Search

Context: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection outcomes include liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver-related death.Objective: To assess the association between sustained virological response (SVR) and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced hepatic fibrosis.Design, Setting, and Patients: An international, multicenter, long-term follow-up study from 5 large tertiary care hospitals in Europe and Canada of 530 patients with chronic HCV infection who started an interferon-based treatment regimen between 1990 and 2003, following histological proof of advanced hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis (Ishak score 4-6). Complete follow-up ranged between January 2010 and October 2011.Main Outcome Measures: All-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were liver failure, HCC, and liver-related mortality or liver transplantation.Results: The 530 study patients were followed up for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 8.4 (6.4-11.4) years. The baseline median (IQR) age was 48 (42-56) years and 369 patients (70%) were men. The Ishak fibrosis score was 4 in 143 patients (27%), 5 in 101 patients (19%), and 6 in 286 patients (54%). There were 192 patients (36%) who achieved SVR; 13 patients with SVR and 100 without SVR died (10-year cumulative all-cause mortality rate, 8.9% [95% CI, 3.3%-14.5%] with SVR and 26.0% [95% CI, 20.2%-28.4%] without SVR; P < .001). In time-dependent multivariate Cox regression analysis, SVR was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.49; P < .001) and reduced risk of liver-related mortality or transplantation (HR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.19; P < .001), the latter occurring in 3 patients with SVR and 103 without SVR. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of liver-related mortality or transplantation was 1.9% (95% CI, 0.0%-4.1%) with SVR and 27.4% (95% CI, 22.0%-32.8%) without SVR (P < .001). There were 7 patients with SVR and 76 without SVR who developed HCC (10-year cumulative incidence rate, 5.1%; 95% CI, 1.3%-8.9%; vs 21.8%; 95% CI, 16.6%-27.0%; P < .001), and 4 patients with SVR and 111 without SVR experienced liver failure (10-year cumulative incidence rate, 2.1%; 95% CI, 0.0%-4.5%; vs 29.9%; 95% CI, 24.3%-35.5%; P < .001).Conclusion: Among patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced hepatic fibrosis, sustained virological response to interferon-based treatment was associated with lower all-cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: The performance of non-invasive liver tests (NITs) is known to vary across settings and subgroups. We systematically evaluated whether the performance of three NITs in detecting advanced fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) varies with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) status or liver enzymes., Methods: Data from 586 adult LITMUS Metacohort participants with histologically characterised MASLD were included. The diagnostic performance of the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) and vibration-controlled transient elastography liver stiffness measurement (VCTE LSM) was evaluated. Performance was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Thresholds for detecting advanced fibrosis (≥F3) were calculated for each NIT for fixed (high) sensitivity, specificity and predictive values., Results: Differences in AUC between all subgroups were small and statistically not significant, indicating comparable performance in detecting ≥F3, irrespective of these clinical factors. However, different thresholds were needed to achieve the same level of accuracy with each test. For example, for a fixed sensitivity and specificity, the thresholds for all three NITs were higher in patients with T2DM. Effects for sex, age and liver enzymes were less pronounced., Conclusions: Performance of the selected NITs in detecting advanced liver fibrosis does not vary substantially with clinical characteristics. However, different thresholds have to be selected to achieve the same sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the respective subgroups. Large prospective studies are called for to study NIT accuracy considering multiple patient characteristics., (© 2025 The Author(s). Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Chronic liver diseases pose a serious public health issue. Identifying patients at risk for advanced liver fibrosis is crucial for early intervention. The Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), a simple non-invasive test, classifies patients into three risk groups for advanced fibrosis. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of patients at risk for advanced hepatic fibrosis at a Swiss tertiary care hospital by calculating the FIB-4 score in routine blood analysis., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data from 36,360 patients who visited outpatient clinics at eight main clinics of the University Hospital Bern in Switzerland. The data collection period ran from January 1st to December 31st, 2022. Patients attending the hepatology outpatient clinic were excluded. We then calculated the overall and clinic-specific prevalence of patients falling into the high risk category for advanced fibrosis according to FIB-4., Results: Among the 36,360 patients, 26,245 (72.2%) had a low risk of advanced fibrosis (FIB-4 <1.3), whereas 3913 (10.8%) and 2597 (7.1%) patients were flagged to have a high risk of advanced fibrosis (FIB-4 >2.67 and FIB-4 >3.25 respectively). Geriatrics and Cardiology had the highest proportions of patients at risk for advanced fibrosis over all clinics., Conclusions: This study demonstrates a high prevalence of high FIB-4 score in a Swiss tertiary care hospital. The implementation of the automatically generated FIB-4 score in daily practice, not only in primary care, but also within tertiary care hospitals, could be crucial for early identification of outpatients at high risk of advanced liver fibrosis requiring further hepatological investigations., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy, and the authors of this article declare the following competing interests: Petra Strajhar was a Master of Public Health student at the time this work was completed and an employee of Alexion AstraZeneca. Alexion AstraZeneca was not involved in or did not fund this work. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE’s policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2025 Strajhar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The year 2024 was rich in developments in the field of hepatology, gastroenterology, and interventional endoscopy. New molecules have been developed for the treatment of metabolic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Technological progress now makes it possible to perform screening measurements for portal hypertension directly under echo-endoscopic guidance and to extend the use of intraluminal stents to surgically modified anatomies. Several new recommendations have also been issued, including some for the nutritional management of inflammatory diseases, the management of polypoid lesions, and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms., Competing Interests: Le Dr D. Galasso figure parmi les auteurs de l’article no. 27 de la bibliographie. Les autres auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Background and Aim: Age and biological sex are risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurrence, but their impact on overall survival (OS) is a matter of debate. This study aims to investigate how sex and age at diagnosis, along with other associated factors (i.e., comorbidities, etiologies, therapy) impact OS in the HCC population. Method: Data from two HCC cohorts-a prospective registry from the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland, and a retrospective registry from General Hospital Vienna, Austria-were combined and analyzed. Clinical and laboratory data were reviewed, and OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Cox regression models with penalized splines were applied to examine how age at diagnosis influenced OS. Results: Of 1547 HCC patients, 1284 (84.1%) were male. Females were older (67 vs. 63 years, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of liver cirrhosis ( p < 0.001), cardiac comorbidities ( p < 0.001), and diabetes ( p < 0.001). No significant difference in median OS between men and women was observed (18 months vs. 16 months, p = 0.304). Mortality risk increased with age, particularly between 60 and 70 years. However, after adjusting for treatment, the age effect became non-significant ( p = 0.171). Conclusions: After controlling the model for therapy, neither age nor sex independently influenced OS in HCC patients, underscoring the impact of therapy on survival.

