Search

The purpose of this work was to determine any effects the presence of sodium carboxymethyl starch may have on the antimicrobial activity of vancomycin given a previously described interaction between vancomycin and sodium carboxymethyl starch. In particular, the in-vitro activity of vancomycin against two clinically relevant bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis, was studied in the presence of varying concentrations of sodium carboxymethyl starch. From two independent studies conducted using an agar dilution method, it appeared that the binding of vancomycin to sodium carboxymethyl starch had no effect on the in-vitro antimicrobial activity of vancomycin. The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin against S. aureus in the presence of as much as 1 mg mL(-1) sodium carboxymethyl starch was similar to that of the control where no sodium carboxymethyl starch was added (1-4 microg mL(-1) vs 1-2 microg mL(-1), respectively). Likewise, the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin against E. faecalis in the presence of 1 mg mL(-1) sodium carboxymethyl starch was also similar to that of the control where no sodium carboxymethyl starch was added (1-4 microg mL(-1) vs 1-4 microg mL(-1), respectively). However, there may be factors in the in-vitro method, such as high ionic strength, that could disrupt the interaction between vancomycin and sodium carboxymethyl starch. Therefore, the possibility of diminished vancomycin activity in-vivo cannot be ruled out. A small percentage (8-10%) of vancomycin was determined to be bound to sodium carboxymethyl starch in broth media. Given these results, the impact of sodium carboxymethyl starch on the in-vitro antimicrobial activity of vancomycin is expected to be minimal. Binding studies could not be conducted with gelled agar due to its semi-solid state.

Compound MDL 62,879 (GE2270 A) is a thiazolyl peptide antibiotic that appears to inhibit aminoacyl-tRNA binding to elongation factor Tu. In the present study, it was shown that MDL 62,879 broth microdilution MIC values were generally 2-4 doubling dilutions lower in the presence of 0.02% bovine serum albumin. Using US clinical isolates and BSA-supplemented media, MDL 62,879 was more active than teicoplanin and vancomycin against the staphylococci and glycopeptide-resistant and glycopeptide-susceptible enterococci and equally active against the streptococci. Broth microdilutions MIC values were not appreciably affected by inoculum concentrations of 5 x 10(4) to 5 x 10(8) cfu/ml or in the presence of 3.5% human serum albumin.

The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin were investigated in 13 subjects with various degrees of renal impairment using a randomized two-period crossover design; 11 subjects completed both periods. Doses of 3 and 30 mg kg-1 were administered as single dose, 60-min constant rate intravenous infusions. Blood samples were obtained over 28 days and urine was collected over 48 h. Serum and urine were analyzed using a microbiological assay. As previously observed in studies conducted in renally impaired subjects, teicoplanin total and renal clearance significantly decreased with decreasing creatinine clearance (p < 0.0001). However, for these parameters, no differences between doses were observed. Dosage adjustment guidelines for renally impaired patients are usually developed using the ratio of total clearance in renally impaired patients to the total clearance in patients with normal renal function. Since no dose-related differences existed in the relationship between teicoplanin total clearance and creatinine clearance, initial dosage adjustment guidelines for renally impaired patients developed at 3 or 30 mg kg-1 are applicable over the range of 3 to 30 mg kg-1.

Comparative teicoplanin in vitro susceptibility data were generated for 1201 Gram-positive US clinical trial isolates using standardized broth microdilution and disk diffusion techniques. Based on the results of this study, the following interpretive criteria for teicoplanin are recommended: for MIC tests, less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml = susceptible, 16 micrograms/ml = moderately susceptible, and greater than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml = resistant; and for disk (30 micrograms) tests, greater than or equal to 14 mm = susceptible, 11-13 mm = intermediate, and less than or equal to 10 mm = resistant.

Teicoplanin pharmacokinetics were investigated upon multiple dose intravenous administration of 6 and 12 mg kg-1 in 10 normal, healthy, male volunteers, using a two-period, randomized, crossover design; six subjects completed both periods. On day 1, 6 or 12 mg kg-1 was administered every 12 h as a 30-min constant rate intravenous infusion (two doses). Starting on day 2, the same dose (6 or 12 mg kg-1) was administered every 24 h for an additional 13 days. Blood and urine samples were collected over 21 days. Serum and urine were analyzed using a microbiological assay. Following a minimum of 3 weeks after completion of the first period, subjects were crossed over to the other dose. Following multiple dose intravenous administration of 6 and 12 mg kg-1, median pharmacokinetic parameters included: steady-state volume of distribution of 1.4 and 1.2 l kg-1; total clearance of 12.2 and 14.0 ml h-1 kg-1; renal clearance of 11.1 and 10.3 ml h-1 kg-1; and terminal disposition half-life of 159 and 155 h, respectively. No statistically significant dose-related difference was observed. In addition, a cross-study comparison further supports dose proportionality of teicoplanin upon multiple dose intravenous administration of 3 to 12 mg kg-1.

Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and local tolerance (at the site of intramuscular administration) of a new formulation of teicoplanin (400 mg/3 mL) were investigated in 24 normal, healthy, male volunteers. A single dose of 6 mg/kg was administered intravenously and intramuscularly using a randomized crossover design. Volunteers and investigator were blinded as to the route of administration; placebo was administered by the other route. Blood and urine samples were collected for 21 days and were analyzed for microbiological activity. The median (range) pharmacokinetic parameters of teicoplanin following single-dose iv administration were as follows: steady-state volume of distribution of 1.6 (1.2-2.8) L/kg; total clearance of 10.2 (8.6-15.1) mL/h/kg; renal clearance of 10.0 (7.9-13.8) mL/h/kg; and terminal disposition half-life of 168 (111-278) h. Following single-dose im administration, significantly more subjects complained of pain following administration of teicoplanin (58%) compared with placebo (4%). Teicoplanin was completely absorbed with a median (range) peak serum concentration of 12.3 (6.6-37.5) micrograms/mL occurring at a median (range) time of 4.1 (0.7-6.1) h. Since the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of areas under the serum concentration-time curve falls within the range of 80 to 120%, the extent of systemic absorption of teicoplanin following im administration is equivalent to that following iv administration.

In this study, the in vitro activity of teicoplanin and vancomycin was directly compared against 503 Gram-positive cocci isolated during the U.S. teicoplanin clinical trials. Both antibiotics were equally active against oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, oxacillin-sensitive and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, and other coagulase-negative staphylococci, except Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Teicoplanin was fourfold more active than vancomycin against oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (MIC90, 0.5 vs. 2.0 micrograms/ml), whereas vancomycin was more active than teicoplanin (MIC90, 2.0 vs. 8.0 micrograms/ml) against oxacillin-resistant S. haemolyticus. Teicoplanin was two- to eightfold more active than vancomycin against the streptococci and enterococci tested.

Phenoxybenzenes and phenoxypyridines were prepared and tested for the effect of substituents on antipicornavirus activity. The most active compound, 2-(3,4-dichlorophenoxy)-5-nitrobenzonitrile (8), demonstrated broad-spectrum antipicornavirus activity. Compound 8 and several analogues each given orally prior to and during infection protected mice against an otherwise lethal challenge with coxsackievirus A21.

A general synthesis to the title compounds 1, substituted in the 6-position and on the phenyl ring, is outlined. Eighteen analogues were compared with respect to in vitro activity against rhinovirus types 1A, 9, and 64. Compounds 1c and 1h, the 6-bromo- and 6-(methylsulfonyl)-3',4'-dichlorophenyl analogues, afforded median MIC50 values against 23 rhinovirus serotypes of 0.05 and 0.13 micrograms/mL, respectively. Mice dosed orally with 200 mg/kg of 1c or 1h exhibited serum levels well in excess of each compound's MIC50, indicating that some analogues have the potential to be orally effective drugs.

Sixteen diarylmethanes and ten aralkylaminopyridines were initially evaluated for their in vitro activity against rhinoviruses 1A, 2 and 64 and against coxsackievirus A21 and for their oral prophylactic and therapeutic activity in mice challenged with coxsackievirus A21. Based on these preliminary studies the diarylmethane (3,4-dichlorophenoxy)-(5 methylsulfonyl-2-pyridinyl)-methane and the aralkylaminopyridine (2-(3,4-dichlorobenzylamino)-5-methylsulfonylpyridine were compared with their oxygen bridged analogue 2-(3,4-dichlorophenoxy)-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine for in vitro activity against a larger number of picornaviruses and for their in vivo protective efficacy in dose response assays. All three compounds exhibit similar in vitro activity inhibiting 12 to 15 (52.2-65.3%) of the 23 picornaviruses tested at concentrations of less than 5.0 micrograms/ml. However, the aralkylaminopyridine was found to be the most active in vivo; significantly protecting coxsackievirus A21 challenged mice after a single oral dose of 37.5 mg/kg (P less than or equal to 0.05) and during a continuous oral dose regimen of as low as 18.8 mg/kg per day (P less than 0.01).

