Search

The determination chromium speciation in the field is a significant analytical challenge. While chromium exists in oxidation states from 0 to VI, it is predominantly found in the (III) and (VI) states [1]. Industry effluent (e.g. textile/electroplating) is a common source of chromium pollution in the environment. Due to corrosion inhibitors used in pipes, and contamination leaching from sanitary landfills, drinking water supplies can become contaminated also [2]. The bioavailability and toxicity of chromium is largely dependent the oxidation state of the element [2]. Consumption of Cr (III) is an essential component in human diet, as it is responsible for maintaining glucose, lipid and protein metabolism [3]. In contrast, Cr (VI) is strongly oxidizing, exhibiting high toxicity, with carcinogenic and mutagenic properties [4]. It is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) that the maximum allowable concentration of chromium (VI) in drinking water is 0.05 mg L−1 [5]. Handheld colourimeters for on-site measurements are a convenient option for frequent water monitoring; however the limit of detection (LOD) of these devices is typically higher than the recommended limit. Microfluidic ‘lab-on-a-disc’ technologies were used in the development of an optical sensor for chromium speciation in water. The principal behind these devices is to minimize laboratory processes onto a microfluidic system that can be brought to the sampling site for rapid sample-to-answer analyses. The objective for this device was to design and fabricate a fully integrated optical sensor for on-site measurement of both trivalent and hexavalent chromium in freshwater. A strong focus was placed on maximizing sensitivity in order to achieve a low LOD.

Centrifugal microfluidics has undergone a massive growth surge over the past 15 years, evident by the number of comprehensive reviews currently available, with special regard towards Lab-On-A-Disc (LOAD) diagnostic solutions.1–3 The potential of a LOAD system is dependent on its ability to mimic the specific laboratory protocols with which are required to conduct sample-to-answer analysis. This would include sample handling and manipulation (such as mixing and separation), sample modification (including heating and redox reactions), as well as reaction detection (such as optical, electrochemical, or as required by user). Optical detection strategies on LOAD platforms has been largely successful in both the fields of biological and chemical sensing.4 Herein, will demonstrate the optical optimisations which were carried out on a biological fluorescent-based5 and a chemical absorbance-based6 LOAD detection platforms. This will include the identification and optimisation of LED-photodiode selection, the effects of detection orientation and pathway-length fluorophore selection. Also covered will be a comparison between the microfluidic architecture for incorporating either detection methods as well as their reported limits of detection.