Background and Aims: The outcome of patients with HCC who achieved complete response (CR) to immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based systemic therapies is unclear., Approach and Results: Retrospective study of patients with HCC who had CR according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (CR-mRECIST) to ICI-based systemic therapies from 28 centers in Asia, Europe, and the United States. Of 3933 patients with HCC treated with ICI-based noncurative systemic therapies, 174 (4.4%) achieved CR-mRECIST, and 97 (2.5%) had CR according to RECISTv1.1 (CR-RECISTv1.1) as well. The mean age of the total cohort (male, 85%; Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer-C, 70%) was 65.9±9.8 years. The majority (83%) received ICI-based combination therapies. Median follow-up was 32.2 (95% CI: 29.9-34.4) months. One- and 3-year overall survival rates were 98% and 86%. One- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were excellent in patients with CR-mRECIST-only and CR-RECISTv1.1 (78% and 55%; 70% and 42%). Among patients who discontinued ICIs for reasons other than recurrence, those who received immunotherapy for ≥6 months after the first mRECIST CR had a longer recurrence-free survival than those who discontinued immunotherapy earlier (p=0.008). Of 9 patients who underwent curative surgical conversion therapy, 8 (89%) had pathological CR (CR-RECISTv1.1, n= 2/2; CR-mRECIST-only, n= 6/7)., Conclusions: Overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients with CR-mRECIST-only and CR-RECISTv1.1 were excellent, and 6 of 7 patients with CR-mRECIST-only who underwent surgical conversion therapy had pathological CR. Despite potential limitations, these findings support the use of mRECIST in the context of immunotherapy for clinical decision-making. When considering ICI discontinuation, treatment for at least 6 months beyond CR seems advisable., (Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Alteration in lipid metabolism plays a pivotal role in developing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). However, our understanding of alteration in lipid metabolism across liver zonation in MASH remains limited. Within this study, we investigated MASH-associated zone-specific lipid metabolism in a diet and chemical-induced MASH mouse model. Spatial lipidomics using mass spectrometry imaging in a MASH mouse model revealed 130 lipids from various classes altered across liver zonation and exhibited zone-specific lipid signatures in MASH. Triacylglycerols, diacylglycerols, sphingolipids and ceramides showed distinct zone-specific changes and re-distribution from pericentral to periportal localization in MASH. Saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids (FA) were the primary FA composition of increased lipids in MASH, while polyunsaturated FAs were the major FA composition of decreased lipids. We observed elevated fibrosis in the periportal region, which could be the result of observed metabolic alteration across zonation. Our study provides valuable insights into zone-specific hepatic lipid metabolism and demonstrates the significance of spatial lipidomics in understanding liver lipid metabolism. Identifying unique lipid distribution patterns may offer valuable insights into the pathophysiology of MASH and facilitate the discovery of diagnostic markers associated with liver zonation., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: VW-SW has served as a consultant or advisory board member for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions and Visirna; and a speaker for Abbott, AbbVie, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk and Unilab. He has received a research grant from Gilead Sciences, and is a co-founder of Illuminatio Medical Technology. JF-D has served as an advisory board member for Alentis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Enyo, Esai, Genfit, Intercept, Inventiva, Ipsen, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk and Roche. He has also had speaking and teaching engagements for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Ipsen and Roche. JF-D has served as a consultant or advisory board member for Alentis, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Enyo, Esai, Genfit, Intercept, Inventiva, Ipsen, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Roche. He has also speaking and teaching engagements for Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Ipsen, Roche.

We aimed to investigate the potential impact of metabolic risk factors and lifestyles on mortality in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. From the Korean Central Cancer Registry database (2008-2016), 8,505 HCC patients were included in the analysis. Patients with 2 or more metabolic risk factors (n = 2384, 28.0%) showed significantly worse overall survival (OS, 29 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27-33) than patients with 0 (n = 2269 [26.7%]; 41 months, 95% CI 37-47), or 1 (n = 3852 [45.3%]; 42 months; 95% CI 38-46) metabolic risk factor. (P < 0.001) In the multivariable Cox analysis, patients with ≥ 2 metabolic risk factors had significantly elevated risk of overall mortality (adjusted hazards ratio (HR) = 1.14 [95% CI 1.06-1.23], P < 0.001) and HCC-specific mortality (sub-distribution HR = 1.09 [95% CI 1.00-1.09], P = 0.046), compared to those without. Alcohol and smoking were also independent risk factors for worse overall and HCC-specific mortality (all P < 0.05). Metabolic comorbidities were associated with greater risk of mortality in a dose-dependent manner in HCC patients, regardless of tumor stage and