Search

Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) have a disproportionately high burden of cancer and cancer mortality. The unique barriers to optimum cancer care in these regions necessitate context-specific research. The conduct of research in LMICs has several challenges, not least of which is a paucity of formal training in research methods. Building capacity by training early career researchers is essential to improve research output and cancer outcomes in LMICs. The International Collaboration for Research methods Development in Oncology (CReDO) workshop is an initiative by the Tata Memorial Centre and the National Cancer Grid of India to address gaps in research training and increase capacity in oncology research. Since 2015, there have been five CReDO workshops, which have trained more than 250 oncologists from India and other countries in clinical research methods and protocol development. Participants from all oncology and allied fields were represented at these workshops. Protocols developed included clinical trials, comparative effectiveness studies, health services research, and observational studies, and many of these protocols were particularly relevant to cancer management in LMICs. A follow-up of these participants in 2020 elicited an 88% response rate and showed that 42% of participants had made progress with their CReDO protocols, and 73% had initiated other research protocols and published papers. In this Policy Review, we describe the challenges to research in LMICs, as well as the evolution, structure, and impact of CReDO and other similar workshops on global oncology research.

The childhood burden of disease attributable to Streptococcus pneumoniae is particularly high in India. The immunogenicity and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) were compared with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in a randomized, active-controlled, double-blind trial conducted at 12 sites in India.Healthy infants received PCV13 or PCV7 at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age (infant series) and at 12 months of age (toddler dose), along with routine pediatric vaccinations. Immunoglobulin G responses against the 13 pneumococcal serotypes were evaluated 1 month after the infant series and after the toddler dose. Pertussis and poliomyelitis immune responses were assessed 1 month after the infant series. Safety and tolerability also were assessed.The immunogenicity results for the 7 common serotypes and the concomitant vaccines (whole-cell pertussis and oral poliovirus) were similar for subjects receiving PCV13 and subjects receiving PCV7. Immune responses to the 6 additional serotypes were higher in the PCV13 group compared with the PCV7 group. PCV13 and PCV7 had similar safety and tolerability profiles.PCV13 has immunogenicity similar to PCV7 in response to the 7 common serotypes, and has generally higher immunogenicity in response to the 6 additional serotypes. PCV13 may provide added protection against pneumococcal disease caused by the additional 6 serotypes and does not interfere with immune responses to whole-cell pertussis and oral poliovirus vaccines. PCV13 has an acceptable safety profile in both infants and toddlers, comparable with that of PCV7.

Context: Adherence to good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines by the researcher provides public confidence that the rights, safety and well-being of human participants involved in research are protected. It has been observed that researchers require basic GCP training. Considering this, we had decided to conduct a training session on overview of GCP. Aims: To strengthen the knowledge and awareness regarding GCP. Settings and Design: The design of the study was quasi-experimental one group, pre-test and post-test design and the study was conducted at ACTREC among healthcare professionals at Tata Memorial Centre. Methods and Material: A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data in pre and post-test. A total of 138 participants were participated in the study. The training session was pre-planned which included a lecture followed by the question-answer session. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to assess the effect of the planned teaching programme. Macnemar test was used for item wise comparison of pre and post-test scores. Mann Whitney test was used to determine the significant difference between knowledge scores and selected demographic variables. Results: This study has resulted in overall improvement of knowledge with a median difference of 5 with P-value