3 weeks) following discontinuation from III trials met the criteria for potential/III trials, we evaluated AE data from four multiple-dosage Phase I trials (duration: 8-34 days). Therapeutic (20 and 40 mg/day) and supratherapeutic clobazam dosages (120 and 160 mg/day) were administered. Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed for patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome enrolled in Phase II (OV-1002) and Phase III (OV-1012) studies (duration ≤15 weeks) and in the open-label extension (OLE) trial OV-1004 (≤5 years). Potential withdrawal-related AEs were identified by preferred terms, provided that the AEs occurred ≥1 day following and ≤30 days after the last clobazam doses, or were deemed withdrawal symptoms by investigators. Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Benzodiazepines (CIWA-B) scale was used to evaluate withdrawal intensity in three of the four Phase I trials. A total of 207 participants in Phase I trials received steady-state clobazam dosages of 20-160 mg/day, 182 received clobazam dosages of ≥40 mg/day, and 94 received clobazam dosages of ≥120 mg/day. Abrupt clobazam discontinuation led to 193 withdrawal-related AEs for 68 Phase I participants. Nearly 50% of AEs occurred after discontinuation of clobazam dosages of ≥120 mg/day. Adverse events were mild or moderate and included headache (14% of Phase I participants), insomnia (12.6%), tremor (10.1%), and anxiety (8.7%). The CIWA-B scores varied (range: 0-59). Most scores were

Study objective To investigate potential drug-drug interactions between clobazam and cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. Design Two, prospective, open-label, single-center, drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies and a population pharmacokinetics analysis of seven multicenter phase II-III trials. Setting Clinical research unit. Participants Fifty-four healthy adult volunteers were enrolled in the two drug-drug interaction studies; 53 completed the studies. The population pharmacokinetics analysis evaluated data from 171 participants from five studies with healthy volunteers and two studies with patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Participants in these studies received clobazam and stable dosages of the following antiepileptic drugs: phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, felbamate, or oxcarbazepine. Intervention In the first drug-drug interaction study, 36 participants received a single oral dose of clobazam 10 mg on day 1, followed by either ketoconazole 400 mg once/day or omeprazole 40 mg once/day on days 17-22, with a single dose of clobazam 10 mg coadministered on day 22, to study the effects of CYP3A4 or CYP2C19 inhibition, respectively, on clobazam and its active metabolite N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB). In the second study, 18 participants received a drug cocktail consisting of caffeine 200 mg, tolbutamide 500 mg, dextromethorphan 30 mg, and midazolam 4 mg on days 1 and 19, and clobazam 40 mg/day on days 4-19, to study clobazam's effects on CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. Measurements and main results In the first DDI study, coadministration of ketoconazole (a CYP3A4 inhibitor) and clobazam increased clobazam's area under the concentration time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-∞) ) 54% and decreased clobazam's maximum plasma concentration (C(max) ) by 15% versus administration of clobazam alone, but the combination affected these pharmacokinetic parameters for N-CLB to a lesser degree. The CYP2C19 inhibitor omeprazole increased AUC(0-∞) and C(max) of N-CLB by 36% and 15%, respectively, but did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of clobazam. At steady state, N-CLB has 3-4 times greater exposure than clobazam. In the second DDI study, no clinically significant drug-drug interactions were observed between clobazam 40 mg and the CYP probe substrates caffeine or tolbutamide. Exposure to midazolam and its 1-hydroxymidazolam metabolite, however, decreased by 27% and increased 4-fold, respectively. Clobazam increased dextromethorphan (CYP2D6) AUC(0-∞) by 95% and C(max) by 59%. In the population pharmacokinetics analysis, stable dosages of common antiepileptic drugs that induce CYP3A4 or CYP2C19, or inhibit CYP2C19, had negligible effects on clobazam or N-CLB. Clobazam did not affect valproic acid or lamotrigine exposures. Conclusion These findings suggest no clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions between clobazam and drugs metabolized by CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, or CYP2C9. Concomitant use of drugs metabolized by CYP2D6 may require dosage adjustment. Clobazam may be administered safely as adjunctive therapy in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, without meaningful changes in clobazam pharmacokinetics that would require dosage adjustment.