liver function. Alcohol intake and smoking significantly increased mortality by themselves and even further with the presence of metabolic risk., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a prevalent chronic liver disease worldwide, and can rapidly progress to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Accurate preclinical models and methodologies are needed to understand underlying metabolic mechanisms and develop treatment strategies. Through meta-analysis of currently proposed mouse models, we hypothesized that a diet- and chemical-induced MASH model closely resembles the observed lipid metabolism alterations in humans., Methods: We developed transcriptomics-driven metabolic pathway analysis (TDMPA), a method to aid in the evaluation of metabolic resemblance. TDMPA uses genome-scale metabolic models to calculate enzymatic reaction perturbations from gene expression data. We performed TDMPA to score and compare metabolic pathway alterations in MASH mouse models to human MASH signatures. We used an already-established WD+CCl4-induced MASH model and performed functional assays and lipidomics to confirm TDMPA findings., Results: Both human MASH and mouse models exhibit numerous altered metabolic pathways, including triglyceride biosynthesis, fatty acid beta-oxidation, bile acid biosynthesis, cholesterol metabolism, and oxidative phosphorylation. We confirm a significant reduction in mitochondrial functions and bioenergetics, as well as in acylcarnitines for the mouse model. We identify a wide range of lipid species within the most perturbed pathways predicted by TDMPA. Triglycerides, phospholipids, and bile acids are increased significantly in mouse MASH liver, confirming our initial observations., Conclusions: We introduce TDMPA, a methodology for evaluating metabolic pathway alterations in metabolic disorders. By comparing metabolic signatures that typify human MASH, we show a good metabolic resemblance of the WD+CCl4 mouse model. Our presented approach provides a valuable tool for defining metabolic space to aid experimental design for assessing metabolism., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: Metabolic dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) outcomes such as MASH (metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis), fibrosis and cirrhosis are ordinarily determined by resource-intensive and invasive biopsies. We aim to show that routine clinical tests offer sufficient information to predict these endpoints., Methods: Using the LITMUS Metacohort derived from the European NAFLD Registry, the largest MASLD dataset in Europe, we create three combinations of features which vary in degree of procurement including a 19-variable feature set that are attained through a routine clinical appointment or blood test. This data was used to train predictive models using supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm XGBoost, alongside missing imputation technique MICE and class balancing algorithm SMOTE. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were added to determine relative importance for each clinical variable., Results: Analysing nine biopsy-derived MASLD outcomes of cohort size ranging between 5385 and 6673 subjects, we were able to predict individuals at training set AUCs ranging from 0.719-0.994, including classifying individuals who are At-Risk MASH at an AUC = 0.899. Using two further feature combinations of 26-variables and 35-variables, which included composite scores known to be good indicators for MASLD endpoints and advanced specialist tests, we found predictive performance did not sufficiently improve. We are also able to present local and global explanations for each ML model, offering clinicians interpretability without the expense of worsening predictive performance., Conclusions: This study developed a series of ML models of accuracy ranging from 71.9-99.4% using only easily extractable and readily available information in predicting MASLD outcomes which are usually determined through highly invasive means., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Quentin M. Anstee has received research grant funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; has served as a consultant on behalf of Newcastle University for Alimentiv, Akero, AstraZeneca, Axcella, 89bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galmed, Genfit, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Hanmi, HistoIndex, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, Medpace, Merck, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Poxel, Resolution Therapeutics, Roche, Ridgeline Therapeutics, RTI, Shionogi, and Terns; has served as a speaker for Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare; and receives royalties from Elsevier Ltd. Jörn M. Schattenberg has served as consultant for Alentis Therapeutics, Astra Zeneca, Apollo Endosurgery, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Madrigal, MSD, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Siemens Healthineers. Research Funding: Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Siemens Healthcare GmbH. Stock Options: AGED diagnostics, Hepta Bio. Speaker Honorarium: Advanz, Echosens, MedPublico GmbH. Andreas Geier served as a speaker and consultant for AbbVie, Advanz, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Burgerstein, CSL Behring, Eisai, Falk, Gilead, Heel, Intercept, Ipsen, Merz, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis; received research funding from Intercept, Falk, Novartis. Dina Tiniakos served as consultant on behalf of the University or for ICON, Merck Greece, Madrigal, Inventiva, Histoindex, Cymabay and Clinnovate. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. We are not opposed to any reviewers., (Copyright: © 2024 McTeer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background & Aims: Widespread use of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection has been paralleled with increased numbers of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after achieving sustained virologic response (post-SVR HCC) worldwide. Few data compare regional differences in the presentation and prognosis of patients with post-SVR HCC., Methods: We identified patients with advanced fibrosis (F3/F4) who developed incident post-SVR HCC between March 2015 and October 2021 from 30 sites in Europe, North America, South America, the Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia. We compared patient demographics, liver dysfunction, and tumor burden by region. We compared overall survival by region using Kaplan-Meier analysis and identified factors associated with survival using multivariable Cox regression analysis., Results: Among 8796 patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis who achieved SVR, 583 (6.6%) developed incident HCC. There was marked regional variation in the proportion of patients detected by surveillance (range: 59.5%-100%), median maximum tumor diameter (range, 1.8-5.0 cm), and the proportion with multinodular HCC (range, 15.4%-60.8%). The prognosis of patients highly varied by region (hazard ratio range, 1.82-9.92), with the highest survival rates in East Asia, North America, and South America, and the lowest survival rates in the Middle East and South Asia. After adjusting for geographic region, HCC surveillance was associated with early stage detection (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A, 71.0% vs 21.3%; P < .0001) and lower mortality rates (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18-0.46)., Conclusions: Clinical characteristics, including early stage detection, and prognosis of post-SVR HCC differed significantly across geographic regions. Surveillance utilization appears to be a high-yield intervention target to improve prognosis among patients with post-SVR HCC globally., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a first-in-class farnesoid X receptor agonist and antifibrotic agent in development for the treatment of pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to validate the original 18-month liver biopsy analysis from the phase III REGENERATE trial of OCA for the treatment of NASH with a consensus panel analysis, provide additional histology data in a larger population, and evaluate safety from >8,000 total patient-years' exposure with nearly 1,000 participants receiving study drug for >4 years., Methods: Digitized whole-slide images were evaluated independently by panels of three pathologists using the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system. Primary endpoints were (1) ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH or (2) NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Safety was assessed by laboratory values and adverse events., Results: Prespecified efficacy analyses included 931 participants. The proportion of participants achieving a ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH was 22.4% for OCA 25 mg vs. 9.6% for placebo (p <0.0001). More participants receiving OCA 25 mg vs. placebo achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis (6.5% vs. 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.093). Histology data in a larger population of 1,607 participants supported these results. Safety data included 2,477 participants. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and deaths was not substantively different across treatment groups. Pruritus was the most common TEAE. Rates of adjudicated hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular events were low and similar across treatment groups., Conclusions: These results confirm the antifibrotic effect of OCA 25 mg. OCA was generally well tolerated over long-term dosing. These data support a positive benefit:risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH., Impact and Implications: Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often have liver scarring (fibrosis), which causes an increased risk of liver-related illness and death. Preventing progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis or reversing fibrosis are the main goals of drug development for NASH. In this clinical trial of obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with NASH (REGENERATE), we reaffirmed our previous results demonstrating that OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis using a more rigorous consensus panel analysis of liver biopsies taken at month 18. We also showed that OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum liver biochemistries and liver stiffness measurements compared with placebo, even in participants in whom histologic fibrosis did not change at 18 months, providing evidence that the benefit of OCA extends beyond what is captured by the ordinal NASH CRN scoring system. OCA was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile supporting a positive benefit: risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Drug development in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is hampered by a high screening failure rate that reaches 60% to 80% in therapeutic trials, mainly because of the absence of fibrotic NASH on baseline liver histology. MACK-3, a blood test including 3 biomarkers (aspartate aminotransferase, homeostasis model