Search

Context. Improving meat quality traits such as marbling is a well established breeding objective for many beef producers. More recently, the inclusion of feed efficiency is being considered. The main driving factors being the direct feed cost, as well as consumer concerns related to environmental sustainability of beef production. Aims. The main aim of this study was to examine modifying the definition of residual feed intake (RFI), by including an adjustment for intramuscular fat (IMF). The secondary aim was to further understand the genetic relationships between feed intake and a range of carcass traits. Methods. Using a population of 4034 Australian Angus animals, feed intake and carcass traits, along with pedigree and fixed effects, were analysed. This included the calculation of three definitions of RFI, being the standard definition, accounting for average daily gain and metabolic mid-weight, and two amended versions accounting for ultrasound IMF (RFIu), or carcass IMF (RFIi). Variance components, heritabilities, and genetic and phenotypic correlations were estimated and compared. Key results. All three definitions of RFI were moderately heritable (0.30-0.32) and highly correlated, both genetically (0.99) and phenotypically (0.99). Unfavourable genetic correlations were observed between RFI and carcass IMF (CIMF), and between RFIu and CIMF at 0.29 and 0.24 respectively. Similarly, there were unfavourable genetic correlations between RFI and ultrasound IMF (UIMF), between RFIi and UIMF, and between RFIu and UIMF at 0.30, 0,21 and 0.23 respectively. Conclusions. RFI can be redefined to account for traits, other than average daily gain and metabolic mid-weight, such as IMF. However due to limitations of phenotypic linear regression, and only small amounts of variation in feed intake being explained by the IMF traits, the redefinition of RFI was a suboptimal approach to breeding candidate selection. Furthermore, the present study confirmed the challenges with selecting for both feed efficiency and meat quality traits as they are generally genetically antagonist. Implications. For beef cattle breeding programs, the investigation of alternative selection approaches is warranted. This may include further understanding the genetic correlations among traits in the breeding objective and, according to their economic value, optimally weighting the related estimated breeding value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context. Genomic profiles are the only information source that can uniquely identify an individual but have not yet been strongly considered in the context of paddock to plate traceability due to the lack of value proposition. Aim. The aim of this study was to define the minimum number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) required to distinguish a unique genotype profile for each individual sample within a large given population. At the same time, ad hoc approaches were explored to reduce SNP density, and therefore, the size of the dataset to improve computing efficiency and storage requirements while maintaining informativeness to distinguish individuals. Methods. Data for this study included two datasets. One included 78 411 high-density SNP genotypes from commercial Angus cattle and the other 2107 from a research data (1000-bull genome data). In a stepwise approach, different-size SNP panels were explored, with the last step being a successive removal resulting in the smallest set of SNPs that still produced the maximum number of unique genotypes. Key results. First study that has demonstrated for large datasets, that ultra-small SNP panels with 20-23 SNPs can generate unique genotypes for up to ~80 000 individuals, allowing for 100% matching accuracy. Conclusions. Ultra-small SNP panels could provide an efficient method to approach the large-scale task of the traceability of beef products through the beef supply chain. Implications. Genomic tools could enhance supply-chain traceability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]