Two toxicologic studies of vigabatrin were conducted with immature Sprague Dawley rats to characterize intramyelinic edema (IME) formation and assess potential impact on behavioral measures. Study 1 was a dosage-ranging characterization of overall toxicity of vigabatrin in young, developing rats. Study 2 evaluated vacuolar brain lesions found in Study 1.During Study 1, immature Sprague Dawley rats were orally administered deionized water (vehicle control), or vigabatrin at 5, 15, or 50mg/kg/day for ≤ 9 weeks, beginning at postnatal day 4 (PND 4) and followed by a recovery period. Toxicologic observations were collected, including adverse clinical signs, body weight gains, food consumption, ophthalmoloscopy, electroretinograms, sexual maturation, motor activity, memory, and learning behaviors. At sacrifice, CNS tissues were examined by light microscopy for evidence of IME. In Study 2, immature Sprague Dawley rats were again orally administered vigabatrin (50mg/kg/day for ≤ 9 weeks, beginning at PND 4). At sacrifice, CNS tissues were examined by both light and transmission electron microscopy for evidence of IME.At 5-50mg/kg/day, dosage-related reduced food consumption, decreased body weight, and delayed sexual maturation were found. Persisting through recovery, effects were more pronounced in males. Increased degrees of vacuolation were observed on PND 67 only after a dosage of 50mg/kg/day, and were attenuated during recovery. Vacuolar-change morphology was characteristic of IME, with no evidence of cellular or neuritic degeneration. Ultrastructural analyses revealed brain vacuoles initiated as splits of myelin sheaths along intra-period lines. These splits expanded, evolving into large membrane-rich vacuoles, and were more prominent at later stages of myelin development. Hypomyelination and gliopathy were noted from PNDs 4-15, and were likely related to vigabatrin exposure during active myelination. A lesser degree of hypomyelination was observed from PNDs 4-46 and 4-65. Vacuolation was markedly attenuated in post-recovery-period rats.The present studies indicated toxicities in young rats at vigabatrin dosages lower than those reported for toxicities in older rats. Dosages50mg/kg/day did not affect CNS, behavior, and reproductive development. However, at the greatest dosage, some retardation of physical growth, delay in sexual maturation, reduction in physical strength, and induction of CNS stimulation (handling-induced spasms) occurred. The key pathologic finding was vacuolar brain lesions in the white and gray matter, which generally reversed upon drug discontinuation. Vacuoles were confined to myelin sheaths, consistent with observations in adult rats. Vigabatrin delayed but did not eliminate myelination despite continued dosing, an effect greatest during active myelination.

An integrative population pharmacokinetics (PPK)-based approach was used to characterize the effect of hepatic impairment on clobazam PK and its major metabolite in systemic circulation, N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB). At therapeutic clobazam dosages, N-CLB plasma concentrations are 3-5 times greater than the parent compound. PK data from clinical trials in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS; OV-1002 and OV-1012), healthy participants (OV-1016), and participants with and without renal impairment (OV-1032), as well as those from a publication describing the effects of hepatic impairment on clobazam PK, were merged to create the PPK model. Individual patient clobazam PK parameters from the publication were used to generate patient plasma-concentration data. Clobazam PK was linear and the formation of N-CLB was elimination-rate limited. Hepatic impairment did not affect the total apparent clearance of clobazam but may affect the PK of N-CLB. Because the formation of N-CLB is elimination-rate limited and the total apparent clearance of clobazam is unaffected by hepatic impairment, the PPK model suggests that patients with LGS and hepatic impairment may not require clobazam dosage modification.

Summary Objective To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous and oral carbamazepine. Methods In this phase 1, open-label study, adult patients with epilepsy on a stable oral carbamazepine dosage (400–2,000 mg/day) were converted to intravenous carbamazepine (administered at 70% of the oral dosage). A 28-day outpatient period preceded an up to 10-day inpatient period and a 30-day follow-up period. Intravenous carbamazepine was administered over 15 or 30 min every 6 h on days 1–7; some patients in the 15-min group were eligible to receive four 2- to 5-min (rapid) infusions on day 8. Patients underwent blood sampling to determine the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) for carbamazepine and metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide following oral (day 0) and intravenous carbamazepine administration (days 1, 7, and 8). Bioequivalence was evaluated in patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance >80 ml/min). Safety assessments were conducted through day 38. Results Ninety-eight patients enrolled and 77 completed the PK component. The mean daily oral and intravenous carbamazepine dosage for 64 PK-evaluable patients with normal renal function was 962.5 and 675.1 mg (70% of oral dosage), respectively. Steady-state minimum concentration (Cmin) and overall exposure (AUC0–24) for intravenous carbamazepine infused over 30, 15, or 2–5 min were similar to oral carbamazepine. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of the adjusted means for AUC0–24, maximum concentration (Cmax), and Cmin were within the 80%–125% bioequivalence range for 30-min intravenous infusions versus oral administration, but exceeded the upper limit for Cmax for the 15-min and rapid infusions. All intravenous carbamazepine infusions were well tolerated. Significance Intravenous carbamazepine infusions (70% of oral daily dose) of 30-, 15-, and 2- to 5-min duration, given every 6 h, maintained patients’ plasma carbamazepine concentrations. Intravenous carbamazepine 30-min infusions were bioequivalent to oral carbamazepine in patients with normal renal function; rapid infusions were well-tolerated in this study.