assessment, and cytokeratin 18), recently was developed for the noninvasive diagnosis of fibrotic NASH. We aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of this noninvasive test in an international multicenter study., Methods: A total of 1924 patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease from 10 centers in Asia, Australia, and Europe were included. The blood test MACK-3 was calculated for all patients. FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase score (FAST), an elastography-based test for fibrotic NASH, also was available in a subset of 655 patients. Fibrotic NASH was defined as the presence of NASH on liver biopsy with a Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score of 4 or higher and fibrosis stage of F2 or higher according to the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system., Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic of MACK-3 for fibrotic NASH was 0.791 (95% CI 0.768-0.814). Sensitivity at the previously published MACK-3 threshold of less than 0.135 was 91% and specificity at a greater than 0.549 threshold was 85%. The MACK-3 area under the receiver operating characteristic was not affected by age, sex, diabetes, or body mass index. MACK-3 and FAST results were well correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.781; P < .001). Except for an 8% higher rate of patients included in the grey zone, MACK-3 provided similar accuracy to that of FAST. Both tests included 27% of patients in their rule-in zone, with 85% specificity and 35% false positives (screen failure rate)., Conclusions: The blood test MACK-3 is an accurate tool to improve patient selection in NASH therapeutic trials., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

NASH is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease with the potential of evolving towards end-stage liver disease and HCC, even in the absence of cirrhosis. Apart from becoming an increasingly prevalent indication for liver transplantation in cirrhotic and HCC patients, its burden on the healthcare system is also exerted by the increased number of noncirrhotic NASH patients. Intermittent fasting has recently gained more interest in the scientific community as a possible treatment approach for different components of metabolic syndrome. Basic science and clinical studies have shown that apart from inducing body weight loss, improving cardiometabolic parameters, namely blood pressure, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels; insulin and glucose metabolism; intermittent fasting can reduce inflammatory markers, endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, autophagy, and endothelial dysfunction, as well as modulate gut microbiota. This review aims to further explore the main NASH pathogenetic metabolic drivers on which intermittent fasting can act upon and improve the prognosis of the disease, and summarize the current clinical evidence., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: The reference standard for detecting non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and staging fibrosis-liver biopsy-is invasive and resource intensive. Non-invasive biomarkers are urgently needed, but few studies have compared these biomarkers in a single cohort. As part of the Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis (LITMUS) project, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 17 biomarkers and multimarker scores in detecting NASH and clinically significant fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and identify their optimal cutoffs as screening tests in clinical trial recruitment., Methods: This was a comparative diagnostic accuracy study in people with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD from 13 countries across Europe, recruited between Jan 6, 2010, and Dec 29, 2017, from the LITMUS metacohort of the prospective European NAFLD Registry. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with paired liver biopsy and serum samples were eligible; those with excessive alcohol consumption or evidence of other chronic liver diseases were excluded. The diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with liver histology as the reference standard and compared with the Fibrosis-4 index for liver fibrosis (FIB-4) in the same subgroup. Target conditions were the presence of NASH with clinically significant fibrosis (ie, at-risk NASH; NAFLD Activity Score ≥4 and F≥2) or the presence of advanced fibrosis (F≥3), analysed in all participants with complete data. We identified thres holds for each biomarker for reducing the number of biopsy-based screen failures when recruiting people with both NASH and clinically significant fibrosis for future trials., Findings: Of 1430 participants with NAFLD in the LITMUS metacohort with serum samples, 966 (403 women and 563 men) were included after all exclusion criteria had been applied. 