Search

01 juni 2023, Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Novel mRNA-based vaccines have been used to protect against SARS-CoV-2, especially in vulnerable populations who also receive an annual influenza vaccination. The TACTIC study investigated potential immune interference between the mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine and the quadrivalent influenza vaccine, and determined if concurrent administration would have effects on safety or immunogenicity. METHODS: TACTIC was a single-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at the Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands. Individuals ≥60 years, fully vaccinated against COVID-19 were eligible for participation and randomized into one of four study groups: 1) 0.5 ml influenza vaccination Vaxigrip Tetra followed by 0.3 ml BNT162b2 COVID-19 booster vaccination 21 days later, (2) COVID-19 booster vaccination followed by influenza vaccination, (3) influenza vaccination concurrent with the COVID-19 booster vaccination, and (4) COVID-19 booster vaccination only (reference group). Primary outcome was the geometric mean concentration (GMC) of IgG against the spike (S)-protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, 21 days after booster vaccination. We performed a non-inferiority analysis of concurrent administration compared to booster vaccines alone with a predefined non-inferiority margin of -0.3 on the log10-scale. FINDINGS: 154 individuals participated from October, 4, 2021, until November, 5, 2021. Anti-S IgG GMCs for the co-administration and reference group were 1684 BAU/ml and 2435 BAU/ml, respectively. Concurrent vaccination did not meet the criteria for non-inferiority (estimate -0.1791, 95% CI -0.3680 to -0.009831) and antibodies showed significantly lower neutralization capacity compared to the reference group. Reported side-effects were mild and did not differ between study groups. INTERPRETATION: Concurrent administration of both vaccines is safe, but the quantitative and functional antibody responses were marginally lower compared to booster vaccin

01 juli 2023, Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 241350.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), OBJECTIVES: To explore the negative predictive value (NPV) of C-reactive protein (CRP) at admission to exclude complicated disease manifestations of pneumococcal disease. METHODS: A Dutch multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted between 01-01-2012 and 30-06-2020. Adults with positive blood cultures for Streptococcus pneumoniae, whose CRP was measured at admission and whose infection focus was known, were included. Electronic medical and microbiological records were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 832 bacteraemic patients enrolled, 30% had complicated manifestations of pneumococcal disease; most frequent were pleural effusion (8.9%), pleural empyema (5.4%) and meningitis (7.5%). Compared to solitary pneumonia, patients with pleural effusion and empyema presented with higher CRP levels. Although low CRP levels did not exclude complicated disease in general, a CRP level < 114 mg/L at admission could reliably exclude empyema among adult pneumonia patients with an NPV of 93% and a specificity of 26%. However, in cases where pleural fluid was present, CRP levels were mostly > 114 mg/L, such that suspicion of empyema could only be ruled out in a minority of cases (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Complicated manifestations are prevalent in adult pneumococcal bacteraemia. Low blood CRP levels can reliably exclude the development of pulmonary empyema. Practical value may be largest in settings without thoracic imaging at hand.