SummaryObjective To report tolerability findings and maintenance of seizure control from a pooled analysis of phase I open-label trial OV-1015 (NCT01079351) and phase III study 13181A (NCT01128959). Methods Patients receiving a stable oral dosage of carbamazepine were switched to an intravenous (IV) carbamazepine formulation solubilized in a cyclodextrin matrix (at a 70% dosage conversion) for either a 15- or a 30-min infusion every 6 h for up to 7 days and then switched back. A subset of patients who tolerated 15-min infusions also received 2- to 5-min (rapid) infusions. Assessments included physical and laboratory evaluations, electrocardiography (ECG) studies, as well as adverse event (AE) monitoring for tolerability. Convulsion/seizure AE terms and data from seizure diaries were used as proxies for the assessment of consistency of seizure control between formulations. Results Of the 203 patients exposed to IV carbamazepine (30 min, n = 43; 15 min, n = 160), 113 received 149 rapid infusions. During infusion, the most commonly reported AEs (≥5%) were dizziness (19%), somnolence (6%), headache (6%), and blurred vision (5%). IV carbamazepine was not associated with clinically relevant cardiac AEs. The tolerability profile appeared similar between patients who received

Ramelteon is a selective MT(1)/MT(2) receptor agonist, indicated for insomnia treatment. Safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and cognitive performance were evaluated following increasing ramelteon doses. Healthy adults (35-65 years) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 5 oral ramelteon doses (4, 8, 16, 32, or 64 mg; n = 8 per group) or placebo (n = 20). C(max) and AUC(infinity) (mean [%CV]) increased with each dose: C(max) = 1.15 (109), 5.73 (97), 6.92 (77), 17.4 (76), and 25.9 (77) ng/mL, respectively, and AUC(infinity) = 1.71 (114), 6.95 (108), 9.88 (78), 22.5 (80), and 36.1 (71 n x h/mL), respectively. Mean T(max) values of 0.75 to 0.94 hours and mean elimination half-life of 0.83 to 1.90 hours remained relatively constant. Ramelteon was extensively metabolized. Besides ramelteon, 4 metabolites, M-I, M-II, M-III, and M-IV, were measured in serum. Metabolite M-II, which has shown weak ramelteon-like activity in vitro, was the major metabolite in serum. Digit Symbol Substitution Test and visual analog scale alertness scores were similar across all dose groups and did not differ from placebo. All adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved before study completion.

Objectives: To evaluate the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD) to assess celecoxib pharmacokinetics (PK) and its effects on pharmacodynamic (PD) outcome measures, prostaglandin (PG) synthesis, inflammation processes, and protein markers for AD progression and cognition. Methods: This was a 4‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial evaluating 3 dose levels of celecoxib (50, 200 and 400 mg BID), placebo, or 1 dose level of celecoxib 400 mg BID in age‐matched controls in concurrent panels of 5 subjects each. Results: 21 subjects with AD and 5 age‐matched controls were controlled. The mean concentration of celecoxib in CSF gradually increased and peaked at 4 hours post‐dose on Day 28 for all groups, and decreased to near or below the 30‐minute pre‐dose levels by 12 hours post‐dose. Mean peak celecoxib plasma concentration peaked at 2 hours post dose on Day 28 and was not dose dependent. PD analysis revealed that Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in the CSF indicat...