335 (35%) of 966 participants had biopsy-confirmed NASH and clinically significant fibrosis and 271 (28%) had advanced fibrosis. For people with NASH and clinically significant fibrosis, no single biomarker or multimarker score significantly reached the predefined AUC 0·80 acceptability threshold (AUCs ranging from 0·61 [95% CI 0·54-0·67] for FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter to 0·81 [0·75-0·86] for SomaSignal), with accuracy mostly similar to FIB-4. Regarding detection of advanced fibrosis, SomaSignal (AUC 0·90 [95% CI 0·86-0·94]), ADAPT (0·85 [0·81-0·89]), and FibroScan liver stiffness measurement (0·83 [0·80-0·86]) reached acceptable accuracy. With 11 of 17 markers, histological screen failure rates could be reduced to 33% in trials if only people who were marker positive had a biopsy for evaluating eligibility. The best screening performance for NASH and clinically significant fibrosis was observed for SomaSignal (number needed to test [NNT] to find one true positive was four [95% CI 4-5]), then ADAPT (six [5-7]), MACK-3 (seven [6-8]), and PRO-C3 (nine [7-11])., Interpretation: None of the single markers or multimarker scores achieved the predefined acceptable AUC for replacing biopsy in detecting people with both NASH and clinically significant fibrosis. However, several biomarkers could be applied in a prescreening strategy in clinical trial recruitment. The performance of promising markers will be further evaluated in the ongoing prospective LITMUS study cohort., Funding: The Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests QMA is the coordinator of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 (IMI2) LITMUS consortium funded by the IMI2 Program of the EU (777377) and is a Newcastle National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre investigator. The multistakeholder LITMUS consortium includes industry partners and received funding from the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. QMA also declares research grant funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Glympse Bio, Intercept, Novartis, and Pfizer; is a consultant on behalf of Newcastle University to Alimentiv, Akero, AstraZeneca, Axcella, 89Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galmed, Genfit, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Hanmi, HistoIndex, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, Medpace, Merck, NGMBio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Poxel, Resolution Therapeutics, Roche, Ridgeline Therapeutics, RTI International, Shionogi, and Terns; has received speaker fees from Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare; is on the North Sea Therapeutics Data Safety and Monitoring Committee at Medpace on behalf of Newcastle University; and has received royalties from Elsevier. JB declares research grant funding from Echosens, Intercept, Inventiva, and Siemens; consulting fees from Echosens, Intercept, and Siemens; speaker fees from Gilead, Intercept, Lilly, and Siemens; and is a member of advisory boards of Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Intercept, Novo Nordisk, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. DT declares grants from and contracts with Histoindex; consulting fees from Alimentiv, Clinnovate Health UK, Allergan, Cirius Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, ICON Clinical Research, and Ionis Pharmaceuticals; and was the past President of the European Society of Pathology (unpaid). PB is the owner and Director of Liverpat. AG declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and research grants from Falk and Intercept; consulting fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead, Intercept, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Sequana; research fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Burger Stein, CSL Behring, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, Mert, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, and Sequana; travel and meeting support from Intercept, Gilead, AbbVie, and Falk; and is a member of an advisory board of Falk. SF has a Senior Clinical Investigator fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (1802154N); declares grants to his institution (University of Antwerp, Belgium) from Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Roche, and Bristol-Meyers Squibb; has been a consultant to Roche, Intercept, Gilead Sciences, Echosens, Allergan, Genentech, AbbVie, Novo Nordisk, Bayer, Novartis, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galmed, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Promethera, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Coherus, Actelion Madrigal, Astellas, Julius Clinical, Genfit, NGM Bio, and Inventiva; and has been lecturer for AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Genfit, and Gilead Sciences. MA declares research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, and AstraZeneca and consulting fees from Intercept and AstraZeneca. GP declares support from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Takeda; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Roche; speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and Takeda; and travel support from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Ipsen, Janssen, and Novo Nordisk. HC-P declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project; consulting fees from Intercept, Novo Nordisk, and Orphalan; and speaker fees from Eisai and Roche Portugal. J-FD is a member of the advisory committees of Alentis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Enyo, Esai, Falk, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Ipsen, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Roche; declares travel and meeting support from Gilead and speaking and teaching fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, and Roche; has received fees from the journal GUT as an Associate Editor and Uptodate; and is President of the Swiss NASH Foundation and the Swiss Foundation against Liver Cancer. DJL declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and Nordic Bioscience and has stock in Nordic Bioscience. SAH declares grants from Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Enyo Pharma, Galectin, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics; consulting and speaker fees from