At physiologically relevant concentrations an antiviral compound should not perturb the host's ability to mount an immune response against the infecting virus or some other opportunistic pathogen. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immunomodulatory activity of the antiviral compound MDL 20,610 using murine models. When tested in vitro at the limit of aqueous solubility (6 microM), MDL 20,610 has no significant effect on neutrophil function as assessed by cell migration against FMLP and LTB4 gradients, myeloperoxidase secretion or 0.-2 production. In addition, 6 microM MDL 20,610 has no significant effect on macrophage function as determined by 0.-2 production, Ia and Mac-1 antigen expression and expression of Fc gamma receptors. Finally, MDL 20,610 does not significantly affect in vivo (1-100 mg/kg/day) NK cell activity or DTH to oxazolone; but treatment of mice with 50 or 100 mg MDL 20,610/kg/day significantly (P less than 0.01) enhances SRBC IgM antibody synthesis. These data indicate that MDL 20,610 is relatively devoid of immunomodulatory activity.

The purpose of this study was to develop bioassays for the measurement of teicoplanin in serum containing rifampin or a beta-lactam antibiotic. Use of rifampin-resistant Bacillus subtilis as indicator organism or pretreatment of the serum sample with Bacillus cereus penicillinase Type I (nafcillin, ticarcillin, mezlocillin) or Type II (cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone) effectively eliminated assay interference. Validation bioassays performed on two separate days utilizing triplicate coded serum samples containing 0 to 200 micrograms teicoplanin in combination with 40 micrograms/ml rifampin or 200 to 500 micrograms/ml beta-lactam showed no significant differences (p greater than 0.05, two-way analysis of variance) in analyte recovery between assay days. Regression analysis of each teicoplanin/rifampin or teicoplanin/beta-lactam data set yielded slope values of 0.92 to 1.01, intercept values of -0.45 to 0.84 and correlation coefficients of 0.9925 to 0.9990. Thus, serum teicoplanin can be quantitated accurately, precisely, and reproducibly in patients receiving concomitant rifampin or beta-lactam chemotherapy.

Fifteen p-benzoylphenoxypyridines were initially evaluated for their in vitro activity against rhinoviruses (RV) 1A, 2 and 64 and coxsackie virus (Cox) A21 and for their oral prophylactic and therapeutic activity in Swiss albino mice lethally challenged with Cox A21. One compound, (4-[(5-methylsulfonyl-2-pyridinyl)oxy]phenyl) phenyl methanone, was selected for additional evaluation. These studies showed the compound to possess MIC50 values of less than or equal to 5 micrograms/ml against only 6 of 20 (30.0%) RV serotypes tested. In contrast, the compound was active at concentrations of less than or equal to 5.0 micrograms/ml against 10 of 12 (83.3%) enteroviruses evaluated. In vivo studies showed the compound to significantly protect mice lethally infected with Cox A21 after a single oral dose of 37.5 mg/kg (P less than 0.02) and during a regimen of continuous oral doses of at least 4.7 mg/kg per day (P less than 0.001). Mechanism of action studies indicated that the compound inhibits picornavirus uncoating or some earlier virus-host cell-associated event. Isotopic studies show that (4-[(5-methylsulfonyl-2-pyridinyl)oxy]phenyl) phenyl methanone perturbs HeLa cell macromolecular synthesis at concentrations of as low as 3.12 micrograms/ml. This concentration is only 4-fold higher than the concentration of compound necessary to inhibit Cox A21 RNA synthesis by 90%. This narrow therapeutic ratio limits the potential clinical utility of this compound to all but the most serious picornavirus infections.

The purpose of this study was to probe the antirhinovirus (RV) mechanism of action of MDL 20,610. Evaluation of the compound's effects on RV RNA synthesis, uncoating of neutral red-sensitized RV, plasma membrane penetration by RV, stabilization of RV against heat (56 degrees C) and low pH (5.0) inactivation, and studies with MDL 20,610-resistant RV mutants indicate that MDL 20,610 binds directly to the RV capsid with subsequent inhibition of acid-mediated virion uncoating.