Vigabatrin is an inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid transaminase. The purpose of these analyses was to develop a population pharmacokinetics model to characterize the vigabatrin concentration–time profile for adults and children with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) and for children with infantile spasms (IS); to identify covariates that affect its disposition, and to enable predictions of systemic vigabatrin exposure for patients 1–12 months of age. Vigabatrin pharmacokinetic data from six randomized controlled clinical trials and one open-label study were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Data collected from 349 adults with rCPS and 119 pediatric patients with rCPS or IS were used in the analyses. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination and transit-compartment absorption consisting of five transit compartments adequately described the vigabatrin concentration–time data for these adult and pediatric patient populations. An exponential error model was used to estimate inter-individual variability for the transit-rate constant (k tr) (24.2 %), elimination rate constant (k) (14.7 %) and apparent central volume of distribution (V c/F) (18 %). For the study of children with IS, inter-occasion variability was estimated for k tr (58.1 %) and relative bioavailability (F) (26.9 %). Covariate analysis indicated that age, creatinine clearance (CLCR), and body weight were important predictors of vigabatrin pharmacokinetic parameters. Vigabatrin apparent clearance increased with increasing CLCR, consistent with renal excretion (primary pathway of vigabatrin elimination). Rate of vigabatrin absorption was dependent on age. The rate was slower in younger patients, which resulted in a smaller predicted maximum concentration and longer predicted time to maximum concentrations. Vigabatrin V c/F, apparent inter-compartmental clearance between the central and peripheral compartment, and apparent peripheral volume of distribution were increased with greater patient body weights. Sex did not contribute significantly to vigabatrin pharmacokinetic variability. The model adequately described vigabatrin pharmacokinetic and enabled predictions of systemic exposures in pediatric patients 1–12 months of age.

Drug development is a process that has no “short cuts” in spite of a detailed road map for developing safe and efficacious drugs. In this context, efficient drug development does not mean “quicker” or “less costly” but is a process that must maintain sight of safety and efficacy, produces information/data that is needed for “Go-No Go” decisions using rational study designs and utilizes flexible study sequences-not linear, ritualistic design. It is important to achieve the first goal: of an open IND, by use Exploratory Guidance as a tool to facilitate entry into humans when possible (IND-enabling development). It should be kept in mind that phase 1/1a studies, whether in healthy subjects or patients, provides the learning phase of drug development, whereas, as development progresses to patients, the safe and effective use are confirmed and thus provide the basis for marketing approval. All aspects of drug development are not addressed here. The present report primarily addresses early development (phase 1)as in many cases the “Go-NoGo” decisions are defined. An overview of the drug development process , regulatory aspects, and the important IND-enabling development, is presented. Considering that all development begins with evaluations of animal safety/toxicity, specifics germain to the transition from animals to humans are presented in some detail. The importance of clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and biopharmaceutics receive a more in depth treatment; collectively as these are the pivotal “learning” areas for successful confirmation as development moves to patients. In this context, decision making studies such as proof of concept and several phase 1 scenarios are presented as examples, drug metabolism and drug–drug interactions studies (in vitro and in vivo) are discussed in some detail. As was stated earlier, an all-encompassing review for drug development is not presented. However the text does provide a learning tool for those interested in the studies and decisions obtained to successful early drug development as a prelude to a more comprehensive development culminating with a safe and efficacious drug. Keywords: effective; early; study designs; drug–drug interactions; IND-enabling

Objective To characterize plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of niacin and its metabolites after oral administration of 2,000 mg of extended-release (ER) niacin in healthy male volunteers. Methods Niacin ER was administered to 12 healthy male subjects following a low-fat snack. Plasma was collected for 12 h post dose and was analyzed for niacin, nicotinuric acid (NUA), nicotinamide (NAM) and nicotinamide-N-oxide (NNO). Urine was collected for 96 h post dose and analyzed for niacin and its metabolites, NUA, NAM, NNO, N-methylnicotinamide (MNA) and N-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide (2PY). Results Mean niacin Cmax and AUC(0-t) values were 9.3 microg/ml and 26.2 microg x h/ml and were the highest of all analytes measured. Peak niacin and NUA levels occurred at 4.6 h (median) while tmax for NAM and NNO were 8.6 and 11.1 h, respectively. The mean plasma terminal half-life for niacin (0.9 h) and NUA (1.3 h) was shorter as compared to NAM (4.3 h). Urine recovery of niacin and metabolites accounted for 69.5% of the administered dose; only 3.2% was excreted as niacin. The highest recovery was for 2PY (37.9%), followed by MNA (16.0%) and NUA (11.6%). Mean half-lives for 2PY and MNA calculated in urine were 12.6 and 12.8 h, respectively. Conclusions Niacin was extensively metabolized following oral administration, and about 70% of the administered dose is recovered in urine in 96 h as niacin, NUA, MNA, NNO, NAM and 2PY. The plasma levels of the parent niacin were higher than its metabolites though only about 3% of the unchanged drug is recovered in urine.