AgomAB, Akero Therapeutics, Alentis Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Altimmune, Axcella Health, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Riley FBR, BVF Partners, Cohbar, Canfite, Corcept Therapeutics, Cymabay, Echosens North America, Enyo Pharma, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress Biotech, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Genius Group, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, HistoIndex, Inipharm, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, Microba, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, Nutrasource, Perspectum Diagnostics, Piper, Sandler, Poxel, Prometic Pharma, Ridgeline, Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes, Medical, Terns, and Viking Therapeutics; is a member of advisory boards of 89 Bio, Akero Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella Health, Chronwell, CiVi, Cymabay, Echosens North America, Foresite Labs, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, HistoIndex, Indalo, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Prometic Pharma, Ridgeline, Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes Medical, Terns, and Theratechnologies; has stock in Akero Therapeutics, Chronwell, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Sonic Incytes, and Medical Corp; and declares consultancy services to Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Enyo Pharma, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics. YC is an employee of Eli Lilly and the company and hold stocks and shares in Eli Lilly. JFC declares support from Oxford National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre; consulting fees from Intercept and Alnylam; speaker fees from AstraZeneca; and is a member of an advisory board of Intercept. MP declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and grants from Cancer Research UK (C30358/A29725); has a patent for medical imaging (WO2015155521A1); and is a shareholder in Perspectum. HY-J declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project; grants from Academy of Finland, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and EVO foundation; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from Novo Nordisk and GlaxoSmithKline; and is a member of advisory boards of Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eli Lilly, and Hamni. JC declares grants and research support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals; consultant fees from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Shionogi, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, and Alexion; speaker support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Shionogi, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Celgene; meeting and travel support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and is President of the Spanish Society of Digestive Pathology. MK declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and Nordic Bioscience. He is a Nordic Bioscience stock share holder. RO is an employee of SomaLogic; declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project (SomaLogic funded the SomaScan proteomic assay results as a contribution to LITMUS); is on the patent application of SomaLogic for NASH biomarkers; and has stock in SomaLogic. RT is an employee of and holds stock in AstraZeneca, Sweden. KD is an employee of Eli Lilly and the company and hold stocks and shares in Eli Lilly. CY is an employee and stock and share holder of Pfizer. CB is a former employee of Novartis Pharma and declares financial support from Novartis Pharma; has pending patents for treatment of NASH (Novartis); and has stock in Novartis Pharma and Merck. ME is a member of the advisory board of AMRA Medical. GPA declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and consulting fees from Clinicpace, Servier Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, NuCana, AstraZeneca, and Benevolent AI. JMS declares grants from Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Nordic Bioscience, and Siemens Healthcare; consulting fees from Apollo Endosurgery, Albireo Pharma, Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Heel, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Julius Clinical, Madrigal, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nordic Bioscience, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Shinogi, Siemens Healthcare, and Summit Clinical Research; speaker fees from Apollo Endosurgery, MedPublico, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and is a member of advisory boards of Novo Nordisk and Boehringer Ingelheim. EB declares consulting fees from Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept; speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Intercept, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; and is a member of advisory boards of Novo Nordisk and Intercept. MR-G declares grants from Siemens, Gilead, and Intercept; consulting fees from AbbVie, Alpha-sigma, Allergen, AstraZeneca, Inventia, Kaleido, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Axcella, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Gilead; speaker fees from Inventia, Sobi, Novo Nordisk, Rubio, and Shionogi; meeting and travel support from Abbvie and Gilead; and is a member of an advisory board of Galmed. VR declares grants from Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals and consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Galmed, Novo Nordisk, Prosciento, Terns, NorthSea Therapeutics, Enyo, Sagimet, NGM Pharmaceuticals, and Madrigal. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)