The metabolic profile of niacin is influenced by the rate of niacin administration. This study characterizes the effect of administration rate on the pharmacokinetics of niacin and its metabolites. Twelve healthy males were enrolled in an open-label, dose-rate escalation study and received 2000 mg niacin at 3 different dosing rates. Plasma was analyzed for niacin, nicotinuric acid, nicotinamide, and nicotinamide-N-oxide. Urine was analyzed for niacin and the metabolites nicotinuric acid, nicotinamide, nicotinamide-N-oxide, N-methylnicotinamide, and N-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide. C(max) and AUC(0-t) for niacin and nicotinuric acid increased with an increase in dosing rate. The changes observed in plasma nicotinamide and nicotinamide-N-oxide parameters, however, did not correlate to dosing rate. The total amount of niacin and metabolites excreted in urine was comparable for all 3 treatments. However, with the increase in dosing rate, urine recovery of niacin and nicotinuric acid showed a significant increase, whereas N-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide and N-methylnicotinamide showed a significant decrease.

The influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of eplerenone following single and multiple dosing was evaluated. Subjects (n = 64) were stratified based on creatinine clearance values as follows: renal impairment (mild, moderate, severe), hemodialysis, and normal matches. Subjects received a single dose of eplerenone 100 mg on day 1 and then received 100 mg once daily on days 3 to 8. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the renal impairment groups and their matched-normal groups for area under the curve (A UC), C m a x , or CL/F or CL/F/WT following either single or m ultiple dosing (P ≥.093). The inactive metabolite and inactive ring-opened form displayed greater AUCs in renal impairment. Hemodialysis removed approximately 10% of the eplerenone dose. Eplerenone 100 mg once daily was well tolerated in all groups. Considering that renal function had no significant effects on eplerenone CL/F and that eplerenone metabolites are inactive, no dose adjustment appears necessary in patients with renal dysfunction.

Objective: We assessed rates of withdrawal-related events following abrupt discontinuation and gradual tapering of clobazam during Phase I–III studies. Background Clobazam, a 1,5-benzodiazepine, is under FDA review for LGS. Design/Methods: Potential withdrawal-related AEs following abrupt CLB discontinuation were assessed in 4 multiple-dosage Phase I trials (dosing 8−34 days). These studies employed therapeutic (20 and 40 mg/day) and supratherapeutic dosages (120 and 160 mg/day). These events were also assessed in Phase II/III studies (dosing ≤18 weeks) and their open-label extension (OLE) (≤5 years). In these studies, gradual tapering over 2–3 weeks was conducted. Withdrawal-related AEs included sedation, somnolence, insomnia, irritability, anxiety, and seizures. AEs must have occurred ≥1 day following last clobazam dose and within 30 days after last dose, or must have been deemed withdrawal symptoms by investigators. Results: Phase I participants received steady-state dosages of 20–160 mg/day, with the vast majority receiving ≥40 mg/day and ∼50% receiving ≥120 mg/day (≤4-times maximum daily dosage in Phase II/III). In contrast, LGS patients received ≤40 mg/day during Phase II/III and ≤80 mg/day in the OLE. 87 patients discontinued clobazam during Phase II/III and tapered drug. None reported withdrawal-related AEs. Abrupt discontinuation led to AEs consistent with withdrawal. 93 AEs were reported for 68 of 207 in Phase I studies. Nearly all AEs occurred after abrupt discontinuation of clobazam ≥40 mg/day, with ∼50% occurring at ≥120 mg/day. The majority of AEs following abrupt discontinuation were mild, and included headache, insomnia, anxiety, and tremor. No status epilepticus occurred during withdrawal/tapering. Conclusions: Withdrawal-related AEs did not occur during 2- to 3-week tapering at the conclusion of Phase II/III studies of clobazam. No withdrawal-related AEs have been observed with long-term therapy through 5 years In Phase I, abrupt withdrawal led to generally mild AEs at rates comparable to those observed for other benzodiazepines. Supported by: Lundbeck Inc. Disclosure: Dr. Tolbert has received personal compensation for activities with Lundbeck Research USA, Inc as an employee. Dr. Harris has received research support from Lundbeck Research USA, Inc. Dr. Bekersky has received personal compensation for activities with Lundbeck Research USA, Inc. as an employee. Dr. Owen has received personal compensation for activities with Lundbeck Research USA, Inc.